Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0BOQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BOQ].

General Topology, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits of topological groups and rings

Let GG be a Hausdorff topological group and let HH be a compact normal subgroup of GG, and φ\varphi the canonical mapping G→G/HG \to G/H. If CC is the identity component of GG, then φ(C)\varphi(C) is the identity component of G′=G/HG' = G/H.

Once this lemma is established, we shall have fα(C)=Cαf_\alpha(C) = C_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in I, and since CC is a closed subgroup of GG (§ 2, no. 2, Proposition 7) it suffices to apply Proposition 3 a).

To prove the lemma, notice first that if C′C' is the component of the identity element e′e' in G′G', then φ(C)⊂C′\varphi(C) \subset C' since φ(C)\varphi(C) is connected. Suppose that φ(C)≠C′\varphi(C) \neq C'. Since CC is a closed normal subgroup of GG (§ 2, no. 2, Proposition 7), φ(C)\varphi(C) is a normal subgroup of G′G'; if ψ\psi is the canonical mapping G′→G′/φ(C)G' \to G'/\varphi(C), then ψ(C′)\psi(C') is connected and does not consist of the identity element alone; hence the identity component of G′/φ(C)G'/\varphi(C) does not consist of the identity element alone. But G′/φ(C)G'/\varphi(C) is isomorphic to (G/H)/(HC/H)(G/H)/(HC/H), hence to G/HCG/HC, and consequently also to (G/C)/(HC/C)(G/C)/(HC/C) (§ 2, no. 7, Corollary to Proposition 22, and Proposition 20). Now, G/CG/C is Hausdorff and totally disconnected (Chapter I, § 11, no. 5, Proposition 9), and HC/CHC/C, being the canonical image of the compact normal subgroup HH of GG, is a compact subgroup of G/CG/C. It is therefore sufficient to prove Lemma 2 under the additional hypothesis that GG is totally disconnected, i.e. C={e}C = \{e\}.

Suppose then that C′≠{e′}C' \neq \{e'\}; replacing GG by its subgroup f′‾(C′)\overline{f'}(C'), which is totally disconnected and contains HH, we may suppose that G′G' is connected and does not consist of a single point.

Let M\mathfrak{M} be the set of closed subgroups LL of GG such that LH=GLH = G. We shall show that the set M\mathfrak{M}, ordered by the relation ⊃\supset, is inductive. Indeed, if T\mathfrak{T} is a linearly ordered subset of M\mathfrak{M}, then for each x∈Gx \in G the set of sets xH∩LxH \cap L with L∈TL \in \mathfrak{T} is a filter base formed of closed sets in the compact space xHxH; hence the intersection of these sets is not empty, which shows that the intersection of the subgroups L∈TL \in \mathfrak{T} belongs to M\mathfrak{M}. Applying Zorn's lemma, we see therefore that M\mathfrak{M} has a minimal element L0L_0. Since HH is compact, G/H=L0H/HG/H = L_0H/H is isomorphic to L0/(L0∩H)L_0/(L_0 \cap H) (§ 4, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 3); since L0L_0 is totally disconnected and L0∩HL_0 \cap H is compact, we see that we may replace GG by L0L_0; in other words, we may suppose in addition that there is no closed subgroup L≠GL \neq G such that LH=GLH = G.

Now let FF be the intersection of the neighbourhoods of the identity element which are both open and closed in GG, and let us show that FF is a closed subgroup of GG. Clearly FF is closed in GG; hence it is enough to show that F−1F⊂FF^{-1}F \subset F. But if x∈Fx \in F and if VV is an open and closed neighbourhood of ee in GG, then so is xVxV; for otherwise ee would belong to the complement WW of xVxV in GG, which is again open and closed, and we should have x∉Wx \notin W; hence x∉Fx \notin F, contrary to hypothesis. It follows that xFxF, the intersection of the sets xVxV as VV runs through the open and closed neighbourhoods of ee in GG, contains FF; in other words, x−1F⊂Fx^{-1}F \subset F, which proves our assertion. Since GG is totally disconnected and G≠{e}G \neq \{e\}, we have F≠GF \neq G. But if VV is an open and closed neighbourhood of ee in GG, then VHVH is also open and closed in GG (§ 4, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 1), hence φ(V)\varphi(V) is both open and closed in G/HG/H, and this implies that φ(V)=G/H\varphi(V) = G/H by virtue of the hypothesis. We shall conclude from this that FH=GFH = G, which will give us the desired contradiction and complete the proof of the lemma. Indeed, for each x∈Gx \in G, xHxH meets every neighbourhood VV of ee which is both open and closed, hence also meets the intersection FF of these neighbourhoods, since the sets Vx∩HVx \cap H form a filter base consisting of closed sets in the compact space xHxH.

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.