Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0BOO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BOO].

General Topology, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits of topological groups and rings

Suppose that GG is Hausdorff and that the HαH_\alpha are compact and satisfy (AP).

a) *Let LL be a closed subgroup of GG; then, for each α∈I\alpha \in I, the subgroup Lα=fα(L)L_\alpha = f_\alpha(L) of Gα=G/HαG_\alpha = G/H_\alpha is closed, and the isomorphism ii of GG onto lim←⁡Gα\varprojlim G_\alpha gives by restriction an isomorphism of LL onto lim←⁡Lα\varprojlim L_\alpha. If also LL is normal in GG, then LαL_\alpha is normal in GαG_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in I, and by passing to the quotients, ii induces an isomorphism of G/LG/L onto lim←⁡Gα/Lα\varprojlim G_\alpha/L_\alpha.

b) Conversely, for each α∈I\alpha \in I let LαL_\alpha be a closed subgroup of GαG_\alpha, such that Lα=fαβ(Lα)L_\alpha = f_{\alpha\beta}(L_\alpha) whenever α≤β\alpha \leq \beta. Then there is a unique closed subgroup LL of GG such that Lα=fα(L)L_\alpha = f_\alpha(L) for each α∈I\alpha \in I; and if in addition LαL_\alpha is normal in GαG_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in I, then LL is normal in GG.

a) Since HαH_\alpha is compact, LHαLH_\alpha is closed in GG (§\S 4, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 1) and therefore LαL_\alpha is closed in GαG_\alpha. Since ii identifies the topological groups GG and lim←⁡Gα\varprojlim G_\alpha, and since lim←⁡Lα\varprojlim L_\alpha may be identified with a (topological) subgroup of lim←⁡Gα\varprojlim G_\alpha, ii identifies the subgroup ⋂αLHα\bigcap_\alpha LH_\alpha of GG with lim←⁡Lα\varprojlim L_\alpha, and to prove the first assertion it is enough to remark that L=⋂αLHαL = \bigcap_\alpha LH_\alpha by Lemma 1. On the other hand, if LL is normal, then for each α∈I\alpha \in I the mapping fα′:G/L→Gα/Lαf'_\alpha : G/L \to G_\alpha/L_\alpha induced by fαf_\alpha is a surjective strict morphism (§\S 2, no. 8, Remark 3), whose kernel is the compact normal subgroup HαL/LH_\alpha L/L of G/LG/L, the canonical image of the compact subgroup HαH_\alpha of GG. Since the subgroups HαL/LH_\alpha L/L of G/LG/L satisfy condition (AP) (§ 2, no. 8, Proposition 24), and since G/LG/L is Hausdorff, the last assertion of a) is a consequence of Proposition 2.

b) Let fαβ′f'_{\alpha \beta} be the restriction of fαβf_{\alpha \beta} to LβL_\beta (α≤β\alpha \leq \beta). Then (Lα,fαβ′)(L_\alpha, f'_{\alpha \beta}) is an inverse system of topological groups, whose inverse limit LL can be identified with the subgroup G∩∏αLαG \cap \prod_\alpha L_\alpha of GG. By hypothesis, fαβ′f'_{\alpha \beta} is surjective and its kernel is the compact subgroup fβ(Hα)∩Lβf_\beta(H_\alpha) \cap L_\beta of LβL_\beta; consequently (Chapter I, § 9, no. 6, Corollary 1 to Proposition 8) we have Lα=fα(L)L_\alpha = f_\alpha(L) for all α∈I\alpha \in I. If L′L' is another closed subgroup of GG such that fα(L′)=Lαf_\alpha(L') = L_\alpha for all α∈I\alpha \in I, then L′Hα=f′‾α(Lα)L'H_\alpha = \overline{f'}_\alpha(L_\alpha), whence (Lemma 1) L′=⋂αL′Hα=⋂αf′‾α(Lα)=LL' = \bigcap_\alpha L'H_\alpha = \bigcap_\alpha \overline{f'}_\alpha(L_\alpha) = L. Finally, the last assertion of b) follows from the formula L=⋂αf′‾α(Lα)L = \bigcap_\alpha \overline{f'}_\alpha(L_\alpha), since the f′‾α(Lα)\overline{f'}_\alpha(L_\alpha) are now normal subgroups of GG.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.