Bourbaki

Proposition 20

Tag 0BIK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BIK].

General Topology, chapter III, § 2. Subgroups, quotient groups, homomorphisms homogeneous spaces, product groups

Let AA be a subgroup of a topological group GG, let HH be a normal subgroup of GG, and let φ\varphi denote the canonical mapping of GG onto G/HG/H. Then the canonical bijection of φ(A)\varphi(A) onto AH/HAH/H is an isomorphism of topological groups.

This follows from the preceding remarks, and from Proposition 10 of no. 4.

The canonical bijection of A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) onto φ(A)\varphi(A) is a continuous homomorphism, since it arises from the restriction of φ\varphi to AA by passing to the quotients; but in general the topological groups A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) and AH/HAH/H are not isomorphic (cf. § 4, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 3).

\* For example, take GG to be the additive group R\mathbf{R} of real numbers, take HH to be the group Z\mathbf{Z} of integers, and take AA to be the group θZ\theta \mathbf{Z} of integer multiples of an irrational number θ\theta. Then A∩H={0}A \cap H = \{0\}, so that A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) is a discrete group, isomorphic to Z\mathbf{Z}; on the other hand, A+HA + H is dense in R\mathbf{R} (as we shall see in Chapter V, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 1), hence (A+H)/H(A + H)/H, which is locally isomorphic to A+HA + H (no. 6, Proposition 19), is not a discrete group and consequently is not isomorphic to A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H). \*

Nevertheless, we have the following proposition:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.