Proposition 18
Tag 0BFN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BFN].
General Topology, chapter II, § 3. Complete spaces
Let be a set, let be a family of uniform spaces, and for each let be a mapping of into . Let carry the coarsest uniformity which makes all the uniformly continuous. Then the uniformity of the Hausdorff completion of is the coarsest for which all the mappings () (no. 7, Proposition 15) are uniformly continuous. Furthermore, if is the canonical mapping of into , and if , then may be identified with the closure in of the image of under the mapping .
Let (resp. ) be the Hausdorff uniform space associated with (resp. ), and let be the uniformly continuous mapping which makes the diagram
commutative (i being the canonical mapping).
The transitivity of initial uniformities (§ 2, no. 3, Proposition 5) shows on the one hand that is the coarsest uniformity for which the mappings are uniformly continuous, and on the other hand that is also the inverse image under of the coarsest uniformity on the set for which the are uniformly continuous. Now is Hausdorff, for if are two points of such that for each , then belongs to all the entourages of and hence . Proposition 17 of no. 8 therefore shows that is the uniformity of the Hausdorff space associated with .
This being so, the bijection identifies with a uniform subspace of the product (§ 2, no. 6, Proposition 8). Since the are Hausdorff, each can be identified with a dense subspace of its completion , and hence can be identified with a dense subspace of (Chapter I, § 4, no. 3, Proposition 7). But is Hausdorff and complete (no. 5, Proposition 10); the closure of in is therefore a complete Hausdorff subspace (no. 4, Proposition 8) which can be identified with the Hausdorff completion of ; under this identification the mappings become the projections onto the factors , and the proposition is proved.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.