Bourbaki

Proposition 18

Tag 0BFN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BFN].

General Topology, chapter II, § 3. Complete spaces

Let XX be a set, let (Yλ)λ∈L(Y_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} be a family of uniform spaces, and for each λ∈L\lambda \in L let fλf_\lambda be a mapping of XX into YλY_\lambda. Let XX carry the coarsest uniformity UU which makes all the fλf_\lambda uniformly continuous. Then the uniformity of the Hausdorff completion X^\hat{X} of XX is the coarsest for which all the mappings f^λ:X^→Y^λ\hat{f}_\lambda : \hat{X} \to \hat{Y}_\lambda (λ∈L\lambda \in L) (no. 7, Proposition 15) are uniformly continuous. Furthermore, if jλj_\lambda is the canonical mapping of YλY_\lambda into Y^λ\hat{Y}_\lambda, and if gλ=jλ∘fλg_\lambda = j_\lambda \circ f_\lambda, then X^\hat{X} may be identified with the closure in ∏λ∈LY^λ\prod_{\lambda \in L} \hat{Y}_\lambda of the image of XX under the mapping x→(gλ(x))x \to (g_\lambda(x)).

Let X′X' (resp. Yλ′Y'_\lambda) be the Hausdorff uniform space associated with XX (resp. YλY_\lambda), and let fλ′:X′→Yλ′f'_\lambda : X' \to Y'_\lambda be the uniformly continuous mapping which makes the diagram

X→fλYλi↓↓jλX′→fλ′Yλ′ \begin{array}{ccc} X & \xrightarrow{f_\lambda} & Y_\lambda \\ i \downarrow & & \downarrow j_\lambda \\ X' & \xrightarrow{f'_\lambda} & Y'_\lambda \end{array}

commutative (i being the canonical mapping).

The transitivity of initial uniformities (§ 2, no. 3, Proposition 5) shows on the one hand that U\mathfrak{U} is the coarsest uniformity for which the mappings jλ∘fλ:X→Yλ′j_\lambda \circ f_\lambda : X \to Y'_\lambda are uniformly continuous, and on the other hand that U\mathfrak{U} is also the inverse image under ii of the coarsest uniformity U′\mathfrak{U}' on the set X′X' for which the fλ′f'_\lambda are uniformly continuous. Now U′\mathfrak{U}' is Hausdorff, for if x1,x2x_1, x_2 are two points of XX such that jλ(fλ(x1))=jλ(fλ(x2))j_\lambda(f_\lambda(x_1)) = j_\lambda(f_\lambda(x_2)) for each λ∈L\lambda \in L, then (x1,x2)(x_1, x_2) belongs to all the entourages of U\mathfrak{U} and hence i(x1)=i(x2)i(x_1) = i(x_2). Proposition 17 of no. 8 therefore shows that U′\mathfrak{U}' is the uniformity of the Hausdorff space X′X' associated with XX.

This being so, the bijection x′→(fλ′(x′))x' \to (f'_\lambda(x')) identifies XX with a uniform subspace of the product ∏λYλ′\prod_\lambda Y'_\lambda (§ 2, no. 6, Proposition 8). Since the Yλ′Y'_\lambda are Hausdorff, each Yλ′Y'_\lambda can be identified with a dense subspace of its completion Y^λ\hat{Y}_\lambda, and hence ∏λYλ′\prod_\lambda Y'_\lambda can be identified with a dense subspace of ∏λY^λ\prod_\lambda \hat{Y}_\lambda (Chapter I, § 4, no. 3, Proposition 7). But ∏λY^λ\prod_\lambda \hat{Y}_\lambda is Hausdorff and complete (no. 5, Proposition 10); the closure X′‾\overline{X'} of X′X' in ∏λY^λ\prod_\lambda \hat{Y}_\lambda is therefore a complete Hausdorff subspace (no. 4, Proposition 8) which can be identified with the Hausdorff completion X^\hat{X} of XX; under this identification the mappings f^λ\hat{f}_\lambda become the projections onto the factors Y^λ\hat{Y}_\lambda, and the proposition is proved.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.