Corollary 3
Tag 0BLN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BLN].
General Topology, chapter III, § 4. Groups operating properly on a topological space; compact ness in topological groups and spaces with operators
Let be a locally compact group, let be a closed subgroup of , and let be the canonical mapping of onto . Then the components of are the closures of the images under of the components of .
Let be the identity component of . The components of are the sets , where (, no. 2, Proposition 7); is clearly connected, hence so is (Chapter I, , no. 1, Proposition 1). But , and since is saturated with respect to the equivalence relation defined by , and since this equivalence relation is open (§ 2, no. 4, Lemma 2), we have (Chapter I, § 5, no. 3, Proposition 7).
Put . is a closed subgroup of which contains and ; hence to prove that the sets are the components of it is enough to show that the quotient space of by the equivalence relation whose classes are the sets is totally disconnected. Now this quotient space is homeomorphic to the homogeneous space (Chapter I, § 3, no. 4, Proposition 7); we are thus reduced to proving that when , is totally disconnected. Since may be identified with (§ 2, no. 7, Proposition 22), we may even assume that itself is totally disconnected. Every neighbourhood of in contains a neighbourhood of the form , where is a neighbourhood of in , and therefore (Corollary 1) contains a neighbourhood of the form , where is a compact open subgroup of . is therefore both open and closed in , and this shows that the component of in consists of alone. By translation, the same is true for the component of every point of , and the corollary is proved.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.