Proposition 9
Tag 0BMU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BMU].
General Topology, chapter III, § 5. Infinite sums in commutative groups
The series defined by the sequence is commutatively convergent if and only if the sequence is summable; and then, for each permutation of , we have
If the sequence is summable, then clearly the series is commutatively convergent. To prove the reverse implication we shall argue by reductio ad absurdum and suppose that the series is commutatively convergent but that the sequence is not summable. The image of the filter under the mapping therefore cannot be a Cauchy filter base in , otherwise this filter base would converge, since by hypothesis it has a cluster point (Chapter II, § 3, no. 2, Proposition 5, Corollary 2). Hence there is a neighbourhood of 0 in such that, for each finite subset of , there is a finite subset of which does not meet and is such that . Hence, by induction, we can define a partition of into finite subsets () such that for an infinite number of indices . Clearly there is a permutation of such that for each , the values of for which are consecutive. If is such a permutation, then the series whose general term is cannot be convergent, and we have a contradiction.
If the group is written multiplicatively, the infinite product defined by a sequence of points of (or infinite product whose general term is , or even product if there is no possibility of confusion) is defined to be the pair formed by the sequence and the sequence of partial products
The infinite product is said to converge if the sequence converges, and the limit of this sequence is denoted by (or by abuse of notation). We leave to the reader the task of transcribing into multiplicative notation the properties of series which we have established.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Exercise 5, § 5
- Proposition 4, § 7
- Proposition 5, § 7
- Exercise 7, Appendix 0
- Proposition 11, § 3
- Proposition 4, § 3