Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0CCH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CCH].

General Topology, chapter X, § 2. Equicontinuous sets

Let XX be a topological (resp. uniform) space, let YY be a uniform space and let HH be an equicontinuous (resp. uniformly equicontinuous) subset of C(X;Y)\mathscr{C}(X; Y). Then the following uniformities on HH are identical: the uniformity of compact (resp. precompact) convergence, the uniformity of pointwise convergence and the uniformity of pointwise convergence in a dense subset DD of XX.

It is enough to show that the last uniformity on HH is finer than the first; in other words that, given an entourage VV of YY and a compact (resp. precompact) subset AA of XX, there exists an entourage WW of YY and a finite subset FF of DD such that the relation

(2)u∈H, v∈H and (u(x),v(x))∈W for all x∈F (2)\quad u \in H,\ v \in H\ \text{and}\ (u(x), v(x)) \in W\ \text{for all}\ x \in F

implies

(3)(u(x), v(x))∈V for all x∈A. (3)\quad (u(x),\ v(x)) \in V\ \text{for all}\ x \in A.

Suppose first that AA is compact and HH equicontinuous. Given a symmetric entourage WW of YY, every point x∈Xx \in X has a neighbourhood U(x)U(x) such that the relation x′∈U(x)x' \in U(x) implies (u(x), u(x′))∈W(u(x),\ u(x')) \in W for all u∈Hu \in H. We can therefore cover the compact set AA by a finite number of open sets UiU_i such that, for each pair of points x′, x′′x',\ x'' of the same set UiU_i, we have (u(x′), u(x′′))∈W^(u(x'),\ u(x'')) \in \hat{W} for all u∈Hu \in H. Let aia_i be a point of D∩UiD \cap U_i, let FF be the set of the aia_i, and suppose that (2) is true; then for each x∈Ax \in A there exists an index ii such that aia_i and xx belong to the same set UiU_i, so that we have (u(x), u(ai))∈W^(u(x),\ u(a_i)) \in \hat{W} and (v(a′), v(x))∈W^(v(a'),\ v(x)) \in \hat{W}; thus (2) implies (3) provided that WW is chosen so that W^⊂V\hat{W} \subset V.

If AA is precompact and HH uniformly equicontinuous, we use Proposition 4 of no. 2; it is enough to note that i(A)i(A) is compact in X^\hat{X}, i(D)i(D) dense in X^\hat{X} and that the entourages of YY are the inverse images of those of Y^\hat{Y} under the mapping j×jj \times j.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.