Theorem 2 (Ascoli)
Tag 0CCJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CCJ].
General Topology, chapter X, § 2. Equicontinuous sets
Let be a topological (resp. uniform) space, let be a covering of , let be a uniform space and a set of mappings of into such that, for each and each , the restriction of to is continuous (resp. uniformly continuous). Then, for to be precompact with respect to the uniformity of -convergence, it is necessary in all cases and also sufficient if the sets are compact (resp. precompact) that the following conditions should be satisfied:
a) For each , the set of restrictions to of functions of is equicontinuous (resp. uniformly equicontinuous).
b) For each , the set of points () is precompact.
1) Let us show first that conditions a) and b) are necessary. We know (§ 1, no. 2, Remark 6) that the mapping of into is uniformly continuous; hence, if is precompact, so is (Chapter II, § 4, no. 2, Proposition 2), which proves b). To prove a), consider a set , a point and an entourage of ; since is precompact it can be covered by a finite number of -small sets; in other words there is a finite sequence of elements of such that, for each , we have
for at least one index .
Since each of the is continuous at (resp. uniformly continuous) there is a neighbourhood of in (resp. an entourage of ) such that
(resp. such that
Let (resp. ) be the intersection of the (resp. ); it is a neighbourhood of in (resp. an entourage of ). For each there is an index for which (4) holds; writing condition (4) for and for (resp. for and ) and taking account of (5) [resp. (6)], we see immediately that the relation [resp. ] implies [resp. ], for each ; and this establishes a).
2) Now let us show that the conditions a) and b) are sufficient if the sets are compact (resp. precompact). Condition b) implies that is precompact with respect to the uniformity of pointwise convergence (Chapter II, § 4, no. 2, Proposition 3). But it follows from condition a) and Theorem 1 of no. 4 that on the uniformity of pointwise convergence in coincides with the uniformity of uniform convergence in ; hence is precompact in , which implies that is precompact with respect to the uniformity of -convergence (§ 1, no. 2).
Note that condition b) of Theorem 2 is automatically satisfied if is a precompact space.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.