Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0CCN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CCN].

General Topology, chapter X, § 2. Equicontinuous sets

Let XX be a topological space, YY a uniform space and S\mathscr{S} a set of subsets of XX. Then on every precompact subset HH of FS(X;Y)\mathscr{F}_{\mathscr{S}}(X; Y), the uniformity of S\mathscr{S}-convergence is the same as the uniformity of pointwise convergence in B=⋃A∈SAB = \bigcup_{A \in \mathscr{S}} A. We can reduce to the case where B=XB = X and YY is Hausdorff and complete; for if jj is the canonical injection B→XB \to X and ii the canonical mapping Y→Y^Y \to \hat{Y}, the uniformity of S\mathscr{S}-convergence on F(X;Y)\mathscr{F}(X; Y) is the inverse image of the uniformity of S\mathscr{S}-convergence on F(B;Y^)\mathscr{F}(B; \hat{Y}) under the mapping θ:u→i∘u∘j\theta : u \to i \circ u \circ j (§ 1, no. 4, Proposition 4), and HH is precompact if and only if θ(H)\theta(H) is (Chapter II, § 4, no. 2, Proposition 3). This being so, if B=XB = X and YY is Hausdorff and complete, FS(X;Y)\mathscr{F}_{\mathscr{S}}(X; Y) is Hausdorff and complete (§ 1, no. 2, Proposition 1 and no. 5, Theorem 1); hence the closure H‾\overline{H} of HH in this space is compact. On H‾\overline{H}, the topology of pointwise convergence is Hausdorff (§ 1, no. 2, Proposition 1) and coarser than that of S\mathscr{S}-convergence; hence these two topologies coincide (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 3) and consequently so do the uniformities of S\mathscr{S}-convergence and pointwise convergence (Chapter II, § 4, no. 1, Theorem 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.