Bourbaki

Proposition 12

Tag 0CE0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CE0].

General Topology, chapter X, § 3. Special function spaces

On the group Γ\Gamma of all homeomorphisms of a locally compact space XX, the topology Tβ\mathscr{T}_\beta is the coarsest for which the mappings u→uu \to u and u→u−1u \to u^{-1} of Γ\Gamma into Cc(X;X)C_c(X; X) are continuous.

Let us denote the latter topology for the moment by C′\mathscr{C}'. Since u→u−1u \to u^{-1} is continuous with respect to Tβ\mathscr{T}_\beta and since Tβ\mathscr{T}_\beta is finer than the topology of compact convergence, it is clear that Tβ\mathscr{T}_\beta is finer than C′\mathscr{C}'. To prove the converse, endow X′X' with its unique uniformity; let u0∈Γu_0 \in \Gamma and let VV be an entourage of X′X'; then we have to prove that there is a compact subset KK of XX and a symmetric entourage WW of X′X' such that the relations

u∈Γ, (u0(x),u(x))∈W and (u0−1(x),u−1(x))∈W for all x∈K u \in \Gamma, \ (u_0(x), u(x)) \in W \text{ and } (u_0^{-1}(x), u^{-1}(x)) \in W \text{ for all } x \in K

imply

(u0(x),u(x))∈V for all x∈X. (u_0(x), u(x)) \in V \text{ for all } x \in X.

Let V1V_1 be a symmetric open entourage of X′X' such that V21⊂V\overset{2}{V}_1 \subset V; then K1=X′−V1(ω)K_1 = X' - V_1(\omega) is a compact subset of XX. Choose a symmetric open entourage WW of X′X' such that W⊂VW \subset V and W(ω)∩W(u0−1(K1))=∅W(\omega) \cap W(u_0^{-1}(K_1)) = \emptyset; this is possible by Proposition 4 of Chapter II, § 4, no. 3. Let K2=X′−W(ω)K_2 = X' - W(\omega), which is a compact subset of XX. We shall see that WW and the compact set K=K1∪K2K = K_1 \cup K_2 do what is required. Since W⊂VW \subset V, it is enough to show that the relation

(u0−1(x),u−1(x))∈W for all x∈K1(u∈Γ) (u_0^{-1}(x), u^{-1}(x)) \in W \text{ for all } x \in K_1 \quad (u \in \Gamma)

implies that

(u(y),ω)∈V1 for all y∈W(ω); (u(y), \omega) \in V_1 \text{ for all } y \in W(\omega);

for we shall then also have (u0(y),ω)∈V1(u_0(y), \omega) \in V_1 and thence

(u0(y),u(y))∈V21⊂V (u_0(y), u(y)) \in \overset{2}{V}_1 \subset V

for all y∈W(ω)=X′−K2y \in W(\omega) = X' - K_2. Now if we had y∈W(ω)y \in W(\omega) and

u(y)∈X′−V1(ω)=K1, u(y) \in X' - V_1(\omega) = K_1,

it would follow that y∈u−1(K1)⊂W(u0−1(K1))y \in u^{-1}(K_1) \subset W(u_0^{-1}(K_1)), contrary to the choice of WW; the proof is therefore complete.

In general the group Γ\Gamma, endowed with Tβ\mathscr{T}_\beta, is not locally compact; but we have the following criterion:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.