Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 0103, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0103].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 3. Subalgebras of split semi-simple Lie algebras

Let b,b′\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{b}' be Borel subalgebras of g\mathfrak{g}. There exists a splitting Cartan subalgebra of g\mathfrak{g} contained in b∩b′\mathfrak{b}\cap \mathfrak{b}'.

Let h\mathfrak{h} be a Cartan subalgebra of b,n=[b,b],n′=[b′,b′],p=b∩b′\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{n}= [\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{b}],\mathfrak{n}'= [\mathfrak{b}',\mathfrak{b}'],\mathfrak{p}=\mathfrak{b}\cap \mathfrak{b}', and s\mathfrak{s} a vector subspace of g\mathfrak{g} complementary to b+b′\mathfrak{b}+\mathfrak{b}'. Denote by s⊥,b⊥,b′⊥\mathfrak{s}^{\bot},\mathfrak{b}^{\bot},\mathfrak{b}^{'\bot} the orthogonal complements of s,b,b′\mathfrak{s},\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{b}' with respect to the Killing form of g\mathfrak{g}. Put l=l= dimh,n=\mathfrak{h}, n= dimn,p=\mathfrak{n}, p= dimp\mathfrak{p}. Then dimb=\mathfrak{b}= dimb′=l+n\mathfrak{b}'=l+n,

dims⊥=\mathfrak{s}^{\bot}= dim(b+b′\mathfrak{b}+\mathfrak{b}') =2(l+n)−p= 2(l+n)-p,

and so

dim(s⊥∩p\mathfrak{s}^{\bot}\cap \mathfrak{p})≥\geq dims⊥+\mathfrak{s}^{\bot}+ dimp−\mathfrak{p}- dimg\mathfrak{g} (3)

=2(l+n)−p+p−(l+2n)=l = 2(l+n)-p+p-(l+ 2n) =l

By Prop. 1 of §2, no. 2,n⊂b⊥,n′⊂b′⊥2,\mathfrak{n}\subset \mathfrak{b}^{\bot},\mathfrak{n}'\subset \mathfrak{b}^{'\bot}. The elements of p∩n\mathfrak{p}\cap \mathfrak{n} are nilpotent in g\mathfrak{g} (Prop. 9 (ii)), and belong to b′\mathfrak{b}', and hence to n′\mathfrak{n}' (Prop. 9 (ii)). Consequently, p∩n⊂n∩n′⊂b⊥∩b′⊥\mathfrak{p}\cap \mathfrak{n}\subset \mathfrak{n}\cap \mathfrak{n}'\subset \mathfrak{b}^{\bot}\cap \mathfrak{b}^{'\bot}, so s⊥∩p∩n=0\mathfrak{s}^{\bot}\cap \mathfrak{p}\cap \mathfrak{n}= 0. In view of (3), we see that s⊥∩p\mathfrak{s}^{\bot}\cap \mathfrak{p} is a complement of n\mathfrak{n} in b\mathfrak{b}. Let zz be an element of h\mathfrak{h} regular in g\mathfrak{g}; there exists y∈ny\in \mathfrak{n} such that y+z∈s⊥∩py+z\in \mathfrak{s}^{\bot}\cap \mathfrak{p}; by Prop. 9 (i), adg(y+z)_{\mathfrak{g}}(y+z) has the same characteristic polynomial as adgz_{\mathfrak{g}}z, so x=y+zx=y+z is regular in g\mathfrak{g} and a fortiori in b\mathfrak{b} and b′\mathfrak{b}' (Chap. VII, §2, no. 2, Prop. 9). Since g,b,b′\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{b}' have the same rank, b0(x)=g0(x)=b′0(x)\mathfrak{b}^0(x) =\mathfrak{g}^0(x) ={\mathfrak{b}'}^0(x) is simultaneously a Cartan subalgebra of b\mathfrak{b}, of g\mathfrak{g} and of b′\mathfrak{b}' (Chap. VII, §3, no. 3, Th. 2). Finally, this Cartan subalgebra of g\mathfrak{g} is splitting by the Cor. of Prop. 9.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.