Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 015A, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 015A].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 8. Symmetric invariants

Let I(g∗)I(\mathfrak{g}^*) be the algebra of invariant polynomial functions on g\mathfrak{g}. Let i:S(g∗)→S(h∗)i:\mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{g}^*)\rightarrow \mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{h}^*) be the restriction homomorphism.

(i) The map i∣I(g∗)i|I(\mathfrak{g}^*) is an isomorphism from the algebra I(g∗)I(\mathfrak{g}^*) to the algebra S(h∗)W\mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{h}^*)^W.

(ii) For any integer n≥0n\geq 0, let In(g∗)I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*) be the set of homogeneous elements of I(g∗)I(\mathfrak{g}^*) of degree nn. Then In(g∗)I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*) is the set of linear combinations of functions on g\mathfrak{g} of the form x→x \rightarrow Tr(ρ(x)n\rho (x)^n), where ρ\rho is a finite dimensional linear representation of g\mathfrak{g}.

(iii) Let l=l= rk(g\mathfrak{g}). There exist ll algebraically independent homogeneous elements of I(g∗)I(\mathfrak{g}^*) that generate the algebra I(g∗)I(\mathfrak{g}^*).

a) Let f∈I(g∗)f\in I(\mathfrak{g}^*) and w∈Ww\in W. There exists s∈s\in Aute(g,h)_e(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) such that s∣h=w(s|\mathfrak{h}=w(§2, no. 2, Cor. of Th. 2). Since ff is invariant under ss (Prop. 33),i(f),i(f) is invariant under ww. Hence i(I(g∗))⊂S(h∗)Wi(I(\mathfrak{g}^*))\subset \mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{h}^*)^W.

b) We prove that, if f∈I(g∗)f\in I(\mathfrak{g}^*) is such that i(f)=0i(f) = 0, then f=0f= 0. Extending the base field if necessary, we can assume that kk is algebraically closed. By Prop. 3,f3,f vanishes on s(h)s(\mathfrak{h}) for all s∈s\in Aute(g)_e(\mathfrak{g}). Hence ff vanishes on every Cartan subalgebra of g\mathfrak{g} (Chap. VII, §3, no. 2, Th. 1), and in particular on the set of regular elements of g\mathfrak{g}. But this set is dense in g\mathfrak{g} for the Zariski topology (Chap. VII, §2, no. 2).

c) Let nn be an integer ≥0\geq 0. Let LnL^n be the set of linear combinations of functions of the form x→x \rightarrow Tr(ρ(x)n\rho (x)^n) on g\mathfrak{g}, where ρ\rho is a finite dimensional linear representation of g\mathfrak{g}. By Lemma 2,Ln⊂In(g∗)2, L^n\subset I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*). Thus

i(Ln)⊂i(In(g∗))⊂Sn(h∗)W i(L^n)\subset i(I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*))\subset \mathbf{S}^n(\mathfrak{h}^*)^W

By Cor. 2 of Prop. 2,Sn(h∗)W⊂i(Ln)2,\mathbf{S}^n(\mathfrak{h}^*)^W\subset i(L^n). Hence i(In(g∗))=Sn(h∗)Wi(I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*)) =\mathbf{S}^n(\mathfrak{h}^*)^W, which proves (i), and i(Ln)=i(In(g∗))i(L^n) =i(I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*)) so Ln=In(g∗)L^n= I^n(\mathfrak{g}^*) by b). Thus (ii) is proved.

d) Assertion (iii) follows from (i) and Chap. V, §5, no. 3, Th. 3.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.