Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0480, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0480].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 3. Local rings. Passage from the local to the global

Let AA be a ring which is not necessarily commutative, mm a two-sided ideal of AA contained in the Jacobson radical of AA and MM a left AA-module. Suppose that one of the following conditions holds: (i) MM is finitely presented; (ii) mm is nilpotent. Then, if (A/m)⊗AM=M/mM(A/m) \otimes_A M = M/mM is a free left (A/m)(A/m)-module and the canonical homomorphism from m⊗AMm \otimes_A M to MM is injective, MM is a free AA-module. To be precise, if (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} is a family of elements of MM such that (1⊗xi)(1 \otimes x_i) is a basis of the (A/m)(A/m)-module M/mMM/mM, (xi)(x_i) is a basis of MM.

If a∈Aa \in A, x∈Mx \in M and aˉ\bar{a} is the class of aa in A/mA/m, then aˉ⊗x=1⊗(ax)\bar{a} \otimes x = 1 \otimes (ax) and hence the hypothesis implies that there exists a family (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} of elements of MM such that (1⊗xi)(1 \otimes x_i) is a basis of the (A/m)(A/m)-module (A/m)⊗AM(A/m) \otimes_A M. We already know that the xix_i generate MM (Corollary 2 to Proposition 4); we shall see that they are linearly independent over AA. To this end, let us consider the free AA-module L=As(I)L = A_s^{(I)}; let (ei)(e_i) be its canonical basis and u:As(I)→Mu : A_s^{(I)} \to M the AA-linear mapping such that u(ei)=xiu(e_i) = x_i for all i∈Ii \in I; if RR is the kernel of uu, we shall prove that R=0R = 0. Under hypothesis (i), (A/m)⊗AM(A/m) \otimes_A M is a finitely generated (A/m)(A/m)-module, hence II is necessarily finite and RR is a finitely generated AA-module by Chapter I, § 2, no. 8, Lemma 9. Then by Proposition 4 it will be sufficient to prove (under either hypothesis) that R=mRR = mR.

Let jj be the canonical injection R→LR \to L; then there is a commutative diagram

m⊗R→1⊗jm⊗L→1⊗um⊗M↓a↓c↓cR→jL→uM \begin{array}{ccccc} m \otimes R & \xrightarrow{1 \otimes j} & m \otimes L & \xrightarrow{1 \otimes u} & m \otimes M \\ \downarrow^a & & \downarrow^c & & \downarrow^c \\ R & \xrightarrow{j} & L & \xrightarrow{u} & M \end{array}

in Which the two rows are exact, jj is injective and 1⊗u1 \otimes u is surjective (Chapter

0→dCoker(a)⟶Coker(b)→vCoker(c) 0 \xrightarrow{d} \mathrm{Coker}(a) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Coker}(b) \xrightarrow{v} \mathrm{Coker}(c)

(Chapter I, § 1, no. 4, Proposition 2); it is sufficient to verify that v is bijective, for then we deduce that Coker(a) = 0, in other words that a is surjective and consequently R = mR. Now, Coker(b) = (A/m) \otimes_A L and

Coker(c)=(A/m)⊗AM \mathrm{Coker}(c) = (A/m) \otimes_A M

and by definition v(1 \otimes e_i) = 1 \otimes x_i; as (1 \otimes e_i) is a basis of (A/m) \otimes_A L, the definition of the x_i shows that v is bijective.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.