Proposition 5
Tag 0480, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0480].
Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 3. Local rings. Passage from the local to the global
Let be a ring which is not necessarily commutative, a two-sided ideal of contained in the Jacobson radical of and a left -module. Suppose that one of the following conditions holds: (i) is finitely presented; (ii) is nilpotent. Then, if is a free left -module and the canonical homomorphism from to is injective, is a free -module. To be precise, if is a family of elements of such that is a basis of the -module , is a basis of .
If , and is the class of in , then and hence the hypothesis implies that there exists a family of elements of such that is a basis of the -module . We already know that the generate (Corollary 2 to Proposition 4); we shall see that they are linearly independent over . To this end, let us consider the free -module ; let be its canonical basis and the -linear mapping such that for all ; if is the kernel of , we shall prove that . Under hypothesis (i), is a finitely generated -module, hence is necessarily finite and is a finitely generated -module by Chapter I, § 2, no. 8, Lemma 9. Then by Proposition 4 it will be sufficient to prove (under either hypothesis) that .
Let be the canonical injection ; then there is a commutative diagram
in Which the two rows are exact, is injective and is surjective (Chapter
(Chapter I, § 1, no. 4, Proposition 2); it is sufficient to verify that v is bijective, for then we deduce that Coker(a) = 0, in other words that a is surjective and consequently R = mR. Now, Coker(b) = (A/m) \otimes_A L and
and by definition v(1 \otimes e_i) = 1 \otimes x_i; as (1 \otimes e_i) is a basis of (A/m) \otimes_A L, the definition of the x_i shows that v is bijective.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Corollary 1, § 3
- Corollary 2, § 3
- Corollary 5, § 3
- Proposition 5, § 5
- Corollary 2, § 3
- Exercise 2, § 4
- Exercise 9, § 3