Bourbaki

Theorem 3

Tag 04S6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04S6].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings

Let AA be a subring of a field KK. The integral closure A′A' of AA in KK is the intersection of the valuation rings of KK which contain AA; if AA is local, A′A' is the intersection of the valuation rings of KK which dominate AA.

Let xx be an element of A′A' and VV a valuation ring of KK containing AA; as xx is integral over VV, there exists a prime ideal p′p' of V[x]V[x] such that p′∩V=m(V)p' \cap V = m(V) (Chapter V, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1); clearly then the local ring (V[x])p′(V[x])_{p'} dominates VV and hence is equal to it; whence x∈Vx \in V. Conversely let yy be an element of KK which is not integral over AA; then there exists a maximal ideal 2.2 of A[y−1]A[y^{-1}] which contains y−1y^{-1} (no. 2, Lemma 1); there exists also a valuation ring VV of KK which dominates (A[y−1])m(A[y^{-1}])_m (no. 2, Corollary to Theorem 2); as y−1∈m(V)y^{-1} \in m(V), y∉Vy \notin V. Further 2.2∩A2.2 \cap A is a maximal ideal of AA (no. 2, Lemma 1); hence, if AA is local, 2.2∩A=m(A)2.2 \cap A = m(A) and VV dominates AA.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.