Theorem 3
Tag 04S6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04S6].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings
Let be a subring of a field . The integral closure of in is the intersection of the valuation rings of which contain ; if is local, is the intersection of the valuation rings of which dominate .
Let be an element of and a valuation ring of containing ; as is integral over , there exists a prime ideal of such that (Chapter V, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1); clearly then the local ring dominates and hence is equal to it; whence . Conversely let be an element of which is not integral over ; then there exists a maximal ideal 2.2 of which contains (no. 2, Lemma 1); there exists also a valuation ring of which dominates (no. 2, Corollary to Theorem 2); as , . Further is a maximal ideal of (no. 2, Lemma 1); hence, if is local, and dominates .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.