Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 04SA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04SA].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings

Let A be a local ring whose maximal ideal is a principal ideal Ap. If ⋂n=1∞Apn=(0)\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} Ap^n = (0) (for example if A is Noetherian, cf. Chapter III, § 3, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5), the only ideals of A are (0) and the Ap^n; then either p is nilpotent or A is a valuation ring.

Let A be filtered by the Ap^n and let v denote the corresponding order function (Chapter III, § 2, no. 2). As

⋂n=1wApn=(0), \bigcap_{n=1}^{w} Ap^n = (0),

the relation v(x)=+∞v(x) = +\infty implies x=0x = 0. Let a be an ideal ≠(0)\neq (0) of A and a an element of a at which v takes its least value; let us write v(a)=sv(a) = s (s≠+∞s \neq +\infty). Then a⊂Apsa \subset Ap^s. In particular, there exists u∈Au \in A such that a=upsa = up^s; as a∉Aps+1a \notin Ap^{s+1}, u∉Apu \notin Ap; hence u is invertible and ps∈Ap^s \in A a⊂aa \subset a. It follows that a=Apsa = Ap^s, whence our first assertion. It is also seen that every element a≠0a \neq 0 of A may be written in the form a=upv(a)a = up^{v(a)} where u is invertible. If a′=u′pv(a′)a' = u'p^{v(a')} (u′u' invertible) is another non-zero element of A, then aa′=uu′pv(a)+v(a′)aa' = uu'p^{v(a)+v(a')}; hence, if p is not nilpotent, aa′≠0aa' \neq 0 and A is an integral domain. Then, as the set of ideals of A is totally ordered by inclusion, we conclude that A is a valuation ring (Theorem I (e)).

For example, if pp is a prime number, the local ring Z(p)\mathbf{Z}_{(p)} is a valuation ring. Let B=K[X1,…,Xn]B = K[X_1, \ldots, X_n] be the polynomial ring in nn indeterminates over a field KK; the ideal BX1BX_1 is prime, since B/BX1B/BX_1 is isomorphic to K[X2,…,Xn]K[X_2, \ldots, X_n]; hence BBX1B_{BX_1} is a valuation ring; it is composed of rational functions PQ−1PQ^{-1}, where PP and QQ are polynomials and Q(0,X2,…,Xn)≠0Q(0, X_2, \ldots, X_n) \neq 0.

More generally, we shall see that, if FF is an extremal element of

B=K[X1,…,Xn], B = K[X_1, \ldots, X_n],

BBFB_{BF} is a valuation ring (cf. Chapter VII, § 3, no. 5). \*

The ring of formal power series K[[T]]K[[T]] in one indeterminate over a field KK is a Noetherian local integral domain whose maximal ideal is principal; it is therefore a valuation ring. On the other hand the ring K[[T1,T2]]K[[T_1, T_2]] of formal power series in two indeterminates, which is a Noetherian local integral domain is not a valuation ring, for neither of the elements T1,T2T_1, T_2 is a multiple of the other.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.