Proposition 2
Tag 04SA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04SA].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings
Let A be a local ring whose maximal ideal is a principal ideal Ap. If (for example if A is Noetherian, cf. Chapter III, § 3, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5), the only ideals of A are (0) and the Ap^n; then either p is nilpotent or A is a valuation ring.
Let A be filtered by the Ap^n and let v denote the corresponding order function (Chapter III, § 2, no. 2). As
the relation implies . Let a be an ideal of A and a an element of a at which v takes its least value; let us write (). Then . In particular, there exists such that ; as , ; hence u is invertible and . It follows that , whence our first assertion. It is also seen that every element of A may be written in the form where u is invertible. If ( invertible) is another non-zero element of A, then ; hence, if p is not nilpotent, and A is an integral domain. Then, as the set of ideals of A is totally ordered by inclusion, we conclude that A is a valuation ring (Theorem I (e)).
For example, if is a prime number, the local ring is a valuation ring. Let be the polynomial ring in indeterminates over a field ; the ideal is prime, since is isomorphic to ; hence is a valuation ring; it is composed of rational functions , where and are polynomials and .
More generally, we shall see that, if is an extremal element of
is a valuation ring (cf. Chapter VII, § 3, no. 5). \*
The ring of formal power series in one indeterminate over a field is a Noetherian local integral domain whose maximal ideal is principal; it is therefore a valuation ring. On the other hand the ring of formal power series in two indeterminates, which is a Noetherian local integral domain is not a valuation ring, for neither of the elements is a multiple of the other.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.