Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 04SR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04SR].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 2. Places

Let K and L be two fields and f a place of K with values in L. Then there exists a valuation ring A\mathbf{A} of K and an isomorphism jj of κ(A)\kappa(\mathbf{A}) onto a subfield of L such that f=j∘hAf = j \circ h_{\mathbf{A}}; these conditions determine A\mathbf{A} and jj uniquely. The ring A\mathbf{A} is the set of x∈Kx \in K such that f(x)≠∞f(x) \neq \infty and m(A)m(\mathbf{A}) is the set of x∈Kx \in K such that f(x)=0f(x) = 0.

If f=j∘hAf = j \circ h_{\mathbf{A}}, the condition f(x)≠∞f(x) \neq \infty (resp. f(x)=0f(x) = 0) is equivalent to the condition hA(x)≠∞h_{\mathbf{A}}(x) \neq \infty (resp. hA(x)=0h_{\mathbf{A}}(x) = 0) and hence to the condition x∈Ax \in \mathbf{A} (resp. x∈m(A)x \in m(\mathbf{A})). Hence A\mathbf{A} is determined uniquely and, as hAh_{\mathbf{A}} is surjective, jj is also unique.

Now let ff be any place of K with values in L; let A\mathbf{A} denote the set of x∈Kx \in K such that f(x)≠∞f(x) \neq \infty. If x∈Ax \in \mathbf{A} and y∈Ay \in \mathbf{A}, the compositions f(x)−f(y)f(x) - f(y) and f(x)f(y)f(x)f(y) are defined and ≠∞\neq \infty, which shows that x−y∈Ax - y \in \mathbf{A} and xy∈Axy \in \mathbf{A}; hence A\mathbf{A} is a subring of K. If x∉Ax \notin \mathbf{A}, then f(x)=∞f(x) = \infty, hence f(x−1)=0f(x^{-1}) = 0 and x−1x^{-1} belongs to the kernel mm of the homomorphism f′f' obtained by restricting ff to A\mathbf{A}. Conversely if y∈my \in m, then y−1∉Ay^{-1} \notin \mathbf{A}. This shows that A\mathbf{A} is a valuation ring of K and that mm is its maximal ideal. Let jj be the injective homomorphism from κ(A)\kappa(\mathbf{A}) to L derived from f' by passing to the quotient. Then f(x)=j(hA(x))f(x) = j(h_A(x)) for all x∈Ax \in A and this equation remains true for x∉Ax \notin A, the two sides being then equal to ∞\infty.

The decomposition f=j∘hAf = j \circ h_A is called the canonical decomposition of the placef. AA is called the ring off, m(A)m(A) the ideal of ff and κ(A)\kappa(A) the residue field off. For two places f:K→Lf : \mathbf{K} \to \mathbf{L} and f′:K→L′f' : \mathbf{K} \to \mathbf{L}' to have the same ring, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist an isomorphisms of the value field off onto that off such that f′=s∘ff' = s \circ f; then ff and f′f' are called equivalent. It is seen that every result on valuation rings can be translated into a result on places and conversely; this is what we shall do in the following nos.

Examples Of places (1) Let KK be a field. The identity mapping on KK is a trivial place with ring KK and ideal (0)(0). (2) Let kk be a field. For all u∈k((T))∼u \in k((T))^\sim, let us write f(u)=∞f(u) = \infty if u∉k[[T]]u \notin k[[T]] and define f(u)f(u) to be the constant term of uu if u∈k[[T]]u \in k[[T]]. Then ff is a place of k((T))k((T)), with residue field kk and ring k[[T]]k[[T]]. For k[[T]]k[[T]] is a valuation ring of k((T))k((T)) (§ 1, no. 4, Example 3 ) and the restriction of ff to k[[T]]k[[T]] is identified with the canonical homomorphism of k[[T]]k[[T]] onto its residue field. (3) Let kk be a field, aa an element of kk and AA the set of u∈k(X)u \in k(X) such that aa is substitutable in uu (Algebra, Chapter IV, § 3, no. 2). If pp denotes the prime ideal (X−a)(X - a) of k[X]k[X], then A=k[X]pA = k[X]_p, so that AA is a valuation ring of k(X)k(X) (§ 1, no. 4, Proposition 2). For all u∈k(X)∼u \in k(X)^\sim, let us write f(u)=∞f(u) = \infty if u∉Au \notin A and f(u)=u(a)f(u) = u(a) if u∈Au \in A. Then ff is a place of k(X)k(X) with residue field kk and ring AA; for the restriction off to AA is a homomorphism of AA onto kk (Algebra, Chapter IV, § 3, Proposition 2) of kernel pA=m(A)pA = m(A). The element f(u)∈kf(u) \in k is said to be obtained by putting X=aX = a in uu. \* (4) Let SS be a connected complex analytic variety of dimension 1 and KK the field of meromorphic functions on SS. For all z0∈Sz_0 \in S, the mapping f↦f(z0)f \mapsto f(z_0) from KK to C\mathbf{C} is a place of KK whose ring is the set off ∈K\in K which are holomorphic at z0z_0 and whose ideal is the set off ∈K\in K which are zero at z0z_0. It is this example and other analogues which are the origin of the term "place".*

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.