*Let V1,V2 be two right vector spaces over K and V1′,V2′ K′-structures on V1,V2 respectively. V1 (resp. V2) is canonically identified with V1′⊗K′K (resp. V2′⊗K′K) (no. 1, Proposition 1).
(i) *The mapping f′↦f′⊗1K=f(K)′ is a bijection of HomK′(V1′,V2′) onto the set of K-linear mappings of V1 into V2 which are rational over K′; the inverse bijection associates with every K-linear mapping f:V1→V2 rational over K′ the K′-linear mapping f′:V1′→V2′ with the same graph as the restriction of f to V1′.
(ii) *For every K-linear mapping f:V1→V2 rational over K′,
f(V1′)=f(V1)∩V2′andf−1(V2′)=V1′+Ker(f).
(i) Clearly with the above identifications, if f′:V1′→V2′ is a K′-linear mapping, f(K)′=f′⊗1K is rational over K′ and f′ is the mapping with the same graph as the restriction of f(K)′ to V1′. Conversely, if f:V1→V2 is a K-linear mapping rational over K′ and f′:V1′→V2′ has the same graph as the restriction of f to V1′, f and f(K)′ coincide on V1′, which is a generating system of V1 over K, hence f=f(K)′.
(ii) If f=f′⊗1K, then f(V1)=f(V1′⊗K′K)=f′(V1′)⊗K′K and, as f′(V1′)⊂V2′,f(V1′)=f′(V1′)∩V2′ (§ 7, no. 9, Proposition 19); the formula f−1(V2′)=V1′+Ker(f) follows immediately.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.