Bourbaki

Proposition 13

Tag 06DC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06DC].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 5. Symmetric tensors and polynomial mappings

— *Let MM and NN be AA-modules, qq an integer ⩾0\geqslant 0, and ff a mapping of MM into NN. Suppose that MM is free, then the following conditions are equivalent: (i) There exists a qq-linear mapping gg of MqM^q into NN such that f(x)=g(x,x,…,x)f(x) = g(x, x, \ldots, x) for all x∈Mx \in M. (ii) There exists a linear mapping hh of TSq(M)TS^q(M) into NN such that f(x)=h(γq(x))f(x) = h(\gamma_q(x)) for all x∈Mx \in M. (iii) There exists a basis (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} of MM and a family (uν)ν∈N(I),∣ν∣=q(u_\nu)_{\nu \in N^{(I)}, |\nu| = q} of elements of NN such that

f(∑i∈Iλiei)=∑ν∈N(I),∣ν∣=qλνuν f\left( \sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i e_i \right) = \sum_{\nu \in N^{(I)}, |\nu| = q} \lambda^\nu u_\nu
for all (λi)∈A(I)(\lambda_i) \in A^{(I)}. (iv) For each basis (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} of MM there exists a family (uν)ν∈N(I),∣ν∣=q(u_\nu)_{\nu \in N^{(I)}, |\nu| = q} of elements of NN such that
f(∑i∈Iλiei)=∑ν∈N(I),∣ν∣=qλνuν f\left( \sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i e_i \right) = \sum_{\nu \in N^{(I)}, |\nu| = q} \lambda^\nu u_\nu
for all (λi)∈A(I)(\lambda_i) \in A^{(I)}. (i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii): let gg satisfy (i), then there exists a linear mapping g′g' of Tq(M)T^q(M) into NN such that g(x1,x2,…,xq)=g′(x1⊗x2⊗…⊗x)g(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_q) = g'(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \ldots \otimes x) for any x,…,x,∈Mx, \ldots, x, \in M. Then
f(x)=g(x,x,…,x)=g′(x⊗x⊗…⊗x)=g′(γq(x)); f(x) = g(x, x, \ldots, x) = g'(x \otimes x \otimes \ldots \otimes x) = g'(\gamma_q(x));
and on writing h=g′∣TSq(M)h = g'|TS^q(M) we see that condition (ii) holds. (ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) and (iv): let hh satisfy the conditions of (ii). By Prop. 4, (ii) (IV, p. 47) there exists a linear mapping g′g' of Tq(M)T^q(M) into NN such that h=g′∣TSq(M)h = g'|TS^q(M). Let gg be the qq-linear mapping of MM into NN associated with g′g', then for any x∈Mx \in M we have
f(x)=h(γq(x))=g′(x⊗x⊗…⊗x)=g(x,x,…,x), f(x) = h(\gamma_q(x)) = g'(x \otimes x \otimes \ldots \otimes x) = g(x, x, \ldots, x),

whence (i). On the other hand, if (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} is a basis of M, we have, by formula (6) (IV, p. 46)

f(∑iλiei)=h(γq(∑iλiei))=h(∑∣ν∣=qλνeν) f \left( \sum_i \lambda_i e_i \right) = h \left( \gamma_q \left( \sum_i \lambda_i e_i \right) \right) = h \left( \sum_{|\nu|=q} \lambda^\nu e_\nu \right)

on writing eν=∏i∈Iγνi(ei)e_\nu = \prod_{i \in I} \gamma_{\nu_i}(e_i); we thus have

f(∑iλiei)=∑∣ν∣=qλνh(eν). f \left( \sum_i \lambda_i e_i \right) = \sum_{|\nu|=q} \lambda^\nu h(e_\nu).

(iv) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii) is clear. (iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) : given (ei),(uν)(e_i), (u_\nu) satisfying the conditions of (iii), let us write eν=∏i∈Iγνi(ei)e_\nu = \prod_{i \in I} \gamma_{\nu_i}(e_i) and recall that (eν)∣ν∣=q(e_\nu)_{|\nu|=q} is a basis of TSq(M)\mathrm{TS}^q(M). Let h be the homomorphism of TSq(M)\mathrm{TS}^q(M) into N defined by h(eν)=uνh(e_\nu) = u_\nu; then for each x=∑iλieix = \sum_i \lambda_i e_i in M we have

f(x)=f(∑iλiei)=∑∣ν∣=qλνuν=h(∑∣ν∣=qλνeν)=h(γq(x)) f(x) = f \left( \sum_i \lambda_i e_i \right) = \sum_{|\nu|=q} \lambda^\nu u_\nu = h \left( \sum_{|\nu|=q} \lambda^\nu e_\nu \right) = h(\gamma_q(x))

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.