Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 06EO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06EO].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 6. Symmetric functions

For every integer m≥0m \geq 0 let cmc_m be the ideal of the algebra A[[X]]symA[[X]]^{sym} consisting of all symmetric formal power series of order ≥m\geq m. The sequence (cm)m≥0(c_m)_{m \geq 0} is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 00 in A[[X]]symA[[X]]^{sym}.

The lemma clearly holds when II is finite, so let us assume that II is infinite. For every finite subset JJ of II, consisting of mm elements, denote by J~\tilde{J} the set of elements of N(1)N^{(1)} of length <m< m and with support in JJ. Further denote by aJ′a_J' the set of formal power series containing no term aXαaX^\alpha with a∈J~a \in \tilde{J}. Since J~\tilde{J} is a finite subset of N(1)N^{(1)} and every finite subset of N(1)N^{(1)} is contained in a set of the form J~\tilde{J}, the family (aJ′)(a_J') is a base of neighbourhoods of 00 in A[[X]]A[[X]] (IV, p. 26). Now Lemma 1 implies the relation aJ′∩A[[X]]sym=cma_J' \cap A[[X]]^{sym} = c_m for every subset JJ with mm elements, and this proves Lemma 3.

Since there are only a finite number of monomials of a given weight in the SkS_k, every formal power series f∈Bf \in B may be written in a unique way as f=∑r≥0Prf = \sum_{r \geq 0} P_r, where PrP_r is an isobaric polynomial of weight rr in B∩A[S]B \cap A[S]. For every integer m≥0m \geq 0 let bmb_m be the ideal of BB consisting of all formal power series of the above type such that Pr=0P_r = 0 for 0≤r<m0 \leq r < m. The sequence (bm)m≥0(b_m)_{m \geq 0} is a base of neighbourhoods of 00 in BB.

With the above notation ψ1(Pr)\psi_1(P_r) is a symmetric formal power series in the XiX_i, homogeneous of degree rr, and so this is the homogeneous component of degree rr of ψ1(f)\psi_1(f). Lemma 2 shows that ψ1\psi_1 is an algebra homomorphism of BB onto A[[X]]symA[[X]]^{sym}, mapping bmb_m to cmc_m for every integer m≥0m \geq 0; now Lemma 3 shows ψ1\psi_1 to be bicontinuous, and this completes the proof of Theorem 2.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.