Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 09GS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09GS].

Integration, chapter VII, § 3. Applications and examples

— Let G be a subgroup of Aut(E). The following three properties are equivalent:

(i) G is relatively compact in End(E); (ii) G is relatively compact in Aut(E); (iii) G leaves invariant a nondegenerate1^1 positive hermitian form on E.

(iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i): Suppose that GG leaves invariant a nondegenerate positive hermitian form Ψ\Psi. Let (e1,…,en)(e_1, \ldots, e_n) be an orthonormal basis for Ψ\Psi (Alg., Ch. IX, § 6, No. 1, Cor. 1 of Th. 1). For every u∈Gu \in G, let (uij)(u_{ij}) be its matrix with respect to (ei)(e_i). For any jj, we have ∑i=1n∣uij∣2=1\sum_{i=1}^n |u_{ij}|^2 = 1, thus ∣uij∣≤1|u_{ij}| \leq 1 for all ii and jj, which proves (i).

(i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii): This follows from GT, X, § 3, No. 5, Cor. of Th. 4, taking into account the fact that the topology of End(E)\mathrm{End}(E) is that of compact convergence.

(ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii): Suppose that the closure G‾\overline{G} of GG in Aut(E)\mathrm{Aut}(E) is compact. Let Φ\Phi be a nondegenerate positive hermitian form on EE. If the field of scalars is R\mathbf{R} or C\mathbf{C}, the giving of Φ\Phi makes EE a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, and condition (iii) will result from the following lemma:

1^1 Non dégénérée; in EVT, the term is replaced by séparante, subsequently translated as "separating" (TVS, V, § 1, No. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.