Example
Tag 09MH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09MH].
Integration, chapter VIII, § 5. The space of closed subgroups
Let us take and for the Lebesgue measure; all of the hypotheses of the Cor. of Prop. 9 are satisfied. The discrete subgroups of such that is compact are none other than the discrete subgroups of rank (GT, VII, §1, No. 1, Th. 1); such a subgroup is generated by a basis of , and
(the determinant being taken with respect to the canonical basis of ) (Ch. VII, §2, No. 10, Th. 4). The space can be interpreted here in the following way: every subgroup is the transform of the subgroup by an element , and the subgroup of leaving stable may be identified with . Consequently may be canonically identified, as a (non-topological) homogeneous space, with . On the other hand, operates continuously in , hence also in for the vague topology (§3, No. 3, Prop. 13), hence in the subspace of ; moreover, the canonical homeomorphism (No. 4, Prop. 8) of onto is compatible with the laws of operation of . Since is countable at infinity and is locally compact, the bijection of onto defined above is a homeomorphism (Ch. VII, App. I, Lemma 2). The Cor. of Prop. 9 therefore gives a criterion for compactness in the homogeneous space .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.