Theorem 5
Tag 0B96, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B96].
General Topology, chapter I, § 9. Compact spaces and locally compact spaces
A locally compact space is paracompact if and only if is the sum of a family of locally compact -compact spaces.
Suppose is paracompact, and for each let be a relatively compact open neighbourhood of in . Then by hypothesis there exists a locally finite open covering of which refines the covering . The are therefore relatively compact. Every compact subset of meets only a finite number of the sets , for the non-empty sets form a locally finite open covering of the compact space ; hence they must be finite in number (no. 1). Now let be the following relation between two points of : "there exists a finite sequence of indices in such that and meets for ".
It is immediately verified that is an equivalence relation, and that each equivalence class mod is an open subset of [since the are open sets]. is therefore the sum of the locally compact subspaces (no. 7, Proposition 13) formed by the equivalence classes mod , and it remains to show that each of these subspaces is the union of a countable subfamily of the family .
Let be any point of , and define a sequence of relatively compact open subsets of by induction on as follows; is the union of the sets which contain , and for each , is the union of the sets which meet . It is immediately verified by induction on that each of the is relatively compact and is the union of a finite number of sets . Furthermore, the equivalence class of with respect to is the union of the : for if is a sequence of indices such that and meets for , then one sees by induction on that for . It follows that the equivalence classes mod are -compact, and this completes the proof of the first part of the theorem.
To prove the converse, we may assume (by Proposition 18) that is -compact. Let be any open covering of , and let be a sequence of relatively compact open sets in which have the properties stated in Proposition 15 of no. 9. Let denote the compact set ( if ). The open set is a neighbourhood of by construction; hence for each there is a neighbourhood of contained in one of the sets and contained also in . Since is compact, a finite number of the sets cover ; let be these sets. Then the family of sets is an open covering of which refines , and hence to complete the proof we have to show that is locally finite. Let be any point of , the smallest integer such that ; then since , there is a neighbourhood of which is contained in and does not meet . It follows that meets only those sets for which , i.e. meets only a finite number of sets of .
In the course of the proof we have also established the following result:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.