Lemma 2
Tag 0BC5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BC5].
General Topology, chapter I, § 11. Connectedness
If is a distinguished pair then the set of all distinguished pairs such that meets is countable.
Since is countable it is enough to show that, given , the set of distinguished pairs such that meets is countable. Now these sets are open, since is locally connected (no. 6, Proposition 11) and mutually disjoint since they are components of ; hence the sets are open and mutually disjoint. But contains a countable subset which is dense in ; hence the set of such that is not empty is also countable.
To prove Theorem 1, consider the following relation R between two points x, x' of X: "There exists a finite sequence of distinguished pairs (W_i, U_i) (1 \leq i \leq n) such that x \in W_1 and x' \in W_n and that W_i \cap W_{i+1} \neq \emptyset for \leq 1 i \leq n — 1."
Lemma 1 states that R is reflexive, and it is readily verified that R is symmetric and transitive, so that R is an equivalence relation; also, since the W_i are open, every equivalence class mod R is open in X. But X is connected; hence there can be only one equivalence class, i.e. any two points of X are congruent mod R. We shall deduce from this that X is the union of a countable family of first elements of distinguished pairs, and this will prove Theorem 1. For this, let x be any point of X, and define by induction on n a sequence (C_n) of open subsets of X as follows: by Lemma 1 there is a distinguished pair (W_1, U_1) such that x \in W_1, and we take C_1 = W_1; if n > 1 then C_n is to be the union of all first elements W of distinguished pairs (W, U) such that W meets C_{n-1}. By induction on n one shows immediately, by virtue of Lemma 2, that C_n is a countable union of first elements of distinguished pairs. Finally, every x' \in X belongs to some C_n; for there is a finite sequence
of distinguished pairs such that x \in W'_1, x' \in W'_m and W'_i \cap W'_{i+1} \neq \emptyset for 1 \leq i \leq m — 1, and by induction on i we see that W'_i \subset C_{i+1} for all i, so that x' \in C_{m+1}.
Q.E.D.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.