Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0BXQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BXQ].

General Topology, chapter VI, § 3. Real projective spaces

The space Pn, pP_{n,\ p} is Hausdorff.

We show first that the relation Δn,p\Delta_{n,p} is open. If UU is an open set in Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1}, to saturate UU with respect to Δn,p\Delta_{n,p} we have to take the union of the images of UU under the mapping X→T.XX \to T.X, where TT runs through the set of non-singular square matrices of order p+1p+1; since each of these mappings is bicontinuous, all these images are open sets and therefore so is their union.

By Proposition 8 of Chapter I, § 8, no. 3, the proof will be complete if we show that the subset NN of Ln+1,p+1×Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1} \times L_{n+1,p+1}, defined by Δn,p\Delta_{n,p}, is closed. Let (X,Y)(X, Y) be a point of the product space which lies in the closure of NN, and let σ\sigma be a sequence of indices such that XσX_\sigma is non-singular: since AσA_\sigma is open, there is a neighbourhood VV of (X,Y)(X, Y) such that, for each pair (X′,Y′)∈N∩V(X', Y') \in N \cap V, the matrix Xσ′X'_\sigma is non-singular; as (X′,Y′)(X', Y') tends to (X,Y)(X, Y) while remaining in NN, the matrix Yσ′Xσ′−1Y'_\sigma {X'_\sigma}^{-1} therefore tends to T=YσXσ−1T = Y_\sigma X_\sigma^{-1}; since we have Y′=(Yσ′Xσ′−1)X′Y' = (Y'_\sigma {X'_\sigma}^{-1}) X', we see by passing to the limit that Y=T.XY = T.X, and the proof is complete.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.