Proposition 8
Tag 0B6K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B6K].
General Topology, chapter I, § 8. Hausdorff spaces and regular spaces
A necessary condition for the quotient space to be Hausdorff is that the graph of is closed in . If the equivalence relation is open, this condition is also sufficient.
Let be the canonical mapping; then is the inverse image under of the diagonal of . The first part of the proposition therefore follows from the continuity of [Axiom (Hii) and Theorem 1 of § 2, no. 1]. If is open then can be identified with the quotient space (, no. 3, corollary to Proposition 8), and is then identified with the canonical image in of the set , which is saturated with respect to . Hence is closed in and therefore is Hausdorff.
If is not open, there are examples where is closed but is not Hausdorff (Exercises 10 and 28).
To show that is Hausdorff we can also apply Proposition 5 of no. 1: and being two distinct equivalence classes of it is sufficient that there should be a continuous mapping of an open subset of , saturated with respect to and containing and , into a Hausdorff space , such that 1) is constant on each equivalence class mod contained in , 2) takes distinct values on and . For since can be identified with an open subset of (, no. 6, Proposition 10, Corollary 1), we can apply Proposition 5 of no. 1 to the mapping induced by , since is continuous (, no. 4, Proposition 6).
In particular:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Proposition 8, § 10
- Corollary, § 8
- Proposition 13, § 2
- Proposition 3, § 4
- Exercise 14, § 4
- Proposition 1, § 3
- Proposition 6, § 3