Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 011W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 011W].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 5. Automorphisms of a semi-simple Lie algebra

We have f(TQ)⊂f(T_Q)\subsetAut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) and ε−1(W(R))=\varepsilon^{-1}(W(R)) = Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}).

a) Let φ∈TQ\varphi \in T_Q and let k‾\overline{k} be an algebraic closure of kk. By Lemma 3,φ3,\varphi extends to an element of Hom(P(R),k∗, k^*). By Prop. 3,

f(φ)⊗1∈f(\varphi )\otimes 1\in Aute(g⊗kk‾,h⊗kk‾)_e(\mathfrak{g}\otimes_k\overline{k},\mathfrak{h}\otimes_k\overline{k}).

Hence f(φ)∈f(\varphi )\in Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}), and Ker ε⊂\varepsilon \subset Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}).

b) The image of Aute(g,h)_e(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) under ε\varepsilon contains W(R) (§2, no. 2, Cor. of Th. 2). In view of a), we see that ε−1(W(R))⊂\varepsilon^{-1}(W(R))\subset Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}).

c) It remains to prove that Aut0(g,h)⊂ε−1(W(R))_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h})\subset \varepsilon^{-1}(W(R)). In view of b), it suffices to prove that ε\varepsilon(Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}))∩\cap Aut(R,B,B), where B denotes a basis of R, reduces to {1}\{1\}.

Let s∈s\in Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) be such that ε(s)∈\varepsilon (s)\in Aut(R,B,B). The subgroup of A(R) generated by ε(s)\varepsilon (s) has a finite number of orbits on R. Let U be such an orbit, of cardinal rr, and gU=∑β∈Ugβ\mathfrak{g}^U=\sum_{\beta\in U}\mathfrak{g}^{\beta}. Let β1∈U\beta_1\in U, and put βi=ε(s)i−1β1\beta_i=\varepsilon (s)^{i-1}\beta_1 for

1≤i≤r1\leq i\leq r, so that U={β1,...,βr}U =\{\beta_1, . . . , \beta_r\}. Let Xβ1X_{\beta_1} be a non-zero element of gβ1\mathfrak{g}^{\beta_1}, and put Xβi=si−1Xβ1X_{\beta_i}=s^{i-1}X_{\beta_1} for 1≤i≤r1\leq i\leq r. There exists cU∈k∗c_U\in k^* such that srXβ1=s^rX_{\beta_1}= cUXβ1c_UX_{\beta_1}, hence srXβi=cUXβis^rX_{\beta_i}=c_UX_{\beta_i} for all ii, and consequently sr∣gU=cU.1s^r|\mathfrak{g}^U=c_U.1. Let φ∈TQ\varphi \in T_Q, and s′=s∘f(φ)s'=s\circ f(\varphi ), which by a) is an element of Aut0(g,h)_0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}). We have s′r∣gU=cU′.1{s'}^r|\mathfrak{g}^U=c'_U.1, where

cU′=cU∏i=1rφ(βi)=cUφ(∑i=1rβi) c'_U=c_U\prod_{i=1}^r\varphi (\beta_i) =c_U\varphi (\sum_{i=1}^r\beta_i)

Put B={α1,...,αl}B =\{\alpha_1, . . . , \alpha_l\} and ∑i=1rβi=∑j=1lmjUαj\sum_{i=1}^r\beta_i=\sum_{j=1}^lm^U_j\alpha_j. Since ε(s)∈\varepsilon (s)\in Aut(R,B,B), the

mjUm^U_j are integers of the same sign and not all zero. We have

cU′=cU∏j=1lφ(αj)mjU c'_U=c_U\prod_{j=1}^l\varphi (\alpha_j)^{m^U_j}

Now φ\varphi can be chosen so that cU′≠1c'_U\not= 1 for every orbit U; indeed, this reduces to choosing elements φ(α1)=t1,...,φ(αl)=tl\varphi (\alpha_1) =t_1, . . . , \varphi (\alpha_l) =t_l of k∗k^* which are not annihilated by a finite number of polynomials in t1,...,tlt_1, . . . , t_l, not identically zero. For such a choice of φ,ε(s′)=1\varphi ,\varepsilon (s') = 1 by Lemma 2, so

ε(s)=ε(s′)ε(f(φ))−1=1. \varepsilon(s)=\varepsilon(s')\varepsilon(f(\varphi))^{-1}=1.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.