We have f(TQ)⊂Aut0(g,h) and ε−1(W(R))= Aut0(g,h).
a) Let φ∈TQ and let k be an algebraic closure of k. By Lemma 3,φ extends to an element of Hom(P(R),k∗). By Prop. 3,
f(φ)⊗1∈ Aute(g⊗kk,h⊗kk).
Hence f(φ)∈ Aut0(g,h), and Ker ε⊂ Aut0(g,h).
b) The image of Aute(g,h) under ε contains W(R) (§2, no. 2, Cor. of Th. 2). In view of a), we see that ε−1(W(R))⊂ Aut0(g,h).
c) It remains to prove that Aut0(g,h)⊂ε−1(W(R)). In view of b), it suffices to prove that ε(Aut0(g,h))∩ Aut(R,B), where B denotes a basis of R, reduces to {1}.
Let s∈ Aut0(g,h) be such that ε(s)∈ Aut(R,B). The subgroup of A(R) generated by ε(s) has a finite number of orbits on R. Let U be such an orbit, of cardinal r, and gU=∑β∈Ugβ. Let β1∈U, and put βi=ε(s)i−1β1 for
1≤i≤r, so that U={β1,...,βr}. Let Xβ1 be a non-zero element of gβ1, and put Xβi=si−1Xβ1 for 1≤i≤r. There exists cU∈k∗ such that srXβ1= cUXβ1, hence srXβi=cUXβi for all i, and consequently sr∣gU=cU.1. Let φ∈TQ, and s′=s∘f(φ), which by a) is an element of Aut0(g,h). We have s′r∣gU=cU′.1, where
cU′=cUi=1∏rφ(βi)=cUφ(i=1∑rβi)
Put B={α1,...,αl} and ∑i=1rβi=∑j=1lmjUαj. Since ε(s)∈ Aut(R,B), the
mjU are integers of the same sign and not all zero. We have
cU′=cUj=1∏lφ(αj)mjU
Now φ can be chosen so that cU′=1 for every orbit U; indeed, this reduces to choosing elements φ(α1)=t1,...,φ(αl)=tl of k∗ which are not annihilated by a finite number of polynomials in t1,...,tl, not identically zero. For such a choice of φ,ε(s′)=1 by Lemma 2, so
ε(s)=ε(s′)ε(f(φ))−1=1.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.