Theorem 2
Tag 04RC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04RC].
Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 3. Finitely generated algebras over a field
Let A be a finitely generated integral k-algebra, K its field of fractions and the integral closure of A in a field K' which is a finite algebraic extension of K. Then is a finitely generated A-module and a finitely generated k-algebra.
By Theorem 1 there exists a subalgebra C of A isomorphic to a polynomial algebra and such that A is integral over C; is obviously the integral closure of C in K' (§ 1, no. 1, Proposition 6); we may therefore confine our attention to the case where . Let be the quasi-Galois extension of (in an algebraic closure of ) generated by , which is a finite algebraic extension of (Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 3, Corollary 1 to Proposition 9). It will suffice to prove that the integral closure of in is a finitely generated -module, for is a sub--module of and is a Noetherian ring (Chapter III, § 2, no. 10, Corollary 2 to Theorem 2). We may therefore confine our attention to the case where is a quasi-Galois extension of . Then we know (Algebra, Chapter V, § 10, no. 9, Proposition 14) that is a (finite) Galois extension of a (finite) radicial extension of . If is the integral closure of in , is the integral closure of in and it will suffice to prove that is a finitely generated -module and is a finitely generated -module. Now, if it has been proved that is a finitely generated -module, it is a Noetherian domain, integrally closed by definition; the fact that is a finitely generated -module will follow from § 1, no. 6, Corollary 1 to Proposition 18.
We see therefore that we may confine our attention to the case where and where is a finite radicial extension of . Then is generated by a finite family of elements and there exists a power of the characteristic exponent of such that . Let () be the coefficients of the numerators and denominators of the rational functions in , equal to (). Then is contained in the extension , where (we are in an algebraic closure of ) and is contained in the algebraic closure of in . Now, is algebraic over and hence is integral over (, no. 1, Proposition 5); as is integrally closed (, no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 13), it is seen that this ring is the integral closure of in and hence also that of (, no. 1, Proposition 6), in other words . Now clearly is a finitely generated -module (, no. 1, Proposition 4) and, as is a finite extension of , is a finitely generated -module and hence is a finitely generated -module; since is Noetherian and , is a finitely generated -module.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.