Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 04XW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04XW].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 9. Application: locally compact fields

Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) locally compact field which is not discrete.

(i) If K is of characteristic 0 and mod, is not an ultrametric absolute value then K is isomorphic to one of the fields R,C\mathbf{R}, \mathbf{C} or H\mathbf{H}.

(ii) If K is of characteristic 0 and mod, is an ultrametric absolute value, K is an algebra of finite rank over a p-adic field Qp\mathbf{Q}_p.

(iii) If K is of characteristic p≠0p \neq 0, it is isomorphic to a field with centre a field of formal power series Fq((T))\mathbf{F}_q((T)) (where qq is a power of pp) and of finite rank over its centre.

(i) It follows from Ostrowski's Theorem (§ 6, no. 4, Theorem 2) that K is a topological field isomorphic to an everywhere dense subfield of R,C\mathbf{R}, \mathbf{C} or H\mathbf{H} and, as K is complete, it is isomorphic to R,C\mathbf{R}, \mathbf{C} or H\mathbf{H}.

(ii) Let A be the ring of the absolute value mod, and m its maximal ideal. We know that A/m is a finite field (§ 5, no. 1, Proposition 2) and hence the absolute value induced by mod, on Q\mathbf{Q} has a finite residue field, which is only possible if it is equivalent to a pp-adic absolute value (§6§ 6, no. 3, Proposition 4); the closure of Q\mathbf{Q} in KK is therefore isomorphic to Qp\mathbf{Q}_p and is contained in the centre of KK since the latter is closed in KK; we conclude using Proposition 2 of no. 1.

(iii) The second assertion follows from the first and the Corollary to Proposition 2 of no. 2. To show the first assertion, note that mod, is necessarily an ultrametric absolute value (§6§ 6, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 3); in the notation of the proof of Proposition 3 of no. 2, the centre ZZ of KK consists of the elements which commute with both ss and uu; but by virtue of (3),

u−qsuq=sqpr=s, u^{-q} s u^q = s^{q p^r} = s,

so that uq∈Zu^q \in Z and we conclude that ZZ is not discrete. As ZZ is locally compact, we may confine our attention to the case where KK is commutative. The sub-Fp\mathbf{F}_p-algebra Fp[s]\mathbf{F}_p[s] in KK is then a finite field since sq−1=1s^{q-1} = 1 and obviously yq=yy^q = y for every element of this field, which is therefore identical with SS and isomorphic to Fq\mathbf{F}_q since S⊂Fp[s]S \subset \mathbf{F}_p[s] has qq elements. Since the sum of two elements of SS is in SS, the mapping which maps each formal power series ∑i=0∞siTi∈Fq[[T]]\sum_{i=0}^\infty s_i T^i \in \mathbf{F}_q[[T]] to the element ∑i=0∞siui\sum_{i=0}^\infty s_i u^i is a bijective homomorphism of the ring Fq[[T]]\mathbf{F}_q[[T]] onto the ring AA, whence immediately the conclusion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.