Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 04US, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04US].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 5. The topology defined by a valuation

Let KK be a not necessarily commutative field, vv a non-improper valuation on KK, AA the ring of vv and mm the ideal of vv. For KK with the topology Tv\mathscr{T}_v to be locally compact, it is necessary and sufficient that the following conditions be fulfilled:

(i) KK is complete; (ii) vv is discrete; (iii) the residue field κ(A)\kappa(A) is finite.

If so, AA is compact.

Suppose KK is locally compact. Then it is complete (General Topology, Chapter 111, §3§ 3, no. 3, Corollary 1 to Proposition 4); further there exists a compact neighbourhood of 0, which contains a neighbourhood Va′V'_a, where aa belongs to the value group of vv; in other words, there exists a≠0a \neq 0 in K∗K^* such that A.aA . a is compact and it follows that A=(A.a)a−1A = (A . a)a^{-1} is compact. As every ideal b≠(0)b \neq (0) of AA is open, A/bA/b is compact and discrete (General Topology, Chapter III, §2§ 2, no. 5, Proposition 14) and therefore finite and in particular κ(A)=A/m\kappa(A) = A/m is finite. Moreover, for y≠0y \neq 0 in mm, the ring A/AyA/Ay being finite, there is only a finite number of ideals of AA containing AyAy and the set PP of elements of the form v(x)v(x) such that

0<v(x)≤v(y) 0 < v(x) \leq v(y)

is finite; as v(K∗)v(K^*) is totally ordered, PP has a least element yy. Then for all x∈Ax \in A such that v(x)>0v(x) > 0, either v(x)>v(y)≥yv(x) > v(y) \geq y, or v(x)≤v(y)v(x) \leq v(y) and then v(x)≥yv(x) \geq y by definition, so that yy is the least of the elements >0> 0 of v(K∗)v(K^*). As PP is finite, there is a greatest integer m≥0m \geq 0 such that my∈Pmy \in P, whence my \leq v(y) < (m+1)\gamma. We deduce that 0 \leq v(y) - my < y and by definition of y this implies v(y)=myv(y) = my. Therefore v(K∗)=Z.γv(K^*) = \mathbf{Z}.\gamma and the valuation vv is discrete.

Conversely, suppose conditions (i), (ii), (iii) hold. We may restrict our attention to the case where vv is normed; let uu be a uniformizer for vv. Then κ(A)=A/Au\kappa(A) = A/Au and hence A/AuA/Au is finite. As x↦xunx \mapsto xu^n defines by taking quotients an isomorphism of the additive group A/AuA/Au onto Aun/Aun+1Au^n/Au^{n+1}, A/AujA/Au^j is finite for all j≥0j \geq 0. As AA is closed in KK, it is complete and hence isomorphic to the inverse limit of the A/AujA/Au^j (General Topology, Chapter 111, § 7, no. 3, Proposition 2) and therefore compact. Since AA is open in KK, it is therefore seen that KK is locally compact.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.