Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0B6U, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B6U].

General Topology, chapter I, § 8. Hausdorff spaces and regular spaces

Let X be a topological space, A a dense subset of X, f : A → Y a mapping of A into a regular space Y. A necessary and sufficient condition for f to extend to a continuous mapping f‾:X→Y\overline{f} : X \to Y is that, for each x∈Xx \in X, f(y)f(y) tends to a limit in Y when y tends to x while remaining in A. The continuous extension f‾\overline{f} of f to X is then unique.

The uniqueness of f‾\overline{f} follows from the principle of extension of identities (no. 1, Proposition 2, Corollary 1). It is clear that the condition is necessary, for if f‾\overline{f} is continuous on X, then for each x∈Xx \in X we have

f‾(x)=lim⁡y→x,y∈Af‾(y)=lim⁡y→x,y∈Af(y) \overline{f}(x) = \lim_{y \to x, y \in A} \overline{f}(y) = \lim_{y \to x, y \in A} f(y)
(§ 7, no. 5). Conversely, suppose that the condition is satisfied and define
f‾(x)=lim⁡y→x,y∈Af(y) \overline{f}(x) = \lim_{y \to x, y \in A} f(y)
for each x∈Xx \in X; f‾(x)\overline{f}(x) is a well-defined element of Y, since Y is Hausdorff. We have to show that f‾\overline{f} is continuous at each point x∈Xx \in X. Let then V' be a closed neighbourhood of f‾(x)\overline{f}(x) in Y; then by hypothesis there is an open neighbourhood V of x in X such that f(V∩A)⊂V′f(V \cap A) \subset V'. Since V is a neighbourhood of each of its points, we have
f‾(z)=lim⁡y→z,y∈V∩Af(y) \overline{f}(z) = \lim_{y \to z, y \in V \cap A} f(y)
for each z∈Vz \in V, and from this it follows that f‾(z)∈f‾(V∩A)⊂V′\overline{f}(z) \in \overline{f}(V \cap A) \subset V', since V' is closed. The result now follows from the fact that the closed neighbourhoods of f(x)f(x) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of f(x)f(x) in Y.

The mapping f‾\overline{f} is said to be obtained by extending f by continuity to X.

In the statement of Theorem 1 the hypothesis that Y is regular cannot be weakened without imposing additional restrictions on X, A or f (Exercise 19).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.