Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0BK7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BK7].

General Topology, chapter III, § 3. Uniform structures on groups

Let F\mathfrak{F} and G\mathfrak{G} be two Cauchy filters on GdG_d. Then the image of the filter F×G\mathfrak{F} \times \mathfrak{G} under the mapping (x,y)→xy(x, y) \to xy is a Cauchy filter base on GdG_d.

Let us evaluate the "proximity" of xyxy and x′y′x'y' in GdG_d; in other words, let us form the product (x′y′)(xy)−1=x′y′y−1x−1(x'y')(xy)^{-1} = x'y'y^{-1}x^{-1}. For each a∈Ga \in G, we can also write (x′y′)(xy)−1=(x′a−1)(ay′y−1a−1)(ax−1)(x'y')(xy)^{-1} = (x'a^{-1})(ay'y^{-1}a^{-1})(ax^{-1}). We shall see that by suitable choice of aa, each of the three factors of this product is very small whenever the pairs (x,y)(x, y) and (x′,y′)(x', y') belong to a sufficiently small set of F×G\mathfrak{F} \times \mathfrak{G}. Let VV be any neighbourhood of ee in GG; then there is a VdV_d-small set A∈FA \in \mathfrak{F}. Choose aa in AA, then if xx and x′x' are any two points of AA, we have x′a−1∈Vx'a^{-1} \in V and ax−1∈Vax^{-1} \in V. On the other hand, the relation ay′y−1a−1∈Vay'y^{-1}a^{-1} \in V is equivalent to

y′y−1∈a−1Va=W, y'y^{-1} \in a^{-1}Va = W,
and since WW is a neighbourhood of ee, there is a WdW_d-small set B∈GB \in \mathfrak{G}. Hence for all (x,y)(x, y) and (x′,y′)(x', y') in A×BA \times B, we have (x′y′)(xy)−1∈V3(x'y')(xy)^{-1} \in V^3, and this completes the proof.

In order that x−1x^{-1} can be extended by continuity to G^d\hat{G}_d it is necessary and sufficient that the image, under the symmetry x→x−1x \to x^{-1}, of a Cauchy filter on GdG_d is a Cauchy filter on GdG_d (Chapter II, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 11). There are examples of topological groups in which this condition is not satisfied (cf. Chapter X, § 3, Exercise 16); we shall suppose that it is satisfied for the remainder of this proof.

2) The extended functions xyxy and x−1x^{-1} define a group structure on G^d\hat{G}_d. For if we apply the principle of extension of identities (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Proposition 2, Corollary 1) to the functions x(yz)x(yz) and (xy)z(xy)z, defined on G^d×G^d×G^d\hat{G}_d \times \hat{G}_d \times \hat{G}_d and equal on the dense subspace Gd×Gd×GdG_d \times G_d \times G_d, we see that the law of composition (x,y)→xy(x, y) \to xy is associative on G^d\hat{G}_d. For the same reason, the functions x,ex,xex, ex, xe are identical on G^d\hat{G}_d, and the functions e,xx−1,x−1xe, xx^{-1}, x^{-1}x are identical on G^d\hat{G}_d.

3) The topological group G^d\hat{G}_d is complete. Let Ud\mathfrak{U}_d be its right uniformity, and let U\mathfrak{U} be the uniformity on G^d\hat{G}_d obtained by completing the right uniformity of GG. Then U\mathfrak{U} and Ud\mathfrak{U}_d induce the same uniformity on GG, and therefore every Cauchy filter base B\mathfrak{B} on GG with respect to Ud\mathfrak{U}_d is also a Cauchy filter base with respect to U\mathfrak{U}. Now B\mathfrak{B} converges in G^d\hat{G}_d, since U\mathfrak{U} is a complete uniformity; and since U\mathfrak{U} and Ud\mathfrak{U}_d induce the same topology on G^d\hat{G}_d, it follows (Chapter II, , no. 4, Proposition 9) that Ud\mathfrak{U}_d is a complete uniformity. This conclusion also shows that U\mathfrak{U} and Ud\mathfrak{U}_d coincide (Chapter II, § 3, no. 6, Corollary to Theorem 2)

4) Uniqueness. This follows from Proposition 5 of no. 3.

To sum up, we have proved the following theorem:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.