Theorem 2
Tag 0CDN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CDN].
General Topology, chapter X, § 3. Special function spaces
Let X be a topological space, Y a uniform space. For each compact subset K of X and each open subset U of Y, let T(K, U) denote the set of all continuous mappings such that . Then the sets generate the topology of compact convergence on .
Let be the Hausdorff uniform space associated with Y (Chapter II, § 3, no. 8) and let be the canonical mapping of Y onto . The topology of compact convergence is the coarsest topology for which the mappings of into are continuous, as K runs through the set of all compact subsets of X ( no. 4, Proposition 4). Hence we obtain a subbase of the topology of by taking a subbase of the topology of for each compact subset K of X and then taking the union [in ] of the inverse images of these subbases in . On the other hand, every open subset of Y is of the form , where is open in (Chapter II, § 3, no. 7, Proposition 12); hence, for each compact subset , is the inverse image of under the mapping
It thus remains for us to prove the theorem when X is compact and Y is Hausdorff; we shall make these assumptions from now on.
Let us first show that is open in . Let be a point of this set; since is compact (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1) and contained in the open set , there exists a symmetric entourage of such that (Chapter II, § 4, no. 3, Proposition 4, Corollary). Let be the neighbourhood of in consisting of all continuous mappings such that for all . For such mappings we clearly have ; hence and therefore , which proves our assertion.
Conversely, if is a neighbourhood of a point , let us show that contains the intersection of a finite number of neighbourhoods of the form . We may suppose that is the set of all such that for all , being a given entourage of . Since is continuous on , it is uniformly continuous (Chapter II, § 4, no. 1, Theorem 2). Let be a symmetric entourage of , open in and such that . can be covered by a finite number of compact sets () such that each is -small (). Let be the open set , and let be a continuous mapping contained in the intersection of the sets (which are neighbourhoods of ). Then, for every , belongs to and therefore and are -close, hence -close. Since each belongs to some , we have and the proof is complete.
This result leads us to make the following definition:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.