Bourbaki

§ 9. Affine spaces and projective spaces

1. Definition of affine spaces

Definition 1

Given a left (resp. right) vector space T over a field K, an affine space attached to T is any homogeneous space E of the additive group T* (I, § 5, no. 5) such that 0 is the only operator in T leaving invariant all the elements of E (that is, T operates faithfully and transitively on E). Under these conditions, T is called the translation space of E and its elements are called the translations of E (or free vectors of E).

Cites 1

Cites I § 5. Groups operating on a set

In what follows we shall confine our attention to the case where T is a left vector space over K. The dimension (over K) of the translation vector space T of an affine space E is called the dimension of E (over K) and is denoted by dim E or dim⁡KE\dim_K E. An affine space of dimension one (resp. two) is called an affine line (resp. an affine plane). The elements of an affine space are also called points.

Under the conditions of Definition 1, for t∈Tt \in T and a∈Ea \in E we shall denote by t+at + a or a+ta + t the transform of the point a under t. Then the relations

s+(t+a)=(s+t)+a,0+a=a s + (t + a) = (s + t) + a, \quad 0 + a = a

hold for s∈T,t∈T,a∈Es \in T, t \in T, a \in E. The mapping x↦x+tx \mapsto x + t is a bijection of E onto itself, which we identify with t. Definition 1 moreover implies that, for all a∈Ea \in E, the mapping t↦t+at \mapsto t + a is a bijection of T onto E. In other words, given two points a,ba, b of E, there exists one and only one translation t such that b=t+ab = t + a; we shall denote this translation by b−ab - a; then the formulae

a−a=0,a−b=−(b−a),b=(b−a)+a a - a = 0, \quad a - b = -(b - a), \quad b = (b - a) + a
(c−b)+(b−a)=c−a (c - b) + (b - a) = c - a

hold for a∈E,b∈E,c∈Ea \in E, b \in E, c \in E. If four points a,b,a′,b′a, b, a', b' of E are such that b−a=b′−a′b - a = b' - a', the formula

b′=(b′−b)+(b−a)+a=(b′−a′)+(a′−a)+a b' = (b' - b) + (b - a) + a = (b' - a') + (a' - a) + a

and the commutativity of addition in T show that b′−b=a′−ab' - b = a' - a.

Given a point a∈Ea \in E, the mapping x↦x−ax \mapsto x - a is a bijection of EE onto TT; when EE is identified with TT under this mapping, we say that EE is considered as the vector space obtained by taking aa as origin in EE. Conversely, every vector space TT has canonically the structure of an affine space attached to TT, namely the homogeneous space structure corresponding to the subgroup {0}\{0\} of TT (I, § 5, no. 6).

Remark

The definitions of this no. and some of the results which follow extend immediately to the case where, instead of a vector space TT, we consider an arbitrary commutative group with operators TT.

2. Barycentric calculus

Proposition 1

Let* (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} be a family of points in an affine space EE and (λi)i∈L(\lambda_i)_{i \in L} a family of elements of KK of finite support such that ∑i∈Iλi=1\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 1 (resp. ∑i∈Iλi=0\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 0*). If aa is any point of EE, the point x∈Ex \in E defined by

x−a=∑i∈Iλi(xi−a) x - a = \sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i (x_i - a)
(resp. the free vector ∑i∈Iλi(xi−a)\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i (x_i - a)) *is independent of the point considered.

Cites 1

Cites V § 1. Prime fields. Characteristic

If a′a' is another point of EE, then

∑iλi(xi−a′)=∑iλi((xi−a)+(a−a′))=∑iλi(x−a)+(∑iλi)(a−a′). \sum_i \lambda_i (x_i - a') = \sum_i \lambda_i ((x_i - a) + (a - a')) = \sum_i \lambda_i (x - a) + \left( \sum_i \lambda_i \right) (a - a').
If ∑iλi=1\sum_i \lambda_i = 1, then ∑iλi(xi−a)=(x−a)+(a−a′)=x−a′\sum_i \lambda_i (x_i - a) = (x - a) + (a - a') = x - a'; if ∑iλi=0\sum_i \lambda_i = 0, then ∑iλi(x−a′)=∑iλi(x−a)\sum_i \lambda_i (x - a') = \sum_i \lambda_i (x - a); whence the proposition.

Under the conditions of Proposition 1, the point xx defined by

x−a=∑i∈Iλi(xi−a) x - a = \sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i (x_i - a)
(resp. the free vector ∑i∈Iλi(xi−a)\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i (x_i - a)) is denoted by ∑i∈Iλixi\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i x_i.

Thus in particular the notation b−ab - a introduced in no. 1 is recovered. When ∑iλi=1\sum_i \lambda_i = 1, the point x=∑iλixix = \sum_i \lambda_i x_i is called the barycentre of the points xix_i given the masses λi\lambda_i.

Given mm points a1,…,ama_1, \ldots, a_m of EE, whose number mm is not a multiple of the characteristic of KK (V, § 1), the point g=∑i=1m1maig = \sum_{i=1}^m \frac{1}{m} a_i is called (by an abuse of

language) the barycentre of the points aia_i (1≤i≤m1 \leq i \leq m) (for m=2m = 2, we say "midpoint" instead of "barycentre"); it is characterized by the relation

∑i=1m(ai−g)=0. \sum_{i=1}^m (a_i - g) = 0.

3. Affine linear varieties

Definition 2

Given an affine space* EE, a subset VV of EE is called an affine linear variety (or simply a linear variety or an affine subset of EE) if, for every family (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} of points of VV and every family (λi)i∈I(\lambda_i)_{i \in I} of elements of KK of finite support such that ∑i∈Iλi=1\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 1, the barycentre ∑i∈Iλixi\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i x_i belongs to VV.

It amounts to the same to say that the condition of Definition 2 holds for every finite family of points of VV.

The empty set is a linear variety; every intersection of linear varieties is a linear variety.

Let VV be a non-empty subset of EE and aa a point of VV; the relation

x−a=∑i=1nλi(xi−a) x - a = \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i (x_i - a)
means that xx is a barycentre ∑i=1nλixi+(1−∑i=1nλi)a\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i x_i + \left(1 - \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\right)a of the family consisting of the xix_i and aa. Therefore:

Proposition 2

For a non-empty subset* VV of an affine space EE to be a linear variety, it is necessary and sufficient that VV be a vector subspace for the vector space structure on EE obtained by taking a point of VV *as origin.

In particular, the non-empty affine linear varieties of a vector space TT (considered as an affine space) are just the translates of the vector subspaces of TT; the vector subspaces of TT are therefore the linear varieties containing 0.

Let VV be a non-empty linear variety of the affine space EE; the set of free vectors x−yx - y, where xx and yy run through VV, is a vector subspace DD of the translation space TT of EE called the direction of VV: for, if a∈Va \in V, then

x−y=(x−a)−(y−a) x - y = (x - a) - (y - a)
and our assertion follows from Proposition 2. It is immediate that DD operates faithfully and transitively on VV, which therefore has canonically the structure of an affine space attached to DD. By the dimension of the affine variety VV, we mean the dimension of VV with this affine space structure, that is the dimension of the vector space DD. The linear varieties of dimension 0 are the points of EE; those of dimension 1 (resp. 2) are called lines (resp. planes) of EE.

Every vector ≠0\neq 0 belonging to the direction of a line is called a direction vector of this line; its components with respect to a basis of T form what is called a system of direction parameters of the line in question.

The codimension of a linear variety V in E is the codimension of its direction D in T; a linear variety of codimension 1 in E is called an (affine) hyperplane of E.

Two linear varieties with the same direction are called parallel; it amounts to the same to say that one is derived from the other by translation. If V is a linear variety in T (considered as an affine space), its direction is the linear variety parallel to V and containing 0.

Proposition 3

Given a family* (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} of points of an affine space E, the set V of barycentres ∑i∈Iλiai\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i a_i ((\lambdai) of finite support, ∑i∈Iλi=1\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 1) is a linear variety of* E.

If the family (ai)(a_i) is empty, then V=∅V = \varnothing because of the condition ∑iλi=1\sum_i \lambda_i = 1. It may therefore be assumed that the family (ai)(a_i) is non-empty and in this case the proposition is obvious, taking one of the aia_i as origin in E.

The variety V is obviously the smallest linear variety containing the aia_i; it is said to be generated by the family (ai)(a_i) and this family is called a generating system of V.

In the notation of Proposition 3, assuming the family (ai)(a_i) is non-empty, for the expression for every point x∈Vx \in V in the form x=∑iλiaix = \sum_i \lambda_i a_i to be unique, it is necessary and sufficient that, denoting an arbitrary index of I by κ\kappa, the family of vectors ai−aκa_i - a_\kappa, where ii runs through the set of indices ≠κ\neq \kappa, be free in T. Then the family (av)v∈I(a_v)_{v \in I} of points of E is said to be affinely free (or that its elements form an affinely free system, or are affinely independent) and that λi\lambda_i is the barycentric coordinate of xx of index ii with respect to the affinely free family (ai)(a_i).

A family (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} of points of E which is not affinely free is said to be affinely related.

Proposition 4

For a non-empty family* (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} of points in an affine space E to be affinely related, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a family (λi)i∈I(\lambda_i)_{i \in I} of elements not all zero in K, of finite support, such that ∑i∈Iλi=0\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 0 and ∑i∈Iλiai=0\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i a_i = 0.

Given an index κ∈I\kappa \in I, to say that the family of vectors (ai−aκ)(a_i - a_\kappa), where ii runs through the set of indices ≠κ\neq \kappa, is related in T, means that there exists a family of scalars (λi)i≠κ(\lambda_i)_{i \neq \kappa} not all zero such that ∑i≠κλi(ai−aκ)=0\sum_{i \neq \kappa} \lambda_i (a_i - a_\kappa) = 0, which may also be written ∑i∈Iλiai=0\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i a_i = 0, with λκ=−∑i≠κλi\lambda_\kappa = -\sum_{i \neq \kappa} \lambda_i, in other words ∑i∈Iλi=0\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 0.

Proposition 5

For a non-empty family (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} of points of an affine space EE to be affinely free, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every index κ∈I\kappa \in I, aκa_\kappa do not belong to the linear variety generated by the aia_i of index ≠κ\neq \kappa.

Cites 1

Cites II § 7. Vector spaces

The proposition is obvious if II has only a single element. Otherwise, taking as origin in EE one of the aia_i of index ≠κ\neq \kappa, the proposition follows from § 7, no. 1, Remark.

4. Affine linear mappings

Definition 3

Given two affine spaces E,E′E, E' attached to two vector spaces T,T′T, T' over the same field KK, a mapping uu of EE into E′E' is called an affine linear mapping (or an affine mapping) if, for every family (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} of points of EE and every family (λi)i∈I(\lambda_i)_{i \in I} such that ∑i∈Iλi=1\sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i = 1,

u(∑i∈Iλixi)=∑i∈Iλiu(xi). u\left( \sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i x_i \right) = \sum_{i \in I} \lambda_i u(x_i).

(3)

Proposition 6

Let uu be an affine mapping of EE into E′E'. There exists one and only one linear mapping vv of TT into T′T' such that

u(x+t)=u(x)+v(t) u(x + t) = u(x) + v(t)

for all x∈E,t∈Tx \in E, t \in T.

Cites 3

Cites I § 6. Extensions, solvable groups, nilpotent groups, Corollary 3, II § 1, Proposition 11, II § 7

Let aa be any point of EE. The mapping

t↦u(a+t)−u(a) t \mapsto u(a + t) - u(a)

is a linear mapping vav_a of TT into T′T', for we may write

a+λt=λ(a+t)+(1−λ)aa+s+t=(a+s)+(a+t)−a a + \lambda t = \lambda (a + t) + (1 - \lambda)a \\ a + s + t = (a + s) + (a + t) - a

and it follows from (3) that va(λt)=λva(t)v_a(\lambda t) = \lambda v_a(t) and va(s+t)=va(s)+va(t)v_a(s + t) = v_a(s) + v_a(t). Moreover, if bb is another point of EE, then va=vbv_a = v_b; for the relation

(a+t)−a+b=b+t (a + t) - a + b = b + t

implies

u(a+t)−u(a)+u(b)=u(b+t) u(a + t) - u(a) + u(b) = u(b + t)

that is u(a+t)−u(a)=u(b+t)−u(b)u(a + t) - u(a) = u(b + t) - u(b). Whence the existence of vv; the uniqueness is immediate.

vv is called the linear mapping of TT into T′T' associated with uu. Conversely, for every linear mapping vv of TT into T′T' and every ordered pair of points a∈E,a′∈E′a \in E, a' \in E', it is immediately verified that

x↦a′+v(x−a) x \mapsto a' + v(x - a)

is an affine mapping of E into E' whose associated linear mapping is v. To say that u is an affine mapping of E into E' therefore also means that, if an arbitrary point a in E and the point u(a) in E' are taken as origins, u is a linear mapping for the two vector spaces thus obtained.

Let E'' be a third affine space, T'' its translation space, u' an affine mapping of E' into E'' and v' the linear mapping of T' into T'' associated with u'. Clearly u' o u is an affine mapping of E into E''; moreover, for a \in E and t \in T,

u′(u(a+t))=u′(u(a)+v(t))=u′(u(a))+v′(v(t)) u'(u(a + t)) = u'(u(a) + v(t)) = u'(u(a)) + v'(v(t))
and hence v' o v is the linear mapping of T into T'' associated with u' o u. For an affine mapping u to be bijective, it is necessary and sufficient that the associated linear mapping v be so, and u^{-1} is then an affine mapping whose associated linear mapping is v^{-1}.

In particular, the affine bijections of E onto itself form a group G, called the affine group of E. The mapping which associates with u \in G the linear mapping v associated with u is, by the above, a homomorphism of G onto the linear group \mathbf{GL}(T). If u is a translation, v is the identity and conversely. Hence, the kernel of the above homomorphism is the translation group T of E which is therefore a normal subgroup of G.

If u \in G, the automorphism t \mapsto utu^{-1} of T (where t is identified with the translation x \mapsto x + t) is the linear mapping v associated with u. For x \in E and t \in T, by definition

x+utu−1=u(u−1(x)+t)=u(u−1(x))+v(t)=x+v(t) x + utu^{-1} = u(u^{-1}(x) + t) = u(u^{-1}(x)) + v(t) = x + v(t)
and hence utu^{-1} = v(t).

Let a \in E and G_a be the subgroup of G consisting of the u \in G such that u(a) = a. If E is identified with T by taking a as origin, G_a is identified with \mathbf{GL}(T). Every u \in G can be expressed uniquely in the form u = t_1u_1 (resp. in the form u = u_2t_2), where u_1, u_2 are in G_a and t_1, t_2 in T: for, writing t_1 = u(a) - a, u^{-1}t_1 \in G_a, whence the existence of u_1 and t_1; the existence of u_2 and t_2 is obtained analogously. The uniqueness follows from the fact that G_a \cap T reduces to the identity element of G. Moreover

t1u1=u1(u1−1t1u1) t_1u_1 = u_1(u_1^{-1}t_1u_1)
whence u_2 = u_1, t_2 = u_1^{-1}t_1u_1. Finally, the linear mappings associated with u and u_1 are the same and hence, if as above G_a is identified with \mathbf{GL}(T), u_1 is the linear mapping from T to itself associated with u. It is thus seen that G is the semi-direct product of G_a by T (I, § 6, no. 1).

Let E, E' be two affine spaces over K. The direct (resp. inverse) image of a linear variety of E (resp. E') under an affine mapping u of E into E' is a linear variety of E' (resp. E); the rank of u is by definition the dimension of u(E); it is equal to the rank of the linear mapping associated with u. If V, V' are linear varieties of the same finite dimension m in E, E' respectively, there exists an affine mapping uu of EE into E′E' such that u(V)=V′u(V) = V': taking as origins in EE and E′E' points of VV and V′V' respectively, then taking in EE (resp. E′E') a basis whose first mm vectors form a basis of VV (resp. V′V'), the proposition follows immediately from § 1, no. 11, Corollary 3 to Proposition 17.

As the field KK has canonically a left vector space structure (of dimension 1) over KK, it can be considered as an affine space of dimension 1. An affine mapping of an affine space DD (over KK) into the affine space KK is also called an affine linear function (or an affine function). If a point aa is taken as origin in EE, every affine function on EE can then be written uniquely as x↦α+v(x)x \mapsto \alpha + v(x), where α∈K\alpha \in K and vv is a linear form on the vector space EE thus obtained; the affine functions on EE therefore form a right vector space over KK of dimension 1+dim⁡E1 + \dim E. If uu is a non-constant affine function on EE and λ∈K\lambda \in K, the set of x∈Ex \in E satisfying the equation u(x)=λu(x) = \lambda is a hyperplane; conversely, for every hyperplane HH in EE, there exists an affine function u0u_0 on EE such that H=u0−1(0)H = u_0^{-1}(0) and every affine function uu such that H=u−1(0)H = u^{-1}(0) is of the form u0μu_0 \mu, where μ∈K\mu \in K (§ 7, no. 5, Proposition 11). If uu is an affine function on EE, the hyperplanes with equations u(x)=αu(x) = \alpha and u(x)=βu(x) = \beta are parallel.

5. Definition of projective spaces

Definition 4

Given a left (resp. right) vector space* VV over a field KK, the left (resp. right) projective space derived from VV, denoted by P(V)\mathbf{P}(V), is the quotient of the complement V−{0}V - \{0\} of {0}\{0\} in VV by the equivalence relation Δ(V)\Delta(V) "there exists λ≠0\lambda \neq 0 in KK such that y=λxy = \lambda x (resp. y=xλy = x \lambda ) between xx and yy in V−{0}V - \{0\}.

Cited by 1

Cited by § 9. Affine spaces and projective spaces

When V=Ksn+1V = K_s^{n+1}, we also write Pn(K)\mathbf{P}_n(K) instead of P(Ksn+1)\mathbf{P}(K_s^{n+1}) and Δn(K)\Delta_n(K) instead of Δ(V)\Delta(V).

Definition 4 can also be expressed by saying that P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is the set of lines (passing through 0) in VV with the origin removed; P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is therefore canonically identified with the set of lines (passing through 0) in VV. The elements of a projective space are called the points of that space.

When VV is of dimension nn, the integer n−1n - 1 is called the dimension of the projective space P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) if nn is finite, and the cardinal nn otherwise; this cardinal is denoted by dim⁡KP(V)\dim_K \mathbf{P}(V) or dim⁡P(V)\dim \mathbf{P}(V). Thus a projective space of dimension −1-1 is empty and a projective space of dimension 0 is a single point. A projective space of dimension 1 (resp. 2) is called a projective line (resp. projective plane).

Henceforth we shall only consider left projective spaces.

6. Homogeneous coordinates

Let VV be a vector space of finite dimension n+1n + 1 over KK, P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) the projective space of dimension nn derived from VV and (ei)0≤i≤n(e_i)_{0 \leq i \leq n} a basis of VV. Let π\pi denote the canonical mapping of V−{0}V - \{0\} onto the quotient set P(V)\mathbf{P}(V). For every point x=∑i=0nξieix = \sum_{i=0}^{n} \xi_i e_i of V−{0}V - \{0\}, (ξ0,ξ1,…,ξn)(\xi_0, \xi_1, \ldots, \xi_n) is called a system of homogeneous coordinates of the point π(x)\pi(x) with respect to the basis (ei)(e_i) of VV. Every system (ξi)(\xi_i) of n+1n + 1 elements not all zero of KK is therefore a system of homogeneous coordinates of a point of P(V)P(V) with respect to (ei)(e_i); for two such systems (ξi)(\xi_i), (ξi′)(\xi'_i) to be systems of homogeneous coordinates of the same point of P(V)P(V) with respect to the same basis (ei)(e_i), it is necessary and sufficient that there exists an element λ≠0\lambda \neq 0 of KK such that ξi′=λξi\xi'_i = \lambda \xi_i for 0≤i≤n0 \leq i \leq n.

This definition is immediately generalized to the case where VV is infinite-dimensional.

Given another basis (e~i)(\tilde{e}_i) of VV such that ei=∑j=0nαije~je_i = \sum_{j=0}^{n} \alpha_{ij} \tilde{e}_j (0≤i≤n0 \leq i \leq n) and a system (ξi)(\xi_i) of homogeneous coordinates of π(x)\pi(x) with respect to the basis (ei)(e_i), for a system (ξˉi)(\bar{\xi}_i) of n+1n + 1 elements of KK to be a system of homogeneous coordinates of π(x)\pi(x) with respect to the basis (e~i)(\tilde{e}_i), it is necessary and sufficient that there exist λ≠0\lambda \neq 0 in KK such that

λξˉi=∑j=0nξjαjifor 0≤i≤n. \lambda \bar{\xi}_i = \sum_{j=0}^{n} \xi_j \alpha_{ji} \quad \text{for } 0 \leq i \leq n.

In particular, if ei=γie~ie_i = \gamma_i \tilde{e}_i with γi≠0\gamma_i \neq 0 (0≤i≤n0 \leq i \leq n), then ξˉi=μξiγi\bar{\xi}_i = \mu \xi_i \gamma_i where μ≠0\mu \neq 0.

7. Projective linear varieties

Let WW be a vector subspace of a vector space VV; the canonical image of W−{0}W - \{0\} in the projective space P(V)P(V) derived from VV is called a projective linear variety (or simply a linear variety when no confusion is to be feared); as the equivalence relation Δ(W)\Delta(W) on W−{0}W - \{0\} is induced by the relation Δ(V)\Delta(V), the projective linear variety the image of W−{0}W - \{0\} in P(V)P(V) can be identified with the projective space P(W)P(W) derived from WW and hence we may speak of the dimension of such a variety. In a projective space P(V)P(V), the canonical image of a hyperplane (with the origin removed) of VV is a linear variety called a projective hyperplane (or simply a hyperplane); if P(V)P(V) is of finite dimension nn the hyperplanes in P(V)P(V) are the linear varieties of dimension n−1n - 1.

Every proposition concerning vector subspaces of a vector space goes over to a proposition concerning projective linear varieties. For example, if a projective space P(V)P(V) is of finite dimension nn and (ei)0≤i≤n(e_i)_{0 \leq i \leq n} is a basis of VV, every linear variety L⊂P(V)L \subset P(V) of dimension rr can be defined by a system of n−rn - r homogeneous linear equations

∑i=0nξiαij=0(1≤j≤n−r) \sum_{i=0}^{n} \xi_i \alpha_{ij} = 0 \qquad (1 \leq j \leq n - r)

between the homogeneous coordinates ξi\xi_i (0≤i≤n0 \leq i \leq n) of a point of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) with respect to the basis (ei)(e_i), the left hand sides of (4) being linearly independent forms on V. In particular, a projective hyperplane is defined by a single homogeneous linear equation with coefficients not all zero. Conversely, the points of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) satisfying an arbitrary system of homogeneous linear equations with respect to the ξi\xi_i form a linear variety L; if the system considered consists of k≤n+1k \leq n + 1 equations, L is of dimension ≥n−k\geq n - k.

Every intersection of linear varieties of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is a linear variety; for every subset A of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V), there exists a smallest linear variety L containing A; it is called the linear variety generated by A and A is called a generating system of L.

If W is the vector subspace of V generated by π−1(A)\pi^{-1}(A), then L=P(W)L = \mathbf{P}(W).

If L and M are any two linear varieties in P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) and N the variety generated by L∪ML \cup M, then (§ 7, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Proposition 4)

dim L+dim M=dim(L∩M)+dim N. \text{dim } L + \text{dim } M = \text{dim}(L \cap M) + \text{dim } N.

In particular, if P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is finite-dimensional and dim L+dim M≥dim P(V)\text{dim } L + \text{dim } M \geq \text{dim } \mathbf{P}(V), it follows from (5) that L∩ML \cap M is non-empty.

Let (xi),(yi)(x_i), (y_i) be two families of points in the vector space V with the same indexing set, such that yi=λixiy_i = \lambda_i x_i, where λi≠0\lambda_i \neq 0 for all ii. If the family (xi)(x_i) is free, so is (yi)(y_i) and conversely; then it is said that the family of points π(xi)\pi(x_i) of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is projectively free (or simply free). It amounts to the same to say that for every index κ\kappa, the point π(xκ)\pi(x_\kappa) does not belong to the linear variety generated by the π(xi)\pi(x_i) for i≠κi \neq \kappa. A family of points of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) which is not projectively free is called projectively related (or simply related).

For a family (xi)(x_i) of points of V−{0}V - \{0\} to be such that the family (π(xi))(\pi(x_i)) is projectively free and generates P(V)\mathbf{P}(V), it is necessary and sufficient that (xi)(x_i) be a basis of V. If P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is of dimension nn the number of elements in such a family is therefore n+1n + 1. Note that giving such a family (π(xi))(\pi(x_i)) in P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) does not determine (even to within a left factor) the homogeneous coordinates of a given point of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) with respect to a basis (yi)(y_i) of V such that π(yi)=π(xi)\pi(y_i) = \pi(x_i) for all ii (cf. no. 6).

8. Projective completion of an affine space

Let V be a (left) vector space over a field K and consider the vector space Ks×VK_s \times V over K; the projective space P(Ks×V)\mathbf{P}(K_s \times V) is called the projective space canonically associated with the vector space V. If V is of dimension nn, P(Ks×V)\mathbf{P}(K_s \times V) is of the same dimension nn. Consider in Ks×VK_s \times V the affine hyperplane V1={1}×VV_1 = \{1\} \times V, whose direction (no. 3) is the subspace V0={0}×VV_0 = \{0\} \times V; if a line (passing through 0) of Ks×VK_s \times V is not contained in V0V_0, it contains a point (α,x)(\alpha, x) with α≠0\alpha \neq 0 and x∈Vx \in V, hence it contains also the point α−1(α,x)=(1,α−1x)\alpha^{-1}(\alpha, x) = (1, \alpha^{-1}x) of V1V_1; the converse is immediate and it is seen that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the points of V1V_1 and the lines (passing through 0) of Ks×VK_s \times V not contained in V0V_0, each of the latter meeting V1V_1 in one and only one point. It follows that the mapping x↦ϕ(x)=π(1,x)x \mapsto \phi(x) = \pi(1, x) is an injection (called canonical) of VV into the projective space P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V); VV is often identified with its image under this injection. The complement of ϕ(V)\phi(V) in P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V) is the projective hyperplane P(V0)P(V_0) called the hyperplane at infinity of P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V) (or of VV, by an abuse of language); its points are also called the "points at infinity" of P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V) (or of VV). If (ai)(a_i) is a basis of VV and in Ks×VK_s \times V the basis is taken consisting of the elements ei=(0,ai)e_i = (0, a_i) and the element eω=(1,0)e_\omega = (1, 0), the points at infinity in P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V) are those whose homogeneous coordinate of index ω\omega is 0.

Let MM be an affine linear variety in VV (no. 3) and DD its direction; the canonical image ϕ(M)\phi(M) of MM in P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V) is contained in the canonical image M‾=π(M2)\overline{M} = \pi(M_2) of the vector subspace M2M_2 of Ks×VK_s \times V generated by the affine variety M1={1}×MM_1 = \{1\} \times M of Ks×VK_s \times V. More precisely, if (ai)(a_i) is an affinely free system of MM generating MM, the elements (1,ai)(1, a_i) form a basis of M2M_2 and therefore M‾\overline{M} is just the projective linear variety generated by ϕ(M)\phi(M); if MM is finite-dimensional, M‾\overline{M} has the same dimension as MM. The complement of ϕ(M)\phi(M) in M‾\overline{M} is the intersection of M‾\overline{M} and the hyperplane at infinity and is equal to the canonical image π(M0)\pi(M_0), where M0={0}×DM_0 = \{0\} \times D.

Conversely, let NN be a projective linear variety not contained in the hyperplane at infinity and let R=π−1(N)R = \pi^{-1}(N); R∩V1R \cap V_1 is an affine linear variety of K×VK \times V of the form {1}×M\{1\} \times M, where MM is an affine linear variety of VV and it is immediately seen that NN is the affine linear variety M‾\overline{M} generated by ϕ(M)\phi(M).

There is therefore a one-to-one correspondence between the affine linear varieties of VV and the projective linear varieties of P(Ks×V)P(K_s \times V) not contained in the hyperplane at infinity; for two affine linear varieties of VV to be parallel, it is necessary and sufficient that the projective linear varieties which they generate have the same intersection with the hyperplane at infinity (which is sometimes expressed by saying that the two affine linear varieties in question have the same points at infinity).

9. Extension of rational functions

If the results of no. 8 are applied to the vector space V=KsV = K_s of dimension 1, it is seen that there exists a canonical injection ϕ\phi of KsK_s into the projective line P1(K)=P(Ks×Ks)P_1(K) = P(K_s \times K_s); for all ξ∈K\xi \in K, ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) is the point with homogeneous coordinates (1,ξ)(1, \xi) with respect to the canonical basis (§ 1, no. 11) of Ks×KsK_s \times K_s. The complement of ϕ(K)\phi(K) in P1(K)P_1(K) consists of the single point with homogeneous coordinates (0,1)(0, 1) with respect to the above basis; it is called the "point at infinity". P1(K)P_1(K) is also called the projective field associated with KK and denoted by K~\tilde{K}, the point at infinity in K~\tilde{K} being denoted by ∞\infty.

*Consider in particular the case where KK is a commutative field and let f \in K(X) be a rational function in one indeterminate over K (IV, § 4); if f≠0f \neq 0, there is a unique expression f=αp/qf = \alpha p/q, where α∈K∗\alpha \in K^* and pp and qq are two relatively prime monic polynomials (VII, § 1); let mm and nn be their respective degrees and let r=sup⁡(m,n)r = \sup(m, n). We write

p1(T,X)=Trp(X/T),q1(T,X)=Trq(X/T); p_1(T, X) = T^r p(X/T), \qquad q_1(T, X) = T^r q(X/T);
p1p_1 and q1q_1 are two homogeneous polynomials of degree rr over KK such that p(X)=p1(1,X)p(X) = p_1(1, X), q(X)=q1(1,X)q(X) = q_1(1, X). Hence, for every element ξ∈K\xi \in K which is not a zero of q(X)q(X), f(ξ)=αp(ξ)/q(ξ)f(\xi) = \alpha p(\xi)/q(\xi) is defined and we may write
f(ξ)=αp1(1,ξ)/q1(1,ξ)=αp1(λ,λξ)/q1(λ,λξ) f(\xi) = \alpha p_1(1, \xi)/q_1(1, \xi) = \alpha p_1(\lambda, \lambda \xi)/q_1(\lambda, \lambda \xi)
for all λ≠0\lambda \neq 0 in KK. Consider then the mapping
(η,ξ)↦(q1(η,ξ),p1(η,ξ)) (\eta, \xi) \mapsto (q_1(\eta, \xi), p_1(\eta, \xi))
of K2K^2 into itself; it is compatible with the equivalence relation Δ(K2)\Delta(K^2) and therefore defines, when passing to the quotients, a mapping f~\tilde{f} of K~\tilde{K} into itself which coincides with ξ↦f(ξ)\xi \mapsto f(\xi) at the points where this rational function is defined; it is said, by an abuse of language, that f~\tilde{f} is the canonical extension of ff to K~\tilde{K}.

For example, if f=1/Xf = 1/X, then f~(0)=∞\tilde{f}(0) = \infty and f~(∞)=0\tilde{f}(\infty) = 0; if

f=(aX+b)/(cX+d) f = (aX + b)/(cX + d)
with ad−bc≠0ad - bc \neq 0, then f~(−d/c)=∞\tilde{f}(-d/c) = \infty, f~(∞)=a/c\tilde{f}(\infty) = a/c if c≠0c \neq 0, f~(∞)=∞\tilde{f}(\infty) = \infty if c=0c = 0. If f=a0Xn+⋯+anf = a_0 X^n + \cdots + a_n is a polynomial of degree n>0n > 0, then f~(∞)=∞\tilde{f}(\infty) = \infty*

10. Projective linear mappings

Let V,V′V, V' be two left vector spaces over a field KK, ff a linear mapping of VV into V′V' and N=f‾(0)N = \overline{f}(0) its kernel. It is immediate that the image under ff of a line (passing through 0) in VV not contained in NN is a line (passing through 0) in V′V'; hence, on passing to the quotients, ff defines a mapping gg of P(V)−P(N)P(V) - P(N) into P(V′)P(V'). Such a mapping is called a projective linear mapping (or, simply, a projective mapping); although it is defined on P(V)−P(N)P(V) - P(N) and not on P(V)P(V) (when N≠{0}N \neq \{0\}), we shall say by an abuse of language that gg is a projective mapping of P(V)P(V) into P(V′)P(V'). The projective linear variety P(N)P(N), where gg is not defined, is called the centre of gg.

Note that, when gg is defined on the whole of P(V)P(V) (that is when N={0}N = \{0\}), gg is an injection of P(V)P(V) into P(V′)P(V').

When bases (aλ)λ∈L,(bμ)μ∈M(a_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L}, (b_\mu)_{\mu \in M} are given in VV and V′V' respectively, a projective mapping of P(V)P(V) into P(V′)P(V') maps a point of P(V)P(V) with homogeneous coordinates ξλ\xi_\lambda (λ∈L\lambda \in L) to a point of P(V′)\mathbf{P}(V') with a system of homogeneous coordinates ημ\eta_\mu (μ∈M\mu \in M) of the form

ημ=∑λ∈Lξλαλμ(αλμ∈K). \eta_\mu = \sum_{\lambda \in L} \xi_\lambda \alpha_{\lambda \mu} \quad (\alpha_{\lambda \mu} \in K).

The centre of gg is the linear variety defined by the equations

∑λ∈Lξλαλμ=0(μ∈M). \sum_{\lambda \in L} \xi_\lambda \alpha_{\lambda \mu} = 0 \quad (\mu \in M).

If CC is the centre of gg and MM is a linear variety of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V), the image under gg of M−(M∩C)M - (M \cap C) is a linear variety of P(V′)\mathbf{P}(V') denoted (by an abuse of language) by g(M)g(M). Then

dim⁡g(M)+dim⁡(M∩C)+1=dim⁡M \dim g(M) + \dim(M \cap C) + 1 = \dim M

(§ 7, no. 4, formula (12)). If M′M' is a linear variety of P(V′)\mathbf{P}(V'), g−1(M′)∪Cg^{-1}(M') \cup C is a linear variety of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) and

dim⁡(g−1(M′)∪C)=dim⁡C+dim⁡(M′∩g(P(V)))+1. \dim(g^{-1}(M') \cup C) = \dim C + \dim(M' \cap g(\mathbf{P}(V))) + 1.

It is said, by an abuse of language, that g−1(M′)∪Cg^{-1}(M') \cup C is the inverse image of M′M' under gg.

As the values taken by a linear mapping on a basis (ei)(e_i) of VV can be chosen arbitrarily in V′V', it is seen that there exists a projective linear mapping of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) into P(V′)\mathbf{P}(V') taking arbitrary values at the points π(ei)\pi(e_i). But (even when gg is everywhere defined) giving g(π(ei))g(\pi(e_i)) does not determine gg uniquely (Exercise 10).

The composition of two projective mappings which are bijections is a projective mapping; so is the inverse mapping of such a bijection. The bijective projective mappings of a projective space P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) onto itself thus form a group, called the projective group of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) and denoted by PGL(V)\mathbf{PGL}(V); we write PGLn(K)\mathbf{PGL}_n(K) or PGL(n,K)\mathbf{PGL}(n, K) instead of PGL(Ksn)\mathbf{PGL}(K^n_s).

Remark

In a projective space P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) over a field KK, let H=P(W)H = \mathbf{P}(W) be a hyperplane. There exists a bijective linear mapping ff of VV onto Ks×WK_s \times W such that f(W)=Wf(W) = W; let gg be the projective mapping obtained from ff by passing to the quotients. It has been seen (no. 8) that the complement of P(W)\mathbf{P}(W) in P(Ks×W)\mathbf{P}(K_s \times W) can be identified with an affine space whose translation space is WW. When P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is identified with P(Ks×W)\mathbf{P}(K_s \times W) by means of gg, it is said that HH has been taken as hyperplane at infinity in P(V)\mathbf{P}(V); the complement of HH in P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) is then identified with an affine space whose translation space is WW.

11. Projective space structure

Given a set E and a field K, a (left) projective space structure on E with respect to the field K is defined by giving a non-empty set Φ\Phi of bijections of subsets of the projective space P(Ks(E))\mathbf{P}(K_s^{(E)}) onto E satisfying the following axioms:

(EPI)(\mathrm{EP}_I)
The set of definition of every mapping f∈Φf \in \Phi is a linear variety of P(Ks(E))\mathbf{P}(K_s^{(E)}).

(EPII)(\mathrm{EP}_{II})
For every ordered pair of elements f,gf, g of Φ\Phi defined respectively on the linear varieties P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) and P(W)\mathbf{P}(W), the bijection h=g−1∘fh = g^{-1} \circ f of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) onto P(W)\mathbf{P}(W) is a projective mapping.

(EPIII)(\mathrm{EP}_{III})
Conversely, if f∈Φf \in \Phi is defined on the linear variety P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) and hh is a bijective projective mapping of P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) onto a linear variety P(W)⊂P(Ks(E))\mathbf{P}(W) \subset \mathbf{P}(K_s^{(E)}), then f∘h−1∈Φf \circ h^{-1} \in \Phi.

Let E be a set, (Vλ)λ∈L(V_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} a family of vector spaces over K and suppose given for each λ∈L\lambda \in L a bijection fλf_\lambda of P(Vλ)\mathbf{P}(V_\lambda) onto E such that, for every ordered pair of indices λ,μ,fλ−1∘fμ\lambda, \mu, f_\lambda^{-1} \circ f_\mu is a projective mapping of P(Vμ)\mathbf{P}(V_\mu) onto P(Vλ)\mathbf{P}(V_\lambda). Then we can define on E a projective space structure with respect to K as follows: let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} be a basis of a space VλV_\lambda and write ai=fλ(π(ei))a_i = f_\lambda(\pi(e_i)); let bib_i be the element of index aia_i in the canonical basis of Ks(E)K_s^{(E)} (§ 1, no. 11). The relation i≠κi \neq \kappa implies bi≠bκb_i \neq b_\kappa because of the hypothesis that fλf_\lambda is bijective; hence the bib_i form a basis of a vector subspace W0W_0 of Ks(E)K_s^{(E)} and there therefore exists a bijective projective mapping hh of P(W0)\mathbf{P}(W_0) onto P(Vλ)\mathbf{P}(V_\lambda) such that h(π(bi))=π(ei)h(\pi(b_i)) = \pi(e_i) for all i∈Ii \in I. If Φ\Phi is taken to be the set of all bijective projective mappings fλ∘h∘g−1f_\lambda \circ h \circ g^{-1}, where gg runs through the set of all bijective projective mappings P(W)⊂P(Ks(E))\mathbf{P}(W) \subset \mathbf{P}(K_s^{(E)}), it is immediately verified that Φ\Phi satisfies axioms (EP_I), (EP_{II}) and (EP_{III}). It is moreover immediate that Φ\Phi depends neither on the choice of index λ∈L\lambda \in L, nor on the choice of basis (ei)(e_i) in VλV_\lambda, nor on the choice of hh.

In particular (taking L to consist of a single element), every projective space P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) derived from a vector space V (no. 5, Definition 4) thus has a well determined "projective space structure" in the sense of the definition given in this no. Hence any set with a projective space structure can be called a projective space.

With the same notation, a linear variety in a projective space E is a subset M of E such that, for at least one bijection f∈Φf \in \Phi defined on P(V)⊂P(Ks(E))\mathbf{P}(V) \subset \mathbf{P}(K_s^{(E)}), f−1(M)f^{-1}(M) is a linear variety in P(V)\mathbf{P}(V) in the sense of no. 7 (this property then holds for all f∈Φf \in \Phi). It follows from the above that every linear variety in a projective space has canonically a projective space structure.

A projective space E is said to be of dimension n if, for all f∈Φ,f−1(E)f \in \Phi, f^{-1}(E) is a linear variety of dimension n (it suffices that this hold for one mapping f∈Φf \in \Phi).

Exercises

See the exercises for § 9.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.