Proposition 4
Tag 05N5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05N5].
Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Modules of linear mappings. Duality
Let P be an A-module. The following properties are equivalent:
(a) P is projective. (b) For every exact sequence 0 → F' → F → F'' → 0 of A-linear mappings, the sequence
is exact.
(c) For every surjective A-module homomorphism u : E → E'' and every homomorphism f : P → E'', there exists a homomorphism g : P → E such that f = u ∘ g (it is said that f can be "lifted" to a homomorphism of P into E).
(d) Every exact sequence 0 → E' → E → P → 0 of A-linear mappings splits (and therefore P is isomorphic to a direct factor of E).
(e) P is isomorphic to a direct factor of a free A-module.
It is trivial that (a) implies (b). To see that (b) implies (c), it suffices to apply (b) to the exact sequence 0 → E' → E → E'' → 0, where E' = Ker(u), since (c) expresses the fact that
is surjective. To see that (c) implies (d), it suffices to apply (c) to the surjective homomorphism and the homomorphism ; the existence of a homomorphism such that implies that the sequence
splits (§ 1, no. 9, Proposition 15). As for every A-module M there exist a free A-module L and an exact sequence (§ 1, no. 11, Proposition 20), clearly (d) implies (e). Finally (e) implies (a) by virtue of Proposition 3 and its Corollary.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Proposition 12, § 3
- Corollary, § 4
- Proposition 24, § 4
- Lemma 1, § 2
- Corollary, § 2
- Proposition 12, § 2
- Corollary 1, § 2
- Corollary 6, § 3
- Lemma 3, § 4
- Corollary, § 5
- Corollary, § 7
- Theorem 1, § 3
- Corollary 1, § 3
- § 11. Grothendieck Groups
- Proposition 5, § 13
- Corollary 3, § 21
- Proposition 4, § 8
- Proposition 8, § 9