Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0B0I, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B0I].

General Topology, chapter I, § 2. Continuous functions

Let XX be a set, let (Yi)i∈I(Y_i)_{i \in I} be a family of topological spaces, and for each i∈Ii \in I let fif_i be a mapping of XX into YiY_i. Let S\mathscr{S} be the set of subsets of XX of the form f‾i−1(Ui)\overline{f}_i^{-1}(U_i) (i∈Ii \in I, UiU_i open in YiY_i), and let B\mathfrak{B} be the set of finite intersections of sets of S\mathscr{S}. Then B\mathfrak{B} is a base of a topology T\mathfrak{T} on XX which is the initial topological structure on XX for the family (fi)(f_i) (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3) and in particular is the coarsest topology on XX for which the mappings fif_i are continuous. More precisely, if gg is a mapping of a topological space ZZ into XX, then gg is continuous at a point z∈Zz \in Z (X carrying the topology T\mathfrak{T}) if and only if each of the functions fi∘gf_i \circ g is continuous at zz.

Let D\mathscr{D} be the set of all unions of sets belonging to B\mathfrak{B}; clearly D\mathscr{D} satisfies axiom (O1)(O_1) since formation of unions is associative; and D\mathscr{D} satisfies axiom (OII)(O_{II}) by reason of the definition of B\mathfrak{B} and the fact that finite intersection is distributive over arbitrary union [Set Theory, R § 4, formula (37)]. The set D\mathscr{D} is therefore the set of open subsets of XX for a topology T\mathfrak{T} of which B\mathfrak{B} is a base. We shall prove the last assertion of the proposition, which implies the others by reason of the general properties of initial structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3, criterion CST 9). In the first place, the definition of S\mathscr{S} shows that the fif_i are continuous on XX (no. 1, Theorem 1); hence, if gg is continuous at zz, so are the mappings fi∘gf_i \circ g (no. 1, Proposition 2). Conversely, suppose that all the mappings fi∘gf_i \circ g are continuous at zz, and let VV be a neighbourhood of g(z)g(z) in XX; by definition, there is a finite subset JJ of II, and for each i∈Ji \in J an open subset UiU_i of YiY_i such that VV contains the set ⋂i∈Jf‾i−1(Ui)\bigcap_{i \in J} \overline{f}_i^{-1}(U_i) and g(z)g(z) belongs to this set. It follows that

g‾−1(V)⊃⋂i∈Jg‾−1(f‾i−1(Ui)), \overline{g}^{-1}(V) \supset \bigcap_{i \in J} \overline{g}^{-1}(\overline{f}_i^{-1}(U_i)),
and the hypothesis implies that each of the sets g‾−1(f‾i−1(Ui))\overline{g}^{-1}(\overline{f}_i^{-1}(U_i)) is a neighbourhood of zz in ZZ; hence g‾−1(V)\overline{g}^{-1}(V) is also a neighbourhood of zz in ZZ. This completes the proof.

Let Bi\mathfrak{B}_i be a base of the topology of Yi(i∈I)Y_i (i \in I); let S′\mathscr{S}' denote the set of subsets of XX of the form f‾i−1(Ui)\overline{f}_i^{-1}(U_i) for i∈Ii \in I and Ui∈BiU_i \in \mathfrak{B}_i for each i∈Ii \in I; if B′\mathfrak{B}' is the set of finite intersections of sets of S′\mathscr{S}', it is evident that B′\mathfrak{B}' is a base of the topology T\mathfrak{T}.

The general properties of initial structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3, criterion CST 10) imply in particular the following transitivity property (the direct proof of which is quite straightforward):

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.