Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0BAR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BAR].

General Topology, chapter I, § 10. Proper mappings

Let XX be a locally compact space, RR an equivalence relation on XX, CC the graph of RR in X×XX \times X, ff the canonical mapping X→X/RX \to X/R; let X′X' be the compact space obtained by adjoining a point at infinity ω\omega to XX, and let R′R' be the equivalence relation on X′X' whose graph is C′=C∪{(ω,ω)}C' = C \cup \{(\omega, \omega)\}. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

a) ff is proper.

b) The saturation of each compact subset of XX with respect to RR is compact.

c) R′R' is closed.

d) The restriction of pr2\mathrm{pr}_2 to CC is proper.

e) RR is closed and the equivalence classes with respect to RR are compact.

Furthermore, if these conditions are satisfied, X/RX/R is locally compact.

a) ⟹\Longrightarrow b): Since X/R=f(X)X/R = f(X) and ff is proper, X/RX/R is Hausdorff (no. 1, Proposition 5, Corollary 2); hence the image under ff of every compact subset KK of XX is compact (§\S 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1).

The saturation of KK with respect to RR is f‾−1(f(K))\overline{f}^{-1}(f(K)) and is therefore compact by no. 2, Proposition 6.

b) ⟹\Longrightarrow c) : If F′F' is closed in X′X' and does not contain ω\omega, then F′F' is a compact subset of XX; hence its saturation with respect to R′R', which is the same as its saturation with respect to RR, is compact and a fortiori closed in X′X'. If ω∈F′\omega \in F' and if F=F′∩X=F′−{ω}F = F' \cap X = F' - \{ \omega \}, then the saturation of F′F' with respect to R′R' is the union of {ω}\{ \omega \} and the saturation HH of FF with respect to RR; hence it is enough to show that HH is closed in XX (i.e. that RR is a closed relation). For this, it is enough to show that if KK is any compact subset of XX then H∩KH \cap K is compact (§9§ 9, no. 7, Proposition 11). Now the saturation LL of KK with respect to RR is compact by hypothesis, and H∩LH \cap L is the saturation of F∩LF \cap L, which is also compact; a fortiori H∩K=(H∩L)∩KH \cap K = (H \cap L) \cap K is compact.

c) ⟹\Longrightarrow d) : Since X′X' is regular (§9§ 9, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 1), C′C' is closed in X′×X′X' \times X' (§8§ 8, no. 6, Proposition 14) and therefore compact. It follows that C′C' is the one-point compactification of CC (§9§ 9, no. 8, Theorem 4). Since the restriction to C′C' of pr2:X′×X′→X′pr_2 : X' \times X' \to X' is continuous at ω\omega, the result follows from no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 7.

d) ⟹\Longrightarrow e) : If FF is any closed subset of XX, then C∩(F×X)C \cap (F \times X) is closed in CC, whence the saturation of FF with respect to RR, which is equal to pr2(C∩(F×X))pr_2(C \cap (F \times X)), is closed in XX (no. 1, Proposition 1). Also the equivalence class of x∈Xx \in X mod RR is homeomorphic to the inverse image of {x}\{ x \} under the restriction of pr2pr_2 to CC and is therefore compact [no. 2, Theorem 1 b)].

e) ⟹\Longrightarrow a) : If RR is closed, then by definition ff is closed, and for each z∈X/Rz \in X/R, f−1(z)f^{-1}(z) is an equivalence class mod RR and is therefore compact; hence ff is proper by Theorem 1 b) of no. 2.

Finally we have to prove that X/RX/R is locally compact. X′/R′X'/R' is compact by c) and Proposition 8; the relation RR is that induced on XX by R′R'; XX is open in X′X' and is saturated with respect to R′R'; hence X/RX/R is homeomorphic to the image f′(X)f'(X) of XX under the canonical mapping f′:X′→X′/R′f' : X' \to X'/R' (§3§ 3, no. 6, Proposition 10, Corollary 1). Now f′(X)f'(X) is open in X′/R′X'/R', and hence is a locally compact subspace of X′/R′X'/R'.

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.