Proposition 9
Tag 0BAR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BAR].
General Topology, chapter I, § 10. Proper mappings
Let be a locally compact space, an equivalence relation on , the graph of in , the canonical mapping ; let be the compact space obtained by adjoining a point at infinity to , and let be the equivalence relation on whose graph is . Then the following conditions are equivalent:
a) is proper.
b) The saturation of each compact subset of with respect to is compact.
c) is closed.
d) The restriction of to is proper.
e) is closed and the equivalence classes with respect to are compact.
Furthermore, if these conditions are satisfied, is locally compact.
a) b): Since and is proper, is Hausdorff (no. 1, Proposition 5, Corollary 2); hence the image under of every compact subset of is compact ( 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1).
The saturation of with respect to is and is therefore compact by no. 2, Proposition 6.
b) c) : If is closed in and does not contain , then is a compact subset of ; hence its saturation with respect to , which is the same as its saturation with respect to , is compact and a fortiori closed in . If and if , then the saturation of with respect to is the union of and the saturation of with respect to ; hence it is enough to show that is closed in (i.e. that is a closed relation). For this, it is enough to show that if is any compact subset of then is compact (, no. 7, Proposition 11). Now the saturation of with respect to is compact by hypothesis, and is the saturation of , which is also compact; a fortiori is compact.
c) d) : Since is regular (, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 1), is closed in (, no. 6, Proposition 14) and therefore compact. It follows that is the one-point compactification of (, no. 8, Theorem 4). Since the restriction to of is continuous at , the result follows from no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 7.
d) e) : If is any closed subset of , then is closed in , whence the saturation of with respect to , which is equal to , is closed in (no. 1, Proposition 1). Also the equivalence class of mod is homeomorphic to the inverse image of under the restriction of to and is therefore compact [no. 2, Theorem 1 b)].
e) a) : If is closed, then by definition is closed, and for each , is an equivalence class mod and is therefore compact; hence is proper by Theorem 1 b) of no. 2.
Finally we have to prove that is locally compact. is compact by c) and Proposition 8; the relation is that induced on by ; is open in and is saturated with respect to ; hence is homeomorphic to the image of under the canonical mapping (, no. 6, Proposition 10, Corollary 1). Now is open in , and hence is a locally compact subspace of .
Q.E.D.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.