Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0BA7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BA7].

General Topology, chapter I, § 10. Proper mappings

Let f:X→X′f : X \to X' and g:X′→X′′g : X' \to X'' be two continuous mappings. a) If ff and gg are proper, then g∘fg \circ f is proper. b) If g∘fg \circ f is proper and ff is surjective, then gg is proper. c) If g∘fg \circ f is proper and gg is injective, then ff is proper. d) If g∘fg \circ f is proper and X′X' is Hausdorff, then ff is proper.

Let ZZ be a topological space. We have

(g∘f)×ιZ=(g×ιZ)∘(f×ιZ); (g \circ f) \times \iota_Z = (g \times \iota_Z) \circ (f \times \iota_Z);
if ff and gg are proper, then f×ιZf \times \iota_Z and g×ιZg \times \iota_Z are closed; hence [§ 5, no. 1, Proposition 1 a)] (g∘f)×ιZ(g \circ f) \times \iota_Z is closed; this proves a). The proof of b) [resp. c)] runs along the same lines, using part b) [resp. c)] of Proposition 1 of § 5, no. 1, and remarking that if ff is surjective (resp. if gg is injective) then f×ιZf \times \iota_Z is surjective (resp. g×ιZg \times \iota_Z is injective). Finally, to prove d), consider the commutative diagram

X→φX×X′f↓↓(g∘f)×ιX′X′→ψX′′×X′ \begin{array}{ccc} X & \overset{\varphi}{\to} & X \times X' \\ f \downarrow & & \downarrow (g \circ f) \times \iota_{X'} \\ X' & \underset{\psi}{\to} & X'' \times X' \end{array}

where φ(x)=(x,f(x))\varphi(x) = (x, f(x)) and ψ(x′)=(g(x′),x′)\psi(x') = (g(x'), x'). The mapping φ\varphi (resp. ψ\psi) is a homeomorphism of XX (resp. X′X') onto the graph of ff (resp. the reflection of the graph of gg) (§ 4, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 2). Further, since X′X' is Hausdorff, the graph φ(X)\varphi(X) of ff is closed in X×X′X \times X' (§ 8, no. 1, Proposition 2, Corollary 2). Hence (Proposition 2) φ\varphi is proper; on the other hand Proposition 4 shows that (g∘f)×iX′(g \circ f) \times i_{X'} is proper. By a) above and the commutativity of the diagram (1), ψ∘f\psi \circ f is proper; but ψ\psi is injective and therefore ff is proper by c) above.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.