Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 0C0W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C0W].

General Topology, chapter VIII, § 4. Complex number spaces and projective spaces

The projective space Pn(C)\mathbf{P}_n(\mathbf{C}), endowed with the topology which is the quotient of that of Cn+1∗\mathbf{C}_{n+1}^* by the equivalence relation Δn(C)\Delta_n(\mathbf{C}), is called complex projective space of nn dimensions.

The projective space P1(C)\mathbf{P}_1(\mathbf{C}) is called the complex projective line, and P2(C)\mathbf{P}_2(\mathbf{C}) is called the complex projective plane.

Most of the arguments relating to real projective spaces extend with very slight modifications to complex projective spaces.

In the first place we see that the topological space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is Hausdorff by the argument of Proposition 1 of Chapter VI, § 3. no. 1, which applies word for word simply by replacing R\mathbf{R} by C\mathbf{C}. Again, the proof of Proposition 2 of Chapter VI, § 3. no. 1 shows that Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is compact and connected, and homeomorphic to the quotient of the sphere S2n−1S_{2n-1} (considered as embedded in the space Cn−1∗C_{n-1}^*, identified with R2n−2∗R_{2n-2}^*) by the equivalence relation induced on this sphere by Δn(C)\Delta_n(\mathbf{C}); the only point of difference is that now, if n⩾0n \geqslant 0, the equivalence classes for this relation are homeomorphic to the circle S1S_1.

For this reason, Proposition 3 of Chapter VI. § 3, no. 1 has no analogue for complex projective spaces.

Next one shows, as in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 2, that every pp-dimensional projective linear variety in the space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is a closed set, homeomorphic to PrCP_r \mathbf{C}, and that its complement is dense in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) if p<np < n. The proof of Proposition 5 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 2 can be transposed as it stands, simply by substituting C\mathbf{C} for R\mathbf{R}, and shows that (if n⩾0n \geqslant 0) the complement of a projective hyperplane in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is homeomorphic to C∗\mathbf{C}^*, and therefore that every point has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to C∗\mathbf{C}^*. This result allows us to embed complex number space Cn\mathbf{C}^n in complex projective space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}), by identifying C∗\mathbf{C}^* with the complement of a projective hyperplane, called the "hyperplane at infinity" (usually the hyperplane whose equation is x0=0x_0 = 0). In the particular case n=1n = 1, the hyperplane at infinity is a point, and Alexandroff's theorem shows that P1CP_1 \mathbf{C} is homeomorphic to the space C~\tilde{\mathbf{C}} obtained by compactifying the locally compact space C\mathbf{C} by adjoining a "point at infinity", denoted by ∞\infty. Proposition 4 of Chapter VI. § 2, no. 4 then shows that the complex projective line P1(C)P_1(\mathbf{C}) is homeomorphic to the sphere S2S_2.

We leave to the reader the task of enunciating the results analogous to those of Chapter VI. § 3. no. 4, for functions which take their values in C\mathbf{C}.

Consider the space Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} as embedded in Cn+1\mathbf{C}^{n+1} (no. 1). Let ff be the canonical mapping of Cn−1∗C_{n-1}^* onto its quotient space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}). The subspace f(Rn−1∗)f(\mathbf{R}_{n-1}^*) consists of the points of Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) which have at least one system of real homogeneous coordinates; let us show that f(Rn−1∗)f(\mathbf{R}_{n-1}^*) is homeomorphic to real projective space Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}), which will allow us to consider the space Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) as embedded in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}). Now the relation induced by Δn(C)\Delta_n(\mathbf{C}) on Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* is Δn(R)\Delta_n(\mathbf{R}); the canonical mapping φ\varphi of

Rn+1∗/Δn(R)=Pn(R) \mathbf{R}_{n+1}^*/\Delta_n(\mathbf{R}) = P_n(\mathbf{R})

onto f(Rn−1∗)f(\mathbf{R}_{n-1}^*) is continuous (Chapter I, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 10); since

Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) is compact, φ\varphi must be a homeomorphism (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 2).

We can also prove that φ\varphi is bicontinuous without using the compactness of Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}), by invoking the criterion of Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6 (see Exercise 3).

Since every vector subspace of p+1p + 1 dimensions of Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} generates a complex vector subspace of p+1p + 1 dimensions in Cn+1\mathbf{C}^{n+1}, we see that every projective linear variety VV of pp dimensions in Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) (VV is called a real projective linear variety) generates a projective linear variety V′V' of pp dimensions in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) (V′V' is called a complex projective linear variety), such that VV is the trace of V′V' on Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}). Moreover, every system of (homogeneous) equations of VV is also a system of (homogeneous) equations of V′V' when we allow the variables to take complex values.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.