Bourbaki

Example 3

Tag 0C4W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C4W].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 3. Metrizable groups, valued fields, normed spaces and algebras

The set B(X;K)\mathscr{B}(X; K) of all functions ff on a set XX with values in a non-discrete valued field KK, such that x→∣f(x)∣x \to |f(x)| is bounded on XX, is an algebra over KK; the norm ∥f∥=sup⁡x∈X∣f(x)∣\|f\| = \sup_{x \in X} |f(x)| is compatible with the ring structure of B(X;K)\mathscr{B}(X; K), because we have ∥fg∥≤∥f∥⋅∥g∥\|fg\| \leq \|f\|\cdot\|g\| (cf. Chapter X, § 1).

Let aa be a closed two-sided ideal in a normed algebra AA. If in the quotient algebra A/aA/a we put ∣∣x˙∣∣=inf⁡x∈X∣∣x∣∣||\dot{x}|| = \inf_{x \in X} ||x||, we get a norm on A/aA/a which defines the topology which is the quotient by aa of the topology of AA (Proposition 9); since this quotient topology is compatible with the quotient ring structure of A/aA/a (Chapter III, § 6, no. 4) it follows that the quotient algebra A/aA/a, with the norm ∣∣x∣∣||x||, is a normed algebra.

Likewise, if (Ai)1≤i≤n(A_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is a family of nn normed algebras over a valued field KK, and if in the product algebra A=∏i=1nAiA = \prod_{i=1}^n A_i we put ∣∣x∣∣=sup⁡i∣∣xi∣∣||x|| = \sup_i ||x_i||, where x=(xi)x = (x_i), we have a norm on AA which defines the product of the topologies of the AiA_i (Proposition 10); since this topology is compatible with the ring structure of AA (Chapter III, § 6, no. 4), it follows that the product algebra AA, with the norm ∣∣x∣∣||x||, is a normed algebra.

Let AA be a normed algebra over a valued field KK. The completion A^\hat{A} of AA (Chapter III, § 6, no. 5, Proposition 6) is also endowed with a K^\hat{K}-vector space structure (no. 3, Proposition 8), and it is clear from the principle of extension of identities that we have t(xy)=(tx)y=x(ty)t(xy) = (tx)y = x(ty) for all t∈K^t \in \hat{K} and all x,y∈A^x, y \in \hat{A}. Hence A^\hat{A} is an algebra over K^\hat{K}; on the other hand (no. 3, Proposition 8), the norm on AA extends by continuity to a norm which defines the topology of A^\hat{A}, and therefore A^\hat{A}, endowed with this norm, is a normed algebra over the field K^\hat{K}.

If (xλ)λ∈L(x_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} and (yμ)μ∈M(y_\mu)_{\mu \in M} are two absolutely summable families in a normed algebra AA, the family (xλyμ)(λ,μ)∈L×M(x_\lambda y_\mu)_{(\lambda, \mu) \in L \times M} is absolutely summable, because ∣∣xλyμ∣∣≤∣∣xλ∣∣⋅∣∣yμ∣∣||x_\lambda y_\mu|| \leq ||x_\lambda|| \cdot ||y_\mu|| (Chapter IV, § 7, no. 3, Proposition 1); if in addition AA is complete, all three families are summable and we have

∑(λ,μ)∈L×Mxλyμ=(∑λ∈Lxλ)(∑μ∈Myμ) \sum_{(\lambda, \mu) \in L \times M} x_\lambda y_\mu = \left( \sum_{\lambda \in L} x_\lambda \right) \left( \sum_{\mu \in M} y_\mu \right)
by the associativity of the sum on the left-hand side (Chapter III, § 5, no. 3, formula (2)).

If the normed algebra AA has an identity element e≠0e \neq 0, the mapping t→tet \to te is an isomorphism of the field structure of KK onto that of the subfield KeKe of AA; this isomorphism is also an isomorphism of the topological field structure of KK onto that of KeKe (the topology of the latter being induced by that of AA), for the restriction ∣∣te∣∣||te|| of the norm of AA to KeKe is a norm equivalent to the absolute value

∣t∣=1∣∣e∣∣∣∣te∣∣. |t| = \frac{1}{||e||} ||te||.
If ∣∣e∣∣=1||e|| = 1 we have ∣∣te∣∣=∣t∣||te|| = |t|, and we can then identify the valued field KK with the normed subfield KeKe of AA, and in particular we may denote the identity element of AA by the symbol 1.

In what follows we shall be concerned only with normed algebras which have an identity element ee, and in which the norm satisfies the inequality (5); putting x=y=ex = y = e in this inequality, it follows that ∣∣e∣∣≥1||e|| \geq 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.