Bourbaki

Theorem 4 (Alexandroff)

Tag 0B8U, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B8U].

General Topology, chapter I, § 9. Compact spaces and locally compact spaces

If XX is any locally compact space, there exists a compact space X′X' and a homeomorphism ff of XX onto the complement of a point in X′X'. Furthermore, if X1′X'_1 is another compact space such that there is a homeomorphism f1f_1 of XX onto the complement of a point in X1′X'_1, then there is a unique homeomorphism gg of X′X' onto X1′X'_1 such that f1=g∘ff_1 = g \circ f.

Let us begin by proving the second assertion of the theorem. Let

f(X)=X′−{ω}andf1(X)=X1′−{ω1}. f(X) = X' - \{ \omega \} \quad \text{and} \quad f_1(X) = X'_1 - \{ \omega_1 \}.
If the homeomorphism gg exists it must be unique, for by definition we have g(x′)=f1(f‾(x′))g(x') = f_1(\overline{f}(x')) if x′≠ωx' \neq \omega and therefore g(ω)=ω1g(\omega) = \omega_1. It remains to show that the bijection g:X′→X1′g : X' \to X'_1 thus defined is bicontinuous; since X′X' and X1′X'_1 are interchangeable we need only show that the image under gg of a neighbourhood of a point x′∈X′x' \in X' is a neighbourhood of g(x′)g(x') in X1′X'_1. This is obvious from the definition of gg if x′≠ωx' \neq \omega. If x′=ωx' = \omega, let V′V' be an open neighbourhood of ω\omega in X′X'; then X′−V′=KX' - V' = K is closed in X′X' and therefore compact (no. 3, Proposition 3) and is contained in f(X)f(X); hence g(K)=f1(f‾(K))g(K) = f_1(\overline{f}(K)) is compact (no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1). It follows that g(V′)=X1′−g(K)g(V') = X'_1 - g(K) is an open neighbourhood of ω1\omega_1 (no. 3, Proposition 4). Hence gg is a homeomorphism.

To prove the first part of the theorem, let X′X' be a set which is the sum of XX and a set consisting of a single point ω\omega. We define a topology on X′X' by taking the set O\mathscr{O} of open subsets of X′X' to consist of all open subsets of XX and all subsets of the form (X−K)∪{ω}(X - K) \cup \{ \omega \}, where KK is a compact subset of XX. Since any intersection of compact subsets of XX is compact (no. 3, Propositions 3 and 4) and since any closed subset of a compact set is compact (no. 3, Proposition 3), it follows that D\mathfrak{D} satisfies axiom (OI)(O_I); and since any finite union of compact subsets of XX is compact (no. 3, Proposition 5), D\mathfrak{D} also satisfies (OII)(O_{II}). Every compact subset of XX is closed in XX (no. 3, Proposition 4) and therefore the topology induced on XX by that of X′X' is the original topology on XX. Thus it remains to show that X′X' is compact. In the first place, X′X' is Hausdorff. For if x,yx, y are any two distinct points of XX, they have disjoint open neighbourhoods V,WV, W respectively in XX, and V,WV, W are open in X′X'; on the other hand each x∈Xx \in X has a compact neighbourhood KK in XX, which is also a neighbourhood of xx in X′X', while

(X−K)∪{ω} (X - K) \cup \{ \omega \}

is a neighbourhood of ω\omega in X′X' and manifestly does not meet KK. Finally, X′X' is quasi-compact. Let (Uλ)λ∈L(U_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} be an open covering of X′X'; then for at least one index μ∈L\mu \in L we have Uμ=(X−Kμ)∪{ω}U_\mu = (X - K_\mu) \cup \{ \omega \} where KμK_\mu is a compact subset of XX. Hence there is a finite subset HH of LL such that the sets UλU_\lambda (for λ∈H\lambda \in H) cover KμK_\mu; if J=H∪{μ}J = H \cup \{ \mu \}, then (Uλ)λ∈J(U_\lambda)_{\lambda \in J} is a finite open covering of X′X', and the proof is complete.

Notice that if XX is already compact, then ω\omega is an isolated point of the compact space X′X'; hence X′X' is the sum (§\S 2, no. 4, Example 3) of the space XX and the space {ω}\{ \omega \}.

When a compact space X′X' has been constructed as above from a locally compact space XX by adjoining an element ω\omega, it is often said that ω\omega is the "point at infinity" of X′X', and that X′X' is obtained from XX by adjoining a point at infinity. X′X' is also called the Alexandroff compactification or the one-point compactification of the locally compact space XX.

\* Example. If we apply Alexandroff's theorem to the real plane R2\mathbf{R}^2, we get a compact space homeomorphic to the sphere S2S_2 whose equation is x12+x22+x32=1x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 = 1 in R3\mathbf{R}^3. A homeomorphism of these two spaces may be described as follows: the point ω\omega (the point at infinity) adjoined to R2\mathbf{R}^2 is mapped to (0,0,1)∈S2(0, 0, 1) \in S_2, and every point (x1,x2)(x_1, x_2) of R2\mathbf{R}^2 is mapped to the point where the line joining the points (0,1,1)(0, 1, 1) and (x1,x2,0)(x_1, x_2, 0) in R3\mathbf{R}^3 meets S2S_2 again. This homeomorphism is known as stereographic projection.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.