Theorem 2
Tag 01A2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01A2].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 2. Maximal tori of compact Lie groups
Let G be a connected compact Lie group.
a) The Lie algebras of the maximal tori of G are the Cartan subalgebras of L(G).
b) Let and be two maximal tori of G. There exists such that .
c) G is the union of its maximal tori.
Let be a Cartan subalgebra of L(G); the integral subgroup of G whose Lie algebra is is closed (Chap. VII, §2, no. 1, Cor. 4 of Prop. 4) and commutative (Th. 1), and hence is a torus of G. If T is a maximal torus of G, its Lie algebra is commutative, hence is contained in a Cartan subalgebra of L(G) (Th. 1). It follows that the maximal tori of G are exactly the integral subgroups of G associated to the Cartan subalgebras of L(G), hence a). Assertion b) follows from Th. 1, since the canonical homomorphism Int(L(G)) is surjective (Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Cor. 4 of Prop. 10).
Denote by X the union of the maximal tori of G, and let T be a maximal torus of G. The continuous map from to G has image X, which is therefore closed in G; thus, to prove c), it suffices to prove that X is open in G; since X is invariant under inner automorphisms, it suffices to show that, for all is a neighbourhood of . We argue by induction on the dimension of G and distinguish two cases:
is not central in G. Let H be the identity component of the centralizer of in G; this is a connected compact subgroup of G distinct from G, which contains T, and hence . Since Ad is semi-simple (§1, no. 1), the Lie algebra of H is the nilspace of Ad ; it now follows from Chap. VII, §4, no. 2, Prop. 4, that the union Y of the conjugates of H is a neighbourhood of . By the induction hypothesis, , and hence ; thus, X is a neighbourhood of .
is central in G. It suffices to prove that exp belongs to X for all in L(G). Now every element of L(G) belongs to a Cartan subalgebra of G (Th. 1); the corresponding integral subgroup contains exp ; since it is conjugate to T, it contains and hence exp , as required.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- § 2. Maximal tori of compact Lie groups
- Exercise 10, § 2
- Exercise 9, § 2
- Remark 3, § 2
- Proposition 5, § 2
- Proposition 9, § 2
- Corollary 8, § 2
- Definition 1, § 4
- Corollary, § 4
- Corollary, § 4
- § 5. Conjugacy classes
- Corollary 3, § 5
Cites
- Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Cor. 4 of Prop. 10 not in this corpus
- §1, no. 1
- Th. 1
- Chap. VII, §2, no. 1, Cor. 4 of Prop. 4
- Chap. VII, §4, no. 2, Prop. 4