Bourbaki

§ 3. Sheaves

1. Sheaves of sets

Let B be a topological space.

Definition 1 01NS

A presheaf on B, relative to a basis B\mathscr{B} of the topology of B, is a projective system of sets, relative to the set of indices B\mathscr{B} ordered by the inclusion relation.

In other words (E, III, p. 52), a presheaf F\mathscr{F} on B relative to B\mathscr{B} is a pair ((F(U))U∈B,(fUV))((\mathscr{F}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}},(f_{UV})), which is also denoted by (F(U),fUV)(\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}), where ((F(U))U∈B((\mathscr{F}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a family of sets having B\mathscr{B} as set of indices and where for each pair (U,V)(U,V) of elements of B\mathscr{B} such that U⊂V,fUVU\subset V,f_{UV} is a mapping of F(V)\mathscr{F}(V) into F(U)\mathscr{F}(U), these mappings satisfying the following conditions:

(PF1_1) The relations U⊂V⊂WU\subset V\subset W imply fUW=fUV∘fVWf_{UW}=f_{UV}\circ f_{VW};

(PF2_2) For every open set U ∈B,fUU\in \mathscr{B},f_{UU} is the identity mapping of

F(U) \mathscr{F}(U)

A presheaf on B relative to the set of open subsets of B is simply called a presheaf on B.

Let F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) be a presheaf on B, relative to a basis B\mathscr{B} of the topology of B. Let U be an element of the basis B\mathscr{B}. The elements of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) are called the sections of F\mathscr{F} over U. If V is an element of the basis B\mathscr{B} containing U and ss an element of F(V)\mathscr{F}(V), the element fUV(s)f_{UV}(s) of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) is called the restriction of ss to U. If there is no danger of ambiguity concerning the mappings fUVf_{UV}, the restriction of ss to U will be denoted by s∣Us|U.

Let B′B' be an open subset of B and B′\mathscr{B}' a basis of the topology of B′B' such that B′⊂B\mathscr{B}'\subset \mathscr{B}. The presheaf on B′B', relative to B′\mathscr{B}', deduced from F\mathscr{F} by restriction, is called the restriction of F\mathscr{F} to B′\mathscr{B}' and denoted by F∣B′\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}', the projective system ((F(U))U∈B′,(fUV))((\mathscr{F}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}'},(f_{UV})) deduced from F\mathscr{F} by restriction to B′\mathscr{B}' of the set of indices (loc. cit.). When F\mathscr{F} is a presheaf on B and B′\mathscr{B}' is the set of open subsets of B′B', the presheaf F∣B′\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}' is also denoted by F∣B′\mathscr{F}|B' and called the presheaf deduced from F\mathscr{F} by restriction to B′B'.

Definition 2 01NT

Let F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) be a presheaf on B. One says that F\mathscr{F} is a sheaf on B if, for every open subset U of B and every family (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} of open subsets of B, with union U, the following properties are satisfied:

(F1)(F_1) The mapping (fUiU)i∈I:F(U)→∏i∈IF(Ui)(f_{U_iU})_{i\in I}:\mathscr{F}(U)\rightarrow \prod_{i\in I}\mathscr{F}(U_i) is injective ;

(F2)(F_2) For every family (si)∈∏i∈IF(Ui)(s_i)\in \prod_{i\in I}\mathscr{F}(U_i) such that f(Ui∩Uj)Ui(si)=f_{(U_i\cap U_j)U_i}(s_i) =

f(Ui∩Uj)Uj(sj)f_{(U_i\cap U_j)U_j}(s_j) for every pair (i,j)∈I×I(i, j)\in I\times I, there exists an element ss

of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) such that for every i∈Ii\in I, one has fUiU(s)=sif_{U_iU}(s) =s_i.

Remark 01NU

Let F\mathscr{F} be a presheaf on B. For every open set U of B, f∅Uf_{\emptyset U} is a map of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) into F(∅)\mathscr{F}(\emptyset ), hence F(∅)\mathscr{F}(\emptyset ) is not empty as soon as there exists an open set U for which F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) is not empty. If F\mathscr{F} is a sheaf, F(∅)\mathscr{F}(\emptyset ) is a one-element set; this is seen by applying (F1)(F_1) and (F2)(F_2) to the covering of the empty set by the empty family (I=∅I =\emptyset ).

Let F\mathscr{F} be a sheaf on B and let B′B' be an open subset of B; the presheaf F∣B′\mathscr{F}|B' deduced from F\mathscr{F} by restriction to B′B' is a sheaf, called the sheaf deduced from F\mathscr{F} by restriction to B′B'.

2. Subsheaves of a Sheaf

Let B be a topological space. Let F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) be a presheaf on B, relative to a basis B\mathscr{B} of the topology of B.

Suppose given, for every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, a subset L(U)\mathscr{L}(U) of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U). If one has fUV(L(V))⊂L(U)f_{UV}(\mathscr{L}(V))\subset \mathscr{L}(U) for every pair (U,V)(U,V) of elements of B\mathscr{B} such that U⊂VU\subset V, the pair L=((L(U))U∈B,(fUV′))\mathscr{L}= ((\mathscr{L}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}},(f'_{UV})), where fUV′:L(V)→L(U)f'_{UV}:\mathscr{L}(V)\rightarrow \mathscr{L}(U) is the map deduced from fUVf_{UV}, is a presheaf. Such a presheaf is called a sub-presheaf of F\mathscr{F}. Since the maps fUV′f'_{UV} are determined by the given presheaf F\mathscr{F} and the family (L(U))U∈B(\mathscr{L}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}}, one also says, by abuse of language, that the family (L(U))U∈B(\mathscr{L}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a sub-presheaf of F\mathscr{F}.

Suppose now that F\mathscr{F} is a sheaf on B and let, for every open subset U of B,L(U),\mathscr{L}(U), a subset of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U). In order that (L(U))U∈B(\mathscr{L}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}} be a sub-presheaf of F\mathscr{F}, and that this presheaf be a sheaf, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied:

(F) Let (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} be a family of open sets of B, U its union, and ss an

element of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U). In order that ss belong to L(U)\mathscr{L}(U), it is necessary and

sufficient that for every ii in I,fUiU(s),f_{U_iU}(s) belong to L(Ui)\mathscr{L}(U_i).

Indeed, if condition (F) is satisfied, one has fUV(L(V))⊂L(U)f_{UV}(\mathscr{L}(V))\subset \mathscr{L}(U) for every pair (U,V)(U,V) of open sets of B such that U⊂VU\subset V and the properties (F1)(F_1) and (F2)(F_2) relative to the subpresheaf (L(U))(\mathscr{L}(U)) result from the analogous properties relative to the sheaf F\mathscr{F}. The converse is immediate.

When condition (F) is satisfied, one says that (L(U))(\mathscr{L}(U)) is a subsheaf of the sheaf F\mathscr{F}.

3. Examples of sheaves

Let B be a topological space.

1) Sheaves of mappings

Let X be a set. For every open set U of B, denote by F(U;X)\mathscr{F}(U; X) the set of mappings from U into X (E, II, p. 31). For every pair (U,V)(U,V) of open sets of B such that U⊂VU\subset V, let rUV:F(V;X)→r_{UV}:\mathscr{F}(V; X)\rightarrow F(U;X)\mathscr{F}(U; X) be the restriction mapping f↦f∣Uf\mapsto f|U. It is clear that the pair (F(U;X),rUV)(\mathscr{F}(U; X), r_{UV}) is a sheaf on B. It is called the sheaf on B of mappings with values in X, and is denoted by F(B;X)\mathscr{F}(B; X).

2) Sheaves of continuous mappings

Let X be a topological space. For every open set U of B, let C(U;X)\mathscr{C}(U; X) be the set of continuous mappings from U into X. Then, (C(U;X))(\mathscr{C}(U; X)) is a subsheaf of the sheaf F(B;X)\mathscr{F}(B; X) by prop. 4 of TG, I, p. 19. The sheaf thus obtained is denoted by C(B;X)\mathscr{C}(B; X) and called the sheaf on B of continuous mappings with values in X. In the particular case where X is endowed with the discrete topology, the sheaf C(B;X)\mathscr{C}(B; X) takes the name of sheaf on B of locally constant mappings with values in X.

3) Sheaves of continuous sections

Let E be a topological space and let p:E→Bp: E\rightarrow B be a continuous mapping. For every open set U of B, denote by S(U;p)\mathscr{S}(U;p) (or S(U;E)\mathscr{S}(U; E) when there is no possible confusion) the set of continuous sections of pp above U. The family (S(U;p))(\mathscr{S}(U;p)) is a subsheaf of the sheaf C(B;E)\mathscr{C}(B; E). The sheaf thus obtained is denoted by S(B;E)\mathscr{S}(B; E) or simply S(E)\mathscr{S}(E) and called the sheaf on B of continuous sections of the B-space (E,p)(E, p). We shall see in noo6^o6 below that every sheaf on B is isomorphic to the sheaf on B of continuous sections of an étalé B-space.

4) Sheaves of B-morphisms

Let (E,p)(E, p) and (E′,p′)(E', p') be B-spaces. For every open set U of E, denote by CB(U;E′)\mathscr{C}_B(U; E') the set of B-morphisms from (U,p∣U)(U, p|U) into (E′,p′)(E', p'). The family (CB(U;E′))(\mathscr{C}_B(U; E')) is a subsheaf of the sheaf C(E;E′)\mathscr{C}(E; E'). The sheaf thus obtained is denoted by CB(E;E′)\mathscr{C}_B(E; E') and called the sheaf on E of B-morphisms with values in (E′,p′)(E', p'). When (E,p)(E, p) is equal to (B(B, IdB)_B), this sheaf is the sheaf S(B;E)\mathscr{S}(B; E) of example 3.

For every open set U of B, let M(U)\mathscr{M}(U) be the set of U-morphisms

from p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U) into (−p′1)(U)(^-{p'}^1)(U). For every pair (U,V)(U,V) of open sets of B such that U⊂VU\subset V, let mUV:M(V)→M(U)m_{UV}:\mathscr{M}(V)\rightarrow \mathscr{M}(U) be the mapping which to a V-morphism

f:p−1(V)→(−p′1)(V)f:\overset{-1}{p}(V)\rightarrow (^-{p'}^1)(V) associates the U-morphism from p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U) into (−p′1)(U)(^-{p'}^1)(U) deduced from ff by passing to the subsets. Then (M(U),mUV)(\mathscr{M}(U), m_{UV}) is a sheaf on B. It is denoted by M\mathscr{M}orB(E;E′)_B(E; E') and is called the sheaf on B of B-morphisms from (E,p)(E, p) into (E′,p′)(E', p').

For every open set U of B, let I\mathscr{I}s(U) be the subset of M(U)\mathscr{M}(U)

consisting of the U-isomorphisms of p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U) into (−p′1)(U)(^-{p'}^1)(U). The family (I(\mathscr{I}s(U)) is a sub-sheaf of the sheaf M\mathscr{M}orB(E;E′)_B(E; E') of morphisms from (E,p)(E, p) into (E′,p′)(E', p'). The sheaf thus obtained is denoted I\mathscr{I}somB(E;E′)_B(E; E') and is called the sheaf on B of B-isomorphisms from (E,p)(E, p) into (E′,p′)(E', p').

5) Sheaves of mappings of class CrC^r

Let X and Y be manifolds of class CrC^r over a field K (the conventions concerning K and rr being those of VAR, R). For every open set U of X, let Cr(U;Y)\mathscr{C}^r(U; Y) be the set of morphisms of class CrC^r from U into Y. The family (Cr(U;Y))(\mathscr{C}^r(U; Y)) is a sub-sheaf of the sheaf C(X;Y)\mathscr{C}(X; Y). The sheaf thus obtained is denoted Cr(X;Y)\mathscr{C}^r(X; Y) and is called the sheaf on X of mappings of class CrC^r with values in Y (cf. VAR, R, 5.4.2).

6) Sheaves of subspaces

If U and V are open sets of B such that U⊂VU\subset V, denote by iUV:P(V)→i_{UV}:\mathfrak{P}(V)\rightarrow P(U)\mathfrak{P}(U) the mapping which, to a subset A of V, associates A∩UA\cap U. The pair (P(U),iUV)(\mathfrak{P}(U), i_{UV}) is a sheaf, called the sheaf of subspaces of B and denoted P(B)\mathfrak{P}(B). Indeed, if X denotes the set {0;1}\{0; 1\}, the mapping which associates to every subset A of U its characteristic function φAU:U→X\varphi^U_A: U\rightarrow X is a bijection of P(U)\mathfrak{P}(U) onto F(U;X)\mathscr{F}(U; X) (E, III, p. 38) ; moreover, if U and V are open sets such that U⊂VU\subset V, for every subset A of V,φA∩UU,\varphi^U_{A\cap U} is the restriction to U of φAV\varphi^V_A so that P(B)\mathfrak{P}(B) is identified with the sheaf on B of mappings with values in X.

Let, for every open set U of B,L(U),\mathscr{L}(U) be a subset of P(U)\mathfrak{P}(U). In order that (L(U))(\mathscr{L}(U)) be a sub-sheaf of P(B)\mathfrak{P}(B), it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied:

(F′)(F') Let (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} be a family of open sets of B, U its union, and A a

subset of U ; in order that A belong to L(U)\mathscr{L}(U), it is necessary and

sufficient that for every ii in I, A∩UiA\cap U_i belong to L(Ui)\mathscr{L}(U_i).

For example, if L(U)\mathscr{L}(U) is the set of closed subsets of U, condition (F′)(F') is satisfied.

7) Products of sheaves

Let B\mathscr{B} be a basis of the topology of B and let I be a set. For every i∈Ii\in I, let Fi=(Fi(U),fi,UV)\mathscr{F}_i= (\mathscr{F}_i(U), f_{i,UV}) be a presheaf on B relative to the basis B\mathscr{B}. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, put F(U)=∏i∈IFi(U)\mathscr{F}(U) =\prod_{i\in I}\mathscr{F}_i(U), and for every pair (U,V)(U,V) of elements of B\mathscr{B} such that U⊂VU\subset V, denote by fUVf_{UV} the mapping (fi,UV)i∈I:F(V)→F(U)(f_{i,UV})_{i\in I}:\mathscr{F}(V)\rightarrow \mathscr{F}(U). Then (F(U),fUV)(\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) is a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B} called the product presheaf of the family (Fi)(\mathscr{F}_i) and denoted ∏i∈IFi\prod_{i\in I}\mathscr{F}_i. It is a sheaf if for every i∈I,Fii\in I,\mathscr{F}_i is a sheaf.

4. Morphisms of presheaves

Definition 3 01NV

Let B be a topological space, B\mathscr{B} a basis of the topology of B,F=(F(U),fUV),\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) and G=(G(U),gUV)\mathscr{G}= (\mathscr{G}(U), g_{UV}) presheaves on B relative to B\mathscr{B}. A morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} to G\mathscr{G} is called a projective system of mappings from F\mathscr{F} to G\mathscr{G}.

In other words (E, III, p. 54), a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} to G\mathscr{G} is a family (φU)U∈B(\varphi_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}} such that :

(MPF1_1) For every open set U belonging to B,φU\mathscr{B},\varphi_U is a mapping

from F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) into G(U)\mathscr{G}(U) ;

(MPF2_2) For every pair (U,V)(U,V) of open sets belonging to B\mathscr{B} such that

U⊂VU\subset V, one has φU∘fUV=gUV∘φV\varphi_U\circ f_{UV}=g_{UV}\circ \varphi_V.

When F\mathscr{F} and G\mathscr{G} are sheaves, a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} to G\mathscr{G} is also called a morphism of sheaves. If F\mathscr{F} and G\mathscr{G} are presheaves on B relative to B\mathscr{B}, the morphisms of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} to G\mathscr{G} constitute a set denoted Mor(F;G\mathscr{F};\mathscr{G}). Instead of saying : “let φ\varphi be a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} to G\mathscr{G}”, one will often say “let φ:F→G\varphi :\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} be a morphism of presheaves”.

Let F,G,H\mathscr{F},\mathscr{G},\mathscr{H} be presheaves on B relative to B\mathscr{B} and let φ:F→G\varphi :\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G}, ψ:G→H\psi :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \mathscr{H} be morphisms of presheaves. The family (ψU∘φU)U∈B(\psi_U\circ \varphi_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} into H\mathscr{H} which is denoted by ψ∘φ\psi \circ \varphi. The family (IdF(U)_{\mathscr{F}(U)})U∈B_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} into itself which is denoted by IdF_{\mathscr{F}}.

For a morphism of presheaves φ=(φU):F→G\varphi = (\varphi_U):\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} to be an isomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every open subset U of B,φU\mathscr{B},\varphi_U be a bijection from F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) onto G(U)\mathscr{G}(U). It is equivalent to saying that there exists a morphism of presheaves ψ:G→F\psi :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \mathscr{F} such that ψ∘φ=\psi \circ \varphi = IdF_{\mathscr{F}} and φ∘ψ=\varphi \circ \psi = IdG_{\mathscr{G}}.

Let F\mathscr{F} and G\mathscr{G} be presheaves on B, relative to a base B\mathscr{B} of the topology of B, let B′B' be an open subset of B and let B′\mathscr{B}' be a base of the topology of B′B' such that B′⊂B\mathscr{B}'\subset \mathscr{B}. Let φ=(φU)U∈B\varphi = (\varphi_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}} be a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} into G\mathscr{G}. Then (φU)U∈B′(\varphi_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}'} is a morphism of presheaves from F∣B′\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}' into G∣B′\mathscr{G}|\mathscr{B}', which is denoted by φ∣B′\varphi |\mathscr{B}'. When B\mathscr{B} is the set of open subsets of B and B′\mathscr{B}' the set of open subsets of B′,φ∣B′B',\varphi |\mathscr{B}' is a morphism of presheaves from F∣B′\mathscr{F}|B' into G∣B′\mathscr{G}|B' and is also denoted by φ∣B′\varphi |B'.

Example 1 01NW

Let B be a topological space, let (E,p)(E, p) and (E′,p′)(E', p') be B-spaces and let f:E→E′f: E\rightarrow E' be a B-morphism. For every open subset U of B, define the mapping fU:S(U;E)→S(U;E′)f_U:\mathscr{S}(U; E)\rightarrow \mathscr{S}(U; E') by fU(s)=f_U(s) = f∘sf\circ s. The family S(f)=(fU)\mathscr{S}(f) = (f_U) is a morphism of presheaves from S(B;E)\mathscr{S}(B; E) into S(B;E′)\mathscr{S}(B; E'). If (E′′,p′′)(E'', p'') is a B-space and g:E′→E′′g: E'\rightarrow E'' is a B-morphism, one has S(g∘f)=S(g)∘S(f)\mathscr{S}(g\circ f) =\mathscr{S}(g)\circ \mathscr{S}(f).

Example 2 01NX

Let B be a topological space, B\mathscr{B} a basis of the topology of B, F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B} and L=(L(U))\mathscr{L}= (\mathscr{L}(U)) a subpresheaf of F\mathscr{F}. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, denote by iUi_U the canonical injection of L(U)\mathscr{L}(U) into F(U)\mathscr{F}(U). Then i=(iU)U∈Bi= (i_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a morphism of presheaves from L\mathscr{L} into F\mathscr{F}. We say that ii is the canonical morphism from L\mathscr{L} into F\mathscr{F}.

Example 3 01NY

Let B be a topological space, B\mathscr{B} a basis of the topology of B and I a set. For every i∈Ii\in I, let Fi=(Fi(U),fi,UV)\mathscr{F}_i= (\mathscr{F}_i(U), f_{i,UV}) be a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B}. Denote by F\mathscr{F} the product presheaf of the family (Fi)i∈I(\mathscr{F}_i)_{i\in I}. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, one has F(U)=∏i∈IFi(U)\mathscr{F}(U) =\prod_{i\in I}\mathscr{F}_i(U); for every i∈Ii\in I, denote by pri,U:F(U)→Fi(U)_{i,U}:\mathscr{F}(U)\rightarrow \mathscr{F}_i(U) the projection of index ii. It follows immediately from the definition of the presheaf F\mathscr{F} that the family pri_i = (pri,U_{i,U})U∈B_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} into Fi\mathscr{F}_i. The morphism pri_i is called the projection morphism of index ii. For every presheaf F′\mathscr{F}' on B relative to B\mathscr{B} and every family (ψi)i∈I(\psi_i)_{i\in I}, where ψi\psi_i is a morphism of presheaves from F′\mathscr{F}' into Fi\mathscr{F}_i, there exists a unique morphism of presheaves ψ:F′→F\psi :\mathscr{F}'\rightarrow \mathscr{F} such that for every i∈Ii\in I, pri∘ψ=ψi_i\circ \psi =\psi_i.

Example 4 01NZ

Let X be a differential manifold of class C∞C^{\infty} over R\mathbf{R} and let C∞(X;R)\mathscr{C}^{\infty}(X;\mathbf{R}) be the sheaf on X of numerical functions of class C∞C^{\infty}. If P is a differential operator with C∞C^{\infty} coefficients on X, the family of the restrictions of P to the open sets of X is a morphism of the sheaf C∞(X;R)\mathscr{C}^{\infty}(X;\mathbf{R}) into itself. One can prove that conversely, every R\mathbf{R}-linear morphism of the sheaf C∞(X;R)\mathscr{C}^{\infty}(X;\mathbf{R}) into itself is locally of this form (I, p. 142, exerc. 3).

5. Étale space associated with a presheaf

Let B be a topological space, B\mathscr{B} a basis of the topology of B and F=(F(U),rUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), r_{UV}) a presheaf on B relative to the basis B\mathscr{B}. Let L be the set of couples (U,s)(U, s) with U ∈B\in \mathscr{B} and s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U). Let XFX_{\mathscr{F}} denote the sum space of the family (U)(U,s)∈L(U)_{(U,s)\in L}. Thus XFX_{\mathscr{F}} is the set of triples (U,s,x)(U, s, x) where U∈B,s∈F(U),x∈UU\in \mathscr{B},s\in \mathscr{F}(U),x\in U. Let RFR_{\mathscr{F}} be the relation in the set XFX_{\mathscr{F}} defined by RF((U,s,x),(U′,s′,x′))R_{\mathscr{F}}((U, s, x),(U', s', x')) if and only if « xx = x′x' and there exists W ∈B\in \mathscr{B} such that x∈Wx\in W, W ⊂U∩U′\subset U\cap U' and rWU(s)=rWU′(s′)r_{WU}(s) =r_{WU'}(s') ». The relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}} is an equivalence relation in XF:X_{\mathscr{F}}: it is, by definition, reflexive and symmetric; let us prove that it is transitive. Let ξ=(U,s,x),ξ′=(U′,s′,x′)\xi = (U, s, x),\xi '= (U', s', x') and ξ′′\xi '' = (U′′,s′′,x′′)(U'', s'', x'') be elements of XFX_{\mathscr{F}} such that one has RF(ξ,ξ′)R_{\mathscr{F}}(\xi , \xi ') and RF(ξ′,ξ′′)R_{\mathscr{F}}(\xi ', \xi ''). We then have x=x′x=x' = x′′x'' and there exist two elements W′W' and W′′W'' of B\mathscr{B} containing xx such that W′⊂U∩U′,W′′⊂U′∩U′′,rW′U(s)=W'\subset U\cap U',W''\subset U'\cap U'',r_{W'U}(s) = rW′U′(s′),rW′′U′(s′)=rW′′U′′(s′′)r_{W'U'}(s'),r_{W''U'}(s') =r_{W''U''}(s''). Let W be an element of B\mathscr{B} containing xx and contained in W′∩W′′W'\cap W''. We then have W⊂U∩U′′W\subset U\cap U'',

rWU(s)=rWW′∘rW′U(s)=rWW′∘rW′U′(s′)=rWU′(s′) r_{WU}(s) =r_{WW'}\circ r_{W'U}(s) =r_{WW'}\circ r_{W'U'}(s') =r_{WU'}(s')

and, analogously, rWU′(s′)=rWU′′(s′′)r_{WU'}(s') =r_{WU''}(s''). Consequently, we have RF(ξ,ξ′′)R_{\mathscr{F}}(\xi , \xi '') and the relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}} is transitive.

Let EFE_{\mathscr{F}} denote the quotient set XF/RFX_{\mathscr{F}}/R_{\mathscr{F}} and [U,s,x][U, s, x] the canonical image in EFE_{\mathscr{F}} of an element (U,s,x)(U, s, x) of XFX_{\mathscr{F}}. For U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), let σF(U,s):U→EF\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s): U\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}} denote the mapping x↦[U,s,x]x\mapsto [U, s, x]. Endow the set EFE_{\mathscr{F}} with the quotient topology, that is, the finest topology for which the mappings σF(U,s)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s) for U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U) are continuous. The mapping pr3:XF→B_3: X_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow B defines, after passing to the quotient, a continuous mapping p:EF→Bp: E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow B : one has p([U,s,x])=xp([U, s, x]) =x.

Proposition 1 01O0

The mapping p:EF→p: E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow B is etale. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and every s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), the mapping σF(U,s)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s) is therefore a continuous section of pp over U.

Let λ=(U,s)\lambda = (U, s) and μ=(U′,s′)\mu= (U', s') be elements of L. By definition of the relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}}, the set AλμA_{\lambda \mu} of points xx of U∩U′U\cap U' at which σF(U,s)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s) and σF(U′,s′)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U', s') coincide is the interior in B, of the set of x∈U∩U′x\in U\cap U' such that s(x)=s′(x)s(x) =s'(x). It follows that Aμλ=AλμA_{\mu\lambda}= A_{\lambda \mu}. We then denote by hμλ:Aλμ→Aμλh_{\mu\lambda}: A_{\lambda \mu}\rightarrow A_{\mu\lambda} the mapping IdAλμ_{A_{\lambda \mu}}. The set EFE_{\mathscr{F}} is obtained by gluing together the open sets U along the AλμA_{\lambda \mu} by means of the bijections hμλh_{\mu\lambda} (TG, I, p. 16). By prop. 9 of TG, I, p. 17, the mapping σF(U,s)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s) induces a homeomorphism of U onto an open subset of EFE_{\mathscr{F}}. This proves that the mapping pp is etale (I, p. 33, prop 9).

For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and every s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), one has σF(U,s)(x)=\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s)(x) = [U,s,x][U, s, x] for every x∈Ux\in U. The second assertion therefore follows from the definition of pp.

Definition 4 01O1

The spread B-space (EF,p)(E_{\mathscr{F}}, p) defined above is called the spread B-space associated with the presheaf F\mathscr{F}. For x∈Bx\in B, the fibre of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} at xx is called the stalk of the presheaf F\mathscr{F} at xx and is denoted by Fx\mathscr{F}_x. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, every section s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U) of F\mathscr{F} over U and every point xx of U, the element [U,s,x][U, s, x] of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} is called the germ at xx of the section ss.

Let aa be a point of B. The set B(a)\mathscr{B}(a) of open sets U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} containing aa and ordered by the relation ⊃\supset is filtering. From F\mathscr{F} one deduces, by restriction of the set of indices to B(a)\mathscr{B}(a), an inductive system ((F(U))U∈B(a),(rUV))((\mathscr{F}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}(a)},(r_{UV})). By definition (E, III, p. 60), the inductive limit of this system is the quotient of the set of pairs (U,s)(U, s) such that a∈Ua\in U and s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U) by the equivalence relation R defined by R((U,s),(U′,s′))R((U, s),(U', s')) if and only if there exists W ∈B\in \mathscr{B} containing aa and contained in U∩U′U\cap U' and such that rWU(s)=rWU′(s′)r_{WU}(s) =r_{WU'}(s'). This limit is therefore identified with the stalk Fa\mathscr{F}_a of F\mathscr{F} at aa, by definition of inductive limits.

Let G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on B relative to the basis B\mathscr{B} and let φ=(φU)U∈B\varphi = (\varphi_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}} be a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} into G\mathscr{G}. The mapping (U,s,x)↦(U, s, x)\mapsto (U,φU(s),x)(U, \varphi_U(s), x) from XFX_{\mathscr{F}} into XGX_{\mathscr{G}} is compatible with the equivalence relations RFR_{\mathscr{F}} and RGR_{\mathscr{G}}, by definition of a morphism of presheaves. Let us denote by E(φ):EF→EGE(\varphi ): E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{G}} the mapping deduced from it by passing to the quotients. For every U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and every s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), we have

E(φ)∘σF(U,s)=σG(U,φU(s)) E(\varphi )\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s) =\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}(U, \varphi_U(s))

consequently, the mapping E(φ)E(\varphi ) is continuous. The mapping E(φ)E(\varphi ) is a B-morphism; it is said to be the B-morphism of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} into EGE_{\mathscr{G}} associated with the morphism of presheaves φ\varphi. For every a∈Ba\in B, by restriction to the fibres at aa, E(φ)E(\varphi ) defines a mapping of the stalk Fa\mathscr{F}_a of F\mathscr{F} into the stalk Ga\mathscr{G}_a of G\mathscr{G}; it is denoted by φa\varphi_a. It is also the inductive limit of the mappings φU\varphi_U (E, III, p. 63), where U ranges over the set B(a)\mathscr{B}(a) of open sets belonging to the base B\mathscr{B} and containing aa.

We have E(IdF_{\mathscr{F}}) == IdEF_{E_{\mathscr{F}}}.

Let H\mathscr{H} be a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B} and let ψ=(ψU)\psi = (\psi_U) be a morphism of presheaves from G\mathscr{G} into H\mathscr{H}. For [U,s,x]∈EF[U, s, x]\in E_{\mathscr{F}}, we have

E(ψ∘φ)([U,s,x])=[U,ψU∘φU(s),x] E(\psi \circ \varphi )([U, s, x]) = [U, \psi_U\circ \varphi_U(s), x]
=E(ψ)([U,φU(s),x]) = E(\psi )([U, \varphi_U(s), x])
=E(ψ)∘E(φ)([U,s,x]) = E(\psi )\circ E(\varphi )([U, s, x])

Consequently, we have E(ψ∘φ)=E(ψ)∘E(φ)E(\psi \circ \varphi ) = E(\psi )\circ E(\varphi ). In particular, if aa is a point of B, (ψ∘φ)a=ψa∘φa(\psi \circ \varphi )_a=\psi_a\circ \varphi_a.

If φ\varphi is an isomorphism, the same is true of E(φ)E(\varphi ).

Remark 01O2

Let F\mathscr{F} be a sheaf on B relative to the base B\mathscr{B}. Let B′B' be an open subset of B, let B′\mathscr{B}' be a basis of the topology of B′B' such that B′⊂B\mathscr{B}'\subset \mathscr{B}. Let F∣B′\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}' be the presheaf on B′B' relative to the base B′\mathscr{B}' deduced from F\mathscr{F} by restriction.

1) The set XF∣B′X_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'} is then a subset of XFX_{\mathscr{F}} and the equivalence relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}} induces in XF∣B′X_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'} the equivalence relation RF∣B′R_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'}. Hence one deduces a canonical injection ii of EF∣B′E_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'} into EFE_{\mathscr{F}}. Its image is p−1(B′)\overset{-1}{p}(B') since for every element [U,s,x][U, s, x] of p−1(B′)\overset{-1}{p}(B'), there exists an element V of B′\mathscr{B}' such that x∈Vx\in V and V⊂UV\subset U, and one has [U,s,x]=i([V,rVU(s),x])[U, s, x] =i([V, r_{VU}(s), x]). The mapping ii is continuous because the topology of XF∣B′X_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'} is the finest making continuous the mappings defined by x↦[U,s,x]x\mapsto [U, s, x], for U∈B′U\in \mathscr{B}' and s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U). By corollary 2 of Proposition 6 in I, p. 30, the canonical injection ii of EF∣B′E_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'} into EFE_{\mathscr{F}} induces a B′B'-isomorphism of EF∣B′E_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'} onto p−1(B′)\overset{-1}{p}(B').

In particular, when B′B' is equal to B,i:EF∣B′→EF,i: E_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}} is a B-isomorphism of étalé spaces.

2) Let G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on B relative to the base B\mathscr{B} and let φ:F→G\varphi :\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} be a morphism of presheaves. The family φ′=(φU)U∈B′\varphi '= (\varphi_U)_{U\in\mathscr{B}'} is a morphism of presheaves from F∣B′\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}' into G∣B′\mathscr{G}|\mathscr{B}'. The diagram

EF∣B′E(φ′)EG∣B′ E\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}'E(\varphi ')E\mathscr{G}|\mathscr{B}'
ii′ii'

EFE(φ)EGE_{\mathscr{F}}^{E(\varphi)}E_{\mathscr{G}} , where ii and i′i' are the canonical injections, is commutative.

Example 1 01O3

Let B be a topological space, B\mathscr{B} a base of the topology of B and F a set. Take for F\mathscr{F} the presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B} defined by F(U)=F\mathscr{F}(U) = F for every U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and rUVr_{UV} = IdF_F for every pair (U,V)(U,V) of elements of B\mathscr{B} such that U⊂VU\subset V. The mapping [U,s,x]↦(x,s(x))[U, s, x]\mapsto (x, s(x)) is a B-isomorphism of the B-space EFE_{\mathscr{F}} onto the B-space B×FB\times F where F is endowed with the discrete topology. It will be noted that when B\mathscr{B} is the set of open subsets of B, the presheaf F\mathscr{F} on B is a sheaf only if the set F is reduced to a point (cf. I, p. 43, remark).

Example 2 01O4

Let B be a topological space and (E,p)(E, p) a B-space. Let F\mathscr{F} be the sheaf on B of continuous sections of (E,p)(E, p). The mapping (U,s,x)↦s(x)(U, s, x)\mapsto s(x) of XFX_{\mathscr{F}} into E is compatible with the equivalence relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}}. The mapping e:EF→Ee: E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow E deduced from it by passing to the quotient is a B-morphism; the B-morphism ee is said to be canonical. The image of ee is the union of the images of the continuous sections of pp over the open sets of B. The mapping ee is therefore surjective if pp is etale (I, p. 33, prop. 9). On the other hand, the mapping ee is injective if and only if for every open set U of B and every pair (s,s′)(s, s') of continuous sections of pp on U, the set of points x∈Ux\in U such that s(x)=s′(x)s(x) =s'(x) is open; this is in particular the case if pp is etale (I, p. 34, prop. 11, b)). Consequently, if (E,p)(E, p) is an etale B-space, the mapping ee is a B-isomorphism.

Example 3 01O5

Let B be a topological space, B\mathscr{B} a base of the topology of B,F,\mathscr{F} a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B} and L\mathscr{L} a sub-presheaf of F\mathscr{F}. Then the set XLX_{\mathscr{L}} is contained in the set XFX_{\mathscr{F}} and the equivalence relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}} induces in XLX_{\mathscr{L}} the equivalence relation RLR_{\mathscr{L}}. The B-morphism E(i):EL→EFE(i): E_{\mathscr{L}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}} associated with the canonical morphism i:L→F(i:\mathscr{L}\rightarrow \mathscr{F}(I, p. 48, example 2) is therefore injective. Since ELE_{\mathscr{L}} and EFE_{\mathscr{F}} are etale B-spaces, the mapping E(i)E(i) is open and even etale (I, p. 30, cor. 1), and therefore induces a homeomorphism of ELE_{\mathscr{L}} onto an open subset of EFE_{\mathscr{F}}.

6. Sheaf associated with a presheaf

Let us retain the notation of No.o5^o5. The sheaf associated with the presheaf F\mathscr{F} is the sheaf S(B;EF)\mathscr{S}(B; E_{\mathscr{F}}) of continuous sections of the etale B-space EFE_{\mathscr{F}} associated with the presheaf F\mathscr{F}, and is denoted by F~\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, let σF(U):F(U)→F~(U)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U):\mathscr{F}(U)\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}}(U) denote the mapping which, to s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), associates the continuous section σF(U,s):x↦[U,s,x]\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s):x\mapsto [U, s, x] of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} over U. By definition of the equivalence relation RFR_{\mathscr{F}}, the family σF=(σF(U))U∈B\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}= (\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U))_{U\in\mathscr{B}} is a morphism of presheaves from F\mathscr{F} into the presheaf F~∣B\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}|\mathscr{B}. The morphism σF\sigma_{\mathscr{F}} is called the canonical morphism of F\mathscr{F} into F~∣B\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}|\mathscr{B}.

Let us denote by jF:EF→EFj_{\mathscr{F}}: E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}} the B-morphism composed of the canonical B-isomorphism EF∣B→EF(~IE_{\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}}\widetilde{(}I, p. 51) and the B-morphism E(σF):EF→E(\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}): E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow EF~∣BE_{\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}|\mathscr{B}}. Let us notes~\widetilde{s} on the other hand by eF:EF~→EFe_{\mathscr{F}}:E_{\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}} the canonical B-isomorphism (I, p. 52, example 2).

Proposition 2 01O6

The mapping jFj_{\mathscr{F}} is the inverse B-isomorphism of eFe_{\mathscr{F}}.

For U∈B,s∈F(U)U\in \mathscr{B},s\in \mathscr{F}(U) and x∈Ux\in U, one has by definition of jF:j_{\mathscr{F}}:

jF([U,s,x])=[U,σF(U,s),x] j_{\mathscr{F}}([U, s, x]) = [U, \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s), x]

whence eF(jF([U,s,x]))=σF(U,s)(x)=[U,s,x]e_{\mathscr{F}}(j_{\mathscr{F}}([U, s, x])) =\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s)(x) = [U, s, x]. This proves the proposition.

Corollary 01O7

For every a∈Ba\in B, the mapping (σF)a:Fa→F~a(\sigma_{\mathscr{F}})_a:\mathscr{F}_a\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}}_a is bijective.

Since jFj_{\mathscr{F}} is a B-isomorphism, the same is true of E(σF)E(\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}), and (σF)a(\sigma_{\mathscr{F}})_a is deduced from it by passing to the fibres at aa.

Let G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B} and let φ:F→G\varphi :\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} be a morphism of presheaves. One denotes by φ~:F~→G~\widetilde{\varphi}:\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} the morphism of sheaves SE(φ)(\mathscr{S}_{E(\varphi)}(I, p. 48, example 1), where E(φ):EF→EGE(\varphi ): E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{G}} is the B-morphism associated with φ\varphi. For every open set U∈BU\in \mathscr{B} and every s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), one has, by definition,

φ~U(σF(U,s))=E(φ)∘σF(U,s)=σG(U,φU(s)) \widetilde{\varphi}_U(\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s)) = E(\varphi )\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U, s) =\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}(U, \varphi_U(s))

One has therefore:

(1) φ~U∘σF(U)=σG(U)∘φU\widetilde{\varphi}_U\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(U) =\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}(U)\circ \varphi_U, for every U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}. In other words:

φ~∣B∘σF=σG∘φ(2) \widetilde{\varphi}|\mathscr{B}\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}=\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}\circ \varphi \tag{2}

Proposition 3 01O8

Let B be a topological space, let B\mathscr{B} be a basis of the topology of B, let F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) be a presheaf on B relative to B\mathscr{B}, let F~\widetilde{\mathscr{F}} be the associated sheaf and let σF:F→F~∣B\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}:\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}}|\mathscr{B} be the canonical morphism. Given a sheaf G=(G(U),gUV)\mathscr{G}= (\mathscr{G}(U), g_{UV}) on B and a morphism of presheaves φ:F→G∣B\varphi :\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G}|\mathscr{B}, there exists a unique morphism of sheaves ψ:F~→G\psi :\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} such that ψ∣B∘σF=φ\psi |\mathscr{B}\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}=\varphi.

Lemma 01O9

Let U be an open subset of B and s:U→EFs: U\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}} a continuous section of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} over U. For every point aa of U, there exist an open set V∈BV\in \mathscr{B} such that a∈Va\in V and V⊂UV\subset U, and an element vv of F(V)\mathscr{F}(V) such that s∣V=σF(V,v)s|V =\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(V, v).

Let a∈Ua\in U. By definition of the space EFE_{\mathscr{F}}, there exist an open set V′∈BV'\in \mathscr{B} such that a∈V′a\in V' and an element tt of F(V′)\mathscr{F}(V') such that s(a)=[V′,t,a]s(a) = [V', t, a]. Then ss and σF(V′,t)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(V', t) induce by restriction two continuous sections of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} over V′∩UV'\cap U which are equal at the point aa. By Prop. 11, b) of I, p. 34, there exists an open neighbourhood V of aa, contained in V′∩UV'\cap U, belonging to B\mathscr{B}, such that ss and σF(V′,t)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(V', t) are equal at every point of V. If we put v=fVV′(t)v=f_{VV'}(t), we indeed have s∣V=σF(V,v)s|V =\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(V, v).

Let us prove the proposition. For every open set U of B and every section s∈F~(U)s\in \widetilde{\mathscr{F}}(U), let us denote by D(U,s)D(U, s) the set of pairs (V,v)(V, v) such that V∈B,V⊂U,v∈F(U)V\in \mathscr{B},V\subset U,v\in \mathscr{F}(U) and s∣V=σF(V,v)s|V =\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(V, v). It follows from the lemma that these open sets V form a covering of U.

If there exists a morphism ψ:F~→G\psi :\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} such that ψ∣B∘σF=φ\psi |\mathscr{B}\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}=\varphi, then, for every open set U of B, every section s∈F~(U)s\in \widetilde{\mathscr{F}}(U) and every pair (V,v)∈D(U,s)(V, v)\in D(U, s), we have gVU(ψU(s))=ψV(s∣V)=φV(v)g_{VU}(\psi_U(s)) =\psi_V(s|V) =\varphi_V(v). This proves the uniqueness of ψ\psi by virtue of property (F1)(F_1) of sheaves.

Let U be an open set of B and ss an element of F~(U)\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}(U). Let (V,v)(V, v) and (V′,v′)(V', v') be elements of D(U,s)D(U, s). We have s(a)=[V,v,a]=[V′,v′,a]s(a) = [V, v, a] = [V', v', a] for every point a∈V∩V′a\in V\cap V'. There therefore exists a pair (W,w)∈D(V∩V′,s)(W, w)\in D(V\cap V', s) such that a∈Wa\in W and fWV(v)=fWV(v′)=wf_{WV}(v) =f_{WV}(v') =w. We then have

gW(V∩V′)∘g(V∩V′)V(φV(v))=gWV(φV(v))=φW(fWV(v))=φW(w) g_{W(V\cap V')}\circ g_{(V\cap V')V}(\varphi_V(v)) =g_{WV}(\varphi_V(v)) =\varphi_W(f_{WV}(v)) =\varphi_W(w)

and analogously,

gW(V∩V′)∘g(V∩V′)V′(φV′(v′))=φW(w) g_{W(V\cap V')}\circ g_{(V\cap V')V'}(\varphi_{V'}(v')) =\varphi_W(w)

whence

gW(V∩V′)∘g(V∩V′)V(φV(v))=gW(V∩V′)∘g(V∩V′)V′(φV′(v′)) g_{W(V\cap V')}\circ g_{(V\cap V')V}(\varphi_V(v)) =g_{W(V\cap V')}\circ g_{(V\cap V')V'}(\varphi_{V'}(v'))

By property (F1)(F_1) of sheaves, we therefore have

g(V∩V′)V(φV(v))=g(V∩V′)V′(φV′(v′)) g_{(V\cap V')V}(\varphi_V(v)) =g_{(V\cap V')V'}(\varphi_{V'}(v'))

By properties (F1)(F_1) and (F2)(F_2) of sheaves, there exists a unique element ψU(s)∈G(U)\psi_U(s)\in \mathscr{G}(U) such that one has:

(3) gVU(ψU(s))=φV(v)g_{VU}(\psi_U(s)) =\varphi_V(v) for every (V,v)∈D(u,s)(V, v)\in D(u, s).

Let ψU:F~(U)→G(U)\psi_U:\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}(U)\rightarrow \mathscr{G}(U) be the resulting mapping. It follows immediately from (3) that the family ψ=(ψU)\psi = (\psi_U) is a morphism of sheaves and that one has φV=ψV∘σF(V)\varphi_V=\psi_V\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(V) for every V∈BV\in \mathscr{B}.

Corollary 1 01OA

Let B be a topological space, F\mathscr{F} a presheaf on B,F~,\widetilde{\mathscr{F}} the associated sheaf and σF:F→F~\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}:\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}} the canonical morphism. For F\mathscr{F} to be a sheaf, it is necessary and sufficient that σF\sigma_{\mathscr{F}} be an isomorphism.

If σF\sigma_{\mathscr{F}} is an isomorphism, F\mathscr{F} is a sheaf. Conversely, if F\mathscr{F} is a sheaf, there exists by proposition 3 a morphism φ:F~→F\varphi :\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \mathscr{F} such that φ∘σF=\varphi \circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}= IdF_{\mathscr{F}}. Since IdF_{\mathscr{F}} is the unique morphism ψ:F~→F~\psi :\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}} such that ψ∘σF=σF\psi \circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}=\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}, one has therefore σ~F∘φ=\widetilde{\sigma}_{\mathscr{F}}\circ \varphi = IdF~_{\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}}.

Remark 01OB

Let B be a topological space, F\mathscr{F} a presheaf on B, G\mathscr{G} a sheaf on B and φ:F→G\varphi :\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} a morphism of presheaves. The canonical morphism σG:G→G~\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} is an isomorphism by corollary 1. By relation (2) of I, p. 54, the unique morphism ψ:F~→G\psi :\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \mathscr{G} such that ψ∘σF=φ\psi \circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}=\varphi is therefore σG−1∘φ~\sigma^{-1}_{\mathscr{G}}\circ \widetilde{\varphi}.

Corollary 2 01OC

Let B be a topological space, F\mathscr{F} and G\mathscr{G} sheaves on B and φ\varphi a morphism of sheaves from F\mathscr{F} into G\mathscr{G}. The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) φ\varphi is an isomorphism;

(ii) There exists a basis B\mathscr{B} of the topology of B such that for every U∈BU\in \mathscr{B}, the mapping φU\varphi_U is bijective;

(iii) For every point aa of B, the mapping φa\varphi_a is a bijection of the stalk Fa\mathscr{F}_a onto the stalk Ga\mathscr{G}_a.

The implication (i)⇒\Rightarrow(ii) is immediate.

(ii)⇒\Rightarrow(iii) : consider the commutative diagram (I, p. 51)

EF∣BE(φ∣B)EG∣B E\mathscr{F}|\mathscr{B}E(\varphi |\mathscr{B})E\mathscr{G}|\mathscr{B}
EFE(φ)EG E_{\mathscr{F}}^{E(\varphi)}E_{\mathscr{G}}

where the vertical arrows are the canonical B-isomorphisms. If condition (ii) is satisfied, E(φ∣B)E(\varphi |\mathscr{B}) is a B-isomorphism, hence E(φ)E(\varphi ) is also one. The mappings φa\varphi_a are deduced from E(φ)E(\varphi ) by passing to the fibres and are therefore bijective.

(iii)⇒\Rightarrow(i) : under assumption (iii), the mapping E(φ):EF→EGE(\varphi ): E_{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{G}} is a bijective B-morphism of étalé spaces and therefore is a B-isomorphism (I, p. 30, cor. 2 of prop. 6). Hence the morphism φ~:F~→G~\widetilde{\varphi}:\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} is an isomorphism. Since F\mathscr{F} and G\mathscr{G} are sheaves, the canonical morphisms σF:F→F~\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}:\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}} and σG:G→G~\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} are isomorphisms (corollary 1) and one has φ~∘σF=σG∘φ(\widetilde{\varphi}\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{F}}=\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}\circ \varphi (I, p. 54, relation (2)) hence φ\varphi is an isomorphism.

Scholium 01OD

Let B be a topological space. To every sheaf F\mathscr{F} on B, one associates an étalé B-space EFE_{\mathscr{F}} (I, p. 50, def. 4). To every étalé B-space T, one associates the sheaf S(T)\mathscr{S}(T) on B of its continuous sections (I, p. 45, example 3). A canonical isomorphism of sheaves σF:F→S(EF)\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}:\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \mathscr{S}(E_{\mathscr{F}}) has been defined (I, p. 55, cor. 1) and a canonical isomorphism of étalé B-spaces eT:ES(T)→Te_T: E_{\mathscr{S}(T)}\rightarrow T (I, p. 52, example 2).

For every pair (F,G)(\mathscr{F},\mathscr{G}) of sheaves on B, a mapping φ↦E(φ)\varphi \mapsto E(\varphi ) of the set of morphisms of sheaves from F\mathscr{F} into G\mathscr{G} into the set of B-morphisms from EFE_{\mathscr{F}} into EGE_{\mathscr{G}} has been defined (I, p. 50). One has the relations

E(IdF_{\mathscr{F}}) == IdEF,E(ψ∘φ)=E(ψ)∘E(φ)_{E_{\mathscr{F}}},E(\psi \circ \varphi ) = E(\psi )\circ E(\varphi ).

For every pair (T,U)(T,U) of étalé spaces over B, a mapping f↦S(f)f\mapsto \mathscr{S}(f) from the set of B-morphisms of T into U to the set of sheaf morphisms of S(T)\mathscr{S}(T) into S(U)\mathscr{S}(U) was defined (I, p. 48, Example 1). One has the relations

S\mathscr{S} (IdT_T) == IdS(T),S(g∘f)=S(g)∘S(f)_{\mathscr{S}(T)},\mathscr{S}(g\circ f) =\mathscr{S}(g)\circ \mathscr{S}(f).

With the preceding notation, the following diagrams are commutative:

FφGES(T)E(S(f))ES(U) \mathscr{F}^{\varphi}\mathscr{G}E_{\mathscr{S}(T)}^{E(\mathscr{S}(f))}E_{\mathscr{S}(U)}

(4) σFσG\sigma_{_{\mathscr{F}}}\sigma_{_{\mathscr{G}}} (5) eTeUe_{_T}e_{_U}

S(EF)S(E(φ))S(EG)\mathscr{S}(E_{\mathscr{F}})^{\mathscr{S}(E(\varphi))}\mathscr{S}(E_{\mathscr{G}}), T fU^fU.

This follows from I, p. 54, formula (2) for the first, and is an immediate consequence of the definitions for the second. This implies that for every pair (F,G)(\mathscr{F},\mathscr{G}) of sheaves on B and every pair (T,U)(T,U) of étalé spaces over B, the mappings φ↦E(φ)\varphi \mapsto E(\varphi ) and f↦S(f)f\mapsto \mathscr{S}(f) considered above are bijective.

These results make it possible to deduce a statement concerning étalé spaces over B from a statement concerning sheaves on B, and conversely.

7. Direct image and inverse image of a sheaf

Let A and B be topological spaces and let u:A→Bu: A\rightarrow B be a continuous mapping.

Let F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) be a presheaf on A. We define a presheaf F′\mathscr{F}' on B as follows: for every open set U of B, put F′(U)=F(u−1(U))\mathscr{F}'(U) =\mathscr{F}(\overset{-1}{u}(U)) and for every pair (U,V)(U,V) of open sets of B such that U ⊂V\subset V, put fUV′=fu−1(U)u−1(V)f'_{UV}=f_{\overset{-1}{u}(U)\overset{-1}{u}(V)}. Then (F′(U),fUV′)(\mathscr{F}'(U), f'_{UV}) is a presheaf on B. It is denoted by u∗(F)u_*(\mathscr{F}) and is called the direct image presheaf of the presheaf F\mathscr{F} by the mapping uu.

If (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} is a family of open sets of B, one has u−1(⋃i∈IUi)=\overset{-1}{u}(\bigcup_{i\in I}U_i) = ⋃i∈Iu−1(Ui)\bigcup_{i\in I}\overset{-1}{u}(U_i) and u−1(⋂i∈IUi)=⋂i∈Iu−1(Ui)\overset{-1}{u}(\bigcap_{i\in I}U_i) =\bigcap_{i\in I}\overset{-1}{u}(U_i) (E, II, p. 25, Prop. 3 and 4). It follows at once that, if F\mathscr{F} has property (F1)(F_1) (resp. (F2)(F_2)) of sheaves (I, p. 43), the same is true of u∗(F)u_*(\mathscr{F}). Consequently, the direct image of a sheaf is a sheaf.

Let F1\mathscr{F}_1 and F2\mathscr{F}_2 be presheaves on A and let φ:F1→F2\varphi :\mathscr{F}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{F}_2 be a presheaf morphism. Then there exists a unique presheaf morphism u∗φ:u∗F1→u∗F2u_*\varphi :u_*\mathscr{F}_1\rightarrow u_*\mathscr{F}_2 such that for every open set U of B, the mapping (u∗φ)(U):(u∗F1)(U)→(u∗F2)(U)(u_*\varphi )(U): (u_*\mathscr{F}_1)(U)\rightarrow (u_*\mathscr{F}_2)(U) is the mapping φ(u−1(U)):F1(u−1(U))→F2(u−1(U))\varphi (\overset{-1}{u}(U)):\mathscr{F}_1(\overset{-1}{u}(U))\rightarrow \mathscr{F}_2(\overset{-1}{u}(U)). If F3\mathscr{F}_3 is a presheaf on A and if ψ:F2→F3\psi :\mathscr{F}_2\rightarrow \mathscr{F}_3 is a presheaf morphism, one has u∗(ψ∘φ)=u∗(ψ)∘u∗(φ)u_*(\psi \circ \varphi ) =u_*(\psi )\circ u_*(\varphi ).

Let C be a topological space and let v:B→v: B\rightarrow C be a continuous mapping. If F\mathscr{F} is a presheaf on A, the presheaves v∗(u∗(F))v_*(u_*(\mathscr{F})) and (v∘u)∗(F)(v\circ u)_*(\mathscr{F}) coincide. If φ:F1→F2\varphi :\mathscr{F}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{F}_2 is a presheaf morphism on A, one has the equality v∗(u∗(φ))=(v∘u)∗(φ)v_*(u_*(\varphi )) = (v\circ u)_*(\varphi ).

Example 1 01OE

Let B be a topological space, A a subspace of B and F=(F(U),fUV)\mathscr{F}= (\mathscr{F}(U), f_{UV}) a presheaf on A. Let i:A→Bi: A\rightarrow B denote the canonical injection. Then one has i∗(F)=(F′(U),fUV′)i_*(\mathscr{F}) = (\mathscr{F}'(U), f'_{UV}) where for every open set U of B,F′(U)=F(U∩A),\mathscr{F}'(U) =\mathscr{F}(U\cap A), and for every pair (U,V)(U,V) of open sets of B with U⊂V,fUV′=f(U∩A)(V∩A)U\subset V,f'_{UV}=f_{(U\cap A)(V\cap A)}.

Let now G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on B. The inverse image of the presheaf G\mathscr{G} by uu is defined to be, and is denoted by u∗(G)u^*(\mathscr{G}), the sheaf CB(A;EG)\mathscr{C}_B(A; E_{\mathscr{G}}) on A of B-morphisms with values in the B-space EG(E_{\mathscr{G}}(I, p. 45, example 4). It is canonically isomorphic to the sheaf on A of sections of the étalé A-space A×BEGA\times_BE_{\mathscr{G}} (I, p. 9, prop. 3). From this one deduces (I, p. 52, example 2) a canonical isomorphism φ\varphi of the étalé space associated with u∗(G)u^*(\mathscr{G}) onto the A-space A×BEGA\times_BE_{\mathscr{G}}. If moreover G\mathscr{G} is a sheaf, for every point aa of A there is a canonical bijection ψa:u∗(G)a→Gu(a):\psi_a:u^*(\mathscr{G})_a\rightarrow \mathscr{G}_{u(a)}: for every open neighbourhood U of aa in A and every B-morphism f:U→EGf: U\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{G}}, one has

φ([U,f,a])=(a,f(a)),ψa([U,f,a])=f(a) \varphi ([U, f, a]) = (a, f(a)),\psi_a([U, f, a]) =f(a)

Let G1\mathscr{G}_1 and G2\mathscr{G}_2 be presheaves on B and let φ:G1→G2\varphi :\mathscr{G}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{G}_2 be a morphism of presheaves. By base change of the morphism of étalé B-spaces E(φ):EG1→EG2E(\varphi ): E_{\mathscr{G}_1}\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{G}_2} one obtains a morphism of étalé A-spaces A×BEG1→A×BEG2A\times_BE_{\mathscr{G}_1}\rightarrow A\times_BE_{\mathscr{G}_2}, whence a morphism of sheaves on A,u∗(φ):u∗(G1)→u∗(G2),u^*(\varphi ):u^*(\mathscr{G}_1)\rightarrow u^*(\mathscr{G}_2). Let G3\mathscr{G}_3 be a presheaf on B and let ψ:G2→G3\psi :\mathscr{G}_2\rightarrow \mathscr{G}_3 be a morphism of presheaves. Then one has the equality u∗(ψ∘φ)=u∗(ψ)∘u∗(φ)u^*(\psi \circ \varphi ) =u^*(\psi )\circ u^*(\varphi ).

Let C be a topological space and let v:B→v: B\rightarrow C be a continuous mapping. If G\mathscr{G} is a presheaf on C, the sheaves u∗(v∗(G))u^*(v^*(\mathscr{G})) and (v∘u)∗(G)(v\circ u)^*(\mathscr{G}) are canonically identified (I, p. 5). If φ:G1→G2\varphi :\mathscr{G}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{G}_2 is a morphism of presheaves on C, one has moreover u∗(v∗(φ))=(v∘u)∗(φ)u^*(v^*(\varphi )) = (v\circ u)^*(\varphi ).

Remark 01OF

The canonical morphism σG:G→G~\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} of I, p. 53 corresponds, in terms of étalé spaces, to the isomorphism jGj_{\mathscr{G}} of proposition 2 of I, p. 53. It follows that u∗(σG)u^*(\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}) is an isomorphism. In particular, if A = B and u=u= IdA_A, the presheaf u∗(F)u^*(\mathscr{F}) is the sheaf F~\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}.

Example 2 01OG

Let B be a topological space and A a subspace of B. Let i:A→Bi: A\rightarrow B denote the canonical injection. For every sheaf G\mathscr{G} on B, let GA\mathscr{G}_A denote the sheaf i∗(G)i^*(\mathscr{G}), and say that GA\mathscr{G}_A is the sheaf on A induced by the sheaf G\mathscr{G}. The sheaf GA\mathscr{G}_A is identified with the sheaf S(A;(EG)A)\mathscr{S}(A; (E_{\mathscr{G}})_A) of sections of the étalé A-space induced by EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over A.

Suppose that A is an open subspace of B, and let G\mathscr{G} be a sheaf on B. By definition, the sheaf GA\mathscr{G}_A is the sheaf G~∣A\widetilde{\mathscr{G}}|A deduced from G~\widetilde{\mathscr{G}} by restriction to the open set A (I, p. 43). Let σG:G→G~\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} be the canonical isomorphism (I, p. 55, cor. 1). Then σG∣A\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}|A is an isomorphism, called canonical, of the sheaf G∣A\mathscr{G}|A onto the sheaf GA\mathscr{G}_A which is called the canonical isomorphism of G∣A\mathscr{G}|A onto GA\mathscr{G}_A.

8. The homomorphisms αetβ\alpha \mathbf{e}\mathbf{t}\beta ; adjunction

Let A and B be topological spaces and let u:A→Bu: A\rightarrow B be a continuous mapping. Let G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on B. By definition of the direct image of presheaves, a section of the sheaf u∗u∗Gu_*u^*\mathscr{G} over an open set U of B is a section of the sheaf u∗Gu^*\mathscr{G} over the open set u−1(U)\overset{-1}{u}(U) of A, that is, a B-morphism u−1(U)→EG\overset{-1}{u}(U)\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{G}}. Thus one defines a sheaf morphism G~→u∗u∗G\widetilde{\mathscr{G}}\rightarrow u_*u^*\mathscr{G} by associating with the section ss of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over an open set U of B the section s∘us\circ u of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over u−1(U)\overset{-1}{u}(U). The composition of this morphism and of the canonical morphism σG:G→G~\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}} (I, p. 53) is a presheaf morphism G→u∗u∗G\mathscr{G}\rightarrow u_*u^*\mathscr{G} which will be denoted by βGu\beta_{\mathscr{G}}^u, or even βG\beta_{\mathscr{G}} if there is no ambiguity as to the mapping uu.

Remark 1 01OH

Let A, B, C be topological spaces, let u:A→B,v:B→Cu: A\rightarrow B,v: B\rightarrow C be continuous mappings; put w=v∘uw=v\circ u. Let G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on C.

Let U be an open set of C and ss a section of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over U. Then βGv(s)\beta_{\mathscr{G}}^v(s) is the section s∘vs\circ v of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over v−1(U)\overset{-1}{v}(U), and v∗(βv∗Gu)(βGv(s))v_*(\beta_{v^*\mathscr{G}}^u)(\beta^v_{\mathscr{G}}(s)) is the section s∘v∘u=s∘ws\circ v\circ u=s\circ w of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over u−1(v−1(U))=w−1(U)\overset{-1}{u}(\overset{-1}{v}(U)) =\overset{-1}{w}(U).

It follows that βGw=v∗(βv∗Gu)∘βGv\beta_{\mathscr{G}}^w=v_*(\beta_{v^*\mathscr{G}}^u)\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}}^v.

Remark 2 01OI

If γ:G1→G2\gamma :\mathscr{G}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{G}_2 is a presheaf morphism on B, the presheaf morphisms βG2∘γ\beta_{\mathscr{G}_2}\circ \gamma and u∗u∗(γ)∘βG1u_*u^*(\gamma )\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}_1} are equal. In fact, if V is an open set of B and s∈G1(V),βG1(s)s\in \mathscr{G}_1(V),\beta_{\mathscr{G}_1}(s) is the section tt of A×BEG1A\times_BE_{\mathscr{G}_1} over u−1(V)\overset{-1}{u}(V), defined by x↦(x,[V,s,u(x)])x\mapsto (x,[V, s, u(x)]). The image of tt under u∗(γ)u^*(\gamma ) is therefore the section of A×BEG2A\times_BE_{\mathscr{G}_2} over u−1(V)\overset{-1}{u}(V) given by x↦(x,[V,γ(s),u(x)])x\mapsto (x,[V, \gamma (s), u(x)]). Hence indeed u∗u∗(γ)∘βG1(s)=βG2(γ(s))u_*u^*(\gamma )\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}_1}(s) =\beta_{\mathscr{G}_2}(\gamma (s)).

Proposition 4 01OJ

Let A and B be topological spaces, u:A→Bu: A\rightarrow B a continuous mapping, G\mathscr{G} a presheaf on B,F,\mathscr{F} a sheaf on A.

For every presheaf morphism φ:G→u∗F\varphi :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow u_*\mathscr{F}, there exists a unique sheaf morphism ψ:u∗(G)→F\psi :u^*(\mathscr{G})\rightarrow \mathscr{F} such that φ=u∗(ψ)∘βG\varphi =u_*(\psi )\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}}.

In other words, the canonical mapping

Mor(u∗(G),Fu^*(\mathscr{G}),\mathscr{F})→\rightarrow Mor(G,u∗(F)\mathscr{G}, u_*(\mathscr{F})),ψ↦u∗(ψ)∘βG,\psi \mapsto u_*(\psi )\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}}

is a bijection.

With the notation of proposition 4, one will sometimes denote ψ=φ♯\psi =\varphi^{\sharp} and φ=ψ♭\varphi =\psi^{\flat}.

Let us prove proposition 4. By remark 2 applied to the morphism σG:G→G~\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{G}}, the morphism βG\beta_{\mathscr{G}} is equal to the composition

u∗(u∗(σG)−1)∘βG~∘σG u_*(u^*(\sigma_{\mathscr{G}})^{-1})\circ \beta_{\widetilde{\mathscr{G}}}\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{G}}

where u∗(σG):u∗(G)→u∗(G~)u^*(\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}):u^*(\mathscr{G})\rightarrow u^*(\widetilde{\mathscr{G}}) is the canonical isomorphism of the remark in I, p. 58. Let φ~:G~→u∗F\widetilde{\varphi}:\widetilde{\mathscr{G}}\rightarrow u_*\mathscr{F} be the unique sheaf morphism such that φ~∘σG=φ(\widetilde{\varphi}\circ \sigma_{\mathscr{G}}=\varphi (I, p. 54, prop. 3). It is then enough to prove that there exists a unique sheaf morphism ψ~:u∗(G)→F\widetilde{\psi}:u^*(\mathscr{G})\rightarrow \mathscr{F} such that u∗(ψ~)∘βG=φ~u_*(\widetilde{\psi})\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}}=\widetilde{\varphi}.

We po~\widetilde{o}ssibly may therefore suppose that G\mathscr{G} is a sheaf. In order that a sheaf morphism ψ:u∗(G)→F\psi :u^*(\mathscr{G})\rightarrow \mathscr{F} satisfy the conclusion of proposition 4, it is necessary and sufficient that for every open set V of B and every section tt of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over V, one have

φV(t)=ψu−1(V)(t∘u∣u−1(V))(6) \varphi_V(t) =\psi_{\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(t\circ u|\overset{-1}{u}(V)) \tag{6}

Let U0U_0 be an open set of A and s0s_0 an element of u∗(G)(U0)u^*(\mathscr{G})(U_0), in other words a B-morphism from U0U_0 into EGE_{\mathscr{G}}. Let S(U0,s0)S(U_0, s_0) be the set of triples (U,V,t)(U,V, t) where U is an open set of A contained in U0U_0, V is an open set of B such that u(U)⊂Vu(U)\subset V, and tt a section of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over V such that one has

t∘u∣U=s0∣U(7) t\circ u|U =s_0|U \tag{7}

If U1U_1 and U2U_2 are open sets of A with U1⊂U2U_1\subset U_2, let us denote by fU1U2f_{U_1U_2} the restriction mapping F(U2)→F(U1)\mathscr{F}(U_2)\rightarrow \mathscr{F}(U_1). For every (U,V,t)∈S(U0,s0)(U,V, t)\in S(U_0, s_0), one then has the relation

fUU0(ψU0(s0))=ψU(s0∣U) f_{UU_0}(\psi_{U_0}(s_0)) =\psi_U(s_0|U)
=ψU(t∘u∣U) =\psi_U(t\circ u|U)
=fUu−1(V)(ψu−1(V)(t∘u∣u−1(V))) =f_{U\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(\psi_{\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(t\circ u|\overset{-1}{u}(V)))

Consequently, if ψ:u∗(G)→F\psi :u^*(\mathscr{G})\rightarrow \mathscr{F} satisfies (6), one has

fUU0(ψU0(s0))=fUu−1(V)(φV(t))(8) f_{UU_0}(\psi_{U_0}(s_0)) =f_{U\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(\varphi_V(t)) \tag{8}

Let us prove that, for every point aa of U0U_0, there exists a triple (U,V,t)∈S(U0,s0)(U,V, t)\in S(U_0, s_0) such that a∈Ua\in U. For indeed, let aa be a point of U0U_0. There exists an open neighbourhood V of B containing u(a)u(a) and a section tt of the étale space EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over V such that t(u(a))=s0(a)t(u(a)) =s_0(a) (I, p. 33, prop. 9). Let U1=u−1(V)∩U0U_1=\overset{-1}{u}(V)\cap U_0. The sections s0∣U1s_0|U_1 and t∘u∣U1t\circ u|U_1 of the U1U_1-étale space EG×BU1E_{\mathscr{G}}\times_BU_1 coincide at the point aa. By proposition 11, b) of I, p. 34, the set of points where they coincide is an open set U of U1U_1 containing aa. The triple (U,V,t)(U,V, t) then belongs to S(U0,s0)S(U_0, s_0).

Formula (8) and property (F1)(F_1) of sheaves (I, p. 43) then imply the uniqueness of ψ\psi.

Let (U,V,t)(U,V, t) and (U′,V′,t′)(U',V', t') be elements of S(U0,s0)S(U_0, s_0). By relation (7), the restrictions of tt and t′t' to u(U∩U′)u(U\cap U') coincide. By Prop. 11, b) of I, p. 34, there exists an open set W of B such that u(U∩U′)⊂u(U\cap U')\subset W⊂V∩V′W\subset V\cap V' and t∣W=t′∣Wt|W =t'|W. Hence

fu−1(W)u−1(V)(φV(t))=φW(t∣W)=φW(t′∣W)=fu−1(W)u−1(V′)(φV′(t′)) f_{\overset{-1}{u}(W)\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(\varphi_V(t)) =\varphi_W(t|W) =\varphi_W(t'|W) =f_{\overset{-1}{u}(W)\overset{-1}{u}(V')}(\varphi_{V'}(t'))

whence

f(U∩U′)u−1(V)(φV(t))=f(U∩U′)u−1(V′)(φV′(t′))(9) f_{(U\cap U')\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(\varphi_V(t)) =f_{(U\cap U')\overset{-1}{u}(V')}(\varphi_{V'}(t')) \tag{9}

By properties (F1)(F_1) and (F2)(F_2) for the sheaf F\mathscr{F}, there exists a unique element s′s' of F(U0)\mathscr{F}(U_0) such that for every triple (U,V,t)(U,V, t) of S(U0,s0)S(U_0, s_0), one has:

fUU0(s′)=fUu−1(V)(φV(t))(10) f_{UU_0}(s') =f_{U\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(\varphi_V(t)) \tag{10}

Let us denote this element by ψU0(s0)\psi_{U_0}(s_0).

Let U1U_1 be an open set contained in U0U_0 and let s1=s0∣U1s_1=s_0|U_1. If (U,V,t)∈(U,V, t)\in S(U1,s1)S(U_1, s_1), U is an open set contained in U0U_0 and t∘u∣U=s1∣U=s0∣Ut\circ u|U =s_1|U =s_0|U, hence (U,v,t)∈S(U0,s0)(U, v, t)\in S(U_0, s_0) and relation (10) then implies that

fUU1(fU1U0(ψU0(s0)))=fUU0(ψU0(s0))=fUu−1(V)(φV(t)) f_{UU_1}(f_{U_1U_0}(\psi_{U_0}(s_0))) =f_{UU_0}(\psi_{U_0}(s_0)) =f_{U\overset{-1}{u}(V)}(\varphi_V(t))

By definition of ψU1(s1)\psi_{U_1}(s_1), one therefore has ψU1(s1)=fU1U0(ψU0(s0))\psi_{U_1}(s_1) =f_{U_1U_0}(\psi_{U_0}(s_0)). This proves that the family ψ=(ψU)\psi = (\psi_U) is a morphism of sheaves from u∗(G)u^*(\mathscr{G}) into F\mathscr{F}.

Let us prove that ψ\psi satisfies relation (6). Let V thus be an open set of B and let tt be a section of EGE_{\mathscr{G}} over V. If U = u−1(V)\overset{-1}{u}(V) and if s=t∘u∣Us=t\circ u|U, the triple (U,V,t)(U,V, t) belongs to S(U,s)S(U, s) and relation (6) is an immediate consequence of relation (10), applied to U=U0U = U_0.

Proposition 5 01OK

Let A and B be topological spaces and let u:A→Bu: A\rightarrow B be a continuous mapping.

a) Let G1\mathscr{G}_1 and G2\mathscr{G}_2 be presheaves on B and let γ:G1→G2\gamma :\mathscr{G}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{G}_2 be a morphism of presheaves. Let moreover F\mathscr{F} be a sheaf on A and φ:G2→u∗F\varphi :\mathscr{G}_2\rightarrow u_*\mathscr{F} a morphism of presheaves. One has the equality

(φ∘γ)♯=φ♯∘u∗(γ)(11) (\varphi \circ \gamma )^{\sharp}=\varphi^{\sharp}\circ u^*(\gamma ) \tag{11}

b) Let F1,F2\mathscr{F}_1,\mathscr{F}_2 be sheaves on A and let G\mathscr{G} be a presheaf on B. Let φ:F1→F2\varphi :\mathscr{F}_1\rightarrow \mathscr{F}_2 be a morphism of sheaves and let γ:G→\gamma :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow u∗F1u_*\mathscr{F}_1 be a morphism of presheaves. One has the relation

(u∗(φ)∘γ)♯=φ∘γ♯ (u_*(\varphi )\circ \gamma )^{\sharp}=\varphi \circ \gamma^{\sharp}

a) By definition of φ♯\varphi^{\sharp} and Remark 2 of I, p. 60, one has

φ∘γ=u∗(φ♯)∘βG2∘γ=u∗(φ♯)∘u∗u∗(γ)∘βG1 \varphi \circ \gamma =u_*(\varphi^{\sharp})\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}_2}\circ \gamma =u_*(\varphi^{\sharp})\circ u_*u^*(\gamma )\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}_1}

Consequently, φ∘γ=u∗(φ♯∘u∗(γ))∘βG1\varphi \circ \gamma =u_*(\varphi^{\sharp}\circ u^*(\gamma ))\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}_1}, whence relation (11).

b) By definition of γ♯\gamma^{\sharp}, one has

u∗(φ)∘γ=u∗(φ)∘u∗(γ♯)∘βG=u∗(φ∘γ♯)∘βG u_*(\varphi )\circ \gamma =u_*(\varphi )\circ u_*(\gamma^{\sharp})\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}}=u_*(\varphi \circ \gamma^{\sharp})\circ \beta_{\mathscr{G}}

whence the announced relation, having regard to the definition of (u∗(φ)∘γ)♯(u_*(\varphi )\circ \gamma )^{\sharp}.

Put αF\alpha_{\mathscr{F}} = Idu∗(F)♯^{\sharp}_{u_*(\mathscr{F})}; it is the unique sheaf morphism ρ:u∗(u∗(F))→F\rho :u^*(u_*(\mathscr{F}))\rightarrow \mathscr{F} such that

Idu∗(F)=u∗(ρ)∘βu∗(F)_{u_*(\mathscr{F})}=u_*(\rho )\circ \beta_{u_*(\mathscr{F})}.

Relation (11), applied to G2=u∗(F)\mathscr{G}_2=u_*(\mathscr{F}) and to the morphism φ=\varphi = Idu∗(F)_{u_*(\mathscr{F})}, yields for every presheaf morphism γ:G→u∗(F)\gamma :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow u_*(\mathscr{F}) the factorization

γ♯=αF∘u∗(γ) \gamma^{\sharp}=\alpha_{\mathscr{F}}\circ u^*(\gamma )

It then follows from proposition 4 that for every sheaf morphism ψ\psi of u∗(G)u^*(\mathscr{G}) into F,ψ♭\mathscr{F},\psi^{\flat} is the unique morphism φ:G→u∗(F)\varphi :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow u_*(\mathscr{F}) such that ψ=αF∘u∗(φ)\psi =\alpha_{\mathscr{F}}\circ u^*(\varphi ).

Example 1 01OL

Consider a topological space B, a subspace A of B, and denote by i:A→Bi: A\rightarrow B the canonical injection. Let (E,p)(E, p) and (E′,p′)(E', p') be B-spaces. Take for G\mathscr{G} the sheaf M\mathscr{M}orB(E;E′)_B(E; E') (I, p. 45, example 4) and for F\mathscr{F} the sheaf M\mathscr{M}orA(EA;EA′)_A(E_A; E'_A). For every open set V of B and every V-morphism f:EV→EV′f: E_V\rightarrow E'_V, put φV(f)=fV∩A\varphi_V(f) =f_{V\cap A}, where fV∩Af_{V\cap A} is the (V∩A)(V\cap A)-morphism of EV∩AE_{V\cap A} into EV∩A′E'_{V\cap A} induced by ff. The family φ=(φV)\varphi = (\varphi_V) resulting is a sheaf morphism of G\mathscr{G} into i∗Fi_*\mathscr{F}. By proposition 4, there exists a unique sheaf morphism ψ:M\psi :\mathscr{M}orB(E;E′)A→M_B(E; E')_A\rightarrow \mathscr{M}orA(EA;EA′)_A(E_A; E'_A) such that one has

ψV∩A(σG(V,f)∣V∩A)=fV∩A(12) \psi_{V\cap A}(\sigma_{\mathscr{G}}(V, f)|V\cap A) =f_{V\cap A} \tag{12}

for every open set V of B and every f∈CV(EV;EV′)f\in \mathscr{C}_V(E_V; E'_V). The morphism ψ\psi is called the canonical morphism of M\mathscr{M}orB(E;E′)A_B(E; E')_A into M\mathscr{M}orA(EA;EA′)_A(E_A; E'_A).

If A is reduced to a point aa, this morphism is identified with the stalk morphism at aa of the sheaf M\mathscr{M}orB(E;E′)_B(E; E') onto the set C(Ea;Ea′)\mathscr{C}(E_a; E'_a).

By passing to subsheaves, the morphism ψ\psi induces a canonical morphism of I\mathscr{I}somB(E;E′)A_B(E; E')_A into I\mathscr{I}somA(EA;EA′)_A(E_A; E'_A).

Example 2 01OM

Let A, B, C be topological spaces and let u:A→Bu: A\rightarrow B, v:B→Cv: B\rightarrow C be continuous mappings; put w=v∘uw=v\circ u. Let E and E′E' be C-spaces. The canonical morphism from M\mathscr{M}orC(E;E′)A_C(E; E')_A into M\mathscr{M}orA(EA;EA′)_A(E_A; E'_A) is the composite morphism of the morphism M\mathscr{M}orC(E;E′)A→M_C(E; E')_A\rightarrow \mathscr{M}orB(EB;EB′)A_B(E_B; E'_B)_A deduced from the canonical morphism of M\mathscr{M}orC(E;E′)B_C(E; E')_B into M\mathscr{M}orB(EB;EB′)_B(E_B; E'_B) and the canonical morphism of M\mathscr{M}orB(EB,EB′)A_B(E_B,E'_B)_A into M\mathscr{M}orA(EA,EA′)_A(E_A,E'_A).

9. Soft Sheaves

Definition 5 01ON

Let p:E→Bp: E\rightarrow B be an étale mapping. One says that the mapping pp is soft, or that the étale B-space (E,p)(E, p) is soft, if every continuous section of pp over a closed subspace of B extends to a continuous section of pp over B.

Let F\mathscr{F} be a sheaf on B. One says that F\mathscr{F} is a soft sheaf if the associated étale space (I, p. 50, def. 4) is soft.

Let F\mathscr{F} be a sheaf on B. The sheaf F\mathscr{F} is soft if and only if for every closed Z of B, every open neighbourhood U of Z and every s∈F(U)s\in \mathscr{F}(U), there exist t∈F(B)t\in \mathscr{F}(B) and an open neighbourhood V of Z contained in U such that s∣V=t∣Vs|V =t|V.

If F\mathscr{F} is a soft sheaf, F(B)\mathscr{F}(B) is nonempty: in fact, the unique section of the étale space EFE_{\mathscr{F}} associated with F\mathscr{F} over ∅\emptyset extends to a continuous section of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} over B.

Let p:E→Bp: E\rightarrow B be an étale mapping and let A be a closed subspace of B. If pp is soft, the mapping pA:p−1(A)→Ap_A:\overset{-1}{p}(A)\rightarrow A is soft. Equivalently, if F\mathscr{F} is a soft sheaf on B, the sheaf induced on a closed subspace A is soft.

Proposition 6 01OO

Let B be a topological space, F\mathscr{F} a sheaf on B and (Ai)i∈I(A_i)_{i\in I} a locally finite closed covering of B. In order that the sheaf F\mathscr{F} be soft, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every i∈Ii\in I, the induced sheaf FAi\mathscr{F}_{A_i} be soft.

The condition is obviously necessary. Let us prove that it is sufficient. Let us denote by p:E→Bp: E\rightarrow B the étale B-space EFE_{\mathscr{F}} associated with the sheaf F\mathscr{F}. Let A be a closed subspace of B and s:A→Es: A\rightarrow E a continuous section of pp over A; it is a question of proving that ss possesses a continuous extension to B. For every subset J of I, put AJ=⋃i∈JAiA_J=\bigcup_{i\in J}A_i; the set AJA_J is closed in B (TG, I, p. 6, prop. 4).

Let S\mathscr{S} be the set of pairs (J,t)(J, t) where J is a subset of I and tt a continuous section of E over AJA_J which coincides with ss in A∩AJA\cap A_J. Let us make S\mathscr{S} into an ordered set by the ordering relation denoted by ⩽\leqslant for which (J,t)⩽(J′,t′)(J, t)\leqslant (J', t') if J⊂J′J\subset J' and t′∣AJ=tt'|A_J=t. For σ=(J,t)∈S\sigma = (J, t)\in \mathscr{S}, we write Jσ=JJ_{\sigma}= J and tσ=tt_{\sigma}=t. Let us show that the ordered set S\mathscr{S} is inductive. Let S be a totally ordered subset of S\mathscr{S}. Put J=⋃σ∈SJσJ =\bigcup_{\sigma\in S}J_{\sigma}; this is a subset of I. One then defines a section tt of E over AJA_J by setting t(x)=tσ(x)t(x) =t_{\sigma}(x), if x∈AJσx\in A_{J_{\sigma}}; thus t∣A∩AJ=st|A\cap A_J=s. Let j∈Jj\in J and let σ∈S\sigma \in S be such that j∈Jσj\in J_{\sigma}; since t∣Aj=tσ∣Ajt|A_j=t_{\sigma}|A_j, the restriction of tt to AjA_j is continuous. It then follows from TG, I, p. 19, Prop. 4 that tt is continuous. Thus, (J,t)(J, t) is an element of S\mathscr{S}; by construction, it is an upper bound of S. This proves that the set S\mathscr{S} is inductive. It therefore possesses a maximal element (J,t)(J, t) (E, III, p. 20, th. 2).

Let us reason by contradiction, supposing that J =I̸= I\not . Let ii be an element of I-J. Put A′=(Ai∩A)∪(Ai∩AJ)A'= (A_i\cap A)\cup (A_i\cap A_J) and define a section s′s' of E over A′A' by:

′s(a)'s(a) for a∈Ai∩Aa\in A_i\cap A,

s(a)= s(a) =

t(a)t(a) for a∈Ai∩AJa\in A_i\cap A_J,

which is possible since ss and tt coincide on A∩AJA\cap A_J. Moreover, since Ai∩AA_i\cap A and Ai∩AJA_i\cap A_J are closed, the section s′s' is continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4). By hypothesis, there exists a continuous section si:Ai→Es_i: A_i\rightarrow E extending s′s'. Since the restrictions of sis_i and tt to AJ∩AiA_J\cap A_i are equal, the continuous section t′:AJ∪{i}→Et': A_{J\cup \{i\}}\rightarrow E which coincides with tt on AJA_J and with sis_i on AiA_i is a continuous section of pp over AJ∪{i}A_{J\cup \{i\}}, extending s∣A∩AJ∪{i}s|A\cap A_{J\cup \{i\}}. We then have (J,t)<(J∪{i},t′)(J, t)<(J\cup \{i\}, t'), which contradicts the hypothesis that (J,t)(J, t) is maximal.

Thus, J = I, hence AJ=BA_J= B and tt is a continuous section of E over B extending ss.

Corollary 1 01OP

Let B be a paracompact space, F\mathscr{F} a sheaf on B and (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} an open covering of B. If, for every i∈Ii\in I, the induced sheaf F∣Ui\mathscr{F}|U_i is soft, then the sheaf F\mathscr{F} is soft.

There exists in fact a locally finite closed covering (Fj)j∈J(F_j)_{j\in J} finer than the covering (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} (TG, IX, p. 49, prop. 4 and p. 48, cor. 1). Consequently, for every j∈Jj\in J, the sheaf F∣Fj\mathscr{F}|F_j is soft and the proposition implies that the sheaf F\mathscr{F} is soft.

Corollary 2 01OQ

Let B be a paracompact space, F\mathscr{F} a sheaf on B and (Ai)i∈I(A_i)_{i\in I} a locally finite closed covering of B. In order that the sheaf F\mathscr{F} be soft, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied:

For every i∈Ii\in I, every closed subset A of AiA_i, every open set V of B containing A and every element ss of F(V)\mathscr{F}(V), there exist an open neighbourhood U of AiA_i in B, an element tt of F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) and an open neighbourhood W of A in B contained in U∩VU\cap V such that t∣W=s∣Wt|W =s|W.

Suppose that the sheaf F\mathscr{F} is soft, and let us show that the condition is satisfied. Let i∈Ii\in I, let A be a closed subset of AiA_i, let V be an open subset of B containing A and let ss be an element of F(V)\mathscr{F}(V). Put s0=σF(s)s_0=\sigma_{\mathscr{F}}(s). It is a continuous section over V of the étalé space EFE_{\mathscr{F}}. Since AiA_i is closed, A is closed in B and s0∣As_0|A extends to a section t0:B→EFt_0: B\rightarrow E_{\mathscr{F}}, by definition of a soft sheaf. The sections s0s_0 and t0∣Vt_0|V of the étalé space over V EF×BVE_{\mathscr{F}}\times_BV coincide on A, hence on a neighbourhood W of A (I, p. 34, prop. 11, b)).

Conversely, suppose that the condition of the corollary is satisfied. By proposition 6, it is enough to prove that, for every i∈Ii\in I, the sheaf FAi\mathscr{F}_{A_i} is soft. Let A be a closed subset of AiA_i and let s0s_0 be a section of the etale space of F∣Ai\mathscr{F}|A_i over A, that is, a continuous section over A of the etale space EFE_{\mathscr{F}}. Since A is closed in B and since B is paracompact, s0s_0 extends to a section ss over a neighbourhood V of A in B (I, p. 37, th. 2). By hypothesis, there exists an open neighbourhood U of AiA_i in B and a section tt of EFE_{\mathscr{F}} over U which coincides with ss on a neighbourhood of A. The restriction of tt to AiA_i is a section of FAi\mathscr{F}_{A_i} which extends s0s_0. The sheaf FAi\mathscr{F}_{A_i} is therefore soft. By proposition 6, the sheaf F\mathscr{F} is soft.

10. Sheaves of structures

Suppose given a Species of structures Σ and a notion of σ\sigma-morphism relative to this Species of structures.

Let B be a topological space.

A presheaf F\mathscr{F} on B is said to be with values in the Species of structures Σ if, for every open set U of B, the set F(U)\mathscr{F}(U) is endowed with a structure of Species Σ and if the restriction mappings are σ\sigma-morphisms.

Such a presheaf will be said to be a sheaf with values in the Species of structures Σ if, moreover, it is a sheaf of sets.

If F\mathscr{F} and G\mathscr{G} are presheaves with values in the Species of structures Σ, a morphism φ\varphi is said to be a morphism of presheaves with values in Σ if, for every open set U, the mapping φ(U)\varphi (U) is a σ\sigma-morphism.

Thus one speaks, for example, of sheaves of groups, of abelian groups, of kk-modules (for a fixed ring kk), of rings, of kk-algebras (for a fixed commutative ring kk).

The sheaf on B of mappings with values in a group (resp. an abelian group, resp. a kk-module, resp. a ring, resp. a kk-algebra) is naturally endowed with a structure of sheaf of groups (resp. of abelian groups, resp. of kk-modules, resp. of rings, resp. of kk-algebras). If X is a differentiable manifold of class CrC^r over R\mathbf{R}, the sheaf Cr(X;R)\mathscr{C}^r(X;\mathbf{R}) of numerical functions of class CrC^r is a sheaf of R\mathbf{R}-algebras, and the sheaf on X of sections of class CrC^r of a vector bundle E over X is a sheaf of R\mathbf{R}-vector spaces; a differential operator defines a morphism of sheaves of R\mathbf{R}-vector spaces.

For these Species of structures Σ, it follows from the construction which we have given that the sheaf F~\widetilde{F} associated with a presheaf F\mathscr{F} with values in the Species of structures Σ (groups, abelian groups, kk-modules, rings, kk-algebras) is a sheaf with values in this Species of structures, and that the canonical morphism jF:F→F~j_{\mathscr{F}}:\mathscr{F}\rightarrow \widetilde{\mathscr{F}} is a morphism of presheaves with values in the Species of structures Σ.

For example, the sheaf on B of mappings with values in a group is naturally endowed with a structure of sheaf of groups.

Let A and B be topological spaces and let u:A→Bu: A\rightarrow B be a continuous mapping. If F\mathscr{F} is a (pre)sheaf on A with values in the Species of structures Σ, the same is true of the direct image (pre)sheaf u∗(F)u_*(\mathscr{F}) of the (pre)sheaf F\mathscr{F} under uu.

Suppose moreover that the Species of structures Σ is that of groups, abelian groups, kk-modules, rings or kk-algebras. If G\mathscr{G} is a (pre)sheaf on B with values in the Species of structures Σ, then the sheaf u∗Gu^*\mathscr{G} on A, inverse image of the presheaf G\mathscr{G} by the mapping uu, is endowed with a sheaf structure with values in Σ. In this case, the adjunction morphisms α\alpha and β\beta are morphisms of presheaves with values in the Species of structures Σ. In particular, if φ:G→u∗F\varphi :\mathscr{G}\rightarrow u_*\mathscr{F} is a morphism of presheaves with values in Σ, the same is true of the morphism φ♯\varphi^{\sharp}; if ψ:u∗(G)→F\psi :u^*(\mathscr{G})\rightarrow \mathscr{F} is a morphism of presheaves with values in Σ, the same is true of the morphism ψ♭\psi^{\flat}.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 3.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.