§ 3. Sheaves
1. Sheaves of sets
Let B be a topological space.
Definition 1 01NS
A presheaf on B, relative to a basis of the topology of B, is a projective system of sets, relative to the set of indices ordered by the inclusion relation.
In other words (E, III, p. 52), a presheaf on B relative to is a pair , which is also denoted by , where is a family of sets having as set of indices and where for each pair of elements of such that is a mapping of into , these mappings satisfying the following conditions:
(PF) The relations imply ;
(PF) For every open set U is the identity mapping of
A presheaf on B relative to the set of open subsets of B is simply called a presheaf on B.
Let be a presheaf on B, relative to a basis of the topology of B. Let U be an element of the basis . The elements of are called the sections of over U. If V is an element of the basis containing U and an element of , the element of is called the restriction of to U. If there is no danger of ambiguity concerning the mappings , the restriction of to U will be denoted by .
Let be an open subset of B and a basis of the topology of such that . The presheaf on , relative to , deduced from by restriction, is called the restriction of to and denoted by , the projective system deduced from by restriction to of the set of indices (loc. cit.). When is a presheaf on B and is the set of open subsets of , the presheaf is also denoted by and called the presheaf deduced from by restriction to .
Definition 2 01NT
Let be a presheaf on B. One says that is a sheaf on B if, for every open subset U of B and every family of open subsets of B, with union U, the following properties are satisfied:
The mapping is injective ;
For every family such that
for every pair , there exists an element
of such that for every , one has .
Remark 01NU
Let be a presheaf on B. For every open set U of B, is a map of into , hence is not empty as soon as there exists an open set U for which is not empty. If is a sheaf, is a one-element set; this is seen by applying and to the covering of the empty set by the empty family ( ).
Let be a sheaf on B and let be an open subset of B; the presheaf deduced from by restriction to is a sheaf, called the sheaf deduced from by restriction to .
2. Subsheaves of a Sheaf
Let B be a topological space. Let be a presheaf on B, relative to a basis of the topology of B.
Suppose given, for every open set , a subset of . If one has for every pair of elements of such that , the pair , where is the map deduced from , is a presheaf. Such a presheaf is called a sub-presheaf of . Since the maps are determined by the given presheaf and the family , one also says, by abuse of language, that the family is a sub-presheaf of .
Suppose now that is a sheaf on B and let, for every open subset U of B, a subset of . In order that be a sub-presheaf of , and that this presheaf be a sheaf, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied:
(F) Let be a family of open sets of B, U its union, and an
element of . In order that belong to , it is necessary and
sufficient that for every in I belong to .
Indeed, if condition (F) is satisfied, one has for every pair of open sets of B such that and the properties and relative to the subpresheaf result from the analogous properties relative to the sheaf . The converse is immediate.
When condition (F) is satisfied, one says that is a subsheaf of the sheaf .
3. Examples of sheaves
Let B be a topological space.
1) Sheaves of mappings
Let X be a set. For every open set U of B, denote by the set of mappings from U into X (E, II, p. 31). For every pair of open sets of B such that , let be the restriction mapping . It is clear that the pair is a sheaf on B. It is called the sheaf on B of mappings with values in X, and is denoted by .
2) Sheaves of continuous mappings
Let X be a topological space. For every open set U of B, let be the set of continuous mappings from U into X. Then, is a subsheaf of the sheaf by prop. 4 of TG, I, p. 19. The sheaf thus obtained is denoted by and called the sheaf on B of continuous mappings with values in X. In the particular case where X is endowed with the discrete topology, the sheaf takes the name of sheaf on B of locally constant mappings with values in X.
3) Sheaves of continuous sections
Let E be a topological space and let be a continuous mapping. For every open set U of B, denote by (or when there is no possible confusion) the set of continuous sections of above U. The family is a subsheaf of the sheaf . The sheaf thus obtained is denoted by or simply and called the sheaf on B of continuous sections of the B-space . We shall see in no below that every sheaf on B is isomorphic to the sheaf on B of continuous sections of an étalé B-space.
4) Sheaves of B-morphisms
Let and be B-spaces. For every open set U of E, denote by the set of B-morphisms from into . The family is a subsheaf of the sheaf . The sheaf thus obtained is denoted by and called the sheaf on E of B-morphisms with values in . When is equal to , Id, this sheaf is the sheaf of example 3.
For every open set U of B, let be the set of U-morphisms
from into . For every pair of open sets of B such that , let be the mapping which to a V-morphism
associates the U-morphism from into deduced from by passing to the subsets. Then is a sheaf on B. It is denoted by or and is called the sheaf on B of B-morphisms from into .
For every open set U of B, let s(U) be the subset of
consisting of the U-isomorphisms of into . The family s(U)) is a sub-sheaf of the sheaf or of morphisms from into . The sheaf thus obtained is denoted som and is called the sheaf on B of B-isomorphisms from into .
5) Sheaves of mappings of class
Let X and Y be manifolds of class over a field K (the conventions concerning K and being those of VAR, R). For every open set U of X, let be the set of morphisms of class from U into Y. The family is a sub-sheaf of the sheaf . The sheaf thus obtained is denoted and is called the sheaf on X of mappings of class with values in Y (cf. VAR, R, 5.4.2).
6) Sheaves of subspaces
If U and V are open sets of B such that , denote by the mapping which, to a subset A of V, associates . The pair is a sheaf, called the sheaf of subspaces of B and denoted . Indeed, if X denotes the set , the mapping which associates to every subset A of U its characteristic function is a bijection of onto (E, III, p. 38) ; moreover, if U and V are open sets such that , for every subset A of V is the restriction to U of so that is identified with the sheaf on B of mappings with values in X.
Let, for every open set U of B be a subset of . In order that be a sub-sheaf of , it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied:
Let be a family of open sets of B, U its union, and A a
subset of U ; in order that A belong to , it is necessary and
sufficient that for every in I, belong to .
For example, if is the set of closed subsets of U, condition is satisfied.
7) Products of sheaves
Let be a basis of the topology of B and let I be a set. For every , let be a presheaf on B relative to the basis . For every open set , put , and for every pair of elements of such that , denote by the mapping . Then is a presheaf on B relative to called the product presheaf of the family and denoted . It is a sheaf if for every is a sheaf.
4. Morphisms of presheaves
Definition 3 01NV
Let B be a topological space, a basis of the topology of B and presheaves on B relative to . A morphism of presheaves from to is called a projective system of mappings from to .
In other words (E, III, p. 54), a morphism of presheaves from to is a family such that :
(MPF) For every open set U belonging to is a mapping
from into ;
(MPF) For every pair of open sets belonging to such that
, one has .
When and are sheaves, a morphism of presheaves from to is also called a morphism of sheaves. If and are presheaves on B relative to , the morphisms of presheaves from to constitute a set denoted Mor(). Instead of saying : “let be a morphism of presheaves from to ”, one will often say “let be a morphism of presheaves”.
Let be presheaves on B relative to and let , be morphisms of presheaves. The family is a morphism of presheaves from into which is denoted by . The family (Id) is a morphism of presheaves from into itself which is denoted by Id.
For a morphism of presheaves to be an isomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every open subset U of be a bijection from onto . It is equivalent to saying that there exists a morphism of presheaves such that Id and Id.
Let and be presheaves on B, relative to a base of the topology of B, let be an open subset of B and let be a base of the topology of such that . Let be a morphism of presheaves from into . Then is a morphism of presheaves from into , which is denoted by . When is the set of open subsets of B and the set of open subsets of is a morphism of presheaves from into and is also denoted by .
Example 1 01NW
Let B be a topological space, let and be B-spaces and let be a B-morphism. For every open subset U of B, define the mapping by . The family is a morphism of presheaves from into . If is a B-space and is a B-morphism, one has .
Example 2 01NX
Let B be a topological space, a basis of the topology of B, a presheaf on B relative to and a subpresheaf of . For every open set , denote by the canonical injection of into . Then is a morphism of presheaves from into . We say that is the canonical morphism from into .
Example 3 01NY
Let B be a topological space, a basis of the topology of B and I a set. For every , let be a presheaf on B relative to . Denote by the product presheaf of the family . For every open set , one has ; for every , denote by pr the projection of index . It follows immediately from the definition of the presheaf that the family pr = (pr) is a morphism of presheaves from into . The morphism pr is called the projection morphism of index . For every presheaf on B relative to and every family , where is a morphism of presheaves from into , there exists a unique morphism of presheaves such that for every , pr.
Example 4 01NZ
Let X be a differential manifold of class over and let be the sheaf on X of numerical functions of class . If P is a differential operator with coefficients on X, the family of the restrictions of P to the open sets of X is a morphism of the sheaf into itself. One can prove that conversely, every -linear morphism of the sheaf into itself is locally of this form (I, p. 142, exerc. 3).
5. Étale space associated with a presheaf
Let B be a topological space, a basis of the topology of B and a presheaf on B relative to the basis . Let L be the set of couples with U and . Let denote the sum space of the family . Thus is the set of triples where . Let be the relation in the set defined by if and only if « = and there exists W such that , W and ». The relation is an equivalence relation in it is, by definition, reflexive and symmetric; let us prove that it is transitive. Let and = be elements of such that one has and . We then have = and there exist two elements and of containing such that . Let W be an element of containing and contained in . We then have ,
and, analogously, . Consequently, we have and the relation is transitive.
Let denote the quotient set and the canonical image in of an element of . For and , let denote the mapping . Endow the set with the quotient topology, that is, the finest topology for which the mappings for and are continuous. The mapping pr defines, after passing to the quotient, a continuous mapping : one has .
Proposition 1 01O0
The mapping B is etale. For every open set and every , the mapping is therefore a continuous section of over U.
Let and be elements of L. By definition of the relation , the set of points of at which and coincide is the interior in B, of the set of such that . It follows that . We then denote by the mapping Id. The set is obtained by gluing together the open sets U along the by means of the bijections (TG, I, p. 16). By prop. 9 of TG, I, p. 17, the mapping induces a homeomorphism of U onto an open subset of . This proves that the mapping is etale (I, p. 33, prop 9).
For every open set and every , one has for every . The second assertion therefore follows from the definition of .
Definition 4 01O1
The spread B-space defined above is called the spread B-space associated with the presheaf . For , the fibre of at is called the stalk of the presheaf at and is denoted by . For every open set , every section of over U and every point of U, the element of is called the germ at of the section .
Let be a point of B. The set of open sets containing and ordered by the relation is filtering. From one deduces, by restriction of the set of indices to , an inductive system . By definition (E, III, p. 60), the inductive limit of this system is the quotient of the set of pairs such that and by the equivalence relation R defined by if and only if there exists W containing and contained in and such that . This limit is therefore identified with the stalk of at , by definition of inductive limits.
Let be a presheaf on B relative to the basis and let be a morphism of presheaves from into . The mapping from into is compatible with the equivalence relations and , by definition of a morphism of presheaves. Let us denote by the mapping deduced from it by passing to the quotients. For every and every , we have
consequently, the mapping is continuous. The mapping is a B-morphism; it is said to be the B-morphism of into associated with the morphism of presheaves . For every , by restriction to the fibres at , defines a mapping of the stalk of into the stalk of ; it is denoted by . It is also the inductive limit of the mappings (E, III, p. 63), where U ranges over the set of open sets belonging to the base and containing .
We have E(Id) Id.
Let be a presheaf on B relative to and let be a morphism of presheaves from into . For , we have
Consequently, we have . In particular, if is a point of B, .
If is an isomorphism, the same is true of .
Remark 01O2
Let be a sheaf on B relative to the base . Let be an open subset of B, let be a basis of the topology of such that . Let be the presheaf on relative to the base deduced from by restriction.
1) The set is then a subset of and the equivalence relation induces in the equivalence relation . Hence one deduces a canonical injection of into . Its image is since for every element of , there exists an element V of such that and , and one has . The mapping is continuous because the topology of is the finest making continuous the mappings defined by , for and . By corollary 2 of Proposition 6 in I, p. 30, the canonical injection of into induces a -isomorphism of onto .
In particular, when is equal to B is a B-isomorphism of étalé spaces.
2) Let be a presheaf on B relative to the base and let be a morphism of presheaves. The family is a morphism of presheaves from into . The diagram
, where and are the canonical injections, is commutative.
Example 1 01O3
Let B be a topological space, a base of the topology of B and F a set. Take for the presheaf on B relative to defined by for every and = Id for every pair of elements of such that . The mapping is a B-isomorphism of the B-space onto the B-space where F is endowed with the discrete topology. It will be noted that when is the set of open subsets of B, the presheaf on B is a sheaf only if the set F is reduced to a point (cf. I, p. 43, remark).
Example 2 01O4
Let B be a topological space and a B-space. Let be the sheaf on B of continuous sections of . The mapping of into E is compatible with the equivalence relation . The mapping deduced from it by passing to the quotient is a B-morphism; the B-morphism is said to be canonical. The image of is the union of the images of the continuous sections of over the open sets of B. The mapping is therefore surjective if is etale (I, p. 33, prop. 9). On the other hand, the mapping is injective if and only if for every open set U of B and every pair of continuous sections of on U, the set of points such that is open; this is in particular the case if is etale (I, p. 34, prop. 11, b)). Consequently, if is an etale B-space, the mapping is a B-isomorphism.
Example 3 01O5
Let B be a topological space, a base of the topology of B a presheaf on B relative to and a sub-presheaf of . Then the set is contained in the set and the equivalence relation induces in the equivalence relation . The B-morphism associated with the canonical morphism I, p. 48, example 2) is therefore injective. Since and are etale B-spaces, the mapping is open and even etale (I, p. 30, cor. 1), and therefore induces a homeomorphism of onto an open subset of .
6. Sheaf associated with a presheaf
Let us retain the notation of No.. The sheaf associated with the presheaf is the sheaf of continuous sections of the etale B-space associated with the presheaf , and is denoted by . For every open set , let denote the mapping which, to , associates the continuous section of over U. By definition of the equivalence relation , the family is a morphism of presheaves from into the presheaf . The morphism is called the canonical morphism of into .
Let us denote by the B-morphism composed of the canonical B-isomorphism , p. 51) and the B-morphism . Let us note on the other hand by the canonical B-isomorphism (I, p. 52, example 2).
Proposition 2 01O6
The mapping is the inverse B-isomorphism of .
For and , one has by definition of
whence . This proves the proposition.
Corollary 01O7
For every , the mapping is bijective.
Since is a B-isomorphism, the same is true of , and is deduced from it by passing to the fibres at .
Let be a presheaf on B relative to and let be a morphism of presheaves. One denotes by the morphism of sheaves I, p. 48, example 1), where is the B-morphism associated with . For every open set and every , one has, by definition,
One has therefore:
(1) , for every . In other words:
Proposition 3 01O8
Let B be a topological space, let be a basis of the topology of B, let be a presheaf on B relative to , let be the associated sheaf and let be the canonical morphism. Given a sheaf on B and a morphism of presheaves , there exists a unique morphism of sheaves such that .
Lemma 01O9
Let U be an open subset of B and a continuous section of over U. For every point of U, there exist an open set such that and , and an element of such that .
Let . By definition of the space , there exist an open set such that and an element of such that . Then and induce by restriction two continuous sections of over which are equal at the point . By Prop. 11, b) of I, p. 34, there exists an open neighbourhood V of , contained in , belonging to , such that and are equal at every point of V. If we put , we indeed have .
Let us prove the proposition. For every open set U of B and every section , let us denote by the set of pairs such that and . It follows from the lemma that these open sets V form a covering of U.
If there exists a morphism such that , then, for every open set U of B, every section and every pair , we have . This proves the uniqueness of by virtue of property of sheaves.
Let U be an open set of B and an element of . Let and be elements of . We have for every point . There therefore exists a pair such that and . We then have
and analogously,
whence
By property of sheaves, we therefore have
By properties and of sheaves, there exists a unique element such that one has:
(3) for every .
Let be the resulting mapping. It follows immediately from (3) that the family is a morphism of sheaves and that one has for every .
Corollary 1 01OA
Let B be a topological space, a presheaf on B the associated sheaf and the canonical morphism. For to be a sheaf, it is necessary and sufficient that be an isomorphism.
If is an isomorphism, is a sheaf. Conversely, if is a sheaf, there exists by proposition 3 a morphism such that Id. Since Id is the unique morphism such that , one has therefore Id.
Remark 01OB
Let B be a topological space, a presheaf on B, a sheaf on B and a morphism of presheaves. The canonical morphism is an isomorphism by corollary 1. By relation (2) of I, p. 54, the unique morphism such that is therefore .
Corollary 2 01OC
Let B be a topological space, and sheaves on B and a morphism of sheaves from into . The following assertions are equivalent:
(i) is an isomorphism;
(ii) There exists a basis of the topology of B such that for every , the mapping is bijective;
(iii) For every point of B, the mapping is a bijection of the stalk onto the stalk .
The implication (i)(ii) is immediate.
(ii)(iii) : consider the commutative diagram (I, p. 51)
where the vertical arrows are the canonical B-isomorphisms. If condition (ii) is satisfied, is a B-isomorphism, hence is also one. The mappings are deduced from by passing to the fibres and are therefore bijective.
(iii)(i) : under assumption (iii), the mapping is a bijective B-morphism of étalé spaces and therefore is a B-isomorphism (I, p. 30, cor. 2 of prop. 6). Hence the morphism is an isomorphism. Since and are sheaves, the canonical morphisms and are isomorphisms (corollary 1) and one has I, p. 54, relation (2)) hence is an isomorphism.
Scholium 01OD
Let B be a topological space. To every sheaf on B, one associates an étalé B-space (I, p. 50, def. 4). To every étalé B-space T, one associates the sheaf on B of its continuous sections (I, p. 45, example 3). A canonical isomorphism of sheaves has been defined (I, p. 55, cor. 1) and a canonical isomorphism of étalé B-spaces (I, p. 52, example 2).
For every pair of sheaves on B, a mapping of the set of morphisms of sheaves from into into the set of B-morphisms from into has been defined (I, p. 50). One has the relations
E(Id) Id.
For every pair of étalé spaces over B, a mapping from the set of B-morphisms of T into U to the set of sheaf morphisms of into was defined (I, p. 48, Example 1). One has the relations
(Id) Id.
With the preceding notation, the following diagrams are commutative:
(4) (5)
, T .
This follows from I, p. 54, formula (2) for the first, and is an immediate consequence of the definitions for the second. This implies that for every pair of sheaves on B and every pair of étalé spaces over B, the mappings and considered above are bijective.
These results make it possible to deduce a statement concerning étalé spaces over B from a statement concerning sheaves on B, and conversely.
7. Direct image and inverse image of a sheaf
Let A and B be topological spaces and let be a continuous mapping.
Let be a presheaf on A. We define a presheaf on B as follows: for every open set U of B, put and for every pair of open sets of B such that U , put . Then is a presheaf on B. It is denoted by and is called the direct image presheaf of the presheaf by the mapping .
If is a family of open sets of B, one has and (E, II, p. 25, Prop. 3 and 4). It follows at once that, if has property (resp. ) of sheaves (I, p. 43), the same is true of . Consequently, the direct image of a sheaf is a sheaf.
Let and be presheaves on A and let be a presheaf morphism. Then there exists a unique presheaf morphism such that for every open set U of B, the mapping is the mapping . If is a presheaf on A and if is a presheaf morphism, one has .
Let C be a topological space and let C be a continuous mapping. If is a presheaf on A, the presheaves and coincide. If is a presheaf morphism on A, one has the equality .
Example 1 01OE
Let B be a topological space, A a subspace of B and a presheaf on A. Let denote the canonical injection. Then one has where for every open set U of B, and for every pair of open sets of B with .
Let now be a presheaf on B. The inverse image of the presheaf by is defined to be, and is denoted by , the sheaf on A of B-morphisms with values in the B-space I, p. 45, example 4). It is canonically isomorphic to the sheaf on A of sections of the étalé A-space (I, p. 9, prop. 3). From this one deduces (I, p. 52, example 2) a canonical isomorphism of the étalé space associated with onto the A-space . If moreover is a sheaf, for every point of A there is a canonical bijection for every open neighbourhood U of in A and every B-morphism , one has
Let and be presheaves on B and let be a morphism of presheaves. By base change of the morphism of étalé B-spaces one obtains a morphism of étalé A-spaces , whence a morphism of sheaves on A. Let be a presheaf on B and let be a morphism of presheaves. Then one has the equality .
Let C be a topological space and let C be a continuous mapping. If is a presheaf on C, the sheaves and are canonically identified (I, p. 5). If is a morphism of presheaves on C, one has moreover .
Remark 01OF
The canonical morphism of I, p. 53 corresponds, in terms of étalé spaces, to the isomorphism of proposition 2 of I, p. 53. It follows that is an isomorphism. In particular, if A = B and Id, the presheaf is the sheaf .
Example 2 01OG
Let B be a topological space and A a subspace of B. Let denote the canonical injection. For every sheaf on B, let denote the sheaf , and say that is the sheaf on A induced by the sheaf . The sheaf is identified with the sheaf of sections of the étalé A-space induced by over A.
Suppose that A is an open subspace of B, and let be a sheaf on B. By definition, the sheaf is the sheaf deduced from by restriction to the open set A (I, p. 43). Let be the canonical isomorphism (I, p. 55, cor. 1). Then is an isomorphism, called canonical, of the sheaf onto the sheaf which is called the canonical isomorphism of onto .
8. The homomorphisms ; adjunction
Let A and B be topological spaces and let be a continuous mapping. Let be a presheaf on B. By definition of the direct image of presheaves, a section of the sheaf over an open set U of B is a section of the sheaf over the open set of A, that is, a B-morphism . Thus one defines a sheaf morphism by associating with the section of over an open set U of B the section of over . The composition of this morphism and of the canonical morphism (I, p. 53) is a presheaf morphism which will be denoted by , or even if there is no ambiguity as to the mapping .
Remark 1 01OH
Let A, B, C be topological spaces, let be continuous mappings; put . Let be a presheaf on C.
Let U be an open set of C and a section of over U. Then is the section of over , and is the section of over .
It follows that .
Remark 2 01OI
If is a presheaf morphism on B, the presheaf morphisms and are equal. In fact, if V is an open set of B and is the section of over , defined by . The image of under is therefore the section of over given by . Hence indeed .
Proposition 4 01OJ
Let A and B be topological spaces, a continuous mapping, a presheaf on B a sheaf on A.
For every presheaf morphism , there exists a unique sheaf morphism such that .
In other words, the canonical mapping
Mor() Mor()
is a bijection.
With the notation of proposition 4, one will sometimes denote and .
Let us prove proposition 4. By remark 2 applied to the morphism , the morphism is equal to the composition
where is the canonical isomorphism of the remark in I, p. 58. Let be the unique sheaf morphism such that I, p. 54, prop. 3). It is then enough to prove that there exists a unique sheaf morphism such that .
We pssibly may therefore suppose that is a sheaf. In order that a sheaf morphism satisfy the conclusion of proposition 4, it is necessary and sufficient that for every open set V of B and every section of over V, one have
Let be an open set of A and an element of , in other words a B-morphism from into . Let be the set of triples where U is an open set of A contained in , V is an open set of B such that , and a section of over V such that one has
If and are open sets of A with , let us denote by the restriction mapping . For every , one then has the relation
Consequently, if satisfies (6), one has
Let us prove that, for every point of , there exists a triple such that . For indeed, let be a point of . There exists an open neighbourhood V of B containing and a section of the étale space over V such that (I, p. 33, prop. 9). Let . The sections and of the -étale space coincide at the point . By proposition 11, b) of I, p. 34, the set of points where they coincide is an open set U of containing . The triple then belongs to .
Formula (8) and property of sheaves (I, p. 43) then imply the uniqueness of .
Let and be elements of . By relation (7), the restrictions of and to coincide. By Prop. 11, b) of I, p. 34, there exists an open set W of B such that and . Hence
whence
By properties and for the sheaf , there exists a unique element of such that for every triple of , one has:
Let us denote this element by .
Let be an open set contained in and let . If , U is an open set contained in and , hence and relation (10) then implies that
By definition of , one therefore has . This proves that the family is a morphism of sheaves from into .
Let us prove that satisfies relation (6). Let V thus be an open set of B and let be a section of over V. If U = and if , the triple belongs to and relation (6) is an immediate consequence of relation (10), applied to .
Proposition 5 01OK
Let A and B be topological spaces and let be a continuous mapping.
a) Let and be presheaves on B and let be a morphism of presheaves. Let moreover be a sheaf on A and a morphism of presheaves. One has the equality
b) Let be sheaves on A and let be a presheaf on B. Let be a morphism of sheaves and let be a morphism of presheaves. One has the relation
a) By definition of and Remark 2 of I, p. 60, one has
Consequently, , whence relation (11).
b) By definition of , one has
whence the announced relation, having regard to the definition of .
Put = Id; it is the unique sheaf morphism such that
Id.
Relation (11), applied to and to the morphism Id, yields for every presheaf morphism the factorization
It then follows from proposition 4 that for every sheaf morphism of into is the unique morphism such that .
Example 1 01OL
Consider a topological space B, a subspace A of B, and denote by the canonical injection. Let and be B-spaces. Take for the sheaf or (I, p. 45, example 4) and for the sheaf or. For every open set V of B and every V-morphism , put , where is the -morphism of into induced by . The family resulting is a sheaf morphism of into . By proposition 4, there exists a unique sheaf morphism oror such that one has
for every open set V of B and every . The morphism is called the canonical morphism of or into or.
If A is reduced to a point , this morphism is identified with the stalk morphism at of the sheaf or onto the set .
By passing to subsheaves, the morphism induces a canonical morphism of som into som.
Example 2 01OM
Let A, B, C be topological spaces and let , be continuous mappings; put . Let E and be C-spaces. The canonical morphism from or into or is the composite morphism of the morphism oror deduced from the canonical morphism of or into or and the canonical morphism of or into or.
9. Soft Sheaves
Definition 5 01ON
Let be an étale mapping. One says that the mapping is soft, or that the étale B-space is soft, if every continuous section of over a closed subspace of B extends to a continuous section of over B.
Let be a sheaf on B. One says that is a soft sheaf if the associated étale space (I, p. 50, def. 4) is soft.
Let be a sheaf on B. The sheaf is soft if and only if for every closed Z of B, every open neighbourhood U of Z and every , there exist and an open neighbourhood V of Z contained in U such that .
If is a soft sheaf, is nonempty: in fact, the unique section of the étale space associated with over extends to a continuous section of over B.
Let be an étale mapping and let A be a closed subspace of B. If is soft, the mapping is soft. Equivalently, if is a soft sheaf on B, the sheaf induced on a closed subspace A is soft.
Proposition 6 01OO
Let B be a topological space, a sheaf on B and a locally finite closed covering of B. In order that the sheaf be soft, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every , the induced sheaf be soft.
The condition is obviously necessary. Let us prove that it is sufficient. Let us denote by the étale B-space associated with the sheaf . Let A be a closed subspace of B and a continuous section of over A; it is a question of proving that possesses a continuous extension to B. For every subset J of I, put ; the set is closed in B (TG, I, p. 6, prop. 4).
Let be the set of pairs where J is a subset of I and a continuous section of E over which coincides with in . Let us make into an ordered set by the ordering relation denoted by for which if and . For , we write and . Let us show that the ordered set is inductive. Let S be a totally ordered subset of . Put ; this is a subset of I. One then defines a section of E over by setting , if ; thus . Let and let be such that ; since , the restriction of to is continuous. It then follows from TG, I, p. 19, Prop. 4 that is continuous. Thus, is an element of ; by construction, it is an upper bound of S. This proves that the set is inductive. It therefore possesses a maximal element (E, III, p. 20, th. 2).
Let us reason by contradiction, supposing that J . Let be an element of I-J. Put and define a section of E over by:
for ,
for ,
which is possible since and coincide on . Moreover, since and are closed, the section is continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4). By hypothesis, there exists a continuous section extending . Since the restrictions of and to are equal, the continuous section which coincides with on and with on is a continuous section of over , extending . We then have , which contradicts the hypothesis that is maximal.
Thus, J = I, hence and is a continuous section of E over B extending .
Corollary 1 01OP
Let B be a paracompact space, a sheaf on B and an open covering of B. If, for every , the induced sheaf is soft, then the sheaf is soft.
There exists in fact a locally finite closed covering finer than the covering (TG, IX, p. 49, prop. 4 and p. 48, cor. 1). Consequently, for every , the sheaf is soft and the proposition implies that the sheaf is soft.
Corollary 2 01OQ
Let B be a paracompact space, a sheaf on B and a locally finite closed covering of B. In order that the sheaf be soft, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied:
For every , every closed subset A of , every open set V of B containing A and every element of , there exist an open neighbourhood U of in B, an element of and an open neighbourhood W of A in B contained in such that .
Suppose that the sheaf is soft, and let us show that the condition is satisfied. Let , let A be a closed subset of , let V be an open subset of B containing A and let be an element of . Put . It is a continuous section over V of the étalé space . Since is closed, A is closed in B and extends to a section , by definition of a soft sheaf. The sections and of the étalé space over V coincide on A, hence on a neighbourhood W of A (I, p. 34, prop. 11, b)).
Conversely, suppose that the condition of the corollary is satisfied. By proposition 6, it is enough to prove that, for every , the sheaf is soft. Let A be a closed subset of and let be a section of the etale space of over A, that is, a continuous section over A of the etale space . Since A is closed in B and since B is paracompact, extends to a section over a neighbourhood V of A in B (I, p. 37, th. 2). By hypothesis, there exists an open neighbourhood U of in B and a section of over U which coincides with on a neighbourhood of A. The restriction of to is a section of which extends . The sheaf is therefore soft. By proposition 6, the sheaf is soft.
10. Sheaves of structures
Suppose given a Species of structures Σ and a notion of -morphism relative to this Species of structures.
Let B be a topological space.
A presheaf on B is said to be with values in the Species of structures Σ if, for every open set U of B, the set is endowed with a structure of Species Σ and if the restriction mappings are -morphisms.
Such a presheaf will be said to be a sheaf with values in the Species of structures Σ if, moreover, it is a sheaf of sets.
If and are presheaves with values in the Species of structures Σ, a morphism is said to be a morphism of presheaves with values in Σ if, for every open set U, the mapping is a -morphism.
Thus one speaks, for example, of sheaves of groups, of abelian groups, of -modules (for a fixed ring ), of rings, of -algebras (for a fixed commutative ring ).
The sheaf on B of mappings with values in a group (resp. an abelian group, resp. a -module, resp. a ring, resp. a -algebra) is naturally endowed with a structure of sheaf of groups (resp. of abelian groups, resp. of -modules, resp. of rings, resp. of -algebras). If X is a differentiable manifold of class over , the sheaf of numerical functions of class is a sheaf of -algebras, and the sheaf on X of sections of class of a vector bundle E over X is a sheaf of -vector spaces; a differential operator defines a morphism of sheaves of -vector spaces.
For these Species of structures Σ, it follows from the construction which we have given that the sheaf associated with a presheaf with values in the Species of structures Σ (groups, abelian groups, -modules, rings, -algebras) is a sheaf with values in this Species of structures, and that the canonical morphism is a morphism of presheaves with values in the Species of structures Σ.
For example, the sheaf on B of mappings with values in a group is naturally endowed with a structure of sheaf of groups.
Let A and B be topological spaces and let be a continuous mapping. If is a (pre)sheaf on A with values in the Species of structures Σ, the same is true of the direct image (pre)sheaf of the (pre)sheaf under .
Suppose moreover that the Species of structures Σ is that of groups, abelian groups, -modules, rings or -algebras. If is a (pre)sheaf on B with values in the Species of structures Σ, then the sheaf on A, inverse image of the presheaf by the mapping , is endowed with a sheaf structure with values in Σ. In this case, the adjunction morphisms and are morphisms of presheaves with values in the Species of structures Σ. In particular, if is a morphism of presheaves with values in Σ, the same is true of the morphism ; if is a morphism of presheaves with values in Σ, the same is true of the morphism .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 3.