Book AC · English
Index of statements
The 888 statements of Commutative Algebra, by chapter and §. Pick a kind, filter by a word, or put the most cited first.
I. Flat modules
§ 1. Diagrams and exact sequences
- Definition 1 Let A be a ring, F, G, H three right (resp. left) A-modules, f a homomorphism of F to G and g a homomorphism of G to H. The ordered pair (f, g) is called an exact sequence if overl… 0421
- Proposition 1 Consider a commutative diagram of commutative groups: beginarrayccccc A & xrightarrowu & B & xrightarrowv & C \\ a downarrow & & b downarrow & & c downarrow \\ A' & xrightarrowu' &… ↩ 3 0422
- Lemma 1 Consider a commutative diagram of commutative groups: 0423
- Proposition 2 Suppose that in the commutative diagram (10) the sequences (u, v) and (u', u') are exact. Then: ↩ 10 0424
- Remark If the groups of the diagram (10) are all (for example, right) modules over a ring A and the homomorphisms are A-module homomorphisms, it is soon verified that the homomorphism d d… 0425
- Corollary 1 Suppose that the diagram (10) is commutative and the two rows are exact. Then: ↩ 2 0426
- Corollary 2 Suppose that the diagram (10) is commutative and the two rows are exact. Under these conditions: ↩ 5 0427
§ 2. Flat modules
- Lemma 1 Let M' xrightarrowv M xrightarroww M'' → 0 be an exact sequence of left A-modules and E a right A-module. Then the sequence ↩ 11 042F
- Lemma 2 If v : M' → M is injective and v(M') is a direct factor of M, the homomorphism 1, ⊗ v is injective and its image is a direct factor of E ⊗_A M. ↩ 3 042G
- Definition 1 Let A be a ring, E a right A-module and M a left A-module. E is said to be flat for M (or M-flat) if, for every left A-module M' and every injective homomorphism v : M' → M, the ho… ↩ 3 042H
- Lemma 3 For a tight A-module E to be M-flat, it is necessary and sufficient that for every finitely generated submodule M' of M the canonical homomorphism ↩ 2 042I
- Lemma 4 Let E be a right A-module and M a left A-module such that E is M-flat. If N is either a submodule or a quotient module of M, then E is N-flat. ↩ 3 042J
- Lemma 5 Let (Mᵢ)_i ∈ I be a family of left A-modules, M = ⨁_i ∈ I Mᵢ, their direct sum and E a right A-module. If, for all i ∈ I, E is flat for Mᵢ, then E is flat for M. ↩ 1 042K
- Proposition 1 Let E be a right A-module. The following three properties are equivalent: ↩ 9 042L
- Lemma 6 If M' xrightarrowv M xrightarroww M'' is an exact sequence of left A-modules and if E is an M''-flat right A-module, the sequence 042M
- Definition 2 A right A-module E is called flat if it has the equivalent properties of Proposition 1. ↩ 1 042N
- Proposition 2 (i) Let (Eₜ)_t ∈ I be a family of right A-modules. For E = ⨁_t ∈ I Eₜ to be flat, it is necessary and sufficient that each of the Eₜ be flat. ↩ 7 042O
- Proposition 3 Let A be a ring and E a right A-module. ↩ 5 042P
- Example Applying Proposition 3 to the ring Z, it is seen that Q is a flat Z-module, but that Z/nZ (for n ≥ 2) is not a flat Z-module. 042Q
- Proposition 4 Let E be a right A-module. The three following properties are equivalent: ↩ 3 042R
- Proposition 5 Let 0 → E' xrightarrowv E xrightarroww E'' → 0 be an exact sequence of right A-modules. Suppose E'' is flat. Then, for E to be flat it is necessary and sufficient that E' be flat. 042S
- Lemma 7 Let E be a right A-module, F a left A-module and F', F'' two submodules of F such that F = F' + F''. Then the intersection of the canonical images of E \otimes F' and E \otimes F''… ↩ 1 042T
- Proposition 6 Let E be a right A-module and F a left A-module such that E is F-flat. For every submodule F' of F, we denote by \phi(F') the image of E \otimes F' under the canonical mapping of E… ↩ 6 042U
- Remark 1 With the hypotheses of Proposition 6, E ⊗_A F' is usually identified with φ(F') for every submodule F' of F, which gives the formula E ⊗_A (F' ∩ F'') = (E ⊗_A F') ∩ (E ⊗_A F''). 042V
- Proposition 7 Let E be a right A-module, E' a submodule of E, F a left A-module and F' a submodule of F. Suppose that E/E' or F/F' is flat. Then the canonical image of E' ⊗ F' in E ⊗ F is the in… ↩ 5 042W
- Corollary Let E be a right A-module and E' a submodule of E. ↩ 3 042X
- Remark 2 The conclusion of Proposition 7 remains true if we assume only that E/E' is F-flat or that F/F' is E-flat. ↩ 2 042Y
- Proposition 8 Let A, B be two rings, E a right A-module and F an (A,B)-bimodule. Suppose that E is flat and that F is flat as a B-module. Then the B-module E ⊗_A F is flat. ↩ 4 042Z
- Corollary 1 Let C be a commutative ring, E, F two flat C-modules. Then E ⊗_C F is a flat C-module. ↩ 1 0430
- Corollary 2 Let ρ be a homomorphism of a ring A to a ring B. If E is a flat right A-module, the right B-module ρ^*(E) = E_(B) obtained by extending the ring of scalars to B (Algebra, Chapter I… ↩ 4 0431
- Corollary 3 Let R, S be two rings and φ : R → S a ring homomorphism. If M is a flat right S-module and φ_*(S_d) is a flat right R-module, then φ_*(M) is a flat right R-module. ↩ 4 0432
- Proposition 9 Let (A_α, f_βα) be a direct system of rings, A = lim A_α its direct limit, (E_α, f_βα) a direct system of right A_α-modules with the same indexing set and E = lim E_α its direct li… ↩ 2 0433
- Lemma 8 (i) Every module admitting a finite presentation is finitely generated. (ii) If A is a left Noetherian ring, every finitely generated left A-module admits a finite presentation. (i… ↩ 5 0434
- Lemma 9 Let A be a ring and E a finitely presented A-module. For every exact sequence ↩ 5 0435
- Proposition 10 Let A, B be two rings, E a right A-module, F a right B-module and G a (B, A)-bimodule. Suppose that F is flat. Then, if E is finitely generated (resp. finitely presented), the cano… ↩ 1 0436
- Proposition 11 Let A be a commutative ring, B a ring, φ a homomorphism of A to the centre of B, and E and F two A-modules. Suppose that B is a flat A-module and E is finitely generated (resp. fin… ↩ 6 0437
- Proposition 12 Let A, B be commutative rings, φ a homomorphism of A to B, E₁, E₂, E₃ three A-modules, f : E₁ × E → E₃ an A-bilinear mapping and ↩ 4 0438
- Corollary 1 Let A, B be two commutative rings, p : A → B a homomorphism such that B is a flat A-module and E a finitely presented A-module. For every finitely generated submodule F of E, the s… 0439
- Corollary 2 Let A, B be two commutative rings, p : A → B a homomorphism such that B is a flat A-module and E an A-module. Then, for every finitely generated submodule F of E, the annihilator o… ↩ 1 043A
- Remark If there is no ambiguity over the modules E, nor the bilinear mapping f, F₃ : F₂ is sometimes used to denote the module denoted by T in Proposition 12 and it is called the transpor… 043B
- Lemma 10 Let (f_λ)_λ ∈ L be a family of generators of F and (e_λ)_λ ∈ L a family of elements of E of finite support. For ∑_λ ∈ L e_λ ⊗ f_λ = 0, it is necessary and sufficient that there exi… ↩ 2 043C
- Proposition 13 For E to be F-flat (no. 2, Definition 1), it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition be satisfied: ↩ 2 043D
- Corollary 1 For a right A-module E to be flat, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition hold: ↩ 1 043E
- Corollary 2 For the ring B to be a flat right A-module, it is necessary and sufficient that it satisfy the following condition: (RP') Every solution (yₖ)_1 ≤ k ≤ n, consisting of elements of B… ↩ 1 043F
§ 3. Faithfully flat modules
- Proposition 1 Let E be a right A-module. The following four properties are equivalent: ↩ 12 0444
- Definition 1 A right A-module E is called faithfully flat if it satisfies the four equivalent conditions of Proposition 1. 0445
- Remark If E is a faithfully flat A-module, E is a faithful A-module: for, if an element a ∈ A is such that xa = 0 for all x ∈ E, the homothety h : b ↦ ba in A is such that 1, ⊗ h = 0; whe… 0446
- Proposition 2 Let E be a faithfully flat right A-module and u : N' → N a left A-module homomorphism. For u to be injective (resp. surjective, bijective), it is necessary and sufficient that 1_E… ↩ 6 0447
- Proposition 3 Let 0 → E' → E → E'' → +0 be an exact sequence of right A-modules. Suppose that E' and E'' are flat and that one of them is faithfully flat. Then E is faithfully flat. ↩ 2 0448
- Proposition 4 Let R, S be two rings, E a right R-module and F an (R, S)-bimodule. Suppose that E is faithfully flat. Then, for F to be a flat (resp. faithfully flat) S-module, it is necessary an… ↩ 4 0449
- Corollary Let C be a commutative ring and E and F two faithfully flat C-modules. Then the C-module E ⊗_C F is faithfully flat. 044A
- Proposition 5 Let ρ be a homomorphism from a ring A to a ring B. If E is a faithfully flat right A-module, the right B-module ρ^*(E) = E_(B) = E ⊗_A B is faithfully flat. ↩ 4 044B
- Corollary If E is a faithfully flat right A-module and if a is a two-sided ideal of A, the right (A/a)-module E/Ea is faithfully flat. 044C
- Proposition 6 Let A be a commutative ring, B an algebra over A and ρ : a ↦ a . 1 the canonical homomorphism of A to B. Suppose that B is a faithfully flat A-module. Then, for an A-module E to be… 044D
- Proposition 7 Let A, B be two rings and ρ a homomorphism of A to B. Let E be a faithfully flat right B-module. For ρ^*(E) to be a flat (resp. faithfully flat) right A-module, it is necessary and… 044E
- Proposition 8 Let A, B be two rings and ρ a homomorphism from A to B. Suppose that there exists a right B-module E such that ρ_*(E) is a faithfully flat A-module. Then: (i) For every left A-modu… ↩ 5 044F
- Corollary Under the hypotheses of Proposition 8, if B is left Noetherian (resp. Artinian), so is A. 044G
- Proposition 9 Let A, B be two rings and ρ a homomorphism of A to B. The following five properties are equivalent: (a) The right A-module B is faithfully flat. (b) The homomorphism ρ is injective… ↩ 3 044H
- Proposition 10 Let B be a ring and A a subring of B such that B is a faithfully flat right A-module. Let F be a left A-module, F', F'' two submodules of F. Then: (i) The canonical mapping B ⊗_A F… ↩ 2 044I
- Proposition 11 Let B be a ring and A a subring of B such that B is a faithfully flat right A-module. For a left A-module F to be definitely generated (resp. finitely presented), it is necessary a… ↩ 2 044J
- Proposition 12 Let B be a ring and A a commutative subring of the centre of B such that B is a faithfully flat A-module. For an A-module F to be projective and finitely generated, it is necessary… ↩ 3 044K
- Proposition 13 Let A be a subring of a ring B. For the ordered pair (A, B) to satisfy the linear extension property, it is necessary and sufficient that B be a faithfully flat A-module. 044L
§ 4. Flat modules and "Tor" functors
- Proposition 1 Let E be a right A-module. The following four properties are equivalent: 044W
- Proposition 2 Let R, S be two rings, ρ : R → S a homomorphism and F a left R-module. The following two properties are equivalent: (a) Tor₁ᴿ(ρ_*(E), F) = 0 for every right S-module E. (b) The lef… ↩ 3 044X
- Remark Proposition 2 also follows from the existence of the exact sequence 044Y
II. Localization
§ 1. Prime ideals
- Definition 1 An ideal p of a ring A is called prime if the ring A/p is an integral domain. ↩ 1 0450
- Proposition 1 Let A be a ring, a₁, a₂, …, aₙ ideals of A and p a prime ideal of A. If p contains the product a₁ a₂ … aₙ, it contains at least one of the aᵢ. ↩ 7 0451
- Corollary Let m be a maximal ideal of A; for every integer n > 0, the only prime ideal containing mⁿ is m. 0452
- Proposition 2 Let A be a ring, a a non-empty set of A which is closed under addition and multiplication and (pᵢ)_i ∈ I a non-empty finite family of ideals of A. Suppose that a is contained in th… ↩ 5 0453
- Proposition 3 Let a and b be two relatively prime ideals of a ring A. Let a' and b' be two ideals of A such that every element of a (resp. b) has a power in a' (resp. b'). Then a' and b' are rel… ↩ 3 0454
- Proposition 4 Let a, b₁, …, bₙ be ideals of a ring A. If a is relatively prime to each of the bᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n), it is relatively prime to b₁ b₂ … bₙ. ↩ 2 0455
- Proposition 5 Let (aᵢ)_i ∈ I be a non-empty finite family of ideals of a ring A. The following properties are equivalent = (a) For i ≠ j, aᵢ and aⱼ are relatively prime. (b) The canonical homomo… ↩ 8 0456
- Proposition 6 Let (aᵢ)_i ∈ I be a non-empty finite family of ideals of a ring A which are relatively prime in pairs; let a be the intersection of the aᵢ. For every A-module M, the canonical mapp… ↩ 2 0457
- Example Let K be a field, a, (1 ≤ i ≤ m) distinct elements of K and, for each i, let gᵢ be a polynomial in K[X]; the principal ideal (X - aᵢ) = mᵢ is maximal in K[X], hence, for every syst… 0458
§ 2. Rings and modules of fractions
- Definition 1 Let A be a ring. A subset S of A is called multiplicative if every finite product of elements of S belongs to S. 045K
- Proposition 1 Let A be a ring and S a subset of A. There exists a ring A' and a homomorphism h of A to A' with the following properties: (1) the elements of h(S) are invertible in A ; (2) for ev… ↩ 8 045L
- Definition 2 Let A be a ring, S a subset of A and overlineS the multiplicative subset generated by S. The ring of fractions of A defined by S and denoted by A[S⁻¹] is the quotient set of A × ov… 045M
- Proposition 2 Let A, B be two rings, S a subset of A, T a subset of B and f a homomorphism from A to B such that f(S) ⊂ T. There exists a unique homomorphism f' from A[S⁻¹] to B[T⁻¹] such that f… ↩ 12 045N
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring, S a subset of A and u an injective homomorphism of A to a ring B such that the elements of u(S) are invertible in B. The unique homomorphism u' of A[S⁻¹] to B such… ↩ 3 045O
- Corollary 2 Let A be a ring and S and T two subsets of A such that S ⊂ T. There exists a unique homomorphism i_A^T,S from A[S⁻¹] to A[T⁻¹] such that i_Aᵀ = i_A^T,S ∘ i_A^S. ↩ 2 045P
- Corollary 3 Let A, B, C be three rings, S (resp. T, U) a multiplicative subset of A (resp. B, C), f : A → B, g : B → C two homomorphisms and h : A → C the composite homomorphism g ∘ f; suppose… ↩ 1 045Q
- Corollary 4 Let S be a subset of a ring A, B a subring of A[S⁻¹] containing i_A^S(A) and S' the set i_A^S(A). Let j be the canonical injection of B into A[S⁻¹]; the unique homomorphism g from… ↩ 1 045R
- Proposition 3 Let A be a ring, S a subset of A, M an A-module, M' the A-module M ⊗_A A[S⁻¹] and f the canonical A-homomorphism x ↦ x ⊗ 1 of M to M'. Then: (1) For all s ∈ S, the homothety z ↦ sz… ↩ 5 045S
- Definition 3 Let A be a ring, S a subset of A, overlineS the multiplicative subset of A generated by S and M an A-module. Then the module of fractions of M defined by S and denoted by M[S⁻¹] or… 045T
- Proposition 4 Let S be a multiplicative subset of A and M an A-module. For ms = 0 (m \in M, s \in S), it is necessary and sufficient that there exist s' \in S such that s'm = 0. ↩ 3 045U
- Corollary 1 For ms = m's' in S^{-1}M, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist t \in S such that t(s'm - sm') = 0. ↩ 1 045V
- Corollary 2 Let M be a finitely generated A-module. For S^{-1}M = 0, it is necessary and sufficient that there exists s \in S such that sM = 0. ↩ 3 045W
- Corollary 3 Let M be a finitely generated A-module. For an ideal a & A to be such that aM = M, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a ∈ a such that (1 + a)M = 0. ↩ 2 045X
- Lemma 1 For every ideal a of A, the set S of elements 1 + a, where a ∈ a, is a multiplicative subset of A and the set a' of elements of S⁻¹A of the form a/s, where a ∈ a and s ∈ S, is an i… ↩ 1 045Y
- Proposition 5 Let A, B be two rings, S a multiplicative subset of A, T a multiplicative subset of B and f a homomorphism from A to B such that f(S) ⊂ T. Let M be an A-module, N a B-module and u… ↩ 3 045Z
- Proposition 6 Let f be a homomorphism from a ring A to a ring B and S a multiplicative subset of A. There exists a unique mapping j from (f(S))⁻¹B to S⁻¹B (where B is considered as an A-module b… ↩ 2 0460
- Proposition 7 Let A be a ring and S, T two multiplicative subsets of A. Set T' = i(TA^S). ↩ 7 0461
- Proposition 8 Let A be a ring and S, T two multiplicative subsets of A such that S ⊂ T. The following properties are equivalent: ↩ 1 0462
- Proposition 9 Let I be a right directed preordered set, (S_α)_α ∈ I an increasing family of multiplicative subsets of a ring A and S = ⋃_α ∈ I S_α. We write ρ_β α = i^S_β, S_α_A^S_β, S_α for α ≤… ↩ 1 0463
- Corollary Under the hypotheses of Proposition 9, let M be an A-module. We write f_β α = i^S_β, S_α_M for α ≤ β, f_α = i^S, S_α_M for all α ∈ I and let f'_α be the canonical mapping from S_α⁻… 0464
- Theorem 1 The ring S⁻¹A is a flat A-module (Chapter I, § 2, no. 1, Definition 2). ↩ 16 0465
- Proposition 10 Let M be an A-module. For every submodule N' of the S⁻¹A-module S⁻¹M, let φ(N') be the inverse image of N' under i_M^S. Then: (i) Sφ(N') = N'. ↩ 3 0466
- Corollary 1 Let N₁, N₂ be two submodules of an A-module M. For S⁻¹N₁ ⊂ S⁻¹N₂, it is necessary and sufficient that the saturation of N₁ with respect to S be contained in that of N₂. 0467
- Corollary 2 If M is a Noetherian (resp. Artinian) A-module, S^{-1}M is a Noetherian (resp. Artinian) S^{-1}A-module. In particular, if the ring A is Noetherian (resp. Artinian), so is the ring… ↩ 3 0468
- Proposition 11 Let A be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of A. For every ideal b' of S^{-1}A, let b = (iA^S)^{-1}(b') be such that b' = S^{-1}b. ↩ 16 0469
- Remark For an ideal a of A to satisfy S⁻¹a = S⁻¹A (or, what amounts to the same thing by no. 4, Theorem I, S⁻¹(A/a) = 0), it is necessary and sufficient that a ∩ S ≠ ∅, as follows immedia… 046A
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of A. Every ideal p of A which is maximal among those which do not meet S is prime. 046B
- Corollary 2 Let A be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of A. For every ideal a of A not meeting S there exists a prime ideal containing a and not meeting S. ↩ 4 046C
- Corollary 3 Let A, B be two rings, ρ a homomorphism from A to B and p a prime ideal of A. For there to exist a prime ideal p' of B such that overlineρ⁻¹(p') = p, it is necessary and sufficient… ↩ 1 046D
- Corollary 4 Let A, B be two rings and ρ a homomorphism from A to B. (i) Suppose that there exists a B-module E such that ρ_*(E) is a faithfully flat A-module. Then, for every prime ideal p of… ↩ 3 046E
- Corollary 5 Let A be a ring, S a multiplicative subset of A and B a ring such that i_A^S(A) ⊂ B ⊂ S⁻¹A. Let q be a prime ideal of B such that the prime ideal p = (i_A^S)⁻¹(q) of A does not mee… 046F
- Definition 4 The ideal of nilpotent elements of a (commutative) ring A is called the nilradical of A. If a is an ideal of A, the inverse image, under the canonical mapping A → A/a, of the nilra… 046G
- Proposition 12 Let p be a minimal prime ideal of a ring A. For all x ∈ p, there exists s ∈ A - p and an integer k > 0 such that sxᵏ = 0. ↩ 2 046H
- Proposition 13 The nilradical of a ring A is the intersection of all the prime ideals of A and it is also the intersection of the minimal prime ideals of A. ↩ 1 046I
- Lemma 2 Every prime ideal of a ring A contains a minimal prime ideal of A. 046J
- Remark In § 4, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Proposition 14, we shall show that in a Noetherian ring the set of minimal prime ideals is finite; moreover we shall see later that every decreasing s… 046K
- Corollary 1 The radical of an ideal a in a ring A is the intersection of the prime ideals containing a and it is also the intersection of the minimal elements of this set of prime ideals. ↩ 2 046L
- Corollary 2 For an ideal a of a ring A we denote by r(a) the radical of a. Then, for two ideals a, b of A, r(a ∩ b) = r(ab) = r(a) ∩ r(b); in particular, if a ⊂ b, then r(a) ⊂ r(b). ↩ 1 046M
- Proposition 14 For two ideals a, b of a ring to be relatively prime, it is necessary and sufficient that their radicals r(a) and r(b) be so. 046N
- Proposition 15 In a ring A let a be an ideal and b a finitely generated ideal contained in the radical of a. Then there exists an integer k > 0 such that bᵏ ⊂ a. ↩ 3 046O
- Corollary In a Noetherian ring the nilradical is a nilpotent ideal. 046P
- Proposition 16 Let B be a ring and A a subring of B. For every minimal prime ideal p of A there exists a minimal prime ideal q of B such that q ∩ A = p. 046Q
- Definition 5 A ring A is called reduced if its nilradical is reduced to 0, in other words if no element ≠ 0 of A is nilpotent. 046R
- Proposition 17 Let A be a ring and 𝔑 its nilradical. For every multiplicative subset S of A, S⁻¹𝔑 is the nilradical of S⁻¹A. In particular, if A is reduced, then S⁻¹A is reduced. 046S
- Proposition 18 Let A be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of A. ↩ 2 046T
- Corollary Let M be an A-module and a an ideal of A. The sub-S⁻¹A-modules (S⁻¹a)(S⁻¹M), a(S⁻¹M), (S⁻¹a)j(M) (where j : M → S⁻¹M is the canonical mapping) and S⁻¹(aM) of S⁻¹M are identical. In… ↩ 2 046U
- Remark Let M, N, P be three A-modules, f : M × N → P an A-bilinear mapping and S⁻¹f : (S⁻¹M) × (S⁻¹N) → (S⁻¹P) the S⁻¹A-bilinear mapping obtained from f by extending the ring of scalars t… 046V
- Proposition 19 Let A be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of A. (i) If M and N are two A-modules and M is finitely generated (resp. finitely presented), the canonical homomorphism (Chapter I… ↩ 2 046W
- Proposition 20 Let A, A' be two rings, p : A → A' a homomorphism, S a multiplicative subset of A, S' = ρ(S) and ρ' : S⁻¹A → S'⁻¹A' the homomorphism corresponding to p (no. 1, Proposition 2). 046X
- Proposition 21 The ring S⁻¹A with the family ((S⁻¹A)ᵢ) is a graded ring and S⁻¹M with the family ((S⁻¹M)ᵢ) is a graded module over the graded ring S⁻¹A. The canonical mappings i^S_A and i^S_M are… 046Y
- Proposition 22 Let A (resp. B) be a graded ring of type A, M (resp. N) a graded module over the graded ring A (resp. B), S (resp. T) a multiplicative subset of A (resp. B) all of whose elements a… 046Z
§ 3. Local rings. Passage from the local to the global
- Proposition 1 Let A be a ring and I the set of non-invertible elements of A. The set I is the union of the ideals of A which are distinct from A. Moreover, the following conditions are equivalen… ↩ 2 047R
- Definition 1 A ring A is called a local ring if it satisfies the equivalent conditions (a), (b) and (c) of Proposition 1. The quotient of A by its Jacobson radical (which is then the unique max… 047S
- Definition 2 Let A, B be two local rings and m, n their respective maximal ideals. A homomorphism u : A → B is called local if u(m) ⊂ n. 047T
- Proposition 2 Let A be a ring and p a prime ideal of A. The ring A, is local; its maximal ideal is the ideal pAₚ = pᵥ, generated by the canonical image of p in A; its residue field is canonicall… ↩ 2 047U
- Definition 3 Let A be a ring and p a prime ideal of A. The ring A, is called the local ring of A at p, or the local ring of p, when there is no ambiguity. 047V
- Proposition 3 Let A be a ring, p a prime ideal of A and S = A - p. For every ideal b' of Aₚ distinct from Aₚ, let b be the ideal (i_A^S)⁻¹(b') of A so that b' = bAₚ. ↩ 4 047W
- Proposition 4 Let A be a ring which is not necessarily commutative, m a right ideal of A contained in the Jacobson radical of A and M a left A-module. Suppose that one of the following condition… ↩ 6 047X
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring which is not necessarily commutative, m a right ideal of A contained in the Jacobson radical of A, M and N two left A-modules and u : M → N an A-linear mapping. If… ↩ 5 047Y
- Corollary 2 Let A be a ring which is not necessarily commutative, m a two-sided ideal of A contained in the Jacobson radical of A, M a left A-module and (xᵢ)_i ∈ I a family of elements of M. I… ↩ 5 047Z
- Proposition 5 Let A be a ring which is not necessarily commutative, m a two-sided ideal of A contained in the Jacobson radical of A and M a left A-module. Suppose that one of the following condi… ↩ 7 0480
- Corollary 1 Let A be a not necessarily commutative ring, m the Jacobson radical of A and M a left A-module. Suppose that A/m is a field, that the canonical homomorphism from m \otimesA M to M… ↩ 3 0481
- Corollary 2 Let A be a not necessarily commutative ring, m the Jacobson radical of A and M a left A-module. Suppose that A/m is a field and that one of the following conditions holds: (i) M is… ↩ 3 0482
- Proposition 6 Let A be a ring which is not necessarily commutative and m its Jacobson radical; suppose that A/m is a field. Let M and N be two finitely generated free A-modules and u: M → N a ho… ↩ 5 0483
- Corollary Under the hypotheses of Proposition 6 the following properties are equivalent: ↩ 1 0484
- Proposition 7 Let A be a reduced local ring, m its maximal ideal, (pᵢ)_i ∈ I the family of minimal prime ideals of A, Kᵢ the field of fractions of A/pᵢ and M a finitely generated A-module. For M… ↩ 1 0485
- Proposition 8 Let A be a ring, m a maximal ideal of A and M an A-module. If there exists an ideal a of A such that m is the only maximal ideal of A containing a and aM = 0, then the canonical ho… ↩ 2 0486
- Proposition 9 Let A be a ring, m a maximal ideal of A, M an A-module and k an integer geqslant 0. The canonical homomorphism M → Mₘ/mᵏ Mₘ is surjective, has kernel mᵏ M and defines an isomorphis… ↩ 5 0487
- Corollary Let A be a ring, m₁, m₂, …, mₙ distinct maximal ideals of A, M an A-module and k₁, k₂, …, kₙ integers geqslant 0. The canonical homomorphism from M to ∏ⁿ Mₘ/m_i₁^k₁ Mₘ is surjectiv… ↩ 1 0488
- Proposition 10 The A-module ⨁_m ∈ Ω Aₘ, the direct sum of the Aₘ where m ∈ Ω, is faithfully flat. ↩ 2 0489
- Theorem 1 Let M, N be two A-modules, u : M → N an A-homomorphism and, for all m ∈ Ω, let uₘ : M, → Nₘ be the corresponding Aₘ-homomorphism (§ 2, no. 2, Remark 5). For u to be injective (resp… ↩ 11 048A
- Corollary 1 Let M be an A-module, N a submodule of M and x an element of M. For x ∈ N, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all m ∈ R, the canonical image of x in M, belong to N. ↩ 5 048B
- Corollary 2 Let M be an A-module and, for all m ∈ Ω, let fₘ be the canonical mapping M → Mₘ. The homomorphism x ↦ (fₘ(x)) of M to ∏_m ∈ Ω Mₘ is injective. ↩ 3 048C
- Corollary 3 (i) Let b be an ideal of A and a an element of A. For a ∈ b, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all m ∈ Ω, the canonical image of a in Aₘ belong to bAₘ. 048D
- Corollary 4 Let A be an integral domain, K its field of fractions and M a torsion-free A-module such that M is canonically identified with a sub-A-module of K ⊗_A M. Then, for all m ∈ Ω, Mₘ is… 048E
- Corollary 5 Let A be a ring. Every system of generators of the A-module Aⁿ with n elements is a basis of Aⁿ. 048F
- Proposition 11 Let M be an A-module, N a finitely generated A-module and u : M → N a homomorphism. For u to be surjective, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all m ∈ S₂, the homomorphism M/… ↩ 2 048G
- Proposition 12 Let E, F, G be three A-modules and v : G → F, u : E → F homomorphisms. Suppose that E is finitely presented. For there to exist a homomorphism w : E → G such that u factors into E… ↩ 3 048H
- Corollary 1 Let M be an A-module and N a submodule of M such that M/N is finitely presented. For N to be a direct factor of M, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all m ∈ S₂, N, be a dire… ↩ 1 048I
- Corollary 2 Let M be a finitely generated free A-module and N a submodule of M which is a finitely generated free A-module. For N to be a direct factor of M, it is necessary and sufficient tha… 048J
- Proposition 13 Let S be a multiplicative subset of a ring A and M an A-module. If M is jflat (resp. faithfully flat), S⁻¹M is ajflat (resp. faithfully flat) S⁻¹A-module and a flat A-module. ↩ 4 048K
- Remark If N is an S⁻¹A-module, S⁻¹N is identified with N and this is consequently equivalent to saying that N is a flat S⁻¹A-module or a flat A-module. 048L
- Proposition 14 Let A be a ring, B a commutative A-algebra and T a multiplicative subset of B. If N is a B-module which is flat as an A-module, T⁻¹N is a flat A-module. ↩ 1 048M
- Proposition 15 Let A, B be two rings, φ : A → B a homomorphism and N a B-module. The following properties are equivalent: (a) N is a flat A-module. (b) For every maximal ideal n of B, Nₙ is a fla… ↩ 1 048N
- Corollary For an A-module M to be flat (resp. faithfully flat), it is necessary and sufficient that, for every maximal ideal m of A, M, be a flat (resp. faithfully flat) Am-module. ↩ 2 048O
- Proposition 16 Let A be a ring. The following properties are equivalent: (a) the set of maximal ideals of A is finite; (b) the quotient of A by its Jacobson radical is the direct composition of a… ↩ 1 048P
- Definition 4 A ring is called semi-local if it satisfies the equivalent conditions (a), (b) of Proposition 16. 048Q
- Example Every local ring is semi-local. Every quotient of a semi-local ring is semi-local. Every finite product of semi-local rings is semi-local. 048R
- Proposition 17 Let A be a ring and 𝔭₁, …, 𝔭ₙ prime ideals of A. We write S = ⋂₁ⁿ (A - 𝔭ᵢ) = A - ⋃₁ⁿ 𝔭ᵢ. ↩ 2 048S
- Corollary Let A be an integral domain and 𝔭₁, …, 𝔭ₙ prime ideals of A, no two of which are comparable with respect to inclusion. If A = ⋂₁ⁿ A_𝔭ᵢ in the field of fractions of A, the maximal i… ↩ 1 048T
§ 4. Spectra of rings and supports of modules
- Definition 1 A topological space X is called irreducible if every finite intersection of non-empty open sets of X is non-empty. 0498
- Proposition 1 Let X be a non-empty topological space. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) X is irreducible; (b) every non-empty open set of X is dense in X; (c) every open set of X is c… ↩ 2 0499
- Proposition 2 In a topological space X, for a set E to be irreducible, it is necessary and sufficient that its closure overlineE be so. ↩ 5 049A
- Proposition 3 (i) If X is an irreducible space, every non-empty open subset of X is irreducible. ↩ 1 049B
- Proposition 4 Let X and Y be two topological spaces and f a continuous mapping from X to Y. For every irreducible subset E of X, f(E) is an irreducible subset of Y. 049C
- Definition 2 Every maximal irreducible subset of a topological space X is called an irreducible component of X. 049D
- Proposition 5 Let X be a topological space. Every irreducible subset of X is contained in an irreducible component of X and X is the union of its irreducible components. 049E
- Corollary Every connected component of a topological space X is a union of irreducible components of X. ↩ 1 049F
- Proposition 6 Let X be a topological space and (Pᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n ajinite covering of X consisting & irreducible closed sets. Then the irreducible components of X are the maximal elements (with resp… ↩ 2 049G
- Corollary Let X be a topological space and E a subspace with only ajinite number of distinct irreducible components Qᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n); then the irreducible components of the closure overlineE i… 049H
- Remark Suppose that X has only ajinite number of distinct irreducible components Xᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n); then U₊ = C(⋃_j ≠ i Xⱼ) is open in X and dense in Xᵢ since Xᵢ ∉ ⋃_j ≠ i Xⱼ; the Uᵢ (1 ≤ i… 049I
- Proposition 7 Let U be an open subset of a topological space X. The mapping V ↦ overlineV (closure in X) is a bijection of the set & irreducible subsets of U which are closed in U onto the set &… 049J
- Definition 3 A topological space X is called Noetherian if every non-empty set of closed subsets of X, ordered by inclusion, has a minimal element. 049K
- Proposition 8 (i) Every subspace of a Noetherian space is Noetherian. (ii) Let (Aᵢ)_i ∈ I be a finite covering of a topological space X. If the subspaces Aᵢ of X are Noetherian, X is Noetherian. ↩ 1 049L
- Proposition 9 For a topological space X to be Noetherian, it is necessary and sufficient that every open set in X be quasi-compact. 049M
- Lemma 1 ("Principle of Noetherian induction") Let E be an ordered set every non-empty subset of which admits a minimal element. Let F be a subset of E with the following property : if a ∈ E is such that the relation x < a impl… 049N
- Proposition 10 If X is a Noetherian space, the set of irreducible components of X (and a fortiori the set of connected components of X) is finite. 049O
- Definition 4 Let A be a ring. The set X of prime ideals of A, with the topology whose closed sets are the sets V(M), where M runs through 𝔓(A), is called the prime spectrum of A and denoted by… ↩ 1 049P
- Proposition 11 Let A be a ring, a an ideal of A and Y a subset of X = Spec(A). (i) V(a) is closed in X and 𝔍(Y) is an ideal of A which is equal to its radical. (ii) 𝔍(V(a)) is the radical of a an… ↩ 8 049Q
- Corollary 1 For every family (Yλ){λ ∈ L} of closed subsets of X, J(∩{λ ∈ L} Yλ) is the radical of the sum of the ideals J(Yλ). 049R
- Corollary 2 Let r(a) denote the radical of an ideal a of A; if a and b are two ideals of A, the relation V(a) ⊂ V(b) is equivalent to b ⊂ r(a) and r(b) ⊂ r(a). ↩ 4 049S
- Corollary 3 Let (fλ){λ ∈ L} be a family of elements of A. For an element g ∈ A to satisfy Xg ⊂ ∪{λ ∈ L} X{fλ}, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist an integer n 0 such that g^n belo… ↩ 2 049T
- Corollary 5 For f ∈ A to satisfy X_f = ∅, it is necessary and sufficient that f be nilpotent. 049U
- Corollary 6 The closure of a set consisting of a point p ∈ X = Spec(A) is the set V(p) of prime ideals containing p. For the set p to be closed in X (or, as we shall also say by an abuse of la… 049V
- Corollary 7 If A is a Noetherian ring, X = Spec(A) is a Noetherian space. ↩ 1 049W
- Proposition 12 For all f ∈ A, the open set X_f in X = Spec(A) is quasi-compact; in particular, the space X is quasi-compact. 049X
- Proposition 13 Let A, A' be two rings, X = Spec(A), X' = Spec(A') and h a homomorphism from A to A'; the mapping ᵃ h : p' ↦ overlineh(p') from X' to X is continuous. ↩ 3 049Y
- Remark If h is surjective and a is its kernel, it follows from the definition of the spectral topology that ᵃ h is a homeomorphism of X' onto the closed subspace V(a) of X; for a prime id… 049Z
- Corollary Let S be a multiplicative subset of A, A' = S⁻¹A and h the canonical homomorphism i_A^S; then ᵃ h is a homeomorphism of X' = Spec(A') onto the subspace of X = Spec(A) consisting of… ↩ 1 04A0
- Proposition 14 Let A be a ring. For a subset Y of X = Spec(A) to be irreducible, it is necessary and sufficient that the ideal 𝔍(Y) be prime. ↩ 1 04A1
- Corollary 1 For a ring A to be such that X = Spec(A) is irreducible, it is necessary and sufficient that the quotient of A by its nilradical 𝔑 be an integral domain. 04A2
- Corollary 2 The mapping p ↦ V(p) is a bijection of X = Spec(A) onto the set of irreducible closed subsets of X; in particular the irreducible components of a closed subset Y of X are the sets… ↩ 2 04A3
- Corollary 3 The set of minimal prime ideals of a Noetherian ring A is finite. ↩ 1 04A4
- Proposition 15 Let A be a ring, I a finite set and E the set of orthogonal families (eᵢ)_i ∈ I of idempotents eᵢ ≠ 0 of A such that ∑_i ∈ I eᵢ = 1. For all (eᵢ)_i ∈ I ∈ E, we set overlineω((eᵢ)_i… ↩ 2 04A5
- Lemma 2 If e, f are two idempotents of A such that Ae and Af have the same radical then e = f. ↩ 1 04A6
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring, r a nil ideal of A and h : A → A/r the canonical homomorphism. For every finite orthogonal family (e'ᵢ)_i ∈ I of idempotents of A/r such that ∑_i ∈ I e'ᵢ = 1, ther… 04A7
- Corollary 2 For the prime spectrum X = Spec(A) of a ring A to be connected, it is necessary and sufficient that A contain no idempotents other than 0 and 1. ↩ 1 04A8
- Definition 5 Let A be a ring and M an A-module. The set of prime ideals p of A such that Mₚ ≠ 0 is called the support of M and is denoted by Supp(M). ↩ 1 04A9
- Example Let a be an ideal of A; in the notation of no. 3, we have V(a) = Supp(A/a). If p is a prime of A such that a ∉ p, then (A/a)ₚ = 0 (§ 3, no. 1, Remark 3); if on the other hand a ⊂ p… 04AA
- Proposition 16 Let A be a ring and M an A-module. (i) If N is a submodule of M, then Supp(M) = Supp(N) ∪ Supp(M/N). (ii) If M is the sum of a family (Nᵢ)_i ∈ I of submodules, then Supp(M) = ⋃_i ∈… ↩ 2 04AB
- Corollary Let A be a ring, M an A-module, (mᵢ)_i ∈ I a system of generators of M and a, the annihilator of mᵢ. Then Supp(M) = ⋃_i ∈ I V(aᵢ). Supp(M) = ⋃_i ∈ I Supp(Amᵢ) by Proposition 16 (ii… ↩ 1 04AC
- Proposition 17 Let A be a ring, M an A-module and a its annihilator; if M is finitely generated, then Supp(M) = V(a) and Supp(M) is therefore closed in Spec(A). Let (mᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n be a system of… ↩ 6 04AD
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring, M a finitely generated A-module and a an element of A. For a to belong to every prime ideal of the support of M, it is necessary and sufficient that the homothety… 04AE
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Noetherian ring, M a finitely generated A-module and a an ideal of A. For Supp(M) ⊂ V(a), it is necessary and sufficient that there exist an integer k such that aᵏ M = 0… 04AF
- Proposition 18 Let M, M' be two finitely generated modules over a ring A; then 04AG
- Lemma 3 Let B be a local ring and E and E' two finitely generated B-modules. If E ≠ 0 and E' ≠ 0, then E ⊗_B E' ≠ 0. 04AH
- Corollary Let M be a finitely generated A-module and n its annihilator. For every ideal a of A, Supp(M/aM) = V(a) ∩ V(n) = V(a + n). 04AI
- Proposition 19 Let A, B be two rings, φ : A → B a homomorphism and ᵃφ : Spec(B) → Spec(A) the continuous mapping associated with φ (Proposition 13). For every A-module M, Supp(M_(B)) ⊂ ᵃφ(Supp(M)… ↩ 1 04AJ
- Lemma 4 Let A, B be two local rings, p : A → B a local homomorphism and E a finitely generated A-module. If E ≠ 0, then E_(B) ≠ 0. ↩ 1 04AK
- Proposition 20 Let A be a ring and M a finitely generated A-module. For every prime ideal p ∈ Supp(M), there exists a non-zero A-homomorphism w : M → A/p. ↩ 1 04AL
§ 5. Finitely generated projective modules. Invertible fractional ideals
- Proposition 1 Let f be an element of a ring A and φ : A → A_f, the canonical mapping. The mapping ᵃφ : Spec(A_f) → Spec(A) is a homeomorphism of Spec(A_f) onto the open subspace X_f of X = Spec(… 04BE
- Proposition 2 Let A be a ring, u : M → N an A-module homomorphism and p a prime ideal of A. ↩ 2 04BF
- Corollary If N is finitely presented and Nₚ is a free Aₚ-module of rank p, there exists f ∈ A - p such that N, is a free A_f-module of rank p. ↩ 1 04BG
- Proposition 3 Let (fᵢ)_i ∈ I be a finite family of elements of a ring A, generating the ideal A of A. The ring B = ∏_i ∈ I Aᵢ, is then a faithfully flat A-module. ↩ 3 04BH
- Corollary Under the hypotheses of Proposition 3, for an A-module M to be finitely generated (resp. finitely presented), it is necessary and sufficient that, for every index i, the A_fᵢ-modul… ↩ 1 04BI
- Theorem 1 Let A be a ring and P an A-module. The following properties are equivalent: ↩ 15 04BJ
- Corollary 1 Suppose that the equivalent properties of the statement of Theorem 1 hold. Let m be an integer 0 such that, for every family (xᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ m of elements of P, there exists a family… 04BK
- Corollary 2 Every finitely presented flat module is projective. ↩ 1 04BL
- Definition 1 Let P be a finitely generated projective A-module. For every prime ideal p of A, the rank of the free Aₚ-module Pₚ is called the rank of P at p and is denoted by rgₚ(P). ↩ 1 04BM
- Definition 2 Let n be an integer geqslant 0. A projective A-module P is said to be of rank n if it is finitely generated and rgₚ(P) = n for every prime ideal p of A. ↩ 3 04BN
- Theorem 2 Let P be an A-module and n an integer geqslant 0. The following properties are equivalent: ↩ 4 04BO
- Remark If A is an integral domain, a projective A-module admits a well-defined rank (in the sense of Definition 2), as has been observed above; moreover, this rank coincides with the rank… 04BP
- Corollary For a finitely generated projective A-module P to be of rank n, it is necessary and sufficient that Aⁿ P be of rank 1. 04BQ
- Proposition 4 Let B be a commutative A-algebra and P a projective A-module of rank n. The B-module P_(B) = B ⊗_A P is then projective of rank n. ↩ 4 04BR
- Proposition 5 Let A be a semi-local ring and P a finitely generated projective A-module. If the rank of P is defined, P is a free A-module. ↩ 1 04BS
- Theorem 3 Let A be a ring and M ajnitely generated A-module. ↩ 2 04BT
- Proposition 6 Let M and N be projective A-modules of rank 1. Then M ⊗_A N, Hom_A(M, N) and the dual M^* of M are projective of rank 1. 04BU
- Proposition 7 The set P(A) of classes of projective A-modules of rank 1, with the law of composition (6), is a commutative group. If M is a projective A-module of rank 1 and M^* is its dual, the… 04BV
- Definition 3 Let M be a sub-A-module of B. M is called non-degenerate if B.M = B. 04BW
- Proposition 8 Let M be a sub-A-module of B. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) M is non-degenerate. (b) M meets S. (c) If j : M → B is the canonical injection, the homomorphism u = S⁻¹… ↩ 4 04BX
- Corollary If M and N are two non-degenerate sub-A-modules of B, the A-modules M + N, M.N and M ∩ N are non-degenerate. 04BY
- Proposition 9 Let M, N be two sub-A-modules of B. If M is non-degenerate, the canonical homomorphism from N : M to Hom_A(M, N) is bijective. ↩ 2 04BZ
- Remark In particular, A : M is canonically identified with the dual M^* of M, the canonical bilinear form on M × M^* being identified with the restriction to M × (A : M) of the multiplica… 04C0
- Definition 4 A sub-A-module M of B is called invertible if there exists a sub-A-module N of B such that M.N = A. 04C1
- Example If b is invertible element of B, the A-module Ab is invertible, as is seen by taking N = Ab⁻¹. 04C2
- Proposition 10 Let M be an invertible sub-A-module & B. Then: (i) There exists s ∈ S such that As ⊂ M ⊂ As⁻¹ (and in particular M is non-degenerate). (ii) A : M is the only sub-A-module N of B su… ↩ 3 04C3
- Theorem 4 Let M be a non-degenerate sub-A-module of B. The following properties are equivalent: (a) M is invertible. (b) M is projective. (c) M is projective of rank 1. (d) M is a finitely g… ↩ 5 04C4
- Corollary Every invertible sub-A-module of B is flat and finitely presented. This follows from Theorem 4 (c). ↩ 1 04C5
- Proposition 11 Let M, N be two sub-A-modules of B. Suppose that M is invertible. Then: (i) The canonical homomorphism M ⊗_A N → M . N is bijective. (ii) N : M = N . (A : M) and N = (N : M) . M. ↩ 3 04C6
- Remark The proof of (i) in Proposition 11 uses only the fact that M is flat and non-degenerate. 04C7
- Proposition 12 The mapping cl : 𝔤 → P(A) defines, by taking quotients, an isomorphism from 𝔠 = 𝔤/θ(B^*) onto the kernel of the canonical homomorphism 04C8
- Corollary 1 For two invertible sub-A-modules of B to have the same image in ℭ, it is necessary and sufficient that they be isomorphic. 04C9
- Corollary 2 If the ring B is semi-local, the group ℭ of classes of invertible sub-A-modules of B is canonically identified with the group P(A) of classes of projective A-modules of rank 1. ↩ 2 04CA
- Remark The hypothesis of Corollary 2 is fulfilled in the two following cases: 04CB
III. Graduations. Filtrations and topologies
§ 1. Finitely generated graded algebras
- Definition 1 In a commutative algebra B over a commutative ring A, a family (xᵢ)_i ∈ I of elements of B is called algebraically free over A (or the xᵢ are called algebraically independent over… 04D1
- Definition 2 A commutative algebra B over a commutative ring A is called finitely generated if it is generated by a finite family of elements. 04D2
- Proposition 1 Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ be a graded commutative ring with positive degrees, m the graded ideal ⨁_i ≥ 1 Aᵢ and (x_λ)_λ ∈ L a family of homogeneous elements of A of degrees ≥ 1. The follo… ↩ 1 04D3
- Corollary Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ, be a graded commutative ring with positive degrees and m the graded ideal, ⨁_i ≥ 1 Aᵢ. ↩ 3 04D4
- Proposition 2 Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ be a graded commutative ring with positive degrees and M = ⨁_i ∈ Z Mᵢ a graded A-module. Suppose that A is a finitely generated A₀-algebra and M a finitely gener… 04D5
- Lemma 1 Let A be a graded commutative ring such that A = A₀[A₁], M a graded A-module and (y_λ)_λ ∈ L a system of homogeneous generators of M such that deg(y_λ) leqslant n₀ for all λ ∈ L. T… ↩ 2 04D6
- Lemma 2 Let A be a graded commutative ring such that A = A₀[A₁] and let S = ⨁_i ≥ 0 Sᵢ, be a graded commutative A-algebra with positive degrees, which is a finitely generated A-module. The… ↩ 1 04D7
- Proposition 3 Let R = ⨁_i ≥ 0 Rᵢ, be a graded commutative ring with positive degrees which is a finitely generated R₀-algebra. There exists an integer e ≥ 1 such that R⁽ᵐᵉ⁾ = R₀[Rₘₑ] for all m ≥… 04D8
- Proposition 4 Let p = ⨁_i ≥ 0 pᵢ be a graded ideal of A; for p to be prime, it is necessary and sufficient that, if x ∈ A, \ y ∈ A, satisfy x ∉ p and y ∉ p, then xy ∉ p. ↩ 2 04D9
- Proposition 5 Let a = ⨁_i ≥ 0 aᵢ be a graded ideal of A and n₀ an integer > 0. For there to exist a graded prime ideal p = ⨁_i ≥ 0 pᵢ such that p_n₀ = a, for n ≥ n₀, it is necessary and sufficie… ↩ 1 04DA
- Proposition 6 Let d be an integer ≥ 1. 04DB
- Proposition 7 Let p be a graded prime ideal of A, d an integer ≥ 1 and p' the graded prime ideal p ∩ A⁽ᵈ⁾ of A⁽ᵈ⁾; for every graded A-module M, the homomorphism (M⁽ᵈ⁾)_(p') → M₍ₚ₎ derived from t… ↩ 1 04DC
- Proposition 8 Let m = ⨁_i ≥ 1 Aᵢ; let (p⁽ᵏ⁾)_1 ≤ k ≤ s be a finite family of graded prime ideals of A and a graded ideal 𝔞 ⊂ A such that 𝔞 ∩ m not⊂ p⁽ᵏ⁾ for all k; then there exists a homogeneou… 04DD
§ 2. General results on filtered rings and modules
- Definition 1 An increasing (resp. decreasing) sequence (Gₙ)_n ∈ Z of subgroups of a group G is called an increasing (resp. decreasing) filtration on G. A group with a filtration is called a fil… 04DH
- Definition 2 Given a ring A, a filtration (Aₙ)_n ∈ Z over the additive group A is called compatible with the ring structure on A if 04DI
- Definition 3 Let A be a filtered ring, (Aₙ)_n ∈ Z its filtration and E an A-module. A filtration (Eₙ)_n ∈ Z on E is called compatible with its module structure over the filtered ring A if Aₘ Eₙ… 04DJ
- Example 1 Let A be a commutative ring and t an element of A which is not a divisor of 0. Let us give A the (t)-adic filtration (no. 1, Example 3). Then the associated graded ring gr(A) is ca… ↩ 1 04DK
- Example 2 Let K be a commutative ring, A the ring of formal power series 04DL
- Example 3 More generally, let A be a commutative ring, b an ideal of A and A be given the b-adic filtration. If we write B=gr₀(A), F=gr₁(A)=b/b², we know (Algebra, Chapter III), that the ide… ↩ 9 04DM
- Example 4 \ Let K be a commutative ring, mathfrak g a Lie algebra over K and U the enveloping algebra of mathfrak g. An increasing filtration (Uₙ)_n∈Z is defined on U by taking Uₙ=0 for n<0… ↩ 1 04DN
- Example 5 Let A be a graded ring of type Z and E a graded A-module of type Z; let A₍ᵢ₎ (resp. E₍ᵢ₎) be the subgroup of homogeneous elements of degree i of A (resp. E). Let A and E be given t… 04DO
- Proposition 1 Let A be a filtered ring, (Aₙ)_n ∈ Z its filtration and v its orderfunction. Suppose that gr(A) is a ring with no divisor of zero. Then, for every ordered pair of elements a, b of… ↩ 1 04DP
- Corollary Let A be a filtered ring and (Aₙ)_n ∈ Z its filtration; let us set B = ⋃_n ∈ Z Aₙ, n = ⋂_n ∈ Z Aₙ. If the ring gr(A) has no divisors of zero, neither has the ring B/n. If a and b a… ↩ 2 04DQ
- Remark Let G be a group which is not necessarily commutative with a filtration (Gₙ)_n ∈ Z such that Gₙ₊₁ is normal in G, for all n ∈ Z; again let grₙ(G) = Gₙ/Gₙ₊₁. The restricted product… 04DR
- Proposition 2 Let G be a filtered commutative group and H a subgroup of G; let H be given the induced filtration and G/H the quotient filtration. If j : H → G is the canonical injection and p… ↩ 3 04DS
- Proposition 3 Let A be a filtered ring, (An) its filtration, B the subring ⋃_n ∈ Z Aₙ of A, E a filtered B-module, (En) its filtration and F the sub-B-module ⋃_n ∈ Z Eₙ of E. Then the mapping (a… ↩ 2 04DT
- Corollary The ring B is a topological ring and the B-module F a topological B-module. ↩ 1 04DU
- Proposition 4 Let A be a commutative ring filtered by an exhaustive filtration (An) and p an ideal of A. Suppose that the ideal gr(p) = ⨁_n ∈ Z (p ∩ Aₙ)/(p ∩ Aₙ₊₁) of the ring gr(A) is prime. Th… 04DV
- Proposition 5 Let G be a filtered group whose filtration (Gₙ) consists of invariant subgroups of G. The following conditions are equivalent: ↩ 1 04DW
- Example 1 Let G be a complete filtered group. Every closed subgroup of G with the induced filtration is complete (General Topology, Chapter II, § 3, no. 4, Proposition 8). Every quotient gro… ↩ 1 04DX
- Example 2 Let A be a filtered commutative ring whose filtration we denote by (aₙ)_n ∈ Z; let A' be the ring of formal power series A[[X₁, …, Xₛ]]. For all e = (e₁, …, eₛ) ∈ Nˢ, we write |e|… 04DY
- Proposition 6 With the above notation, suppose that a₀ = A and let h denote the mapping P ↦ (α_e,P)_e ∈ Nˢ. Then h is an isomorphism of the additive topological group A onto the additive topolog… ↩ 3 04DZ
- Corollary Let A be a commutative ring, ↩ 5 04E0
- Proposition 7 Let A be a filtered ring, E a filtered A-module and (Eₙ) filtration of E; suppose that E₀ = E, that the Eₙ are submodules of E, that the A-modules E/Eₙ are Artinian and finally tha… ↩ 1 04E1
- Proposition 8 Suppose that A and E satisfy the hypotheses of Proposition 7. Let (Fₚ) be a decreasing sequence of closed submodules of E such that ⋂ Fₚ = 0. Then, for every neighbourhood V of 0 i… ↩ 4 04E2
- Theorem 1 Let X, Y be two filtered groups whose filtrations (Xₙ), (Yₙ) consist of normal subgroups; let u : X → Y be a homomorphism compatible with the filtrations. ↩ 4 04E3
- Corollary 1 Suppose that X is Hausdorff and its filtration exhaustive. Then, if gr(u) is injective, u is injective. ↩ 4 04E4
- Corollary 2 Suppose that one of the following hypotheses holds : (α) X is complete, Y is Hausdorff and its filtration is exhaustive; (β) Y is discrete and its filtration is exhaustive. Then, i… ↩ 2 04E5
- Corollary 3 Suppose that X and Y are Hausdorff, the filtrations of X and Y exhaustive and X complete. Then, if gr(u) is bijective, u is bijective. 04E6
- Proposition 9 Let A be a local ring, m its maximal ideal, M, N two A-modules and u : N \to M an A-homomorphism. M and N are given the m-adic filtrations and suppose that: (1) M satisfies propert… ↩ 1 04E7
- Corollary Under the hypotheses of Proposition 9, if we assume also that N is Hausdorf with the m-adic filtration, then u is injective. 04E8
- Proposition 10 Let A be a filtered commutative ring and (Aₙ) its filtration; suppose that there exists a subring C of A₀ such that C ∩ Aₙ = 0 and C is identified with a subring of gr₀(A). Let (xᵢ… ↩ 1 04E9
- Proposition 11 Let A be a complete Hausdorff filtered commutative ring, C a subring of A₀ such that C ∩ Aₙ = 0 and (xᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ q a finite family of elements of A such that xᵢ ∈ A_nᵢ where nᵢ > 0… ↩ 3 04EA
- Proposition 12 Let A be a filtered ring, E a filtered A-module and (Aₙ) and (Eₙ) the respective filtrations on A and E. Suppose that A is complete and the filtration (Eₙ) is exhaustive and separa… ↩ 5 04EB
- Corollary 1 Let A be a complete filtered ring and E a filtered A-module whose filtration is exhaustive and separated. If gr(E) is a finitely generated (resp. Noetherian) gr(A)-module, then E i… ↩ 4 04EC
- Corollary 2 Let A be a complete Hausdorff filtered ring whose filtration is exhaustive. If gr(A) is a left Noetherian ring, so is A. ↩ 2 04ED
- Corollary 3 Let A be a complete filtered ring, (An) its filtration, E a Hausdorff filtered A-module, (En) its filtration and F a finitely generated submodule of E; suppose that A∞ = A and E0 =… ↩ 3 04EE
- Proposition 13 Let A be a ring, m a two-sided ideal of A contained in the Jacobson radical of A and E an A-module. Let A and E be given the m-adic filtrations (no. 1, Example 3). Suppose that one… ↩ 2 04EF
- Lemma 1 Let A be a graded ring of type Z, whose graduation (Aₙ) is such that Aₙ = 0 for all n < 0 or Aₙ = 0 for all n > 0. Let M be a graded A-module of type Z. For M to be a Noetherian A-… ↩ 1 04EG
- Theorem 2 Let A be a graded ring of type N, M a graded A-module of type N and (Aₙ) and (Mₙ) their respective graduations. Suppose that there exists an element a ∈ A₀ such that Aₙ = A₀ aⁿ and… ↩ 2 04EH
- Corollary 1 (Hilbert’s Theorem) For every commutative Noetherian ring C, the polynomial ring C[X] is Noetherian (cf. Exercise 10). ↩ 1 04EI
- Corollary 2 For every commutative Noetherian ring C and every integer n > 0, the polynomial ring C[X1, ..., Xn] is Noetherian. ↩ 1 04EJ
- Corollary 3 If C is a commutative Noetherian ring, every finitely generated commutative C-algebra is a Noetherian ring. ↩ 5 04EK
- Corollary 4 Let A be a graded commutative ring of type N and let (Aₙ) be its graduation. For A to be Noetherian, it is necessary and sufficient that Aₙ be Noetherian and that A be ajinitely ge… ↩ 2 04EL
- Corollary 5 Let A be a commutative ring and m an ideal of A such that A/m is Noetherian, m/m² is ajinitely generated (A/m)-module and A is Hausdorff and complete with the m-adic topology. Then… ↩ 4 04EM
- Corollary 6 For every commutative Noetherian ring C and every integer n 0, the ring of formal power series C[[X₁, …, Xₙ]] is Noetherian. 04EN
- Proposition 14 Let (Aᵢ, hᵢⱼ) be an inverse system of discrete commutative rings, whose indexing set is N and let (Mᵢ, uᵢⱼ) be an inverse system of modules over the inverse system of rings (Aᵢ, hᵢ… ↩ 4 04EO
- Corollary 1 With the notation and hypotheses of Proposition 14 suppose further that M₀ is a finitely generated A-module and that the ideal n₁ of A, is finitely generated. Let m₁ be the kernel… ↩ 1 04EP
- Corollary 2 Under the hypotheses of Corollary 1, for A to be Noetherian, it is necessary and sufficient that A, be so. ↩ 1 04EQ
- Proposition 15 Let A be a filtered ring and E a filtered A-module, the respective filtrations (Aₙ), (Eₙ) of A and E being exhaustive. Then (hatAₙ) is a filtration compatible with the ring structu… ↩ 2 04ER
- Lemma 2 Let X xrightarrowf Y xrightarrowg Z be an exact sequence of strict morphisms of topological groups (Algebra, Chapter II, § 1, no. 4, Remark). Suppose that X, Y, Z admit Hausdorff c… ↩ 3 04ES
- Proposition 16 Let A be a filtered ring, (A,) its filtration, E an A-module and (Eₙ) the filtration on E derived from that on A consisting of the Eₙ = Aₙ E. Suppose that the filtration (A,) is ex… ↩ 5 04ET
- Corollary 1 Under the conditions of Proposition 16, if A is complete, so is E. ↩ 1 04EU
- Corollary 2 Let A be a commutative ring, m a finitely generated ideal of A and hatA the Hausdorff completion of A with respect to the m-adic topology. Then hatmⁿ = (hatm)ⁿ = mⁿ . hatA for ever… ↩ 2 04EV
- Proposition 17 Let A be a commutative ring and (m_λ)_λ ∈ L a family of ideals of A, distinct from A, such that m_λ and m_μ are relatively prime for λ ≠ μ. For every family s = (s(λ))_λ ∈ L of int… ↩ 3 04EW
- Corollary Let A be a principal ideal domain and P a representative system of extremal elements of A (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 1, no. 3). The topology on A with respect to which the ideals ≠ 0… 04EX
- Proposition 18 Let A be a commutative ring, (mᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ q a finite family of distinct maximal ideals of A, t the product ideal m₁ m₂ … m_q = m₁ ∩ m₂ ∩ … ∩ m_q and S the multiplicative subset ⋂ᵢ₌… ↩ 1 04EY
- Proposition 19 Let A be a commutative ring and m a maximal ideal of A. The Hausdorff completion hatA of A with respect to the m-adic topology is a local ring whose maximal ideal is m. 04EZ
- Lemma 3 Let A be a complete Hausdorf topological ring, in which there exists a fundamental system G of neighbourhoods of 0 consisting of additive subgroups of A. (i) For all x ∈ A such tha… ↩ 3 04F0
- Corollary Let A be a semi-local ring (Chapter II, § 3, no. 5), mᵢ its distinct maximal ideals (1 ≤ i ≤ q) and ↩ 3 04F1
§ 3. m-adic topologies on Noetherian rings
- Definition 1 Let A be a commutative ring, m an ideal of A, E an A-module and (Eₙ) a filtration on the additive group E consisting of submodules of E. The filtrations (Eₙ) is called m-good if: (… 04FX
- Theorem 1 Let A be a commutative ring, m an ideal of A, E an A-module and (Eₙ) a filtration of the additive group E consisting offinitely generated sub-A-modules. Suppose that m Eₙ ⊂ Eₙ₊₁ fo… ↩ 2 04FY
- Lemma 1 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A. Then the subring A' = ∑_n ≥ 0 mⁿ Xⁿ of A[X] is Noetherian. ↩ 1 04FZ
- Proposition 1 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A; let A be given the m-adic filtration. Let E, F be twofiltered A-modules and j : F → E an injective homomorphism compatib… ↩ 3 04G0
- Corollary 1 (the Artin-Rees Lemma) Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, E a finitely generated A-module and F a submodule of E. The filtration induced on F by the m-adic filtration on E is m-good… ↩ 2 04G1
- Corollary 2 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and a, b two ideals of A. There exists an integer h 0 such that aʰ ∩ b ⊂ ab. 04G2
- Corollary 3 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A and x an element of A which is not a divisor of O. There exists an integer k > 0 such that, for all n ≥ k, the relation xy ∈… 04G3
- Corollary 4 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, E ajnitely generated A-module and (Eₙ) and (E'ₙ) two filtrations consisting of submodules of E. Suppose that the filtration… 04G4
- Lemma 2 Let A, B be two commutative Noetherian rings, φ : A → B a ring homomorphism, E a finitely generated A-module and F a finitely generated B-module. Then Hom_A(E, φ_*(F)) is a finitel… ↩ 1 04G5
- Proposition 2 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A and E, F two finitely generated A-modules. If (Fₙ) is an m-good filtration on F, the submodules Hom_A(E, Fₙ) form an m-good… ↩ 1 04G6
- Proposition 3 Let A be a Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A such that A is Hausdorff and complete with respect to the m-adic topology. Let E be a filtered A-module over the filtered ring A, the… 04G7
- Proposition 4 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A and E a finitely generated A-module. All the m-good filtrations on E define the same topology (namely the m-adic topology). ↩ 1 04G8
- Theorem 2 (Krull) Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, E a finitely generated A-module and F a submodule of E. Then the m-adic topology on F is induced by the m-adic topology on… ↩ 6 04G9
- Corollary Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, E an A-module and F a finitely generated A-module. Every A-linear mapping u : E → F is a strict morphism (General Topology… ↩ 1 04GA
- Proposition 5 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A and E a finitely generated A-module. The closure ⋂ₙ₌₁ᵐ mⁿE of 0 in E with respect to the m-adic topology is the set of x ∈ E… ↩ 6 04GB
- Corollary (Krull) Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A. The ideal ⋂ₙ₌₁ᵐ mⁿ is the set of elements x ∈ A for which there exists m ∈ m such that (1 - m)x = 0. In particular, for… ↩ 3 04GC
- Remark The hypothesis that A is Noetherian is essential in this corollary. For example, let A be the ring of infinitely differentiable mappings from R to itself and let m be the (maximal)… 04GD
- Definition 1 Let A be a topological ring. If a two-sided ideal m of A is such that the given topology on A is the m-adic topology, m is called a defining ideal & the topology on A. 04GE
- Proposition 6 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A. The following properties are equivalent: (a) m is contained in the Jacobson radical of A. (b) Every finitely generated A… ↩ 6 04GF
- Definition 2 A topological ring A is called a Zariski ring if it is commutative and Noetherian and there exists a defining ideal m for the topology on A satisfying the equivalent conditions of… 04GG
- Example 1 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A. If A is Hausdorff and complete with the m-adic topology, A is a Zariski ring with this topology, by virtue of § 2, no. 1… ↩ 1 04GH
- Example 2 Every quotient ring A/b of a Zariski ring is a Zariski ring, for it is Noetherian and, if m is a defining ideal of A, m(A/b) = (m + b)/b is contained in the Jacobson radical of A/b… 04GI
- Example 3 Let A be a Noetherian semi-local ring and r its Jacobson radical. Then A with the r-adic topology is a Zariski ring. This will always be the topology in question (unless otherwise… ↩ 2 04GJ
- Proposition 7 Let A, A' be two commutative rings and h : A → A' a ring homomorphism. Suppose that A is Noetherian and that A' is a finitely generated A-module (with the structure defined by h)… ↩ 2 04GK
- Theorem 3 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A and E, F, G threefinitely generated A-modules. Then: ↩ 7 04GL
- Corollary 1 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, E a finitely generated A-module and F and G two submodules of E. Let A, E, F, G be given the m-adic topologies and let i be… ↩ 2 04GM
- Corollary 2 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A and hatA the Hausdorff completion of A with respect to the m-adic topology. If an element a ∈ A is not a divisor of 0 in A… ↩ 1 04GN
- Corollary 3 If A is a commutative Noetherian ring, the ring of formal power series A[[X₁, …, Xₙ]] is a flat A-module. 04GO
- Proposition 8 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, hatA the Hausdorff completion of A with respect to the m-adic topology and j the canonical mapping from A to hatA. The: (i)… ↩ 3 04GP
- Corollary Let A be a Noetherian local (resp. semi-local) ring and m its Jacobson radical. Then hatA is a Noetherian local (resp. semi-local) ring whose Jacobson radical is hatm. 04GQ
- Proposition 9 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A; let A be given the m-adic topology. For hatA to be a faithfully flat A-module, it is necessary and sufficient that A be… ↩ 3 04GR
- Corollary 1 Let A be a Zariski ring, E a finitely generated A-module and F a submodule of E. Then F = hatF ∩ E = (hatAF) ∩ E. 04GS
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Zariski ring and E a finitely generated A-module. If hatE is a free A-module, E is a free A-module. ↩ 1 04GT
- Corollary 3 Let A be a Zariski ring such that hatA is an integral domain and let a be an ideal of A. If the ideal ahatA of hatA is principal, a is principal. ↩ 1 04GU
- Corollary 4 Let A be a Zariski ring such that hatA is an integral domain, L the field of fractions of hatA and K ⊂ L the field of fractions of A; then hatA ∩ K = A. ↩ 1 04GV
- Corollary 5 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, E, F twofinitely generated A-modules and u : E → F an A-homomorphism. For every maximal ideal m of A, let A(m) (resp. E(m), F(m)) denote the… 04GW
- Proposition 10 Let A, B be two Zariski rings, hatA, hatB their completions, f : A → B a continuous ring homomorphism and hatf : hatA → hatB the homomorphism obtained from f by passing to the comp… ↩ 1 04GX
- Proposition 11 Let A be a Noetherian local ring, m its maximal ideal, hatA its m-adic completion and B a ring such that A ⊂ B ⊂ hatA. Suppose that B is a Noetherian local ring whose maximal ideal… 04GY
- Remark A local ring B such that A ⊂ B ⊂ hatA, whose maximal ideal n is equal to mB and whose n-adic topology is induced by the m-adic topology on A, is not necessarily Noetherian (Exercis… 04GZ
- Proposition 12 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, m an ideal of A, S the multiplicative subset 1 + m of A and E a finitely generated A-module. Under these conditions: 04H0
§ 4. Lifting in complete rings
- Lemma 1 ("Euclid's Lemma") Let x, y be two strongly relatively prime elements of R; if z ∈ R is such that x divides yz, then x divides z. ↩ 1 04HS
- Proposition 1 Let A be a commutative ring and P and P' two strongly relatively prime polynomials in A[X]. Suppose that P is monic and of degree s. Then every polynomial T in A[X] may be written… ↩ 3 04HT
- Example For a polynomial P ∈ A[X] to be strongly relatively prime to X - a (where a ∈ A), it is necessary and sufficient that P(a) be invertible in A. For if P and X - a are strongly relat… 04HU
- Proposition 2 Let A and B be two commutative rings, f a homomorphism from A to B and P, P' two polynomials in A[X]. If P and P' are strongly relatively prime in A[X], then barf(P) and barf(P') a… ↩ 2 04HV
- Definition 1 A commutative topological ring A is said to be linearly topologized (and its topology is said to be linear) if there exists a fundamental system B of neighbourhoods 𝔬 consisting of… 04HW
- Definition 2 Given a commutative topological ring A, a formal power series T = ∑_(nᵢ) c_n₁ n₂ … nₚ X₁^n₁ X₂^n₂ … Xₚ^nₚ in the ring A[[X₁, …, Xₚ]] is called restricted if, for every neighbourhoo… 04HX
- Proposition 3 If the linearly topologized commutative ring A is Hausdorff and complete, the canonical homomorphism π is a topological ring isomorphism. ↩ 1 04HY
- Proposition 4 Let A, B be two linearly topologized commutative rings, B being Hausdorff and complete, and u : A → B a continuous homomorphism. For every family b = (bᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ p of elements of… ↩ 3 04HZ
- Remark 1 Proposition 4 proves that for every closed ideal a in a ring A which is assumed to be Hausdorff and complete, the relations bᵢ ∈ a for 1 ≤ i ≤ p imply f(b₁, …, bₚ) ∈ a for every re… ↩ 1 04I0
- Remark 2 Suppose that A is linearly topologized; let r be an integer such that 1 ≤ r ≤ p and let the ring AX₁, …, Xᵣ be given the topology defined above. Then the topological ring AX₁, …, X… ↩ 1 04I1
- Remark 3 With the notation of Remark 2, suppose further that A is Hausdorff and complete and let us write every restricted formal power series f ∈ AX₁, …, Xᵣ in the form ↩ 1 04I2
- Proposition 5 Let A be a commutative ring and f = (f₁, …, fₙ) a system without constant term of n series in A[[X₁, …, Xₙ]]. Suppose that J_f(0) is invertible in A. Then there exists a system wit… ↩ 1 04I3
- Proposition 6 Let A be a commutative ring, B a ring satisfying Hensel’s conditions and u : A → B a homomorphism. For every family x = (x₁, …, xₙ) of topologically nilpotent elements of B, there… ↩ 3 04I4
- Corollary Let A be a ring satisfying Hensel's condition and x = (x₁, …, xₙ) a family of topologically nilpotent elements of A. Let g = (g₁, …, g_q) be a system without constant term of serie… ↩ 1 04I5
- Proposition 7 Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A, m) satisfies Hensel's conditions. Let f = (f₁, …, fₙ) be a system without constant term of series in A[[X₁, …, Xₙ… ↩ 1 04I6
- Corollary Let q be a closed ideal of A contained in m. Then the relation x ≡ x' pmodq^xⁿ is equivalent to f(x) ≡ f(x') pmodq^xⁿ. 04I7
- Theorem 2 Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A, m) satisfies Hensel's conditions. Let f = (f₁, …, fₙ) be a system of n elements of ↩ 1 04I8
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A, m) satisfies Hensel's conditions. Let f ∈ AX, a ∈ A and write e = f'(a). If f(a) ≡ 0 (mod. e² m), then there exis… ↩ 2 04I9
- Remark The corollary applies notably when e is invertible in A; we can then also deduce the existence of b from Hensel's Theorem, for the canonical image of f(X) in (A/𝔪)X is of the form… 04IA
- Corollary 2 Let A be a ring and 𝔪 an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A, m) satisfies Hensel's conditions. Let r, n be integers such that 0 ≤ r < n and f = (fᵣ₊₁, …, fₙ) is a system of n… ↩ 1 04IB
- Corollary 3 With the notation & Corollary 2, let a ∈ Aⁿ; let us write e = Jᵣ^(n-r)(a) (not necessarily invertible in A) and suppose that f(a) ≡ 0 (mod. e^2m^×(n-r)). Then there exist n - r for… 04IC
- Lemma 2 Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A, m) satisfies Hensel’s conditions. Let B be the quotient ring A/m and π : A → B be the canonical homomorphism. For… ↩ 1 04ID
- Proposition 8 Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A, m) satisfies Hensel’s conditions. Let B be the quotient ring A/m and π : A → B the canonical homomorphism. If B i… ↩ 3 04IE
- Remark Proposition 8 again gives the structure of a semi-local ring on A which is Hausdorff and complete with the c-adic topology (c the Jacobson radical of A), which has already been obt… 04IF
§ 5. Flatness properties of filtered modules
- Definition 1 Let A be a commutative ring and 𝔤 an ideal of A. An A-module M is called ideally Hausdorff with respect to 3 (or simply ideally Hausdorff if there is no ambiguity) if, for every fi… 04IO
- Example 1 If A is Noetherian and 𝔤 is contained in the Jacobson radical of A (in other words if A is a Zariski ring with the 3-adic topology), every finitely generated A-module is ideally Ha… ↩ 1 04IP
- Example 2 Every direct sum of ideally Hausdorff modules is an ideally Hausdorff module, by virtue of the relations 𝔤ⁿ ( a ⊗_A ⨁_λ ∈ L M_λ ) = 𝔤ⁿ ⨁_λ ∈ L (a ⊗_A M_λ) = ⨁_λ ∈ L 𝔤ⁿ (a ⊗_A M_λ). 04IQ
- Example 3 If an A-module M is flat and Hausdorff with the 𝔤-adic topology it is ideally Hausdorff, for a ⊗_A M is then identified with a submodule of M and the 𝔤-adic topology on a ⊗_A M is… 04IR
- Theorem 1 Let A be a commutative ring, 𝔤 an ideal of A and M an A-module. Consider the following properties: (i) M is afat A-module. (ii) Tor₁ᴬ(N, M) = 0 for every A-module N annihilated by… ↩ 5 04IS
- Remark If A / 𝔤 is a field (as often happens in applications) the condition "M/ 𝔤M is a flat (A / 𝔤)-module" holds automatically for every A-module M, which simplifies the statement of pr… 04IT
- Proposition 1 Let A be a commutative ring, 3 an ideal of A and M an A-module. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) For all n ≥ 1, Tor₁ᴬ(A/𝔤ⁿ, M) = 0. (b) For all n ≥ 1, the canonical hom… 04IU
- Proposition 2 Let A be a commutative ring, 𝔤 an ideal of A and B a commutative Noetherian A-algebra such that B is contained in the Jacobson radical of B. Then every finitely generated B-module… ↩ 2 04IV
- Proposition 3 Let A be a commutative ring, B a commutative A-algebra, 𝔤 an ideal of A and M a B-module. Suppose that B is a Noetherian ring and a flat A-module and that M is ideally Hausdorff wi… 04IW
- Corollary Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring, 𝔍 an ideal of A, hatA the Hausdorff completion of A with respect to the 𝔍-adic topology and M an ideally Hausdorff hatA-module with respect… ↩ 1 04IX
- Proposition 4 Let A and B be two commutative Noetherian rings, h : A → B a ring homomorphism, 3 an ideal of A and 2 an ideal of B containing 𝔍B and contained in the Jacobson radical of B. Let ha… 04IY
IV. Associated prime ideals and primary decomposition
§ 1. Prime ideals associated with a module
- Definition 1 Let M be a module over a ring A. A prime ideal p is said to be associated with M if there exists x ∈ M such that p is equal to the annihilator & x. The set of prime ideals associat… ↩ 1 04J7
- Proposition 1 For every prime ideal p of a ring A and every submodule M ≠ 0 of A/p, Ass(M) = p. ↩ 2 04J8
- Proposition 2 Let M be a module over a ring A. Every maximal element of the set of ideals Ann(x) of A, where x runs through the set of elements ≠ 0 of M, belongs to Ass(M). ↩ 6 04J9
- Corollary 1 Let M be a module over a Noetherian ring A. Then the condition M ≠ 0 is equivalent to Ass(M) ≠ ∅. ↩ 8 04JA
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module and a an element of A. For the homothety on M with ratio a to be injective, it is necessary and sufficient that a belong to no prime ideal… ↩ 1 04JB
- Corollary 3 The set of divisors of zero in a Noetherian ring A is the union of the ideals p ∈ Ass(A). ↩ 2 04JC
- Proposition 3 Let A be a ring, M an A-module and N a submodule of N. Then Ass(N) ⊂ Ass(M) ⊂ Ass(N) ∪ Ass(M/N). The inclusion Ass(N) ⊂ Ass(M) is obvious. Let p ∈ Ass(M), E be a submodule of M iso… ↩ 9 04JD
- Corollary 1 If an A-module M is the direct sum of a family (Mᵢ)_i ∈ I of submodules, then Ass(M) = ⋃_i ∈ I Ass(Mᵢ). ↩ 2 04JE
- Corollary 2 Let M be an A-module and (Qᵢ)_i ∈ I a finite family of submodules of M. If ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ = 0, then Ass(M) ⊂ ⋃_i ∈ I Ass(M/Qᵢ). The canonical mapping M → ⨁_i ∈ I (M/Qᵢ) is injective; t… ↩ 1 04JF
- Proposition 4 Let M be an A-module and Φ a subset of Ass(M). Then there exists a submodule N of M such that Ass(N) = Ass(M) - Φ and Ass(M/N) = Φ. ↩ 3 04JG
- Proposition 5 Let A be a ring, S a multiplicative subset of A, Φ the set of prime ideals of A which do not meet S and M an A-module. Then: (i) The mapping p ↦ S⁻¹p is a bijection of Ass_A(M) ∩ Φ… ↩ 2 04JH
- Corollary If the ring A is Noetherian, the mapping 𝔭 ↦ S⁻¹𝔭 is a bijection of Ass_A(M) ∩ Φ onto Ass_S⁻¹A(S⁻¹M). ↩ 7 04JI
- Proposition 6 Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, S a multiplicative subset of A and Y the set of elements of Ass_A(M) which do not meet S. Then the kernel N of the canonical mapping M →… ↩ 4 04JJ
- Proposition 7 Let A be a ring and M an A-module. ↩ 3 04JK
- Corollary 1 If M is a module over a Noetherian ring, then Ass(M) ⊂ Supp(M) and these two sets have the same minimal elements. ↩ 2 04JL
- Corollary 2 The nilradical of a Noetherian ring A is the intersection of the ideals 𝔭 ∈ Ass(A). ↩ 1 04JM
- Theorem 1 Let A be a Noetherian ring and M a finitely generated A-module. There exists a composition series (Mᵢ)_0 ≤ i ≤ n of M such that, for 0 ≤ i ≤ n - 1, Mᵢ / Mᵢ₊₁ is isomorphic to A / 𝔭… ↩ 3 04JN
- Theorem 2 Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A and (Mᵢ)_0 ≤ i ≤ n a composition series of M such that, for 0 ≤ i ≤ n - 1, Mᵢ / Mᵢ₊₁ is isomorphic to A / 𝔭ᵢ where 𝔭ᵢ… ↩ 2 04JO
- Corollary If M is a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A, Ass(M) is finite. ↩ 1 04JP
- Proposition 8 Let A be a Noetherian ring, a an ideal of A and M a finitely generated A-module. The following conditions are equivalent: ↩ 1 04JQ
- Proposition 9 Let A be a Noetherian ring, a an ideal of A and M a finitely generated A-module. For there to exist an integer n > 0 such that aⁿ M = 0, it is necessary and sufficient that a be co… ↩ 2 04JR
- Definition 2 Given an A-module M, an endomorphism u of M is called almost nilpotent if, for all x ∈ M, there exists an integer n(x) > 0 such that uⁿ⁽ˣ⁾(x) = 0. 04JS
- Corollary Let A be a Noetherian ring. M an A-module and a an element of A. For the homomorphism a_M : x ↦ ax of M to be almost nilpotent, it is necessary and sufficient that a belong to ever… 04JT
- Proposition 10 Let A be a Noetherian ring, E a finitely generated A-module and F an A-module. Then ↩ 1 04JU
§ 2. Primary decomposition
- Proposition 1 Let A be a Noetherian ring and M an A-module. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) Ass(M) is reduced to a single element. ↩ 5 04KE
- Definition 1 Let A be a Noetherian ring, N an A-module and Q a submodule of N. If the module M = N/Q satisfies the conditions of Proposition 1, Q is called p-primary with respect to N (or in N)… ↩ 2 04KF
- Remark Let q be a p-primary submodule of an A-module N. If N/Q is finitely generated, there exists an integer k > 0 such that pᵏ N ⊂ Q by § 1, no. 4, Proposition 9. 04KG
- Example 1 If p is a prime ideal of A, p is p-primary (§ 1, no. 1, Proposition 1). 04KH
- Example 2 Let q be an ideal of A such that there exists a single prime ideal m (necessarily maximal) containing q; then, if M is an A-module such that qM ≠ M, qM is m-primary with respect to… ↩ 1 04KI
- Example 3 Let m be a maximal ideal of A; the m-primary ideals are then the ideals q of A for which there exists an integer n ≥ 1 such that mⁿ ⊂ q ⊂ m. For if mⁿ ⊂ q ⊂ m, m is the only prime… ↩ 1 04KJ
- Example 4 In a principal ideal domain A, the primary ideals are (0) and the ideals of the form Apⁿ, where p is an extremal element and n ≥ 1; this follows immediately from Example 3. ↩ 2 04KK
- Example 5 The powers of any prime ideal are not necessarily primary ideals (Exercise 1). On the other hand, there exist primary ideals which are not powers of prime ideals (Exercise 1). 04KL
- Proposition 2 Let M be a module over a Noetherian ring A, p a prime ideal of A and (Qᵢ)_i ∈ I a non-empty finite family of submodules of M which are p-primary with respect to M. Then ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ… ↩ 4 04KM
- Proposition 3 Let A be a Noetherian ring, S a multiplicative subset of A, p a prime ideal of A, M an A-module, N a submodule of M and i = i_A^S the canonical mapping of M to S⁻¹M. ↩ 5 04KN
- Definition 2 Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module and N a submodule of M. A finite family (Qᵢ)_i ∈ I of submodules of M which are primary with respect to M and such that N = ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ is… 04KO
- Example Let us take A = Z, M = Z, N = nZ for some integer n > 0. If n = p₁^α₁ ⋯ pₖ^αₖ is the decomposition of n into prime factors, nZ = (p₁^α₁Z) ∩ … ∩ (pₖ^αₖZ) is a primary decomposition… 04KP
- Theorem 1 Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring and let N be a submodule of M. There exists a primary decomposition of N of the form N = ⋂_p ∈ Ass(M/N) Q(p) where, for… ↩ 4 04KQ
- Definition 3 Let M be a module over a Noetherian ring and N a submodule of M. A primary decomposition N = ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ of N in M is called reduced if the following conditions are fulfilled: 04KR
- Proposition 4 Let M be a module over a Noetherian ring, N a submodule of M, N = ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ a primary decomposition of N in M and, for all i ∈ I, let pᵢ = Ass(M/Qᵢ). For this decomposition to be… ↩ 7 04KS
- Corollary Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, N a submodule of M and (Qᵢ)_i ∈ I a primary decomposition of N in M. Then Card(I) ≥ Card(Ass(M/N)); for (Qᵢ)_i ∈ I to be a reduced primar… ↩ 2 04KT
- Proposition 5 Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, N a submodule of M, N = ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ a reduced primary decomposition of N in M and, for all i ∈ I, let pᵢ = Ass(M/Qᵢ). If pᵢ is a minimal e… ↩ 3 04KU
- Remark The prime ideals pᵢ ∈ Ass(M/N) which are not minimal elements of this set are sometimes called the immersed prime ideals associated with M/N; if M/N is finitely generated, for p₀ ∈… 04KV
- Proposition 6 Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, N a submodule of M and I = Ass(M/N). Let S be a multiplicative subset of A and J the subset of I consisting of the indices i such that S… ↩ 3 04KW
- Corollary The mappings 04KX
- Proposition 7 Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A. The following properties are equivalent: (a) M is of finite length. (b) Every ideal p ∈ Ass(M) is a maximal ideal of… ↩ 6 04KY
- Corollary 1 For every module of finite length M over a Noetherian Zing A, Ass(M) = Supp(M). 04KZ
- Corollary 2 Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A and p a prime ideal of A. For Mₚ to be a non-zero Aₚ-module of finite length, it is necessary and sufficient that p be… ↩ 1 04L0
- Remark (1) Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A; let (M₁), … be a composition series of M such that, for 0 ≤ i ≤ n - 1, Mᵢ / Mᵢ₊₁ is isomorphic to A/pᵢ, where pᵢ is a… 04L1
- Proposition 8 Let M be a module of finite length over a Noetherian ring A. ↩ 3 04L2
- Corollary If M is a module of finite length over a Noetherian ring A, then 04L3
- Proposition 9 Let A be a Noetherian ring. The following conditions are equivalent : (a) A is Artinian. (b) All the prime ideals 𝔞 in A are maximal ideals. (c) All the elements of Ass(A) are maxi… ↩ 8 04L4
- Remark (2) The conditions of Proposition 9 for a Noetherian ring A imply that the spectrum of A is finite and discrete, every point of Spec(A) being therefore closed (Chapter 11, § 4, no. 3… 04L5
- Corollary 1 Every Artinian ring A is isomorphic to the direct composition of a finite family of Artinian local rings. 04L6
- Remark (3) This corollary can also be deduced from the fact that Spec(A) is finite and discrete and Chapter 11, § 4, no. 3, Proposition 15. 04L7
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Noetherian ring and m an ideal of A. The following conditions are equivalent: ↩ 2 04L8
- Corollary 3 Let A, A' be two rings and h a homomorphism from A to A'. Suppose that A is semi-local and Noetherian and that A' is a finitely generated A-module. Then the ring A' is semi-local a… ↩ 1 04L9
- Corollary 4 Let A be a complete semi-local Noetherian ring, m a defining ideal of A, E a finitely generated A-module and (Fₙ) a decreasing sequence of submodules of E such that ⋂ₙ Fₙ = 0. Then… ↩ 1 04LA
- Corollary 5 In a complete semi-local Noetherian ring every decreasing sequence φ ideals whose intersection is 0 is a filter base which converges to 0. 04LB
- Proposition 10 Let A be a Noetherian ring and p₁, …, pₙ the prime ideals associated with the A-module A, where pᵢ ≠ pⱼ for i ≠ j. ↩ 1 04LC
- Lemma 1 Let A be a Noetherian ring, p a prime ideal of A, E an A-module whose annihilator contains a power of p and such that Ass(E) = p and F a B-module such that ρ_*(F) is a flat A-modul… ↩ 2 04LD
- Theorem 2 Let ρ : A → B be a ring homomorphism, E an A-module and F a B-module such that ρ_*(F) is a flat A-module. Then ↩ 6 04LE
- Corollary 1 If A is Noetherian and 𝔓 ∈ Ass_B(E ⊗_A F), then ρ⁻¹(𝔓) ∈ Ass_A(E) and ρ⁻¹(𝔓) is the only prime ideal p of A such that 𝔓 ∈ Ass_B(F/pF). ↩ 1 04LF
- Corollary 2 Suppose that A and B are Noetherian and that B is a flat A-module. Let p be a prime ideal of A, Q ⊂ E a p-primary submodule and 𝔓 a prime ideal of B. For Q ⊗_A B to be a q-primary… ↩ 1 04LG
- Remark Suppose that A and B are Noetherian. Let 𝔓 be a prime ideal of B and let p = overlineρ⁻¹(𝔓); let us write S = A - p and let k(p) = S⁻¹(A/p) be the field of fractions of A/p. Since… 04LH
- Proposition 11 Suppose that A and B are Noetherian and that B is a flat A-module. Let E be an A-module and E' a submodule of E such that, for every ideal p ∈ Ass_A(E/E'), pB is a prime ideal of B… ↩ 2 04LI
- Corollary Suppose that pB is prime for all p ∈ Ass_A(E/E'). Then, if p₁, …, pₙ are the minimal elements of Ass_A(E/E'), the pᵢB are minimal elements of Ass_A((E ⊗_A B)/(E' ⊗_A B)). It follow… 04LJ
§ 3. Primary decomposition in graded modules
- Proposition 1 Let A be a torsion-free commutative group, A a graded ring of type A and M a graded A-module of type A. Every prime ideal associated with M is graded and is the annihilator of a ho… ↩ 4 04MJ
- Corollary For every (necessarily graded) prime ideal p associated with a graded A-module M, there exists an index k ∈ A such that the graded A-module (A/p)(k) obtained from the graded A-modu… ↩ 1 04MK
- Proposition 2 Let A be a torsion-free commutative group, A a graded Noetherian ring of type A and M a graded finitely generated A-module of type A. There exists a composition series (Mᵢ)_0 ≤ i ≤… 04ML
- Proposition 3 Let A be a torsion-free commutative group, A a graded Noetherian ring of type A, p a graded ideal of A and M a graded A-module of type A not reduced to 0. Suppose that for every ho… ↩ 1 04MM
- Proposition 4 Let A be a torsion-free commutative group, A a graded Noetherian ring of type A and M a graded A-module of type A. Let p be a prime ideal of A and N, a submodule of M which is p-pr… ↩ 1 04MN
- Proposition 5 Let A be a torsion-free commutative group, A a graded Noetherian ring of type A, M a graded A-module of type M, N a graded submodule of M and N = ⋂_i ∈ I Qᵢ a primary decomposition… 04MO
V. Integers
§ 1. Notion of an integral element
- Theorem 1 Let A be a (commutative) ring, R an algebra over A (not necessarily commutative) and x an element of R. The following properties are equivalent: ↩ 4 04MS
- Lemma 1 Let A be a ring, R an algebra (not necessarily commutative) over A and x an element of R. Let M be a faithful module over A[x] which is a finitely generated A-module. If q is an id… 04MT
- Definition 1 Let A be a ring and R an A-algebra (not necessarily commutative). An element x ∈ R is called integral over A if it satisfies the equivalent properties (E₁), (E_II), (E_III) of Theo… 04MU
- Example 1 Let K be a (commutative) field and R a K-algebra; to say that an element x ∈ R is integral over K is equivalent to saying that x is a root of a non-constant polynomial in the ring… ↩ 2 04MV
- Example 2 Let R' be a sub-A-algebra of R; the elements of R' which are integral over A are just the elements of R which are integral over A and belong to R'; this often allows us not to spec… 04MW
- Proposition 1 Let A be a ring, R an algebra over A (not necessarily commutative) and x an element of R. For x to be integral over A, it is necessary and sufficient that A[x] be contained in a su… ↩ 3 04MX
- Corollary Let A be a Noetherian ring, R an A-algebra (not necessarily commutative) and x an element of R. For x to be integral over A, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a finit… ↩ 1 04MY
- Definition 2 Let A be a ring. An A-algebra R (not necessarily commutative) is called integral over A if every element of R is integral over A. R is called finite over A if R is a finitely gener… 04MZ
- Proposition 2 Let A, A' be two rings, R an A-algebra, R an A'-algebra (not necessarily commutative) and f : A → A' and g : R → R' two ring homomorphisms such that the diagram ↩ 12 04N0
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring, B a (commutative) A-algebra and C a (not necessarily commutative) B-algebra. Then every element x ∈ C which is integral over A is integral over B. 04N1
- Corollary 2 Let K be a field, L an extension of K and x, x' two elements of L which are conjugate over K (Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 2). If A is a subring of K and x is integral over A, x' i… 04N2
- Corollary 3 Let A be a ring, B a (commutative) A-algebra and C a (not necessarily commutative) B-algebra. If C is integral over A, C is integral over B. 04N3
- Proposition 3 Let (Rᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n be a finite family of (not necessarily commutative) A-algebras and let R = ∏ᵢ₌₁ⁿ Rᵢ be their product. For an element x = (xᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n of R to be integral over… ↩ 1 04N4
- Proposition 4 Let A be a ring, R an A-algebra (not necessarily commutative) and (xᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n a finite family of elements of R which are pairwise permutable. If, for all i, xᵢ is integral over… ↩ 10 04N5
- Corollary 1 Let A be a ring and R a (Commutative)A-algebra. The set of elements & R integral over A is a subalgebra of R. 04N6
- Corollary 2 Let A be a ring, R an A-algebra (not necessarily commutative) and E a set & elements & R which are pairwise permutable and integral over A. Then the sub-A-algebra B & R generated b… 04N7
- Proposition 5 Let A be a ring and A and R two (commutative)A-algebras. If R is integral over A, R ⊗_A A' is integral over A'. ↩ 6 04N8
- Corollary Let R be a ring and A, B, C subrings & R such that A ⊂ B. If B is integral over A, C[B] is integral over C[A]. ↩ 1 04N9
- Proposition 6 Let A be a ring, B a (commutative)A-algebra and C a (not necessarily commutative)B-algebra. If B is integral over A and C is integral over B, then C is integral over A. ↩ 6 04NA
- Corollary Let A be a ring and R, R' two (commutative)A-algebras integral over A. Then R ⊗_A R' is integral over A. 04NB
- Definition 3 Let A be a ring and R a (commutative)A-algebra. The sub-A-algebra A' of R consisting of the elements of R integral over A (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 4) is called the integr… ↩ 2 04NC
- Definition 4 If A is an integral domain, the integral closure of A in its field of fractions is called the integral closure of A. An integral domain is called integrally closed if it is equal t… 04ND
- Proposition 7 Let A be a ring and R an A-algebra. The integral closure A' of A in R is a subring integrally closed in R. ↩ 3 04NE
- Corollary The integral closure of an integral domain A is an integrally closed domain. 04NF
- Proposition 8 Let R be a ring, (B_λ)_λ ∈ L a family of subrings of R and for each λ ∈ L let A_λ be a subring of B_λ. If each A_λ is integrally closed in B_λ, then A = ⋂_λ ∈ L A_λ is integrally c… ↩ 1 04NG
- Corollary Every intersection of a non-empty family of integrally closed subdomains of an integral domain A is an integrally closed domain. ↩ 3 04NH
- Proposition 9 Let A be a ring, (Rᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n a finite family of A-algebras and A'ᵢ the integral closure of A in Rᵢ, (1 ≤ i ≤ n). Then the integral closure of A in R = ∏ᵢ₌₁ⁿ Rᵢ, is equal to ∏ᵢ₌₁… 04NI
- Corollary 1 Let A be a reduced Noetherian ring, pᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) its distinct minimal prime ideals, K, the field of fractions of the integral domain A/pᵢ (canonically isomorphic to the local rin… 04NJ
- Corollary 2 For a reduced Noetherian ring to be integrally closed in its ring of fractions it is necessary and sufficient that it be a direct composition of integrally closed (Noetherian) doma… 04NK
- Proposition 10 Every principal ideal domain is integrally closed. ↩ 4 04NL
- Lemma 2 Let R be a ring and P a monic polynomial in R[X]. There exists a ring R' containing R such that in the polynomial ring R'[X] the polynomial P is a product of monic polynomials of d… ↩ 1 04NM
- Proposition 11 Let A be a ring, R an A-algebra and P and Q monic polynomials in R[X]. If the coefficients of PQ are integral over A, the coefficients of P and Q are integral over A. ↩ 4 04NN
- Corollary Let A be an integral domain, K its field of fractions and x an element of a K-algebra K (not necessarily commutative). If x is integral over A, the coefficients of the minimal poly… ↩ 3 04NO
- Proposition 12 Let A be a ring, R an A-algebra and P a polynomial in R[X₁, …, Xₙ]. For P to be integral over A[X₁, …, Xₙ], it is necessary and sufficient that the coefficients of P be integral ov… ↩ 3 04NP
- Proposition 13 Let A be a ring, R an A-algebra and A' the integral closure of A in R. Then the integral closure of A[X₁, …, Xₙ] in R[X₁, …, Xₙ] is equal to A'[X₁, …, Xₙ]. ↩ 2 04NQ
- Corollary 1 Let A be an integral domain and A' its integral closure. Then the integral closure of the polynomial ring A[X₁, …, Xₙ] is A'[X₁, …, Xₙ]. 04NR
- Corollary 2 Let A be an integral domain. For the polynomial ring A[X₁, …, Xₙ] to be integrally closed, it is necessary and sufficient that A be integrally closed. ↩ 2 04NS
- Corollary 3 If K is a field, every polynomial algebra K[X₁, …, Xₙ] is an integrally closed domain. 04NT
- Definition 5 An integral domain A is called completely integrally closed if the following condition is satisfied: every element x of the field of fractions K of A such that all the powers xⁿ (n… ↩ 1 04NU
- Proposition 14 Let A be a completely integrally closed domain. Then every polynomial ring A[X₁, …, Xₙ] (resp. every ring of formal power series A[[X₁, …, Xₙ]]) is completely integrally closed. ↩ 1 04NV
- Proposition 15 Let A be a filtered ring whose filtration is exhaustive and such that every principal ideal of A is closed under the topology defined by the filtration. If the associated graded ri… 04NW
- Proposition 16 Let A be a ring, R an A-algebra, A' the integral closure of A in R and S a multiplicative subset of A. Then the integral closure of S⁻¹A in S⁻¹R is S⁻¹A'. ↩ 6 04NX
- Corollary 1 Let A be an integral domain, A' its integral closure and S a multiplicative subset of A such that 0 ∉ S. Then the integral closure of S⁻¹A is S⁻¹A'. ↩ 4 04NY
- Corollary 2 Let A be an integral domain, K its field of fractions, R an algebra over K and B the integral closure of A in R. The elements of R which are algebraic over K (no. 1, Example 1) are… ↩ 1 04NZ
- Corollary 3 Let A be an integral domain and Ω the set of maximal ideals of A. For A to be integrally closed, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all m ∈ Ω, Aₘ be integrally closed. 04O0
- Corollary 4 Let A be an integral domain, K its field of fractions and S a multiplicative subset of A such that 0 ∉ S. 04O1
- Corollary 5 Let A be an integral domain, A' its integral closure and f the annihilator of the A-module A'/A. Suppose that A' is afinitely generated A-module. The prime ideals p ∈ A such that A… 04O2
- Proposition 17 Let A be a ring, B a (commutative) A-algebra and X a square matrix of order n over B; the following properties are equivalent: ↩ 3 04O3
- Corollary 1 Let A be an integral domain, K its field of fractions and K' a finite-dimensional K-algebra (not necessarily commutative). If x \in K' is integral over A, the coefficients of the c… ↩ 1 04O4
- Corollary 2 With the same hypotheses and notation as in Corollary 1, Tr{K'/K}(x) and N{K'/K}(x) are integral over A. ↩ 1 04O5
- Remark (1) If K' is a simple central algebra over K and x \in K' is integral over A, the coefficients of the reduced characteristic polynomial of x (Algebra, Chapter VIII, § 12, no. 3) are in… 04O6
- Proposition 18 Let A be an integrally closed domain, K its field of fractions, K' a finite-dimensional separable K-algebra (Algebra, Chapter VIII, § 7, no. 5) and A' the integral closure of A in… ↩ 1 04O7
- Lemma 3 Under the hypotheses of Proposition 18, let (w1, ..., wn) be a basis of K' over K contained in A' (no. 5, Corollary 2 to Proposition 16); then there is a unique basis (w1^, ..., wn… ↩ 1 04O8
- Corollary 1 If A is a Noetherian ring, the A-module A' is finitely generated and in particular the ring A' is Noetherian. ↩ 2 04O9
- Corollary 2 If A is a principal ideal domain, A' is a free A-module of rank n. Every submodule of a free A-module is then free (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 3, Theorem 1). ↩ 2 04OA
- Corollary 3 Let E be an extension of degree n of the field Q of rational numbers. The additive group of the integral closure in E of the ring Z of rational integers is a free commutative group… 04OB
- Proposition 19 Let k be a field, L a separable extension of k and R an integrally closed k-algebra. If the ring L ⊗ₖ R is an integral domain, it is integrally closed. ↩ 1 04OC
- Corollary Let k be a field and R and S two integrally closed k-algebras. Suppose that the ring R ⊗ₖ S is an integral domain and that the fields of fractions K and L of R and S respectively a… 04OD
- Proposition 20 Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ, be a graded ring and B a (commutative) graded A-algebra. The set A' of elements of B integral over A is a graded subalgebra of B. ↩ 2 04OE
- Lemma 4 Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ be a graded integral domain and S the set of homogeneous elements ≠ 0 of A. ↩ 2 04OF
- Proposition 21 Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ be a graded integral domain and S the set of homogeneous elements ≠ 0 of A. The integral closure A' of A is then a graded subring of S⁻¹A. If further Aᵢ = 0 for… ↩ 3 04OG
- Corollary 1 With the hypotheses and notation of Proposition 21, if every homogeneous element of S⁻¹A which is integral over A belongs to A, then A is integrally closed. ↩ 1 04OH
- Corollary 2 If A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ is an integrally closed graded domain, the domain A₀ is integrally closed. 04OI
- Corollary 3 Let A = ⨁_i ∈ Z Aᵢ be an integrally closed graded domain. Then, for every integer d > 0, the ring A⁽ᵈ⁾ (Chapter III, § 1, no. 3) is an integrally closed domain. 04OJ
- Proposition 22 Let A be a (commutative) K-algebra and G a locally finite group of operators on A. Then A is integral over the subalgebra Aᴳ. ↩ 2 04OK
- Theorem 2 Let A be a finitely generated K-algebra and G a locally finite group of operators on A. Then A is a finitely generated A-module; if further K is Noetherian, Aᴳ is affinitely genera… 04OL
- Lemma 5 Let K be a Noetherian ring, B a finitely generated K-algebra and C a sub-K-algebra of B such that B is integral over C. Then C is a finitely generated A-algebra. 04OM
- Remark The set of σ ∈ G such that σ aⱼ = aⱼ for 1 ≤ j ≤ m obviously leaves invariant every element of A. The normal subgroup H of G leaving invariant every element of A is therefore of fi… 04ON
- Proposition 23 Let A be a K-algebra, G a locally finite group of operators on A, S a multiplicative subset of A stable under G and Sᴳ the set S ∩ A''. Then the canonical mapping of (Sᴳ)⁻¹A to S⁻¹… ↩ 5 04OO
- Corollary Let A be an integral domain, K its field of fractions and G a locally finite group of operators on A. Then G operates on K and Kᴳ is the field of fractions of Aᴳ. 04OP
§ 2. The lift of prime ideals
- Definition 1 Let A, A' be two rings and h : A → A' a ring homomorphism. An ideal a' ∈ A' is said to lie above an ideal a of A if a = overlineh¹(a'). 04PJ
- Lemma 1 Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism, S a multiplicative subset of A, i = i_A^S : A → S⁻¹A, i' = i_A'^h(S) : A' → S⁻¹A' = (h(S))⁻¹A' the canonical homomorphisms and h₁ = S⁻¹h : S⁻… ↩ 3 04PK
- Proposition 1 Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism such that A' is integral over A, 𝔭' a prime ideal of A' and 𝔭 = h⁻¹(𝔭'). For 𝔭 to be maximal, it is necessary and sufficient that 𝔭' be so. ↩ 12 04PL
- Lemma 2 Let B be an integral domain and A a subring of B such that B is integral over A. For B to be a field, it is necessary and sufficient that A be a field. ↩ 1 04PM
- Corollary 1 Let h : A → A' a ring homomorphism such that A' is integral over A, 𝔭 a prime ideal of A and 𝔭' and a' two ideals of A' lying above 𝔭 such that 𝔭' ⊂ a'. If 𝔭' is prime, then a' = 𝔭… ↩ 5 04PN
- Corollary 2 Let A' be an integral domain, A a subring of A' such that A' is integral over A and f a homomorphism from A' to a ring B. If the restriction off to A is injective f is injective. ↩ 1 04PO
- Corollary 3 Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism such that A' is integral over A and m a maximal ideal of A and suppose that there are in A' only a finite number of distinct maximal ideals m'… 04PP
- Remark (1) If A' is Noetherian, it follows from (i) and (ii) that (q'ⱼ)_1 ≤ j ≤ n is the unique primary decomposition of mA' (Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3). 04PQ
- Theorem 1 Let h : A → A' be an injective ring homomorphism such that A is integral over A and p a prime ideal of A. There exists a prime ideal p' of A' lying above p. ↩ 15 04PR
- Corollary 1 With the hypotheses and notation of Theorem 1, barh⁻¹(pA') = p. 04PS
- Corollary 2 Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism such that A' is integral over A, a and p two ideals of A such that a ⊂ p and a' an ideal of A' lying above a. Suppose that p is prime. Then th… ↩ 3 04PT
- Corollary 3 Let A be a ring and A' a ring containing A and integral over A. If R' is the Jacobson radical of A', R' ∩ A is the Jacobson radical of A. 04PU
- Corollary 4 Let A be a ring, A' a ring containing A and integral over A and f a homomorphism from A to an algebraically closed field L. Then f can be extended to a homomorphism from A' to L. ↩ 2 04PV
- Remark (2) Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism such that A' is integral over A; then the associated continuous mapping ᵃ h : Spec(A') → Spec(A) is closed. For every ideal a' of A', A'/a' is… ↩ 2 04PW
- Proposition 2 Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism such that A' is integral over A, 𝔭 a prime ideal of A, S = A - 𝔭, (p'ᵢ)_i ∈ I the family of all the prime ideals 𝔭 of A' lying above 𝔭 and S'… ↩ 3 04PX
- Proposition 3 Let h : A → A' be a ring homomorphism such that A' is a finitely generated A-module; then, for every prime ideal 𝔭 of A, the set of prime ideals of A' lying above 𝔭 is finite. 04PY
- Definition 2 Let A' be a ring and G a group operating on A' (§ 1, no. 9). Given a prime ideal p' ⊂ A' the subgroup of elements σ ∈ G such that σ.p' = p' is called the decomposition group of p'… ↩ 3 04PZ
- Definition 3 With the notation of Definition 2, the subgroup of Gᶻ(p') consisting of those σ such that the endomorphism z ↦ σ.z of A'/p' is the identity is called the inertia group of p' (with… 04Q0
- Lemma 3 Let A' be a ring, G a group operating on A', A the ring of invariants of G, p' a prime ideal of A' and S a multiplicative subset of A not meeting p'. Then G^Z(S⁻¹p') = G^Z(p'), G^Γ… ↩ 2 04Q1
- Theorem 2 Let A' be a ring, G a finite group operating on A' and A the ring of invariants of G, so that A' is integral over A (§ 1, no. 9, Proposition 22). ↩ 9 04Q2
- Corollary With the hypotheses and notation Of Theorem 2, let f₁, f₂ be two homomorphisms of A to a field L with the same restriction to A. Then there exists σ ∈ G such that ↩ 1 04Q3
- Proposition 4 Let A' be a ring, G a finite group operating on A', H a subgroup of G, A and B the rings of invariants of G and H respectively and p' a prime ideal of A; let us write p = A ∩ p' an… ↩ 6 04Q4
- Corollary 1 Under the hypotheses Of Theorem 2 the rings A/p and A^Z/(p' ∩ A^Z) have the same field Of fractions and the maximal ideal of the local ring (A^Z)'_p' ∩ A^Z is generated by p. 04Q5
- Corollary 2 Let A' be an integral domain, G a finite group operating on A', A' the ring of invariants of G and p' a prime ideal of A'; let K, K^Z and K be the fields of fractions of A, A^Z and… ↩ 1 04Q6
- Definition 4 With the hypotheses and notation of Corollary 2 to Proposition 4, a prime ideal 𝔭 of A is said to decompose completely in K' if the number of prime ideals of A' lying above 𝔭 is eq… 04Q7
- Corollary 3 Let A' be an integral domain, G a finite commutative group operating on A', A the ring of invariants of G, 𝔭 a prime ideal of A and K and K' the fields of fractions of A and A' res… 04Q8
- Proposition 5 With the hypotheses and notation of Theorem 2, the field of fractions kᵀ of Aᵀ/(𝔭' ∩ Aᵀ) is equal to the greatest separable extension k'ₛ of k contained in k'. ↩ 4 04Q9
- Corollary If the order of the inertia group Gᵀ(p') is relatively prime to the characteristic exponent p of k, the field k' is a Galois extension of k. 04QA
- Lemma 4 Let A be an integrally closed domain, K its field of fractions, p the characteristic exponent of K, K' a radicial extension of K and A' a subring of K' containing A and integral ov… ↩ 2 04QB
- Remark (1) It follows from § 1, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 11 that the integral closure of A in K' is the set of x ∈ K' such that there exists m ≥ 0 for which x^pᵐ ∈ A (Algebra, Chapter… 04QC
- Proposition 6 Let A be an integrally closed domain, K its field of fractions, K' a quasi-Galois extension of K and A' the integral closure of A in K'. Then: ↩ 7 04QD
- Corollary 1 Under the hypotheses of Proposition 6, let f be a homomorphism from A to a field L and g1, g2 two homomorphisms from A' to L which extend f. Then there exists a K-automorphism σ ∈… ↩ 1 04QE
- Corollary 2 Let A be an integrally closed domain, K its field of fractions, K' a finite algebraic extension of K and A' a subring of K' containing A and integral over A. ↩ 1 04QF
- Corollary 3 With the hypotheses and notation of Corollary 2, if A is semi-local, so is A'. 04QG
- Corollary 4 Let A be an integrally closed domain, K its field of fractions, K a Galois extension of K, A' the integral closure of A in K', 𝔭' a prime ideal of A, 𝔭 = A ∩ 𝔭' and k and k' the fi… ↩ 1 04QH
- Definition 5 With the hypotheses and notation of Proposition 6, the field of invariants K^Z(p') (resp. Kᵀ(p')) of the group G^Z(p') (resp. Gᵀ(p')) in the field K' is called the decomposition fi… 04QI
- Proposition 7 Let A be an integrally closed domain, K its field of fractions, K' a Galois extension of K, G its Galois group, A' the integral closure of A in K', p' a prime ideal of A' and p = A… 04QJ
- Theorem 3 Let A be an integrally closed domain and A' a ring containing A and integral over A. Suppose that 0 is the only element of A which is a divisor of 0 in A'. Let p, q be two prime id… ↩ 4 04QK
- Corollary Under the hypotheses on A and A' of Theorem 3, let p be a prime ideal of A. The prime ideals of A' lying above p are the minimal elements of the set E of prime ideals of A' contain… 04QL
§ 3. Finitely generated algebras over a field
- Theorem 1 (Normalization Lemma) Let A be a finitely generated k-algebra and let a₁ ⊂ a₂ ⊂ … ⊂ aₚ be an increasing finite sequence of ideals of A such that p ≥ 1 and aₚ ≠ A. There exists a finite sequence (xᵢ)_1 ≤… ↩ 4 04R8
- Corollary 1 Let A be an integral domain and B a finitely generated A-algebra containing A as a subring. Then there exist an element s ≠ 0 of A and a subalgebra B' of B isomorphic to a polynomi… ↩ 4 04R9
- Corollary 2 Let K be a field, A a subring of K and L the field of fractions of A. If K is a finitely generated A-algebra, [K:L] is finite and there exists a ≠ 0 in A such that L = A[a⁻¹]. ↩ 1 04RA
- Corollary 3 Let A be an integral domain, B a finitely generated A-algebra and b an element of B such that zbⁿ ≠ 0 for all z ≠ 0 in A and every integer n > 0. Let φ : A → B be the canonical hom… ↩ 2 04RB
- Theorem 2 Let A be a finitely generated integral k-algebra, K its field of fractions and A' the integral closure of A in a field K' which is a finite algebraic extension of K. Then A' is a f… ↩ 2 04RC
- Proposition 1 Let A be a finitely generated algebra over a field k and L the algebraic closure of k. ↩ 2 04RD
- Lemma 1 Let A be a finitely generated algebra over a field k, (aᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n a system of generators of this algebra and c the ideal of algebraic relations between the aᵢ with coefficients… 04RE
- Proposition 2 (Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz) Let k be a field and L an algebraic closure of k. 04RF
- Definition 1 A ring A is called a Jacobson ring if every prime ideal of A is the intersection of a family of maximal ideals. 04RG
- Proposition 3 For a ring A to be a Jacobson ring, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every ideal a of A, the Jacobson radical of A/a be equal to its nilradical (Chapter II, § 2, no. 6). ↩ 1 04RH
- Corollary Let A be a Jacobson ring; for every ideal a of A, the radical of a is the intersection of the maximal ideals of A containing a. ↩ 1 04RI
- Proposition 4 Let A be a principal ideal domain and (p_λ)_λ ∈ L a representative system of extremal elements of A (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 1, no. 3, Definition 2). For A to be a Jacobson ring, i… ↩ 2 04RJ
- Proposition 5 Let A be a ring and B an A-algebra integral over A. If A is a Jacobson ring, so is B. ↩ 1 04RK
- Theorem 3 Let A be a Jacobson ring, B a finitely generated A-algebra and φ : A → B the canonical homomorphism. Then: (i) B is a Jacobson ring. (ii) For every maximal ideal m' of B, m = φ⁻¹(m… ↩ 3 04RL
- Corollary 1 Every finitely generated algebra A over Z is a Jacobson ring; for a prime ideal p ⊂ A to be maximal, it is necessary and sufficient that the ring A/p be finite. ↩ 1 04RM
- Corollary 2 Let (P_λ)_λ ∈ L be a family of polynomials in Z[X₁, …, Xₙ] and let Q be a polynomial in Z[X₁, …, Xₙ] such that, for every system of elements (xᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n belonging to a finite fi… 04RN
- Corollary 3 Let A be a Jacobson ring. If there exists a finitely generated A-algebra B containing A and which is a field, then A is a field and B is an algebraic extension of A. 04RO
VI. Valuations
§ 1. Valuation rings
- Definition 1 Let A and B be two local rings. B is said to dominate A if A is a subring of B and m(A) = A ∩ m(B). 04RZ
- Proposition 1 Let A and B be local rings such that A is a subring of B. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) m(A) ⊂ m(B); (b) B dominates A; (c) the ideal Bm(A) generated by m(A) in B do… ↩ 1 04S0
- Theorem 1 Let K be a field and V a subring of K. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) V is a maximal element of the set of local subrings of K, this set being ordered by the relation… ↩ 7 04S1
- Lemma 1 Let A be a subring of a ring B and x an element of B not integral over A; then the ring of fractions B, (Chapter II, § 5, no. 1) is not reduced to O and there exists in the subring… ↩ 1 04S2
- Definition 2 In the notation of Theorem 1, V is called a valuation ring for the field K if the equivalent conditions (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) hold. A ring is called a valuation ring if it is an… ↩ 1 04S3
- Theorem 2 Let K be a field and h a homomorphism from a subring A of K to an algebraically closed field L. Then there exist a valuation ring V for K and a homomorphism h' from V to L such tha… ↩ 2 04S4
- Corollary Every local subring A of a field K is dominated by at least one valuation ring of K. ↩ 3 04S5
- Theorem 3 Let A be a subring of a field K. The integral closure A' of A in K is the intersection of the valuation rings of K which contain A; if A is local, A' is the intersection of the val… ↩ 5 04S6
- Corollary 1 Every valuation ring is integrally closed. 04S7
- Corollary 2 For an integral domain to be integrally closed, it is necessary and sufficient that it be the intersection of a family of valuation rings of its field of fractions. 04S8
- Corollary 3 Let K be a field, K' an extension of K and A a valuation ring of K. The integral closure of A in K' is the intersection of the valuation rings V' of K such that V' ∩ K = A. ↩ 3 04S9
- Proposition 2 Let A be a local ring whose maximal ideal is a principal ideal Ap. If ⋂ₙ₌₁^∞ Apⁿ = (0) (for example if A is Noetherian, cf. Chapter III, § 3, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5), th… ↩ 3 04SA
- Proposition 3 Let A be a principal ideal domain and K its field of fractions. The valuation rings of K containing A and distinct from K are the rings of the form A_Ap, where p is an extremal ele… ↩ 3 04SB
- Corollary 1 Every valuation ring of the field Q and distinct from Q is of the form Z₍ₚ₎ where p is a prime number. ↩ 1 04SC
- Corollary 2 Let K be a field, K(X) the field of rational functions in one indeterminate over K and V a valuation ring of K(X) containing K and distinct from K(X). If X ∈ V, there exists an irr… ↩ 1 04SD
§ 2. Places
- Definition 1 Let E and E' be two sets each with an internal law of composition denoted by (x, y) ↦ x * y, not necessarily everywhere defined. A mapping f : E → E' is a morphism if, for all x, y… 04SN
- Definition 2 Let E and E' be two sets each with a family of internal laws of composition (x, y) ↦ x *_α y, α ∈ I. A mapping f : E → E' is a morphism if it is a morphism for each of the laws of… 04SO
- Definition 3 Let K and L be two fields. Every morphism f of K to tildeL (for addition and multiplication) such that f(1) = 1 is called a place of K with values in L. 04SP
- Proposition 1 Let K be a field, A a valuation ring of K and κ(A) the residue field of A. We extend the canonical mapping of A onto κ(A) to a mapping h_A : tildeK → (κ(A)) by the equation h_A(x)… ↩ 1 04SQ
- Proposition 2 Let K and L be two fields and f a place of K with values in L. Then there exists a valuation ring A of K and an isomorphism j of κ(A) onto a subfield of L such that f = j ∘ h_A; th… 04SR
- Proposition 3 Let K be a field, S a subring of K and f a homomorphism from S to an algebraically closed field L. Then there exists a place of K with values in L which extends f. ↩ 1 04SS
- Proposition 4 Let K be a field, f a place of K with values in a field L and K' an extension of K. Then there exists an extension L' of L and a place f' of K' with values in L' which extends f. I… ↩ 1 04ST
- Proposition 5 Let K be a field, S a subring of K, h a homomorphism from S to a field and p the kernel of h. For an element x of K to be integral over the local ring S, it is necessary and suffic… 04SU
- Proposition 6 Let K be a field and S a subring of K. For an element x ∈ K to be integral over S, it is necessary and sufficient that every place of K which is finite on S be finite at x. ↩ 1 04SV
§ 3. Valuations
- Definition 1 Let C be a (not necessarily commutative) ring and Γ a totally ordered commutative group written additively. A valuation on C with values in Γ is any mapping v : C → Γ_∞ which satis… 04T2
- Proposition 1 Let v be a valuation on a (not necessarily commutative) ring C. For any elements xᵢ ∈ C (1 ≤ i ≤ n), ↩ 3 04T3
- Corollary If a finite sequence of elements (xᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n of C (for n ≥ 2) is such that ∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ xᵢ = 0, there exist at least two distinct indices j, k such that 04T4
- Proposition 2 Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) field and v a valuation on K with values in Γ. Then: (i) For x ≠ 0, v(x) ≠ +∞. (ii) The set A of x ∈ K such that v(x) ≥ O is a subring of K… ↩ 1 04T5
- Proposition 3 For two valuations v, v' over a (not necessarily commutative) field K to be equivalent, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist an isomorphism λ of the ordered group v(K^*)… 04T6
- Proposition 4 Let C be an integral domain, K its field of fractions, C^* = C - 0 and v : C → Γ_∞ a valuation on C. Then there exists a unique valuation w on K which extends v and w(K^*) is the s… ↩ 3 04T7
- Proposition 5 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K and K' an extension of K. There exists a valuation v' on K' whose restriction to K is equivalent to v. ↩ 1 04T8
- Proposition 6 Let K be a field, A a subring of K and x an element of K. For x to be integral over A, it is necessary and sufficient that every valuation on K which is positive on A be positive a… ↩ 1 04T9
- Example (1) Every valuation on a finite field F is improper, since every element of F is a root unity. 04TA
- Example (2) If K is a subfield of a field K', the restriction to K of a valuation on K' is a valuation on K. 04TB
- Example (3) Let k be a field and K = k((T)). The mapping v which maps every non-zero formal power series to its order (Algebra, Chapter IV, § 5, no. 7) is a valuation on K whose order group is… ↩ 4 04TC
- Example (4) Let A be a principal ideal domain, K its field of fractions and p an extremal element of A. For x ∈ K let vp(x) denote the exponent of p in the decomposition of x into extremal ele… ↩ 3 04TD
- Example (5) The mapping P(X, Y) ↦ P(T, e^T) of C[X, Y] to C((T)) is injective (Functions of a real variable, Chapter IV, §2, Proposition 9) and therefore can be extended to an isomorphism of C… 04TE
- Example (6) Let Γ be a totally ordered group and k a field. Let Γ+ be the monoid of positive elements of Γ and C the algebra of Γ+ over k. By definition, C has a basis (x\alpha){\alpha \in \Ga… ↩ 1 04TF
- Definition 2 Let G be an ordered set. A subset of G is called major if the relations x ∈ M and y ≥ x imply y ∈ M. 04TG
- Proposition 7 The mapping M ↦ a(M) is an increasing bijection of the set of major subsets of G onto the set of sub-A-modules of K. 04TH
- Corollary Let G₊ be the set of positive elements in G. The mapping M ↦ a(M) is a bijection of the set of major subsets of G₊, onto the set of ideals of A. ↩ 1 04TI
- Definition 3 Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) field, v a valuation on K and Γ the order group of v. v is called discrete if there exists a (necessarily unique) isomorphism of the ordere… ↩ 1 04TJ
- Proposition 8 Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) field, v a discrete valuation on K, A the ring of v and u a uniformizer for v. The non-zero ideals of A are two-sided and of the form Auⁿ (… ↩ 1 04TK
- Proposition 9 Let A be a local integral domain distinct from its field of fractions. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) A is the ring of a discrete valuation. (b) A is a principal idea… ↩ 6 04TL
- Lemma 1 Let A be a valuation ring. Every finitely generated torsion-free A-module is free. Every finitely generated ideal 𝔞 of A is principal. Every torsion-free A-module is flat. ↩ 1 04TM
§ 4. The height of a valuation
- Proposition 1 Let K be a field and A a valuation ring of K. Then: (a) Every ring B such that A ⊂ B ⊂ K is a valuation ring of K; (b) The maximal ideal m(B) of such a ring is contained in A and i… ↩ 3 04TV
- Corollary The set & subrings of K containing A is totally ordered by inclusion. ↩ 2 04TW
- Proposition 2 Let K be a field, B a valuation ring of K and h, the place & K associated with B (with values in κ(B)). Then the mapping A ↦ h_B(A) defines a bijection of the set A of valuation ri… ↩ 1 04TX
- Corollary Let A and B be two valuation rings of K, where A ⊂ B; let A' = h_B(A), which is a valuation ring of κ(B). The residue field κ(A') of A' is canonically isomorphic to the residue fie… ↩ 1 04TY
- Remark Conversely, let f be a place of K with values in K' and f' a place of K' with values in K''. Then f' ∘ f is a place of K whose ring is contained in the ring of the place f. 04TZ
- Definition 1 A subgroup H of an ordered group G is called isolated if the relations 0 ≤ y ≤ x and x ∈ H imply y ∈ H. ↩ 1 04U0
- Example (1) Let A and B be two ordered groups; let A × B be given the lexicographic order (i.e. "(a, b) ≤ (a', b')" is equivalent to "(a < a') or (a = a' and b ≤ b')"). The second factor B of… 04U1
- Proposition 3 Let G be an ordered group and P the set of its positive elements. ↩ 3 04U2
- Example (2) If we reconsider the example where G is a lexicographic product A × B and H = B, the ordered group G/H is canonically identified with A. ↩ 1 04U3
- Proposition 4 The mapping B ↦ H_B is an increasing bijection of the set of subrings of K containing A onto the set of isolated subgroups of Γ_A. ↩ 1 04U4
- Remark Under the above hypotheses, let f denote the canonical homomorphism of B onto κ(B) and A' = f(A); it is a valuation ring of κ(B) (Proposition 2, no. 1). Then f⁻¹(κ(B)^*) = U(B), f⁻… 04U5
- Example Let k be a field, 04U6
- Definition 2 Let G be a totally ordered group. If the number of isolated subgroups of G distinct from G is finite and equal to n, G is said to be of height n. If this number is infinite, G is s… 04U7
- Definition 3 The height of the order group of a valuation is called the height of that valuation. 04U8
- Proposition 5 The height of a valuation is equal to the number of non-zero prime ideals in its ring. ↩ 1 04U9
- Proposition 6 Let K be a field and A a subring of K. Suppose that A is not a field. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (a) A is the ring of a valuation of height 1 on K; (b) A is a va… ↩ 3 04UA
- Proposition 7 For a valuation on a field to be of height 1, it is necessary and sufficient that its order group be isomorphic to a non-zero ordered subgroup of \mathbf{R}. 04UB
- Proposition 8 Let G be a totally ordered group not reduced to O. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) G is of height 1; (b) for all x 0 and y ≥ 0 in G, there exists an integer n ≥ 0 such… ↩ 2 04UC
- Proposition 9 Let K be a field, v a non-improper valuation on K and A the ring of v. For A to be completely integrally closed (Chapter V, § 1, no. 4, Definition 5), it is necessary and sufficien… 04UD
- Corollary Let K be a field, (v_α)_α ∈ I a family of valuations of height 1 on K and A the intersection of the rings of the v. Then A is a completely integrally closed domain. ↩ 1 04UE
§ 5. The topology defined by a valuation
- Lemma 1 Let x ∈ K^*, y ∈ K^* and α ∈ G. If v(x - y) > sup(α + 2v(y), v(y)), then v(x⁻¹ - y⁻¹) > a. ↩ 2 04UQ
- Proposition 1 The topology Tᵥ is Hausdorff and compatible with the field structure on K. The mapping v : K^* → G is continuous if G is given the discrete topology. ↩ 1 04UR
- Proposition 2 Let K be a not necessarily commutative field, v a non-improper valuation on K, A the ring of v and m the ideal of v. For K with the topology Tᵥ to be locally compact, it is necessa… ↩ 4 04US
- Remark Note that it is sufficient in this proof to suppose that A is complete. 04UT
- Proposition 3 Let E be a left topological vector space over K which is Hausdorff and of dimension 1. Suppose that v is not improper. For all x₀ ≠ 0 in E, the mapping a ↦ ax₀ of Kₛ onto E is a to… ↩ 1 04UU
- Corollary Let E be a left topological vectorspace over K, H a closed hyperplane of E and D a 1-dimensional vector subspace of E an algebraic supplement of H. Suppose that v is not improper… 04UV
- Proposition 4 Suppose that v is not improper and K is complete. Let E be a left topological vector space over K, which is Hausdorff and of finite dimension n. For every basis (eᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n of E… ↩ 1 04UW
- Corollary Suppose that v is not improper and K is complete. Let E be a Hausdorff topological vector space over K and F a finite-dimensional vector subspace of E. Then F is closed. ↩ 2 04UX
- Proposition 5 Let K be a not necessarily commutative field, v a valuation on K and G the group v(K^*) with the discrete topology. ↩ 2 04UY
- Remark For all x ∈ hatK not belonging to hatA, there exists x₀ ∈ K such that hatv(x - x₀) > 0, hatv(x) = hatv(x₀) = v(x₀) < 0; then x₀⁻¹ x ∈ hatA and, as x₀⁻¹ ∈ A, it is seen that, if we… 04UZ
§ 6. Absolute values
- Proposition 1 For a mapping f from K to R, satisfying (VA,) and (VAII) to belong to V(K), it is necessary and sufficient that f(1 + x) be bounded in the set of x ∈ K such that f(x) ≤ 1. ↩ 1 04VA
- Proposition 2 Let f be a mapping of K to R₊ belonging to V(K); if there exists C > 0 such that f(n.1) ≤ C for every integer n > 0, f is an absolute value on K. ↩ 4 04VB
- Corollary 1 For a mapping f from K to R₊ to be an absolute value, it is necessary and sufficient that it satisfy conditions (VA_I), (VA_II) and (U₂). ↩ 1 04VC
- Corollary 2 For a mapping f of K to R₊ to belong to V(K), it is necessary and sufficient that it be of the form gᵗ, where t > 0 and g is an absolute value on K. ↩ 1 04VD
- Proposition 3 Let f be a mapping of K to R₊. The following properties are equivalent: (a) f is an ultrametric absolute value. (b) There exists a valuation v on K with values in R and a real numb… ↩ 3 04VE
- Corollary If K is a (not necessarily commutative) field of characteristic p > 0, every function on V(K) is an ultrametric absolute value. ↩ 1 04VF
- Proposition 4 Let f be a mapping of Q to R₊ belonging to V(Q). Then: ↩ 2 04VG
- Theorem 1 (Gelfand-Mazur) Let K be an algebra over the field R with the two following properties: (1) K is a (not necessarily commutative) field. (2) There exists on K a norm x ↦ |x| compatible with the alg… ↩ 3 04VH
- Lemma 1 Let D be a field with centre L such that, for all x ∈ D, L(x) is an extension of L of degree ≤ m. Then the rank of D over L is ≤ m². ↩ 1 04VI
- Theorem 2 (Ostrowski) Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) field and f an element V(K) which is not an ultrametric absolute value. Then there exist a unique real number s > 0 and an isomorphism j of… ↩ 2 04VJ
- Lemma 2 Let L be a (not necessarily commutative) field and K a subfield of L such that L is ajinite-dimensional left vector space over K. Let g be an absolute value on L andf its restricti… 04VK
§ 7. Approximation theorem
- Proposition 1 Let K be a field, (Aᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n ajinitefamily of valuation rings of K and B = ⋂ᵢ₌₁ⁿ Aᵢ. We write pᵢ = B ∩ m(Aᵢ). Then Aᵢ = B_pᵢ for all i and the jield of ructions of B is K. ↩ 5 04VN
- Lemma 1 Let vᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) be ualuations on the jield K and x ∈ K^*. Then there exists a polynomialf (X) of theform ↩ 1 04VO
- Proposition 2 With the hypotheses of Proposition 1 suppose further that Aᵢ not⊂ Aⱼ for i ≠ j. Then the pᵢ are distinct maximal ideals of B and every maximal ideal of B is equal to one of the pᵢ. ↩ 2 04VP
- Corollary 1 Suppose that Aᵢ not⊂ Aⱼ for i ≠ j. For every family of elements aᵢ ∈ Aᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n), there exists x ∈ B such that x ≡ aᵢ pmodm(Aᵢ) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n. ↩ 1 04VQ
- Corollary 2 Suppose that Aᵢ not⊂ Aⱼ for i ≠ j. There exist elements xᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) of K such that vᵢ(xᵢ) = 0 and vⱼ(xᵢ) > 0 for i ≠ j. 04VR
- Corollary 3 Every valuation ring of K containing B contains one of the Aᵢ. 04VS
- Definition 1 Let A and A' be two valuation rings of the same field K. A and A' are called independent if K is the ring generated by A and A'. Two valuations on K are called independent if their… ↩ 1 04VT
- Theorem 1 (Approximation Theorem for Valuations) Let vᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) be valuations on a field K which are independent in pairs and Γᵢ the order group of vᵢ. Let aᵢ ∈ K and αᵢ ∈ Γᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n). Then there exists x ∈ K such that vᵢ(… ↩ 7 04VU
- Lemma 2 Let A be a valuation ring and b an ideal of A distinct from A. Then the radical c of b is a prime ideal. 04VV
- Corollary 1 For every family of elements γᵢ ∈ Γᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n), there exists x ∈ K such that vᵢ(x) = γᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n). ↩ 2 04VW
- Corollary 2 Let Tᵢ be the topology defined on K by vᵢ; let Kⁿ be given the topology the product of the Tᵢ. If the vᵢ are not improper, the diagonal of Kⁿ is dense in Kⁿ. ↩ 1 04VX
- Proposition 3 Let v and v' be two non-improper valuations on the same field K. For v and v' to define the same topology on K, it is necessary and sufficient that they be dependent. ↩ 1 04VY
- Proposition 4 Let v₁, …, vₙ (n ≥ 2) be pairwise dependent valuations on the same field K. Then the rings A₁, …, Aₙ of v₁, …, vₙ generate a subring δ \ K distinct from K. ↩ 1 04VZ
- Theorem 2 (Approximation Theorem for Absolute Values) Let fᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) be absolute values on the same field K which are not improper and no two of which are equivalent. Let aᵢ \ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) be elements of K and ε a real number > 0… ↩ 1 04W0
§ 8. Extensions of a valuation to an algebraic extension
- Definition 1 The index [𝔭ᵥ : Γ_v'] is called the ramification index of v' over v (or over K) and denoted by e(v'/v) (or e(A'/A), or sometimes e(L/K)). 04W4
- Definition 2 The degree [κ(A') : κ(A)] is called the residue class degree of v' over v (or over K) and denoted by f(v'/v) (or f(A'/A), or sometimes f(L/K)). 04W5
- Lemma 1 Let K, K', K'' be three fields such that K ⊂ K' ⊂ K'', v'' a valuation on K'' and v and v' its restriction to K and K'. Then there are the relations: (1) e(v''/v) = e(v''/v') e(v'/… ↩ 4 04W6
- Lemma 2 Let K be a field, L a finite extension of K of degree n, v' a valuation on L and v its restriction to K. Then the inequality ↩ 8 04W7
- Proposition 1 Let K be a field, L an algebraic extension of K, v' a valuation on L, v its restriction to K and A and A' the rings of v and v'. Then Γ_v'/Γᵥ is a torsion group and κ(A') is an alg… ↩ 4 04W8
- Corollary 1 The height of v' is equal to that of v. 04W9
- Lemma 3 Let G' be a totally ordered group, G a subgroup of G and G' (resp. G) the set of isolated subgroups of G' (resp. G). The mapping H' ↦ H' ∩ G maps G' onto G. This mapping is bijecti… ↩ 1 04WA
- Corollary 2 For v' to be improper (resp. of height 1), it is necessary and sufficient that v be improper (resp. of height 1). ↩ 4 04WB
- Corollary 3 Suppose that L is a finite extension of K. For v' to be discrete, it is necessary and sufficient that v be discrete. If v' is discrete, Γ_v' is isomorphic to a non-zero subgroup of… ↩ 3 04WC
- Definition 3 Let K be afield, v a valuation on K and L an extension of K. A family (v'ᵢ)_i ∈ I of valuations on L which extend v and such that every valuation on L extending v is equivalent to… 04WD
- Proposition 2 Let K be afield, v a valuation on K, hatK the completion of K with respect to v, hatv the continuous extension of v to hatK and L a finite extension of K of degree n. (a) Let v' be… ↩ 5 04WE
- Corollary 1 If K is complete with respect to v and v is not improper, two valuations on L extending v are dependent. ↩ 1 04WF
- Corollary 2 If hatK or L is separable over K, the canonical mapping 04WG
- Remark Proposition 2 (b) shows that every composite extension of hatK and L over K (Algebra, Chapter VIII, § 8) is isomorphic to one of the completions hatLᵢ and that these are composite… 04WH
- Theorem 1 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K and L a finite extension of K of degree n. Then: ↩ 2 04WI
- Remark The intersection C of the rings Aᵢ' of the valuations vᵢ' (i ∈ I) is the integral closure of A in L (§ 1, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Theorem 3); it follows moreover from (c) and § 7, no… 04WJ
- Definition 4 Let G be a totally ordered commutative group and H a subgroup of G of finite index. The number of major subsets of G consisting of strictly positive elements and containing all the… ↩ 1 04WK
- Proposition 3 Under the hypotheses of Definition 4, if the set of strictly positive elements of G has no least element, then ε(G, H) = 1 for all H. If there exists a least element O of G and G'… ↩ 1 04WL
- Corollary The initial index ε(G, H) divides the index (G : H) and is equal to it if G is isomorphic to Z. ↩ 1 04WM
- Definition 5 Let K be a field, L a finite extension of K, w a valuation on L, v its restriction to K and Γ_w and Γᵥ their order groups. The initial index of Γᵥ in Γ_w is called the initial rami… ↩ 1 04WN
- Proposition 4 Under the hypotheses of Definition 5, let A and m (resp. A' and m') be the ring and ideal of the valuation v (resp. w). Then ↩ 5 04WO
- Proposition 5 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, A its ring, m its ideal, L a finite extension of K of degree n, B the integral closure of A in L and (v'ᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ s a complete system of exte… ↩ 2 04WP
- Corollary With the same hypotheses and notation, [B/mB : A/m] = ∑ᵢ₌₁ˢ ε(v'ᵢ/v) f(v'ᵢ/v) ≤ ∑ᵢ₌₁ˢ ε(v'ᵢ/v) f(v'ᵢ/v) ≤ n. We know that ε(v'ᵢ/v) ≤ ε(v'ᵢ/v) (no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 3) an… ↩ 1 04WQ
- Theorem 2 With the hypotheses and notation of Proposition 5, the following conditions are equivalent : (a) B is a finitely generated A-module; (b) B is a free A-module; (c) [B/mB : A/m] = n… ↩ 4 04WR
- Remark (1) If v is discrete, ε(v'ᵢ/v) = ε(v'ᵢ/v) (no. 4) and condition (d) reduces to ∑ᵢ₌₁ˢ ε(v'ᵢ/v) f(v'ᵢ/v) = n. 04WS
- Corollary 1 With the same hypotheses and notation, suppose further that v is discrete and L separable. Then 04WT
- Corollary 2 Let K be a field, v a discrete valuation on K with respect to which K is complete and L a finite extension of K of degree n. Then v admits a unique (upto equivalence) extension v'… ↩ 1 04WU
- Corollary 4 Under the hypotheses of Corollary 3, if L is a separable extension of K, each of the hatLᵢ is a separable extension of hatK. If further L is a Galois extension of K with Galois gro… 04WV
- Proposition 6 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, A its ring, L an algebraic extension of K and A' the integral closure of A in L. Let 23 be the set of valuation rings on L which extend v and… ↩ 2 04WW
- Proposition 7 Let K be a field, L a quasi-Galois extension of K and f and f' places of L with values in the same field F. Suppose that the restrictions off and f' to K coincide. Then there exist… ↩ 2 04WX
- Corollary 1 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, L a quasi-Galois extension of K and v' and v'' two extensions of v to L. Then there exists a K-automorphism s of L such that v'' is equivalent… ↩ 3 04WY
- Corollary 2 Let K be a field, f a place of K (resp. v a valuation on K) and L a radicial extension of K. Then all the extensions of f (resp. v) to L are equivalent. 04WZ
- Proposition 8 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, L a finite quasi-Galois extension of K of degree n and (v'ᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ g a complete system of extensions of v to L. Then e(v'ᵢ/v) and f(v'ᵢ/v) h… 04X0
- Proposition 9 Let K be a field, L an algebraic extension of K and 𝔣 an absolute value on K. Then 𝔣 can be extended to an absolute value on L. ↩ 1 04X1
- Proposition 10 Let K be a field, f an absolute value on K such that K is complete and not discrete with respect to f and L an algebraic extension of K. Then f can be extended uniquely to an absol… 04X2
- Proposition 11 Let K be a field, f a non-ultrametric absolute value on K, hatK the completion of K with respect to f, hatf the continuous extension off to hatK and L a finite extension of K of de… ↩ 1 04X3
- Proposition 12 Let K be a field, f an absolute value on K, L a quasi-Galois extension of K and f' and f'' two extensions off to L. Then there exists a K-automorphism s of L such that f'' = f' ∘ s… 04X4
§ 9. Application: locally compact fields
- Proposition 1 If K is a locally compactfield, thefunction mod, belongs to V(K) (§ 6, no. 1). Moreover: (i) If s > 0 is such that (mod_K)ˢ = g is an absolute value, then g defines the topology on… ↩ 1 04XQ
- Proposition 2 Let K, K' be two (not necessarily commutative) locally compact fields such that K is a topological subfield of K' and K is not discrete. Then: (i) K' is a finite dimensional left (… ↩ 1 04XR
- Corollary 1 Every locally compactfield whose centre is not discrete is of finite rank over its centre. 04XS
- Corollary 2 Let K' be a locally compact field and K a closed subfield of K' (neither necessarily commutative). If K' is a left (resp. right) vector space of finite dimension n over K, then (2)… 04XT
- Proposition 3 Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) locally compact field which is not discrete and whose topology is defined by a discrete valuation v; let A be the ring and m the ideal of v… ↩ 1 04XU
- Lemma 1 Let x, y be two permutable elements of A such that x - y ∈ mʲ \ (j ≥ 1); then x^pⁿ - y^pⁿ ∈ mʲ⁺ⁿ for every integer n ≥ 0. 04XV
- Theorem 1 Let K be a (not necessarily commutative) locally compact field which is not discrete. ↩ 1 04XW
- Corollary 1 Every locally compact field which is not discrete is of finite rank over its centre. ↩ 1 04XX
- Corollary 2 Every locally compact field is connected or totally disconnected; if it is connected, it is isomorphic to R, C or H. 04XY
- Remark Let s be an integer > 0; the subfield F_q((Tˢ)) = L of K = F_q((T)) is closed in K and e(K/L) = s and f(K/L) = 1. It is therefore seen that there are closed subfields L of K which… 04XZ
§ 10. Extensions of a valuation to a transcendental extension
- Lemma 1 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, Γ its order group, Γ' a totally ordered group containing Γ and ξ an element of Γ'. There exists a unique valuation w on K(X) such that, for P… ↩ 5 04Y5
- Proposition 1 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, Γ its order group, Γ' a totally ordered group containing Γ and ξ an element of Γ' such that the relations nξ ∈ Γ, n ∈ Z imply n = 0. Then ther… ↩ 1 04Y6
- Proposition 2 Let K be a field, v a valuation on K, Γ its order group and k its residue field. There exists a unique valuation w on K(X) extending v such that w(X) = 0 and the image t of X in th… ↩ 3 04Y7
- Remark It should not be thought that the two types of extensions of v to K(X) which we have just met are the only ones; there may exist a third type of extension, where Γ'/Γ is a torsion… 04Y8
- Definition 1 The rational rank of a commutative group G is the dimension of the vector Q-space G ⊗_Z Q. 04Y9
- Proposition 3 Let G be a totally ordered Commutative group and H a subgroup of G. If h(G) and h(H) denote the heights of G and H (§ 4, no. 4), then the inequality ↩ 2 04YA
- Corollary For every totally ordered commutative group G, h(G) ≤ r(G). We set H = (0) in Proposition 3. ↩ 1 04YB
- Proposition 4 Let G be a totally ordered commutative group. Suppose that G is finitely generated and that h(G) = r(G). Then G is isomorphic to Zʳ⁽ᴳ⁾ ordered lexicographically. ↩ 1 04YC
- Lemma 2 Let H be an isolated subgroup of a totally ordered commutative group G. If H is a direct factor of G, the ordered group G is isomorphic to the group (G/H) × H ordered lexicographic… ↩ 1 04YD
- Theorem 1 Let x₁, …, x, be elements of the ring of v' whose canonical images overlinexᵢ in k' are algebraically independent over k and y₁, …, yᵣ elements of K' such that the canonical images… ↩ 1 04YE
- Corollary 1 The inequality 04YF
- Corollary 2 Let h and h' be the heights of v and v'. Then s(v'/v) + h' ≤ d(K'/K) + h. By Proposition 3, h' ≤ r(v'/v) + h. 04YG
- Corollary 3 Suppose that K' is a finitely generated extension of K, that Γ is isomorphic to Z^h' (ordered lexicographically) and there is equality in formula (10). Then Γ' is isomorphic to Z^h… 04YH
- Corollary 4 Suppose that v is improper (in which case k = K). Then h(Γ') + d(k'/K) ≤ r(Γ') + D(k'/K) ≤ d(K'/K). If, in particular, v' is of height 1, then d(k'/K) ≤ d(K'/K) - 1; further, if K'… 04YI
VII. Divisors
§ 1. Krull domains
- Definition 1 Let A be an integral domain and K its field of fractions. Every sub-A-module a of K such that there exists an element d ≠ 0 in A for which da ⊂ A is called a fractional ideal 𝔡 of… ↩ 1 04YL
- Definition 2 Every element a of I(A) such that a = tildea is called a divisorial fractional ideal of A. ↩ 1 04YM
- Proposition 1 (a) If b is a divisorial ideal and a ∈ I(A), b : a is divisorial. ↩ 6 04YN
- Remark In the course of the above proof it has been proved that A : a = A : (A : (A : a)) for every ideal a ∈ I(A), which is a special case of Set Theory, Chapter 111, § 1, no. 5, Proposi… 04YO
- Proposition 2 (i) In D(A) every non-empty set bounded above admits a least upper bound. More precisely, if (aᵢ) is a non-empty family of elements of I(A) which is bounded above, then sup(div aᵢ)… ↩ 5 04YP
- Corollary If x, y and x + y are in K^*, then div(x + y) ≥ inf(div(x), div(y)). 04YQ
- Proposition 3 Let a, a', b, b' be elements of I(A). The relations a > a' and b > b' imply ab > a'b'. 04YR
- Proposition 4 Let a, b be two divisorial fractional ideals of A. The following properties are equivalent: (a) div a and div b are equivalent divisors; (b) there exists x ∈ K^* such that b = xa. 04YS
- Theorem 1 Let A be an integral domain. For the monoid D(A) of divisors of A to be a group, it is necessary and sufficient that A be completely integrally closed. ↩ 1 04YT
- Corollary Let A be a completely integrally closed domain and a a divisorial fractional ideal of A. Then, for every fractional ideal b ≠ 0 of A, div(a : b) = div a - div b ↩ 1 04YU
- Definition 3 A n integral domain A is called a Krull domain if there exists a family (vᵢ)_i ∈ I of valuations on the field of fractions K of A with the following properties: (AK_I) the valuatio… ↩ 5 04YV
- Theorem 2 Let A be an integral domain. For A to be a Krull domain, it is necessary and sufficient that the twofollowing conditions be satisfied: (a) A is completely integrally closed; (b) ev… ↩ 3 04YW
- Lemma 1 If A is a Krull domain and (vₜ)ₜ, is a family of normed valuations on K satisfying (AK_I), (AK_II) and (AK_III), the mapping a ↦ (vₜ(a))_t ∈ I is a decreasing injective mapping of… ↩ 1 04YX
- Corollary For a Noetherian ring to be a Krull domain, it is necessary and sufficient that it be an integrally closed domain. ↩ 1 04YY
- Proposition 5 Let A be a Krull domain, K its field of fractions and (v_P)_P ∈ P(A) the family of its essential valuations. Let (n_P)_P ∈ P(A) be a family of rational integers which are zero exce… ↩ 5 04YZ
- Proposition 6 Let A be a Krull domain, K its field of fractions, (vₜ)_t ∈ I a family of valuations on K with the properties of Definition 3 and A, the ring of vₜ. Let S be a multiplicative subse… ↩ 8 04Z0
- Corollary 1 Let P be an extremal divisor of A and p the corresponding divisorial ideal. Then p is prime, the ring of v_P is A, and the residue field of v_P is identified with the field of frac… ↩ 7 04Z1
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Krull domain, K its field of fractions and (vₜ)_t ∈ I a family of valuations with the properties of Definition 3. Then every essential valuation of A is equivalent to on… ↩ 4 04Z2
- Proposition 7 Let A be a Krull domain, (v_P)_P ∈ P(A) the family of its essential valuations and a ∈ I(A). Then the coefficient of P in div a is inf_y ∈ a (v_P(y)). If p is the divisorial prime… ↩ 1 04Z3
- Proposition 8 Let A be an integrally closed Noetherian domain. (a) Let P be an extremal divisor of A and p the corresponding divisorial prime ideal; ↩ 3 04Z4
- Proposition 9 Let v₁, …, vᵣ be distinct essential valuations of a Krull domain A and n₁, …, nᵣ rational integers. There exists an element x of the field of fractions K of A such vᵢ(x) = nᵢ for 1… ↩ 8 04Z5
- Corollary 1 Let A be a Krull domain, K its field of fractions and a, b and c three divisorial fractional ideals of A such that a ⊂ b. There exists x ∈ K such that a = b ∩ xc. ↩ 1 04Z6
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Krull domain. For a fractional ideal a of A to be divisorial, it is necessary and sufficient that it be the intersection of two fractional principal ideals. ↩ 2 04Z7
- Definition 4 Let A be an integral domain. A prime ideal 𝔭 of A is said to be of height 1 if it is minimal among the non-zero prime ideals of A. 04Z8
- Theorem 3 Let A be a Krull domain and 𝔭 an integral ideal of A. For 𝔭 to be the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor, it is necessary and sufficient that 𝔭 be a prime ideal… ↩ 5 04Z9
- Corollary 1 In a Krull domain every non-zero prime ideal m contains a prime ideal of height 1. If m is not of height 1, then div m = 0 and A : m = A. ↩ 1 04ZA
- Corollary 2 Let A be a Krull domain, K its field of fractions, v a valuation on K which is positive on A and p the set of x ∈ A such that v(x) 0. If the prime ideal p is of height 1, v is equi… ↩ 2 04ZB
- Theorem 4 Let A be an integral domain and M the set of its prime ideals of height 1. For A to be a Krull domain, it is necessary and sufficient that the following Properties are satisfied: (… ↩ 6 04ZC
- Proposition 10 Let A be an integrallyclosed Noetherian domain and a an integral ideal of A. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) a is divisorial; (b) the prime ideals associated with A/a… 04ZD
- Proposition 11 Let A be a local Krull domain (in particular an integrally closed local Noetherian domain) and m its maximal ideal. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) A is discrete valua… ↩ 1 04ZE
- Proposition 12 Let A be a Krull domain, K its field of fractions, K' a finite extension of K and A' the integral closure of A in K'. Then A' is a Krull domain. The essential valuations of A' are… ↩ 3 04ZF
- Corollary Let p (resp. p') be a prime ideal of A (resp. A') of height 1 and v (resp. u') the essential valuation of A (resp. A') corresponding to it. For p' to lie above p, it is necessary a… ↩ 1 04ZG
- Proposition 13 Let A be a Krull domain and X₁, Xₙ, …, Xₙ indeterminates. The ring A[X₁, …, Xₙ] is a Krull domain. ↩ 2 04ZH
- Remark The valuations v_f and barw introduced in the proof of Proposition 13 are the essential valuations of A[X]. It will be sufficient for us to show that, if V is the set of valuations… 04ZI
- Proposition 14 Let A be a Krull domain and B a Krull domain containing A. Suppose that the following condition holds: ↩ 3 04ZJ
- Proposition 15 Let A and B be Krull domains such that B contains A and is aflat A-module. Then: (a) condition (PDE) of Proposition 14 is fulfilled; (b) for every divisorial ideal a ∈ A, Ba is the… ↩ 1 04ZK
- Corollary Let A be a local Krull domain and B a discrete valuation ring such that B dominates A and is aflat A-module. Then A is a field or a discrete valuation ring. 04ZL
- Remark In the former of the two above cases, the mapping i : D(A) → D(B) is injective: as the elements of P(B) form a basis of D(B) and two distinct ideals of P(A) cannot be the traces on… 04ZM
- Proposition 16 Let A be a Zariski ring such that its completion hatA is a Krull domain. Then A is a Krull domain and the canonical homomorphism tildei from C(A) to C(hatA) (which is defined since… ↩ 2 04ZN
- Proposition 17 Let A be a Krull domain and S a multiplicative subset of A not containing 0. Then the canonical homomorphism bari from C(A) to C(S⁻¹A) is surjective. If further S is generated by a… ↩ 4 04ZO
- Proposition 18 Let R be a Krull domain and A the polynomial ring R[X]. The canonical homomorphism of C(R) to C(R[X]) is bijective. ↩ 1 04ZP
§ 2. Dedekind domains
- Definition 1 A Krull domain all of whose non-zero prime ideals are maximal is called a Dedekind domain. 050M
- Theorem 1 Let A be an integral domain and K its field of fractions. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) A is a Dedekind domain; (b) A is a Krull domain and every non-improper valuat… ↩ 6 050N
- Proposition 1 A semi-local Dedekind domain is a principal ideal domain. ↩ 3 050O
- Proposition 2 Let A be a Dedekind domain, K its field of fractions and P the set of non-zero prime ideals of A; for p ∈ P let vₚ denote the corresponding essential valuation of A. Let p₁, …, p_q… ↩ 2 050P
- Proposition 3 The ring A, (resp. A ) is identified with the completion of A (resp. K) with respect to the ring topology for which a fundamental system of neighbourhoods & 0 consists & all the in… ↩ 1 050Q
- Proposition 4 The group SL(n, K) is dense in SL(n, A). 050R
- Lemma 1 Let A be a Noetherian domain in which every non-zeroprime ideal is maximal and M afinitely generated torsion A-module. Then the length long_A(M) of M is infinite. ↩ 1 050S
- Lemma 2 Let A be a ring, T an A-module and (Tᵢ) a right directed family of submodules of T with union T. Then long_A(T) = supᵢ (long_A(Tᵢ)). ↩ 1 050T
- Remark This proof does not assume that A is commutative. 050U
- Lemma 3 Let A be a Noetherian domain such that every non-zero prime ideal & A is maximal, M a torsion-free A-module of finite rank r and a non-zero element of A. Then A/Aa is an A-module o… ↩ 1 050V
- Proposition 5 (Krull-Akizuki) Let A be a Noetherian domain each of whose non-zeroprime ideals is maximal, K its field of fractions, L a finite extension of K and B a subring of L containing A. Then B is Noether… ↩ 3 050W
- Corollary 1 For every prime ideal p of A, the set of prime ideals of B lying above p is finite. ↩ 2 050X
- Corollary 2 The integral closure of A in L is a Dedekind domain. 050Y
- Corollary 3 The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of its field of fractions is a Dedekind domain. ↩ 2 050Z
- Proposition 6 Let A be a Dedekind domain, K its field of fractions, L a finite extension of K and B the integral closure of A in L. Let p be a non-zero prime ideal of A, v the corresponding esse… 0510
§ 3. Factorial domains
- Definition 1 A Krull domain all of whose divisorial ideals are principal is called a factorial (or unique factorization) domain. ↩ 4 051N
- Theorem 1 Let A be an integral domain. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) A is factorial; (b) the ordered group of non-zero fractional principal ideals of A is a direct sum of grou… ↩ 4 051O
- Proposition 1 Let A be a Krull domain. If every divisorial ideal of A is invertible, then, for every maximal ideal m of A, Aₘ is factorial. The converse is true if it is also assumed that every… ↩ 1 051P
- Proposition 2 Let A be an integral domain. For A to be factorial, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a subset P of A such that every a ∈ A - 0 may be written uniquely in the form a… 051Q
- Proposition 3 Let A be a Krull domain and S a multiplicative subset of A not containing 0. ↩ 5 051R
- Lemma 1 (Gauss) Let f, f' be non-zero elements of K[X] and c, c' contents off, f', f'. Then cc' is a content of ff'. ↩ 1 051S
- Theorem 2 Let A be a factorial domain, K its field of fractions, (p_λ) a representative system of extremal elements of A and (P_λ) a representative system of irreducible polynomials of K[X]… ↩ 3 051T
- Corollary If A is a factorial domain, the domain A[X₁, …, Xₙ] is factorial. 051U
- Proposition 4 Let A be a Zariski ring and hatA its completion. If hatA is a factorial domain, A is a factorial domain. 051V
- Corollary If the completion of a Noetherian local ring A is a factorial domain, A is a factorial domain. ↩ 1 051W
- Lemma 2 Let f(X₁, X₂, …, Xₙ) be a formal power series ≠ 0 with coefficients in a ring E. There exist integers u(i) geqslant 1 (1 leqslant i leqslant n - 1) such that ↩ 1 051X
- Lemma 3 Let f be a non-zero element of E[[X₁, …, Xₙ]]. There exist integers u(i) ≥ 1 (1 ≤ i ≤ n-1) such that the automorphism s of E defined by s(Xᵢ) = Xᵢ + Xₙᵘ⁽ⁱ⁾ (1 ≤ i ≤ n-1) and s(Xₙ)… ↩ 1 051Y
- Proposition 5 Let f ∈ B be a series whose reduced series is non-zero. Let s denote its reduced order and M the sub-A-module of B with basis 1, X, …, Xˢ⁻¹. Then B is the direct sum of M and f is… ↩ 3 051Z
- Corollary With the hypotheses and notation of Proposition 5, suppose that s ≥ 1, so that f ∈ Bm + BX. Then the A-homomorphism h of B' = A[[T]] to B = A[[X]] such that h(T) = f (Chapter III… 0520
- Definition 2 A polynomial F ∈ A[X] is called distinguished if it is of the form F = Xˢ + aₛ₋₁ Xˢ⁻¹ + ⋯ + a₀, where aᵢ ∈ 𝔪 for 0 ≤ i ≤ s - 1. ↩ 1 0521
- Proposition 6 (Preparation Theorem) Let f ∈ B be a series whose reduced series is not zero and s its reduced order. Then there exists a unique ordered pair (u, F) such that u is an invertible element of B, F a distin… ↩ 3 0522
- Proposition 7 Let F be a distinguished polynomial and g, h two formal power series of B such that F = gh. Then there exists an invertible element u of B such that ug and u⁻¹h are distinguished p… ↩ 2 0523
- Corollary Suppose further that A is an integral domain and F a distinguished polynomial of degree s. For F to be extremal in A[X], it is necessary and sufficient that it be extremal in B = A… ↩ 2 0524
- Proposition 8 Let C be a ring which is either a field or a discrete valuation ring. Then the domain of formal power series C[[X₁, …, Xₙ]] is factorial. ↩ 3 0525
§ 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains
- Definition 1 Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over the field K. A lattice of V with respect to A (or simply a lattice of V) is defined to be any sub-A-module M of V satisfying the fol… 052X
- Proposition 1 For a sub-A-module M of V to be a lattice of V, it is necessary and sufficient that KM = V and that M be contained in a finitely generated sub-A-module of V. ↩ 5 052Y
- Corollary Suppose that A is Noetherian; for a sub-A-module M of V to be a lattice of V, it is necessary and sufficient that KM = V and M be finitely generated. ↩ 1 052Z
- Remark (1) Recall that for every sub-A-module M of V the canonical mapping M ⊗_A K → V is injective and has image KM (Algebra, Chapter II, § 7, no. 10, Proposition 26); to say that KM = V mea… 0530
- Proposition 2 Let M be a lattice of V and M, a sub-A-module of V. If there exist two elements x, y of K^* such that xM ⊂ M₁ ⊂ yM, M₁ is a lattice of V; conversely, if M₁ is a lattice of V, there… ↩ 3 0531
- Proposition 3 (i) If M₁ and M₂ are lattices of V, so are M₁ ∩ M, and M₁ + M₂. ↩ 5 0532
- Corollary Let U, V, W be three vector spaces of finite rank over K and f: U × V → W a left non-degenerate K-bilinear mapping (Algebra, Chapter IX, § 1, no. 1, Definition 3). If M is a lattic… 0533
- Proposition 4 Let B be an integral domain, A a subring of B and K and L the respective fields & fractions of A and B. Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over K. ↩ 3 0534
- Corollary Suppose that A is a discrete valuation ring. Let hatA be its completion and let hatK be the field of fractions of hatA (Chapter VI, § 5, no. 3). The mapping φ, which maps every lat… 0535
- Proposition 5 Let V, W vector spaces of finite rank over K, M a lattice of V and N a lattice of W. If M is finitely generated, then (in the notation of Proposition 3): ↩ 3 0536
- Theorem 1 If M is a lattice of V, then M^* = ⋂_p ∈ P Mₚ^*. 0537
- Remark (1) Let M be a finitely generated A-module; it is immediate that the dual M^* of M, identified with a sub-A-module of Hom_A(M, K) is a lattice of the vector K-space Hom_A(M, K); in par… ↩ 1 0538
- Theorem 2 If M is a lattice of V, the following conditions are equivalent: (a) M is reflexive. (b) M = ⋂_p ∈ P Mₚ. (c) Ass(V/M) ⊂ P. ↩ 6 0539
- Corollary Let M, N be two lattices of V with respect to A such that N is reflexive. In order that M ⊂ N, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all p ∈ P, Mp ⊂ Np. 053A
- Proposition 6 (i) If M1 and M are reflexive lattices of V, so is M, n M. (ii) If W is a vector subspace of V and M is a reflexive lattice of V, M n W is a reflexive lattice of W. (iii) Let V, W… 053B
- Proposition 7 Let 0 → M → N → Q → 0 be an exact sequence of A-modules. Suppose that N is finitely generated and torsion-free. (i) If M is reflexive, then Ass(Q) ⊂ P ∪ 0 (in other words, every id… ↩ 4 053C
- Proposition 8 Let R and S be two commutative rings, p : R → S a ring homomorphism and M a finitely generated R-module. Suppose that R is Noetherian and that S is a flat R-module. Then, if M is r… ↩ 2 053D
- Theorem 3 Let V be a vector space of finite rank over K and M a lattice of V with respect to A. ↩ 2 053E
- Lemma 1 Let p and p' be two prime ideals of A such that (0) is the only prime ideal of A contained in p ∩ p'. Then, for every sub-A-module E of V, (Eₚ)_p' = K.E. 053F
- Remark Let L be a free lattice of V with respect to A. Since Aₚ is a principal ideal domain for p ∈ P, N(p) is a free A-module of the same rank as L and there exists u(p) ∈ GL(V) such tha… 053G
- Proposition 9 Let M be a finitely generated A-module. The following conditions are equivalent: ↩ 3 053H
- Remark (1) The equivalent conditions of Proposition 9 mean also that Ass(M) contains no prime ideal of height ≤ 1. They may also be interpreted by saying that Supp(M) is of codimension ≥ 2 in… 053I
- Definition 2 An A-module M is called pseudo-zero if it is finitely generated and it satisfies the equivalent conditions of Proposition 9. ↩ 3 053J
- Definition 3 Let M and N be two A-modules and f : M → N a homomorphism. f is called pseudo-injective (resp. pseudo-surjective pseudo-zero) if Ker(f) (resp. Coker(f), Im(f)) is pseudo-zero; f is… 053K
- Theorem 4 Let E be a finitely generated A-module, T the torsion submodule of E and M = E/T. There exists a pseudo-isomorphism ↩ 3 053L
- Lemma 2 Let (pᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ k be a non-empty finite family of prime ideals of A of height 1 and let S = ⋂ᵢ (A - pᵢ); then the ring S⁻¹A is a principal ideal domain. ↩ 3 053M
- Lemma 3 There exists a homomorphism g : E → T whose restriction to T is both a homothety and a pseudo-isomorphism. 053N
- Theorem 5 Let T be a finitely generated torsion A-module. There exist two finite families (nᵢ)_i ∈ I and (pᵢ)_j ∈ I, where the nᵢ are integers ≥ 1 and the pᵢ are prime ideals of A of height… ↩ 3 053O
- Remark (2) In the statement of Theorem 5, the modules A/pᵢ^nᵢ may be replaced by A/pᵢ^(nᵢ) (§ 1, no. 4, Proposition 8). For all p ∈ P, the canonical mapping g : A/pⁿ → A/p⁽ⁿ⁾ = A/(A ∩ pⁿAₚ) i… ↩ 1 053P
- Definition 4 If T is a finitely generated torsion A-module, the divisor: ↩ 3 053Q
- Proposition 10 (i) Let 0 → T₁ → T₂ → T₃ → 0 be an exact sequence of finitely generated torsion A-modules. Then ↩ 2 053R
- Corollary Let 0 → Tₙ → Tₙ₋₁ → … → T₀ → 0 be an exact sequence of finitely generated torsion A-modules. Then ∑ᵢ₌₀ⁿ (-1)ⁱ χ(Tᵢ) = 0. ↩ 1 053S
- Proposition 11 Let G be a commutative group written additively and φ : T(A) → G a mapping; for every finitely generated torsion A-module T, we also write, by an abuse of language, φ(T) = φ(cl(T))… ↩ 3 053T
- Proposition 12 If a is an ideal ≠ 0 of A, ↩ 1 053U
- Proposition 13 Let M be a lattice of V and u a K-automorphism of V. Then : (6) -χ(M, u(M)) = div(det(u)). For all p ∈ P, then bigwedgeⁿ (u(M)ₚ) = bigwedgeⁿ (u(Mₚ)); if (eᵢ)_1 ≤ i ≤ n is a basis o… 053V
- Proposition 14 If M, M' are two lattices of V such that M' \subset M, M/M' is a finitely generated torsion A-module and: ↩ 1 053W
- Corollary Let L1, L2 be twofree A-modules & the same rank n and let f: L1 \to L2 be a homomorphism. Let U be the matrix off with respect to bases of L1 and L2. For Coker(f) to be a torsion A… ↩ 1 053X
- Example If A = Z, the divisor group of A is identified with the multiplicative group Q₊^* of rational numbers 0. For every finite commutative group T, χ(T) is the order of T; the above cor… ↩ 1 053Y
- Proposition 15 Let M be a finitely generated A-module. There exists a free submodule L of M such that M/L is a torsion module and the element c(χ(M/L)) of C does not depend on the free submodule… ↩ 1 053Z
- Proposition 16 (i) Let 0 → M₁ xrightarrowα M₂ xrightarrowg M₃ → 0 be an exact sequence of finitely generated A-modules. Then ↩ 7 0540
- Corollary 1 Let 0 → M, xrightarrowu Mₙ₋₁ → ⋯ → M₀ → 0 be an exact sequence of finitely generated A-modules. Then ↩ 3 0541
- Corollary 2 If a divisorial fractional ideal a ≠ 0 of A admits a finite free resolution, it is principal. ↩ 2 0542
- Corollary 3 If every divisorial ideal ≠ 0 of A admits a finite free resolution, A is factorial. ↩ 1 0543
- Proposition 17 Let G be a commutative group written additively and φ a mapping from the set F(A) of classes of finitely generated A-modules to G; for every finitely generated A-module M we also w… 0544
- Proposition 18 (i) For R to be a pseudo-zero B-module, it is necessary and sufficient that the A-module R_[A] be pseudo-zero. ↩ 1 0545
- Proposition 19 Let R be a finitely generated B-module. For R to be reflexive, it is necessary and sufficient that R_[A] be a reflexive A-module. ↩ 1 0546
- Lemma 4 Let W be a vector space of finite rank over L and let R be a lattice of W with respect to B. Then, for all p ∈ P(A), (R_[A])ₚ = ⋂_𝔭/p R_𝔭. ↩ 1 0547
- Corollary The ring B is a reflexive A-module. 0548
- Proposition 20 (i) For a finitely generated A-module M to be pseudo-zero, it is necessary and sufficient that M ⊗_A B be a pseudo-zero B-module. (ii) If M is a finitely generated torsion A-module… 0549
- Lemma 5 Let M₁, M, be two finitely generated A-modules, and f : M₁ → M₂ an injective homomorphism. Then the kernel of f ⊗ 1 ; M₁ ⊗_A B → M₂ ⊗_A B is pseudo-zero. 054A
- Lemma 6 Let R be a commutative ring and pᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ n) distinct prime ideals of R. ↩ 1 054B
- Theorem 6 Let M be a torsion-free finitely generated A-module. There exists a free submodule L of M such that M/L is isomorphic to an ideal of A. ↩ 2 054C
- Lemma 7 Let xᵢ (1 ≤ i ≤ m) be linearly independent elements of M (over A or K, which amounts to the same) and let L be the sub-A-module of M generated by the xᵢ. Then, for almost all p ∈ P… ↩ 1 054D
- Lemma 8 Suppose that the rank n of M is geqslant 2; then there exists an element x ≠ 0 of M such that M/Ax is torsion-free. 054E
- Remark If M is reflexive, the same is not necessarily true of M/L (Exercise 9). 054F
- Proposition 21 Let A be a Dedekind domain. Every pseudo-zero A-module is zero. Every pseudo-injective (resp. pseudo-surjective, pseudo-bijective, pseudo-zero) A-module homomorphism is injective (… 054G
- Proposition 22 Let A be a Dedekind domain and M a finitely generated A-module. The following properties are equivalent: (a) M is torsion-free. (b) M is reflexive. (c) M is projective. ↩ 2 054H
- Corollary Let M be a finitely generated A-module and let T be its torsion submodule. Then T is a directfactor of M. ↩ 1 054I
- Proposition 23 Let A be a Dedekind domain and T a finitely generated torsion A-module. There exist two finite families (nᵢ)_i ∈ I and (𝔭ᵢ)_i ∈ I, where the nᵢ are integers ≥ 1 and the 𝔭ᵢ elements… 054J
- Proposition 24 Let A be a Dedekind domain and M a finitely generated torsion-free A-module & rank n ≥ 1. Then there exists an ideal b ≠ 0 of A such that M is isomorphic to the direct sum of the m… 054K